Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T06:25:38.988Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Global Ordovician faunal transitions in the marine benthos: proximate causes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2016

Sean R. Connolly
Affiliation:
Department of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721
Arnold I. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, Post Office Box 210013, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0013

Abstract

During the Ordovician Radiation, domination of benthic marine communities shifted away from trilobites, toward articulate brachiopods, and, to a lesser degree, toward bivalves and gastropods. In this paper, we identify the patterns in origination and extinction probabilities that gave rise to these transitions. Using methods adapted from capture-mark-recapture (CMR) population studies, we estimate origination, extinction, and sampling probabilities jointly to avoid confounding patterns in turnover rates with temporal variation in the quality of the fossil record. Not surprisingly, higher extinction probabilities in trilobites relative to articulate brachiopods, bivalves, and gastropods were partly responsible for relative decreases in trilobite diversity. However, articulate brachiopods also had higher origination probabilities than trilobites, indicating that relative increases in articulate brachiopod diversity would have occurred even in the absence of between-class differences in extinction probabilities. This contrasts with inferences based on earlier Phanerozoic-scale, long-term averages of turnover probabilities, and it indicates that a major cause of this faunal transition has been overlooked.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Anderson, D. R.Burnham, K. P. 1994. AIC model selection in overdispersed capture-recapture data. Ecology 75:17801793.Google Scholar
Babin, C. 1993. Rôle des plates-formes gondwaniennes dans les diversifications des mollusques bivalves durant l'Ordovicien. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de France 164:141153.Google Scholar
Babin, C. 1995. The initial Ordovician bivalve mollusc radiations on the western Gondwanan shelves. Pp. 491498in Copper, J. D.Droser, M. L.Finney, S. C., eds. Ordovician odyssey: short papers for the seventh international symposium on the Ordovician System. Pacific Section of the Society for Sedimentary Geology, Fullerton, Calif.Google Scholar
Boucot, A. 1983. Does evolution take place in an ecological vacuum? II. Journal of Paleontology 57:130.Google Scholar
Bowring, S.Erwin, D. H. 1998. A new look at evolutionary rates in deep time: uniting paleontology and high-precision geochronology. GSA Today 8:18.Google Scholar
Burnham, K. P.Anderson, D. R. 1998. Model selection and inference: an information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Connolly, S. R.Miller, A. I. 2001. Joint estimation of sampling and turnover rates from fossil databases: capture-mark-recapture methods revisited. Paleobiology 27:751767 (this volume).Google Scholar
Connolly, S. R.Miller, A. I. 200. Global Ordovician faunal transitions in the marine benthos: ultimate causes. Paleobiology 28 (in press).Google Scholar
Conroy, M. J.Nichols, J. D. 1984. Testing for variation in taxonomic extinction probabilities: a suggested methodology and some results. Paleobiology 10:328337.Google Scholar
Eberhard, L. L. 1978. Appraising variability in population studies. Journal of Wildlife Management 42:207238.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 1993. Discordance and concordance between morphological and taxonomic diversity. Paleobiology 19:185204.Google Scholar
Foote, M. 1995. Morphological diversification of paleozoic crinoids. Paleobiology 21:273299.Google Scholar
Gilinsky, N. L. 1994. Volatility and the Phanerozoic decline of background extinction intensity. Paleobiology 20:445458.Google Scholar
Gilinsky, N. L.Good, I. J. 1991. Probabilities of origination, persistence, and extinction of families of marine invertebrate life. Paleobiology 17:145166.Google Scholar
Hargrove, J. W.Borland, C. H. 1994. Pooled population parameter estimates from mark-recapture data. Biometrics 50:11291141.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B.Armstrong, R. L.Cox, A. V.Craig, L. E.Smith, A. G.Smith, D. G. 1990. A geologic time scale 1989. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Khain, V. E.Seslavinsky, K. B. 1996. Historical geotectonics: palaeozoic. Translated by Rao, P. M. Russian translations series, No. 115. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Kirchner, J. W.Weil, A. 2000. Delayed biological recovery from extinctions throughout the fossil record. Nature 404:177180.Google Scholar
