Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:56:45.350Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Consideration of the Code of Computer Music as Writing, and Some Thinking on Analytical Theories

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 November 2019

Maxence Larrieu Open the ORCID record for Maxence Larrieu [Opens in a new window]
Maxence Larrieu*
Affiliation:
LISAA EA 3347, UPEM, Université Paris-Est, Marne-la-Vallée, 77454 Marne-la-Vallée, France
*
Email: maxence@larri.eu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article focuses on the analysis of computer music, that is, music which uses programming languages so that what the listener hears is the result of computer code. One key point in this article is that this music exists with some writing, that is, the computer code. I note that this key point has not been addressed in the latest theories for analysing computer music. Indeed, we often see this music as part of the electroacoustic field, where the audio signal is essential, and where we usually read that those musics are non-written music. After an introduction on this topic, in the second section I will make a distinction between ‘before the signal’ and ‘from the signal’ to organise the theories to analyse electroacoustic music. In the third section, I will focus on computer music and I will show the historical difficulty in considering ‘code’ in musical analysis, mainly with an important exchange between two pioneers, Marco Stroppa and Jean-Claude Risset. In the fourth section I will explain with Jean-Claude Risset and Horacio Vaggione the specificity of computer music: this music is written. Finally, I will look into a recent analysis theory, the Interactive Aural Analysis by Michael Clarke, which seems to fit with the latter specificity.

