Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T22:38:53.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enforcing Professional Standards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2021

Jane Greenlaw
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The medical-surgical instructor was appalled when she learned that one of her students had volunteered to perform a complex wound irrigation — a procedure in which the student was thus far untrained. Throughout the semester the student had required extra supervision and guidance, and despite this her performance had been marginal at best. Written assignments were disorganized, incomplete, and revealed poor grasp of theory, while clinical skills were consistently below acceptable levels.

But the instructor was even more appalled when other faculty members opposed her decision to give the student a failing clinical grade. “Too harsh,” they said. “Give the poor kid a break.” The instructor followed her own judgment and conscience and failed the student, but never received any support for her decision from the school's administration or faculty. Some time later, in talking with faculty from other schools, the instructor learned that her experience was not unique. Others had similar problems: resistance to failing and even not-so-subtle pressures to pass students whose performance the instructor deemed to be substandard.

Type
Ethical Dilemmas
Information
Nursing Law & Ethics , Volume 1 , Issue 10 , December 1980 , pp. 3 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. For example, for a discussion of how one school dealt with its students' math deficiencies, see Dexter, P. and Applegate, M., How to Solve a Math Problem. Journal of Nursing Education 19(2): 49–53 (February 1980).Google ScholarPubMed
2. Gengler v.Phelps, 589 P.2d 1056 (N.Mex.Ct. App. 1978).Google Scholar
3. The requirement to act responsibly is parallel to that discussed in Ethical Dilemmas — Reporting Incompetent Colleagues II: Will I Be Sued for Defamation? Nursing Law & Ethics 1(5): 5 (May 1980).Google Scholar
4. See e.g., Darling v. Charlestown Memorial Hospital, 211 N.E. 2d 253 (Ill. 1965).Google Scholar
5. American Nurses Association, Code for Nurses with Interpretive Statements (ANA, Kansas City, 1976) Canon 3.Google Scholar
6. Id., Canon 8.Google Scholar
7. Id., Canon 10.Google Scholar