Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:43:46.108Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Age (Mortality) Profiles as a Means of Distinguishing Hunted Species from Scavenged Ones in Stone Age Archeological Sites

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 July 2015

Richard G. Klein
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Some ungulate species at Upper Pleistocene and Holocene archeological sites in South Africa exhibit catastrophic mortality profiles, while others exhibit attritional ones. The awareness by Stone Age people that some species are especially amenable to driving or snaring probably accounts for the catastrophic profiles. Natural catastrophic death immediately followed by human scavenging is a much less likely explanation because the species samples comprise material lumped from deposits that accumulated more or less continuously over hundreds or even thousands of years during which period there is no reason to suppose the repeated occurrence of natural catastrophes nearby.

The inability of Stone Age people to obtain prime-age adults in species that are not particularly amenable to driving or snaring presumably accounts for the attritional mortality profiles. Although the species that display attritional profiles conceivably were scavenged, the high proportion of very young individuals in the profiles suggests active hunting. Very young individuals are much less abundant in attritional profiles from local non-archeological sites, probably because their carcasses were removed from the record before burial, primarily by carnivore or scavenger feeding. Scavenging would account for the abundance of very young individuals in the archeological sites only in the unlikely event that people could regularly locate carcasses before other predators did.

In general, geomorphic/sedimentologic context is probably the best criterion for determining whether a species characterized by a catastrophic profile in an archeological site was hunted or scavenged. At the majority of known sites, active hunting is suggested. In the case of a species characterized by an attritional profile in an archeological site, the proportion of very young individuals in the sample probably provides the best criterion for distinguishing hunting from scavenging. A relatively high proportion of very young individuals suggests active hunting.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 8 , Issue 2 , Spring 1982 , pp. 151 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Butzer, K. W. 1973. Re-evaluation of the geology of the Elandsfontein (Hopefield) site, South-Western Cape, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 69:234–238.Google Scholar
Butzer, K. W. 1978. Sediment stratigraphy of the Middle Stone Age sequence at Klasies River Mouth. S. Afr. archaeol. Bull. 33:141–151.Google Scholar
Frison, G. C. 1978. Animal population studies and cultural inference. Plains Anthropol. 23(82,2):44–52.Google Scholar
Goddard, J. 1970. Age criteria and vital statistics of a black rhinoceros population. E. Afr. Wildl. J. 8:105–121.Google Scholar
Hendey, Q. B. 1974. The Late Cenozoic Carnivora of the South-Western Cape Province. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 63:1–369.Google Scholar
Hendey, Q. B. 1981. Paleoecology of the late Tertiary fossil occurrences in “E” Quarry, Langebaanweg, South Africa, and a reinterpretation of their geological context. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 84:1–104.Google Scholar
Klein, R. G. 1978. Stone Age predation on large African bovids. J. archaeol. Sci. 5:195–217.Google Scholar
Klein, R. G. 1981a. Stone Age predation on small African bovids. S. Afr. archaeol. Bull. 36:55–65.Google Scholar
Klein, R. G. 1981b. Ungulate mortality and sedimentary facies in the late Tertiary Varswater Formation, Langebaanweg, South-Western Cape Province, South Africa. Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 81:233–254.Google Scholar
Klein, R. G., Cruz-Uribe, K., and Wolf, C. 1982. The calculation and interpretation of ungulate age profiles from dental crown heights. In: Bailey, G., ed. Hunter-gatherer Economics in Late Pleistocene Europe. Cambridge Univ. Press; Cambridge.Google Scholar
Klein, R. G., Wolf, C., Freeman, L. G., and Allwarden, K. 1981. The use of dental crown heights for constructing age profiles of red deer and similar species in archeological samples. J. archaeol. Sci. 8:1–31.Google Scholar
Kurtén, B. 1953. On the variation and population dynamics of fossil and recent mammal populations. Acta zool. fenn. 76:1–122.Google Scholar
Laws, R. M. 1966. Age criteria for the African elephant, Loxodonta africana africana . E. Afr. Wildl. J. 4:1–37.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A. R. E. 1977. The African Buffalo. Univ. Chicago Press; Chicago, Illinois.Google Scholar
Singer, R. and Crawford, J. R. 1958. The significance of the archaeological discoveries at Hopefield, South Africa. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 88:11–19.Google Scholar
Singer, R. and Wymer, J. 1968. Archaeological investigations at the Saldanha Skull site in South Africa. S. Afr. archaeol. Bull. 23:63–74.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1964. Age in two fossil horse populations. Acta Zool. 45:93–106.Google Scholar
Voorhies, M. R. 1969. Taphonomy and population dynamics of an early Pliocene vertebrate fauna, Knox County, Nebraska. Univ. Wyoming Special Contrib. to Geol. Special Paper 1:1–69.Google Scholar
Wymer, J. and Singer, R. 1972. Middle Stone Age occupational settlements on the Tzitzikama coast, eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Pp. 207–210. In: Ucko, P. J., Tringham, R., and Dimbleby, G. W., eds. Man, Settlement, and Urbanism. Gerald Duckworth & Co.; London.Google Scholar