Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:31:27.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acoustic Art Forms in the Age of Recordability

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 July 2015

Gerald Fiebig
Gerald Fiebig*
Affiliation:
DEGEM – Deutsche Gesellschaft für Elektroakustische Musik e.V., Kazböckstr. 21, 86157 Augsburg, Germany
*
*Email: fiebiggerald@gmail.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Many theoretical accounts of sound art tend to treat it as a subcategory of either music or visual art. I argue that this dualism prevents many works of sound art from being fully appreciated. My subsequent attempt of finding a basis for a more comprehensive aesthetic of acoustic art forms is helped along by Trevor Wishart’s concept of ‘sonic art’. I follow Wishart’s insight that the status of music was changed by the invention of sound recording and go on to argue that an even more important ontological consequence of recording was the new possibility of storing and manipulating any acoustic event. This media-historic condition, which I refer to as ‘recordability’, spawned three distinct art forms with different degrees of abstraction – electroacoustic music in the tradition of Pierre Schaeffer, gallery-oriented sound art and radiogenic Ars Acustica. Introducing Ars Acustica, or radio art, as a third term provides some perspective on the music/sound art binarism. A brief look at the history of radio art aims at substantiating my claim that all art forms based on recordable sounds can be fruitfully discussed by appreciating their shared technological basis and the multiplicity of their reference systems rather than by subsuming one into another.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 20 , Special Issue 2: Sound Art and Music, Historical Continuum and Mimetic Fissures , August 2015 , pp. 200 - 206
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anonymous. 2000. Liner notes to Walter Ruttmann Weekend Remix. CD, Intermedium Records, Indigo CD 93172.Google Scholar
Black, C. 2014. International Perspectives on the Historic Intersections of Electroacoustic Music and the Radio Medium. Organised Sound 19(2): 182–191.Google Scholar
Conrad, T. 1997. MINor premise, from liner notes to Early Minimalism. Volume One. Table of the Elements, 33 As-Arsenic.Google Scholar
Dack, J. 1994. Pierre Schaeffer and the Significance of Radiophonic Art. www.zainea.com/PierreSchaffer1994.pdf (accessed 30 August 2014).Google Scholar
de la Motte-Haber, H. 1996. Klangkunst – eine neue Gattung? In Akademie der Künste (ed.) Klangkunst. Munich/New York: Prestel.Google Scholar
Fuchs, M. 2010. Sinn und Sound. Berlin: Wissenschaftlicher Verlag Berlin.Google Scholar
Gilfillan, D. 2008. Networked Radio Space and Broadcast Simultaneity. An interview with Robert Adrian. In H. Grundmann, E. Zimmermann, R. Braun, D. Daniels, A. Hirsch and A. Thurmann-Jajes (eds.) Re-Inventing Radio. Aspects of Radio as Art. Frankfurt am Main: Revolver.Google Scholar
Gould, G. 1966. The Prospects of Recording. In C. Cox and D. Warner (eds.) Audio Culture. Readings in Modern Music. New York/London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hagelüken, A. 2006. Acoustic (Media) Art: Ars Acustica and the Idea of a Unique Art Form for Radio – An Examination of the Historical Conditions in Germany. www.randfunk.de/texte/Ars_Acustica_englishedit.pdf (accessed 30 August 2014).Google Scholar
Kane, B. 2013. Musicophobia, or Sound Art and the Demands of Art Theory. http://nonsite.org/article/musicophobia-or-sound-art-and-the-demands-of-art-theory (accessed 30 August 2014).Google Scholar
Kim-Cohen, S. 2009. In the Blink of an Ear. Toward a Non-Cochlear Sonic Art. New York/London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Kittler, F. 1986. Grammophon Film Typewriter. Berlin: Brinkmann & Bose.Google Scholar
Landy, L. 2007. Understanding the Art of Sound Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
López, F. 2014. Music Dematerialized? In M. Carvalhais and P. Tudela (eds.) Cochlear Poetics. Writings on Music and Sound Arts. Oporto: University of Porto.Google Scholar
Minard, R. 2002. Musique concrète and its importance to the visual arts. In B. Schulz (ed.) Resonanzen. Aspekte der Klangkunst/Resonances. Aspects of Sound Art. Heidelberg: Kehrer.Google Scholar
Sanio, S. 1996. Hören im musikalischen Environment. In Akademie der Künste (ed.) Klangkunst. Munich/New York: Prestel.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. 1970. Machines à Communiquer. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Schöning, K. 1999. Riverrun. On the Human Voice, the Universe of Sounds and Noises Amidst the Silence. A Sound Journey into WDR’s Studio of Acoustic Art . In K. Schöning (ed.) Riverrun. Voicings/Soundscapes. Mainz: Wergo, WER-6307-2.Google Scholar
Voegelin, S. 2010. Listening to Noise and Silence. Towards a Philosophy of Sound Art. New York/London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Wishart, T. 1996. On Sonic Art. A New and Revised Edition. Edited by Simon Emmerson. New York/Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar