Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T05:30:12.514Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Measuring the Primary Impacts of Severance Taxation: A Spatial Equilibrium Approach

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 May 2017

Jill L. Findeis ,
James S. Shortle  and
Virginia M. Kibler
Jill L. Findeis
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
James S. Shortle
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Virginia M. Kibler
Affiliation:
Pennsylvania State University
Get access

Abstract

A spatial equilibrium model is used to quantify the effects of a severance tax on the Pennsylvania coal market. Two regions are identified: the Pennsylvania Market Area and an import/export region. The impacts on prices and quantities of coal supplied and demanded are found to be small. Little of the tax is exported from Pennsylvania, with a high proportion of the tax being passed back to Pennsylvania coal producers. Although the tax revenue exceeds the welfare losses in Pennsylvania, this result is very sensitive to the magnitude of the Pennsylvania own-price demand elasticity.

Type
Articles
Information
Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics , Volume 17 , Issue 1 , April 1988 , pp. 15 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © 1988 Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

The authors gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments made by Charles Abdalla, Donald Epp, and anonymous reviewers of the Journal. The article is published as Journal Series Article No. 7846 of the Pennsylvania Agricultural Experiment Station.

References

Beierlein, J., Dunn, J., and McConnen, J. Jr. “The Demand for Electricity and Natural Gas in the Northeastern United States.” The Review of Economics and Statistics 63 (1981):403–409.Google Scholar
Bohi, D. Analyzing Demand Behavior, A Study of Energy Elasticities. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press. 1981.Google Scholar
Campbell, T. C., Hwang, M., and Shahrohk, F. “Spatial Equilibrium in the United States Coal Industry.” Energy Economics 2 (1980):230–236.Google Scholar
Church, A. “Economic Rent, Economic Efficiency, and the Distribution of Natural Resource Tax Burdens: Copper and Coal.” Natural Resources Journal 22 (1982):559–595.Google Scholar
Findeis, J. and Shortle, J. “Trade-offs Between Severance Tax Revenues and Coal Mining Employment.” Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 14 (1985):203–210.Google Scholar
Gillis, M. “Severance Taxes on Energy Resources in the United States: A Tale of Two Minerals.” Growth and Change 10 (1979):55–77.Google Scholar
Hogarty, T. “The Geographic Scope of Energy Markets: Oil, Gas, and Coal.” Competition in the U.S. Energy Industry. Duchenseau, T. D., (ed.). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger Publishing Co., 1975.Google Scholar
Labys, W. and Yang, C. “A Quadratic Programming Model of the Appalachian Steam Coal Market.” Energy Economics 2 (1980):86–95.Google Scholar
Libbin, J. D. and Boehlje, M. D. “Interregional Structure of the U.S. Coal Industry.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 59 (1977):456–466.Google Scholar
Melmed, J. State Mineral Taxation and the Demand for Pennsylvania Steam Coal. . Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University. 1984.Google Scholar
Morgan, W. and Mutti, J. “Shifting, Incidence and Inter-State Exportation of Production Taxes on Energy Resources.” Land Economics 57 (1981):422–435.Google Scholar
Samuelson, P. “Spatial Price Equilibrium and Linear Programming.” American Economic Review 42 (1952):283–303.Google Scholar
Stinson, Thomas F. and Temple, George S. State Mineral Taxes, 1982. Rural Development Research Report No. 36, USDA/ERS, Washington, DC. March 1983.Google Scholar
Takayama, T. and Judge, G. “An Interregional Activity Analysis Model of the Agricultural Sector.” Journal of Farm Economics 46 (1964):349–365.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy, Energy information Administration. Cost and Quality of Fuels for Electric Utility Plants. (Selected Years).Google Scholar