Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T13:02:12.226Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bone-collecting by harvesting ants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Pat Shipman  and
Alan Walker
Pat Shipman
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Alan Walker
Affiliation:
Department of Cell Biology and Anatomy, Johns Hopkins Medical School, 725 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21205
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Bone-collecting behavior in the harvester ant, Messor barbarus, has been observed for the first time. Excavation to the depth of the packed substrate of a single ant hill yielded 1167 modern bones derived from nine or more species of small vertebrates. Since harvester ants of various species are well-known from the Americas, Africa, and Eurasia, ants may have served as important agents of concentration for micromammal assemblages in the fossil record. Analysis of the faunal and skeletal representation of the ant hill assemblages reveals characteristic patterns that might be used to distinguish such assemblages from those collected by avian or mammalian predators.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , Fall 1980 , pp. 496 - 502
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Behrensmeyer, A. K. 1978. Taphonomic and ecologic information from bone weathering. Paleobiology. 4:150–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrensmeyer, A. K. and Dechant-Boaz, D. E. 1980. The recent bones of Ambeseli Park, Kenya, in relation to East African paleoecology. pp. 72–93. In: Behrensmeyer, A. K. and Hill, A. P., eds. Fossils in the Making. Univ. Chicago Press; Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Blatt, H., Middleton, G., and Murray, R. 1972. Origin of Sedimentary Rocks. 634 pp. Prentice-Hall, Inc.; Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Brown, J. H., Reichman, O. J., and Davison, D. W. 1979. Granivory in desert ecosystems. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 10:20–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, J., Beerbower, J. R., and Kietzke, K. 1967. Oligocene sedimentation, stratigraphy and paleoecology and paleoclimatology in the Big Badlands of South Dakota. Field Geol. 5:1–58.Google Scholar
Dodson, P. and Wexlar, D. 1979. Taphonomic investigations of owl pellets. Paleobiology 5:275–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glover, P. E. 1967. Notes on some ants in Northern Somalia. F. Afr. Wildl. J. 5:65–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glue, D. E. 1970. Avian predator pellet analysis and the mammalogist. Mamm. Rev. 1:53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, J. 1974. East African Mammals. Vol. IIB. 704 pp. Academic Press; New York.Google Scholar
Korth, W. W. 1979. Taphonomy of microvertebrate fossil assemblages. Ann. Carnegie Mus. 48(15):235–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moggridge, J. T. 1873. Harvesting Ants and Trap-Door Spiders. 156 pp. L. Reeve and Co.; London.Google Scholar
Trapp, G. R. 1978. Comparative behavioral ecology of the ringtail and gray fox in southwestern Utah. Carnivore. 1(2):13–32.Google Scholar
Wheeler, W. M. 1910. The Ants. Columbia Univ. Press; New York.Google Scholar
Whitford, W. G. 1978. Foraging in seed-harvester ants (Pogonomyrmex spp.) Ecology 59:185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar