Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T06:38:54.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orders Not to Resuscitate: The Sharon Siebert Case

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 January 2021

George J. Annas
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In a previous column I discussed the testimony of a number of nurses in the case of Ms. Sharon Siebert. That case was decided by a lower court on February 13, 1981, and this column discusses Judge Lindsay G. Arthur's opinion. Jane Hoyt, a friend, not a relative, of Ms. Siebert, brought suit to enjoin an order not to resuscitate that had been written on Ms. Siebert. The case raised a number of important issues, including whether the court would allow a suit brought by someone in Ms. Hoyt's position vis-à-vis the patient, and if it did, what legal standard the court might require in the writing of Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders.

Type
Health Law Notes
Information
Nursing Law & Ethics , Volume 2 , Issue 5 , May 1981 , pp. 3 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of Law, Medicine and Ethics 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Annas, G.J., What to Know Before You Testify in Court, Nursing Law & Ethics 2(3):3 (March 1981).Google ScholarPubMed
2. Hoyt v. St. Mary's Rehabilitation Center, No. 774555, slip op. (Dist. Ct., 4th Jud. Dist., Hennepin Co., Minn. Feb. 13, 1981).Google Scholar
3. In re Quintan, 355 A.2d 647 (N.J. 1976), Superintendent ofBelcherlown, v. Saikewicz, 370 N.E.2d 417 (Mass. 1977), Eichner v. Dillon. 426 N.Y.S.2d 517 (App. Div. 1980).Google Scholar