Marshall, C. R. 1990. Confidence intervals on stratigraphic ranges. Paleobiology 16:110.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I. 1997a. Comparative diversification dynamics among paleocontinents during the Ordovician Radiation. Geobios 20:397406.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I. 1997b. Dissecting global diversity patterns: examples from the Ordovician Radiation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 28:85104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Miller, A. I. 1997c. A new look at age and area: the geographic and environmental expansion of genera during the Ordovician Radiation. Paleobiology 23:410419.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I. 1998. Biotic transitions in global marine diversity. Science 281:11571160.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I.Foote, M. 1996. Calibrating the Ordovician Radiation of marine life: implications for Phanerozoic diversity trends. Paleobiology 22:304309.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I.Mao, S. 1995. Association of orogenic activity with the Ordovician Radiation of marine life. Geology 23:305308.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I.Mao, S. 1998. Scales of diversification and the Ordovician Radiation. Pp. 288310in McKinney, M. L.Drake, J. A., eds. Biodiversity dynamics: turnover of populations, taxa, and communities. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. D.Pollock, K. H. 1983. Estimating taxonomic diversity, extinction rates, and speciation rates from fossil data using capture-recapture models. Paleobiology 9:150163.Google Scholar
Nichols, J. D.Morris, R. W.Brownie, C.Pollock, K. H. 1986. Sources of variation in extinction rates, turnover, and diversity of marine invertebrate families during the Paleozoic. Paleobiology 12:421432.Google Scholar
Patzkowsky, M. E. 1995. A hierarchical branching model of evolutionary radiations. Paleobiology 21:440460.Google Scholar
Pitman, J. 1993. Probability. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Pollock, K. H.Nichols, J. D.Brownie, C.Hines, J. E. 1990. Statistical inference for capture-recapture experiments. Wildlife Monographs 107:197.Google Scholar
Pradel, R. 1996. Utilization of capture-mark-recapture for the study of recruitment and population growth rate. Biometrics 52:703709.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., 1979. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. II. Early Phanerozoic families and multiple equilibria. Paleobiology 5:222251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., 1981. A factor-analytic description of the Phanerozoic marine fossil record. Paleobiology 7:3653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., 1984. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity. III. Post-Paleozoic families and mass extinctions. Paleobiology 10:246267.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., 1986. Phanerozoic overview of mass extinction. Pp. 277295in Raup, D. M.Jablonski, D., eds. Patterns and processes in the history of life. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., 1991. Diversity in the Phanerozoic oceans: a partisan review. Pp. 210236in Dudley, E. C., ed. The unity of evolutionary biology. Dioscorides, Portland, Ore.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., 1993. Ten years in the library: new data confirm paleontological patterns. Paleobiology 19:4351.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., 1995. The Ordovician Radiations: diversification and extinction shown by global genus-level taxonomic data. Pp. 393396in Copper, J. D.Droser, M. L.Finney, S. C., eds. Ordovician odyssey: short papers for the seventh international symposium on the Ordovician System. Pacific Section of the Society for Sedimentary Geology, Fullerton, Calif.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., 1997. Biodiversity: past, present, and future. Journal of Paleontology 71:533539.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., 1998. Rates of speciation in the fossil record. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 353:315326.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr.Miller, A. I. 1985. Evolutionary faunas and the distribution of Paleozoic benthic communities in space and time. Pp. 153190in Valentine, J. W., ed. Phanerozoic diversity patterns: profiles in macroevolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Smith, S. G.Skalski, J. R.Schlechte, J. W.Hoffmann, A.Cassen, V. 1994. Statistical survival analysis of fish and wildlife tagging studies: SURPH. 1. Center for Quantitative Science, School of Fisheries, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Strauss, D.Sadler, P. M. 1989. Classical confidence intervals and Bayesian probability estimates for ends of local taxon ranges. Mathematical Geology 21:411427.Google Scholar
Tucker, R. D.McKerrow, W. S. 1995. Early Paleozoic chronology: a review in light of new U-Pb zircon ages from Newfoundland and Britain. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 32:368379.Google Scholar
Veizer, J.Ala, D.Azmy, K.Bruckschen, P.Buhl, D.Bruhn, F.Carden, G. A. F.Diener, A.Ebneth, S.Godderis, Y.Jasper, T.Korte, C.Pawellek, F.Podlaha, O. G.Strauss, H. 1999. 87Sr86Sr, δ13C and δ18O evolution of Phanerozoic seawater. Chemical Geology 161:5988.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1995. Economics, volcanoes, and Phanerozoic revolutions. Paleobiology 21:125152.Google Scholar
White, G. C. 2000. MARK: mark and recapture survival rate estimation, Version 1.7.Google Scholar
Williams, B.Conroy, M.Nichols, J. 2001. The analysis and management of animal populations. Academic Press, San Diego (in press).Google Scholar