Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:52:43.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Network Socio-Synthesis and Emergence in NOMADS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 February 2012

Matthew Burtner ,
Steven Kemper  and
David Topper
Matthew Burtner*
Affiliation:
Interactive Media Research Group (IMRG), Department of Music, University of Virginia, PO Box 400176, Charlottesville, VA 22904–4176, USA
Steven Kemper*
Affiliation:
Interactive Media Research Group (IMRG), Department of Music, University of Virginia, PO Box 400176, Charlottesville, VA 22904–4176, USA
David Topper*
Affiliation:
Interactive Media Research Group (IMRG), Department of Music, University of Virginia, PO Box 400176, Charlottesville, VA 22904–4176, USA
*
E-mail: *mburtner@virginia.edu; **stk8m@virginia.edu; †topper@virginia.edu
E-mail: *mburtner@virginia.edu; **stk8m@virginia.edu; †topper@virginia.edu
E-mail: *mburtner@virginia.edu; **stk8m@virginia.edu; †topper@virginia.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

NOMADS (Network-Operational Mobile Applied Digital System) is a network client–server-based system for participant interaction in music and multimedia performance contexts. NOMADS allows large groups of participants, including the audience, to form a mobile interactive computer ensemble distributed across a network. Participants become part of a synergistic interaction with other performers, contributing to the multimedia performance. The system enhances local performance spaces, and it can integrate audiences located in multiple performance venues. Individual user input from up to thousands of simultaneous users across a network is synthesised into a single emergent sound and visual structure in an approach we call socio-synthesis. This paper recounts research leading up to NOMADS, outlines its technological architecture, and describes several implementations. Current applications include the telematic opera Auksalaq, and performances by the MICE Orchestra. The authors also consider the potential of large-scale human–computer ensembles as a paradigm for composition and performance.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 17 , Issue 1: Networked Electroacoustic Music , 14 February 2012 , pp. 45 - 55
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbosa, Álvaro. 2011. Displaced Soundscapes: A Survey of Network Systems for Music and Sonic Art Creation. Leonardo Music Journal (15 August): 53–59.Google Scholar
Beck, Steven David et al. ‘GRENDL: GRid ENabled Distribution and control for Laptop orchestras’. SIGGRAPH 2010, Los Angeles, California.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bischoff, J., Gold, R., Horton, J. 1978. Microcomputer Network Music. Computer Music Journal 2(3): 24–29. (Reprinted in C. Roads and J. Strawn (eds.) Foundations of Computer Music. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1985.)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwell, T.M., Bentley, P. 2002. Improvised Music with Swarms. In Proceedings of the 2002 Congress on Evolutionary Computation. CEC ‘02, 2: 1462–1467.Google Scholar
Bongers, B. 1998. An Interview with Sensorband. Computer Music Journal 22(1): 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burk, Phil. 1998. JSyn: A Real-time Synthesis API for Java. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference 98: 252–255.Google Scholar
Burtner, Matthew. 2006 Perturbation Techniques for Multi-Performer or Multi-Agent Interactive Musical Interfaces.New Interfaces for Musical Expression, NIME 2006, IRCAM/Centre George Pompidou Paris.Google Scholar
Cáceres, Juan-Pablo, Chafe, C. 2009. Jacktrip: Under the Hood of an Engine for Network Audio. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. Montreal.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cáceres, Juan-Pablo, Chafe, C., Gurevich, M. 2010. Effect of Temporal Separation on Synchronization in Rhythmic Performance’, in Perception 39: 982–992.Google Scholar
Camurri, A., De Poli, G., Leman, M., Volpe, G. 2005. Toward Communicating Expressiveness and Affect in Multimodal Interactive Systems for Performing Art and Cultural Applications’. IEEE Multimedia 12(1): 43–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dannenberg, R.B. et al. 2007. The Carnegie Mellon Laptop Orchestra. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Freeman, JasonAkito, Van Troyer. 2011. Collaborative Textual Improvisation in a Laptop Ensemble. Computer Music Journal 35(2): 8–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerzso, Andrew. 2008. Introductory Remarks to PANEL: Network Performance. International Computer Music Conference (ICMC). Belfast.Google Scholar
Harker, A., Atmadjaja, A., Bagust, J., Field, A. 2008. Worldscape Laptop Orchestra. In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. Belfast.Google Scholar
Kim-Boyle, David. 2009. Network Musics: Play, Engagement and the Democratization of Performance. Contemporary Music Review 28: 4–5, 363–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MICE (Mobile Interactive Computer Ensemble). 2009. ‘MICE World Tour’ CD. EcoSono Charlottesville, VA.Google Scholar
Stockhausen, Karlheinz. 1965. Mikrophonie 1 for tam tam, 6 players. Vienna: Universal dition.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Atau., Nao, Tokui, Ali, Momeni. 2005. Facilitating Collective Musical Creativity. In Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Singapore: ACM, 191–8.Google Scholar
Trueman, Dan. 2007. Why a Laptop Orchestra? Organised Sound 12(2): 171–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Ge et al. 2009. Stanford Laptop Orchestra (SLOrk). In Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. Montreal.Google Scholar
Weinberg, G. 2003. Interconnected Musical Networks: Bringing Expression and Thoughtfulness to Collaborative Music Making. Cambridge, MA: MIT Media Laboratory.Google Scholar
Weinberg, G. 2005. Local Performance Networks: Musical Interdependency Through Gestures and Controllers. Organised Sound 10(3): 255–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weiser, Mark. 1993. Some Computer Science Issues in Ubiquitous Computing. Communications of the ACM 36(7) (July 1993): 75–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, Hen-I., Lim, S., King, J., Helal, S. 2006. Open Issues in Nomadic Pervasive Computing. Proceedings of UbiSys (September).Google Scholar