Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T06:54:48.370Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Economic Impact of bGH on the New York State Dairy Sector: Comparative Static Results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

William B. Magrath  and
Loren W. Tauer
William B. Magrath
Affiliation:
Department of Ag. Econ., Cornell University
Loren W. Tauer
Affiliation:
Department of Ag. Econ., Cornell University
Get access

Abstract

The price and quantity effects of a forthcoming biotechnology product, bovine growth hormone (bGH), are explored in a simple partial equilibrium model. The model is based on previous theoretical work on technological change but is developed in terms of a sector output. A particular output curve is estimated using data from a random sample of New York State dairy farms. Information on the farm level production effects of bGH is used to shift the output curve and to solve for equilibrium levels of price and output. The model projects the bGH may lead to the exit of 5,400 New York dairy farms and a 20 percent reduction in herd size. Consumers will benefit from an approximately 30 percent drop in milk price. The effect on gradual diffusion of bGH on farm numbers is considered. To accommodate this technology policies encouraging an orderly transfer of resources out of the dairy sector should be examined.

Type
Research Article
Information
Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , April 1986 , pp. 6 - 13
Copyright
Copyright © 1986 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors acknowledge the comments of Richard N. Boisvert. This work was supported by the New York State Science and Technology Foundation through the Cornell Biotechnology Program.

References

Akino, Masakatsu and Hayami, Yujiro. “Efficiency and Equity in Public Research: Rice Breeding in Japan's Economic Development.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57 (1975):1–10.Google Scholar
Bauman, D. E., Eppard, P. J., DeGeeter, M. J. and Lanza, G. M. “Responses of High Producing Dairy Cows to Long Term Treatment with Pituitary- and Recombinant-Somatotrophin.” Journal of Dairy Science 68 (1985):1352.Google Scholar
Binswanger, Hans P. “Income Distribution Effects of Technical Change: Some Analytic Issues.” South East Asian Economic Review 1 (1980):179–218.Google Scholar
Dahlgren, Roger A. “A Synthesis of Microeconomic Duality Theory and Distributed Lag Modeling with Implications for U.S. Dairy Policy.” North Central Journal of Agricultural Economics 7 (1985):132–144.Google Scholar
George, P. S. and King, G. A. “Consumer Demand for Food Commodities in the United States with Projections for 1980.” Giannini Foundation Monograph 26, University of California, Division of Agricultural Sciences, March 1971.Google Scholar
Grisley, William and Gitu, Kangethe W. “The Production Structure of Pennsylvania Dairy Farms.” Northeast Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 13 (1984):245–253.Google Scholar
Hayami, Yujiro and Herdt, Robert W. “Market Price Effects of New Rice Technology on Income Distribution” in International Rice Research Institute, Economic Consequences of the New Rice Technology (IRRI:Los Banos), 1978.Google Scholar
Hoque, Anwarul and Adelaja, Adesoji. “Factor Demand and Return to Scale in Milk Production: Effects of Price, Substitution and Technology.” Northeast Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 13 (1984):238–244.Google Scholar
Ippolito, Richard A. and Masson, Robert T. “The Social Cost of Government Regulation of Milk.” Journal of Law and Economics 21 (1978):33–65.Google Scholar
Kalter, Robert J. et al. “Biotechnology and the Dairy Industry: Production Costs and Commercial Potential of the Bovine Growth Hormone.” Cornell University, Dept. of Agricultural Economics, A.E. Res. 84-22, Ithaca, NY, December 1984.Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. Principles of Economics, 8th edition. New York: MacMillan, 1920.Google Scholar
Miller, W. L., Martial, J. A. and Baxter, J. D. “Molecular Cloning of DNA Complementary to Bovine Growth Hormone mRNA.” Journal of Biological Chemistry 255 (1980):7521–4.Google Scholar
New York State Department of Agriculture and Markets. New York Agricultural Statistics 1983. Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Novakovic, Andrew. “The Dairy Industry and Dairy Policy in 1985.” Cornell University, Dept. of Agricultural Economics, A.E. Ext. 85-3, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment. Technology, Public Policy, and the Changing Structure of American Agriculture: A Special Report for the 1985 Farm Bill. Washington, DC: U.S. Congress, OTA-F-272, 1985.Google Scholar
Pindyck, R. S. and Rubinfield, D. J. Econometric Models and Economic Forecasts. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Company, 2nd ed.Google Scholar
Riley, John B. and Blakley, Leo V. “Impacts of Alternative Class I Pricing Systems on Fluid Milk Prices.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 57 (1975):67–73.Google Scholar
Smith, Stuart F. and Putnam, Linda. “Dairy Farm Management Business Summary, New York 1983.” Cornell University, Dept. of Agricultural Economics, A.E. Res. 84-10, Ithaca, NY.Google Scholar