Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T01:53:38.923Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regional and Farm-Level Risk Analyses with the Single-Index Model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Calum G. Turvey*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Business, University of Guelph
Get access

Abstract

This paper estimates single-index model (SIM) beta coefficients for the major cash crops of Ontario's agricultural-producing counties. Beta coefficients are estimated using per acre gross revenues weighted by (1) the proportion of each crop planted in each county and (2) equal weights. The results show that sometimes substantial differences arise from these procedures. Implications for government policy and farm-level risk-management strategies are discussed. A practical approach for using SIM for farm management purposes is presented and the effects of systematic and nonsystematic risk are discussed.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1991 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This research was partially funded by a grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council and the Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. The author is grateful to Jim Humphrey and Inger Tai for technical assistance, and Al Weersink, Bruno Larue, two anonymous referees, and the NJARE editor for helpful review comments. All errors are the sole responsibility of the author.

References

Adams, R. M., Menkhaus, D. J., and Woolery, B. A.Alternative Parameter Specification in E-V Analysis: Implications for Farm Level Decision Making.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 5 (1980):1320.Google Scholar
Berndt, E. R. The Practice of Econometrics: Classic and Contemporary. New York: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 1991.Google Scholar
Blank, S. C.Returns to Limited Crop Diversification.” Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 15 (1990):204–22.Google Scholar
Collins, R. A.Risk Analysis with the Single-Index Portfolio Models: An Application to Farm Planning: Reply.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (1988):195–96.Google Scholar
Collins, R. A., and Barry, P. J.Risk Analysis With Single Index Portfolio Models: An Application to Farm Planning.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 68 (1986):152–61.Google Scholar
Gempesaw, C. M., Tambe, A. M., Nayga, R. M., and Toensmeyer, U. C.The Single Index Market Model in Agriculture.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 17 (1988):147–55.Google Scholar
Hutchison, R. W., and McKillop, D. G.Risk Analysis with the Single-Index Model: An Application to Farm Planning: Comment.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (1988):192–94.Google Scholar
Lin, W., Dean, G. W., and Moore, C. V.An Empirical Test of Utility vs. Profit Maximization in Agricultural Production.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 56 (1974):497508.Google Scholar
Miranda, M. J.Area-Yield Crop Insurance Reconsidered.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73 (1991):233–42.Google Scholar
Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food. Agricultural Statistics for Ontario. Publication 20, various issues.Google Scholar
Sharpe, S., and Baker, T. G.Systematic and Diversifiable Risk Costs for Typical Indiana Farm Enterprises.” Selected paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 30 July–2 August 1989.Google Scholar
Sharpe, W. F.A Simplified Model for Portfolio Analysis.” Management Science 2 (1963):277–93.Google Scholar
Turvey, C. G., and Driver, H. C.Systematic and Nonsystematic Risks in Agriculture.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 35 (1987):387401.Google Scholar
Turvey, C. G., Driver, H. C., and Baker, T. G.Systematic and Nonsystematic Risk in Farm Portfolio Selection.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 70 (1988):831–36.Google Scholar