Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T03:26:44.614Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An Economic Analysis of the U.S. Generic Dairy Advertising Program Using an Industry Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Donald J. Liu
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Iowa State University
Harry M. Kaiser
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University
Olan D. Forker
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University
Timothy D. Mount
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University
Get access

Abstract

The market impacts of generic dairy advertising are assessed using an industry model which encompasses supply and demand conditions at the retail, wholesale, and farm levels, and government intervention under the dairy price support program. The estimated model is used to simulate price and quantity values for four advertising scenarios: (1) no advertising, (2) historical fluid advertising, (3) historical manufactured advertising, and (4) historical fluid and manufactured advertising. Compared to previous studies, the dairy-industry model provides additional insights into the way generic dairy advertising influences prices and quantities at the retail, wholesale, and farm levels.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1990 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blaylock, J. R., and Blisard, W. N. Effects of Advertising on the Demand for Cheese. U.S. Department of Agriculture. Economic Research Service. Technical Bull. no. 1752. 1988.Google Scholar
Chavas, J-P., and Klemme, R. M.Aggregate Milk Supply Response and Investment Behavior on U.S. Dairy Farms.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 (1986): 5566.Google Scholar
Cook, H. L., Blakley, L., Jacobson, R., Knutson, R., Milligan, R., and Strain, R. The Dairy Subsector of American Agriculture: Organization and Vertical Coordination. N.C. Project 117, Monograph 5. 1978.Google Scholar
Doran, H. E., and Quilkey, J. J.Harmonic Analysis of Seasonal Data: Some Important Properties.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 54 (1972): 646–51.Google Scholar
Kaiser, H. M., Streeter, D. H., and Liu, D. J.Welfare Comparisons of U.S. Dairy Policies With and Without Mandatory Supply Control.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (1988): 848–58.Google Scholar
Kinnucan, H., and Forker, O. D.Seasonality in the Consumer Response to Milk Advertising with Implications for Milk Promotion Policy.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 (1986): 562–71.Google Scholar
LaFrance, J. T., and de Gorter, H.Regulation in a Dynamic Market: The U.S. Dairy Industry.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67 (1985): 821–32.Google Scholar
Liu, D. J., and Forker, O. D.Generic Fluid Milk Advertising, Demand Expansion, and Supply Response: The Case of New York City.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (1988): 229–35.Google Scholar
Liu, D. J., Kaiser, H. M., Forker, O. D., and Mount, T. D. The Economic Implications of the U.S. Generic Dairy Advertising Program: An Industry Model Approach. A. E. Res. No. 89–22. Department of Agricultural Economics, Cornell University, 1989.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S. Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1977.Google Scholar
Maddala, G. S. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Phlips, L. Applied Consumption Analysis. New York: North-Holland, 1983.Google Scholar
Thompson, S. R., and Eiler, D. A.Determinants of Milk Advertising Effectiveness.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59 (1977): 330–35.Google Scholar
Ward, R. W., and Dixon, B. L.Effectiveness of Fluid Milk Advertising Since the Dairy and Tobacco Adjustment Act of 1983.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 71 (1989): 730–40.Google Scholar