Type
Articles
Information
Organised Sound , Volume 24 , Issue 3: Bringing New Music to New Audiences , December 2019 , pp. 319 - 328
Copyright
© Cambridge University Press, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Battier, M. 2003. A Constructivist Approach to the Analysis of Electronic Music and Audio Art – between Instruments and Faktura . Organised Sound 20(1): 249–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudoin, O. 2007. A Reconstruction of Stria. Computer Music Journal 31(3): 75–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baudoin, O. 2009. La faktura ‘outil conceptuel d’analyse’ – illustration avec Stria de John Chowning. Journées d’Informatique Musicale, 1–3 April: 77–83.Google Scholar
Bergsland, A. 2011. The Six Fantasies Machine – An Instrument Modelling Phrases from Paul Lansky’s Six Fantasies. Proceeding of 11th International Conference on New Interfaces for Musical Expression. Olso: NIME.Google Scholar
Bonardi, A. 2013. Pérenniser pour transmettre, transmettre pour pérenniser – Destins de l’oeuvre mixte interactive – autour de en Echo, pièce de Philippe Manoury. In Musique et technologie – Préserver, archiver, reproduire, Portraints Polychones, hors-série thématique. Paris, INA-GRM, 105–26.Google Scholar
Bonardi, A. 2017. Analyser l’orchestre électronique interactif dans les oeuvres de Manoury. In Bonardi, A., Bossis, B., Courpi, P. and Tiffon, V. (eds.) Analyser la musique mixte. Sampzon: Delatour, 83–98.Google Scholar
Budwn, O. 2013. Composer avec des objets, réseaux et échelles temporelles: une interview avec Horacio Vaggione. In Solomos, M. (ed.) Espaces composables. Essais sur la musique et sur la pensée musicale d’Horacio Vaggione. Paris: L’Harmattan, 101–20.Google Scholar
Chion, M. 1994. Guide des Objets Sonores. Paris: Buchet Chastel.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 2005. An Interactive Aural Approach to the Analysis of Computer Music. Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. Barcelona: ICMC.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 2006. Jonhatan Harvey’s Mortuos Plango, Vivo Voco . In Simoni, M. (ed.) Analytical Methods of Electroacoustic Music. Abingdon: Routledge, 111–43.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 2009. Extending Interactive Aural Analysis: Acousmatic Music. Electroacoustic Music Studies Network: Heritage and Future, 22–25 June. Buenos Aires: EMS.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 2010. Wind Chimes and Interactive Aural Anlaysis. In Gayou, E. (ed.) Denis Smalley. Paris: INA-GRM, 35–57.Google Scholar
Clarke, M. 2012. Analysing Electroacoustic Music: An Interactive Aural Approach. Music Analysis 31(3): 347–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Couprie, P. 2003. Analyse Comparée des Trois rêves d’oiseau de François Bayle. Déméter. Lille: Université de Lille 3. HAL hal-01257522.Google Scholar
Couprie, P. 2016. Le développement d’un outil d’aide à l’analyse musicale: bilan et perspectives musicologiques. In Marty, N. (ed.) Musique électroacoustiques. Analyses – Écoutes. Sampzon, Delatour, 157–69.Google Scholar
Dahan, K. 2007. Reconstructing Stria. Proceeding of the 2007 International Computer Music Conference. Copenhagen: ICMC.Google Scholar
Delalande, F. 2013. Analyser la musique, pourquoi, comment? Paris: INA-GRM.Google Scholar
Di Scipio, A. 2000. An Analysis of Jean-Claude Risset’s Contours . Journal of New Music Reseach 29(1):1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donin, N. 2015. Introduction. In Donin, N., Grésillon, A. and Lebrave, J.-L. (eds.) Genèses Musicales. Paris: Presses Universitaire de Paris-Sorbonne, 7–17.Google Scholar
Dufeu, F. 2010. L’instrument numériqe comme objet d’analyse des musiques mixtes. Journées d’Informatique Musicale. Rennes: JIM.Google Scholar
Emmerson, S. and Landy, L. 2016. The Analysis of Electroacoustic Music: The Differing Needs of its Genres and Categories. Proceeding of the 2012 International Computer Music Conference. Stockholm: ICMC.Google Scholar
Forte, A. 1982. Introduction to Schenkenrian Analysis. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Larrieu, M. 2018. Analyse des musiques d’informatique, vers une intégration de l’artefact. PhD diss., Université Paris-Est. HAL tel-01757277Google Scholar
Lerdahl, F. and Jackendoff, R. 1983. A Generative Theory of Tonal Music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Licata, T. 2002. Electroacoustic Music: Analytical Perspectives. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Lorrain, D. 1980. Analyse de la bande magnétique de l’oeuvre de Jean-Claude Risset Inharmonique. Rapport Ircam 26/80. Paris.Google Scholar
Malloch, J., Birnbaum, D. and Sinyor, E. 2006. Towards a New Conceptual Framework for Digital Musical Instruments. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects. Montreal: DAFx Conference.Google Scholar
Manning, P. 2004. Electronic and Computer Music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marty, N. 2016. Introduction – Écoutes et analyses. In Marty, N. (Eeds.) Musiques électroacoustique – Analyses – Écoutes. Sampzon: Delatour, 17–32.Google Scholar
Mathews, M. 1963. The Digital Computer as a Musical Instrument. Science 142(3592): 553–57.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meneghini, M. 2007. An Analysis of the Compositionnal Techniques in John Chowning’s Stria. Computer Music Journal 31(3): 26–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mion, P., Nattiez, J. J. and Thomas, J. C. 1982. L’envers d’une oeuvre: ‘de natura sonorum‘ de Bernard Parmegiani. Paris: Buchet-Chastel.Google Scholar
Nattiez, J. J. 1987. Musicologie générale et sémiologie. Paris: Christian Bourgeois.Google Scholar
Nucibella, F., Porcelluzzi, S. and Zattra, L. 2005. Computer Music Analysis via a Multidisciplinary Approach. Proceeding of the 2005 Sound and Music Computing. Salerno: SMSGoogle Scholar
Risset, J. C. 1969. An Introducy Catalogue of Computer Synthesized Sounds. Murray Hill: Bell Telephone Laboratories.Google Scholar
Risset, J. C. 1991. Timbre et synthèse des sons. In Barrière, J. B. (ed.) Le timbre métaphore pour la composition. Paris: Christian Bourgois, 239–60.Google Scholar
Risset, J. C. 2001. Problèmes posés par l’analyse d’oeuvres musicales dont la réalisation fait appel à l’informatique. Analyse et création musicales: actes du Troisième congrès européen d’Analyse Musicale (Montpellier, 1995). Paris: L’Harmattan, 131–60.Google Scholar
Ruwet, N. 1972. Langage, musique, poésie. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Smalley, D. 1986. Spectro-Morphology and Structuring Processes. In Emmerson, S. (ed.) The Language of Electroacoustic Music. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 61–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, F. de. 1969. Cours de linguistique générale. Paris: Payot.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, P. 1952. À la recherche d’une musique concrète. Paris: Edition du Seuil.Google Scholar
Stroppa, M. 1984. The Analysis of Electronic Music. Contemporary Music Review 1(1): 175–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaggione, H. 1998. Son, temps, objet, synthaxe. Vers une approche multi-échelle dans la composition assistée par ordinateur. In Soulez, A. and Vaggione, H. (eds.) Cahiers de Philosophie du Langage. Vol. 3: Musique, rationalité, langage. L’harmonie: du monde au matériau. Paris: L’Harmatan, 169–202.Google Scholar
Vaggione, H. 2003. Composition musicale et moyens informatiques: questions d’approche. In Soulez, A. and Solomos, M. (eds.) Formel, informer: musique-philosophie. Paris: L’Harmattan, 91–116.Google Scholar
Vaggione, H. 2010. Représentations musicales numériques: temporalités, objets, contextes. In Soulez, A. and Vaggione, H. (eds.) Manières de faire des sons. Paris: L’Harmattan, 45–82.Google Scholar
Wang, G. 2008. The Chuck Audio Programming Language.’A String-Timed and on-the-fly Environ/Mentality. PhD diss., Princeton University.Google Scholar
Zattra, L. 2005. Analysis and analyses of electroacoustic music. Proceeding of the Sound and Music Computing, vol. 36. Salerno (Italy): SMC Network.Google Scholar
Zattra, L. 2015. Génétiques de la computer music. In Donin, N., Grésillon, A. and Lebrave, J. L. (eds.) Genèses musicales. Paris: Presses Universitaires de Paris-Sorbonne, 213–38.Google Scholar