Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:07:24.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Dynamic Factor Demands and Energy Substitution in Regional U.S. Manufacturing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Andriana Vlachou*
Affiliation:
Department of Economics, Athens School of Economics and Business, Athens, Greece
Get access

Abstract

Although energy substitution in U.S. manufacturing has been studied in great depth at the national level, little attention has been paid to the regional level. However, regions may differ in their use of energy for a variety of reasons. The main objective of this study is to estimate region-specific demands for energy using a dynamic model for two-digit SIC Code manufacturing sectors. We derive own and cross-price elasticities for energy for different regions and we compare them. We, thus, provide information which has implications for a region specific energy policy.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alperovich, G.Regional Elasticities of Substitution.” Journal of Regional Science (1980):503512.Google Scholar
Berndt, E. R.Reconciling Alternative Estimates of the Elasticity of Substitution.” Review of Economics and Statistics 63 (1976):5968.Google Scholar
Berndt, E. R., Fuss, M. A., and Waverman, Leonard. Dynamic Model of the Industrial Demand for Energy, Interim Report, Research Project 681-1, EPRI EA-80, Palo Alto, Electric Power Research Institute, November 1977, 136 pp.Google Scholar
Berndt, E. R., Fuss, M. A., and Waverman, L. Dynamic Adjustment Models of Industrial Energy Demand: Empirical Analysis for U.S. Manufacturing, 1947–1974, Final Report, Research Project 683-1, EPRI EA-1613, Palo Alto, Electric Power Research Institute, November 1980, 182 pp.Google Scholar
Berndt, E. R. and Morrison, C. J.Short Run Labor Productivity in a Dynamic Model.” Journal of Econometrics (1981):339365.Google Scholar
Berndt, E. R. and Wood, D. O.Technology, Prices and the Derived Demand for Energy.” Review of Economics and Statistics (1975):376384.Google Scholar
Chambers, R. G. and Lopez, R. E.A General, Dynamic, Supply-Response Model.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (1984):142154.Google Scholar
Denny, M., Fuss, M., and Waverman, L.The Substitution Possibilities for Energy: Evidence From U.S. and Canadian Manufacturing Industries,” in Berndt, E. R. and Field, Barry C., eds., Modelling and Measuring Natural Resource Substitution, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Epstein, L. G.Duality Theory and Functional Forms for Dynamic Factor Demands.” Review of Economic Studies 48 (1981):8195.Google Scholar
Epstein, L. R. and Denny, M.The Multivariate Flexible Accelerator Model: Its Empirical Restrictions and Application to U.S. Manufacturing.” Econometrica (1983):647674.Google Scholar
Fuss, M. A.The Demand for Energy in Canadian Manufacturing: An Example of the Estimation of Production Structures with Many Inputs.” Journal of Econometrics (1977):89116.Google Scholar
Gallaway, L.The North-South Wage Differential.” Review of Economics and Statistics (1963):264272.Google Scholar
Griffin, J. R. and Gregory, P. R.An Intercountry Translog Model of Energy Substitution Responses.” American Economic Review (1976):845857.Google Scholar
Halvorsen, R.Energy Substitution in U.S. Manufacturing.” Review of Economics and Statistics 59 (1977):381388.Google Scholar
Harper, C. and Field, B. C.Energy Substitution in U.S. Manufacturing: A Regional Approach.” Southern Economic Journal (1983):385395.Google Scholar
Karp, L. and Shumway, R.Issues and Methods in Estimating Adjustment Costs.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics (1984):155162.Google Scholar
Lande, P. S. and Gordon, P.Regional Growth in the United States: A Reexamination of the Neoclassical Model.” Journal of Regional Science (1977):6169.Google Scholar
Lau, L. J.A Characterization of the Normalized Restricted Profit Function.” Journal of Economic Theory (1976):131163.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. Jr.Optimal Investment Policy and the Flexible Accelerator.” International Economic Review 8 (1967a):7885.Google Scholar
Lucas, R. E. Jr.Adjustment Costs and the Theory of Supply.” Journal of Political Economy (1967b):331344.Google Scholar
MacAvoy, P. W. and Pindyck, R. S. The Economics of the Natural Gas Shortage, 1960–1980, Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1975.Google Scholar
McFadden, D.Cost, Revenue and Profit Functions,” in Production Economics: A Dual Approach to Theory and Applications, Volume I, edited by Fuss, M. and McFadden, D., Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1978, pp. 3110.Google Scholar
Moroney, J. R. The Structure of Production in American Manufacturing, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Pindyck, R. S. The Structure of World Energy Demand, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Pindyck, R. S. and Rotemberg, J. J.Dynamic Factor Demands and the Effects of Energy Price Shocks.” American Economic Review (1983):10661078.Google Scholar
Scully, G. W.Interstate Wage Differentials: A Cross Section Analysis.” American Economic Review (1969):757773.Google Scholar
Treadway, A. B.The Rational Multivariate Flexible Accelerator.” Econometrica 39 (1971):845856.Google Scholar
Treadway, A. B.The Globally Optimal Flexible Accelerator.” Journal of Economic Theory 7 (1974):1739.Google Scholar
Vinod, H. D.Interregional Comparisons of Production Structures.” Journal of Regional Science (1973):261267.Google Scholar
Vlachou, Andriana. “A Dynamic Analysis of Energy Demand in U.S. Manufacturing During the 1970's,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, 1983.Google Scholar
Walton, A. L.Variations in the Substitutability of Energy and Non-Energy: The Case of the Middle Atlantic Region.” Journal of Regional Science (1981):411420.Google Scholar