Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T02:39:04.340Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Chronospecies' longevities, the origin of genera, and the punctuational model of evolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Steven M. Stanley
Steven M. Stanley*
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland 21218
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Taxonomists working with late Cenozoic faunas tend to view living species as starting points for the evaluation of chronospecies (i.e., segments of evolutionary lineages subjectively designated as species) that extend backward in time from the Recent. This practice makes it possible to construct a survivorship curve for late Cenozoic chronospecies by evaluating all fossil lineages believed to have survived to the present day. A survivorship curve is produced by plotting the fraction of these lineages existing at any time that have not undergone enough phyletic evolution that their extant representatives are assigned to new species. This kind of surviviorship curve has been plotted for chronospecies of mammals using the beginning of the Würm, rather than the Recent, as an endpoint in order to avoid the effects of the Würm and post-Würm mass extinction. The survivorship curve reveals that all but a small fraction of established chronospecies have long durations relative to intervals of time during which distinctive higher taxa have arisen. Phyletic turnover of species has been remarkably slow. Most net evolutionary change must have been associated with saltational speciation. Even the large majority of genera must have arisen rapidly by one or more divergent speciation events. Estimates of rates of extinction suggest that the bottleneck effect, in which constriction of a lineage is followed by re-expansion as a distinct species, cannot be a major source of evolutionary change. These conclusions, based on the evaluation of mammalian phylogeny, seem also to apply to other taxa of animals, supporting the punctuational model of evolution. The long durations of hominid species imply that the evolution of humans, like that of other mammals, conforms to this model.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , Winter 1978 , pp. 26 - 40
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Berggren, W. A. and Van Couvering, J. A. 1974. The Late Neogene. Developments in Paleontology and Stratigraphy. 2. 216 pp. Elsevier; Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Britten, R. J. and Davidson, E. H. 1969. Gene regulation for higher cells: a theory. Science. 165:349–357.Google Scholar
Britten, R. J. and Davidson, E. H. 1971. Repetitive and non-repetitive DNA sequences and a speculation on the origins of evolutionary novelty. Q. Rev. Biol. 46:111–133.Google Scholar
Brown, W. L. Jr. and Wilson, E. O. 1956. Character displacement. Syst. Zool. 5:49–64.Google Scholar
Carson, J. L. 1968. The population flush and its genetic consequences. Pp. 123–137. In: Lewontin, R. C., ed. Population Biology and Evolution. Syracuse Univ. Press; Syracuse, New York.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P. R. and Raven, P. H. 1969. Differentiation of populations. Science. 165:1228–1232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eldredge, N. 1971. The allopatric model and phylogeny in Paleozoic invertebrates. Evolution. 25:156–157.Google Scholar
Eldredge, N. and Gould, S. J. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to phyletic gradualism. Pp. 82–115. In: Schopf, T. J. M., ed. Models in Paleobiology. Freeman and Cooper and Co.; San Francisco, Calif.Google Scholar
Endler, J. A. 1977. Geographic Variation Speciation, and Clines. 246 pp. Princetion Univ. Press; Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Fryer, G. and Iles, T. D. 1972. The cichlid fishes of the Great Lakes of Africa. 641 pp. Oliver and Boyd; Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Gingerich, P. D. 1976. Paleontology and phylogeny: patterns of evolution at the species level in early Tertiary mammals. Am. J. Sci. 276:1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gould, S. J. 1976. Ladders, bushes, and human evolution. Nat. Hist. 85(4):24–31.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J. and Eldredge, N. 1977. Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology. 3:115–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, V. 1963. The Origin of Adaptations. 606 pp. Columbia Univ. Press; New York.Google Scholar
Grant, V. 1971. Plant Speciation. 435 pp. Columbia Univ. Press; New York.Google Scholar
Greenwood, P. H. 1974. The cichlid fishes of Lake Victoria, East Africa: the biology and evolution of a species flock. Brit. Mus. (Nat. Hist.) Bull. Suppl. 6. 134 pp.Google Scholar
Hallam, A. 1975. Evolutionary size increase and longevity in Jurassic bivalves and ammonites. Nature. 258:493–496.Google Scholar
Harper, C. W. Jr. 1975. Origin of species in geologic time: alternatives to the Eldredge-Gould model. Science. 190:47–48.Google Scholar
Kennedy, W. J. and Cobban, W. A. 1976. Aspects of ammonite biology, biogeography, and biostratigraphy. Palaeontol. Assoc. Spec. Pap. in Palaeontol. No. 17. 94 pp.Google Scholar
Kurtén, B. 1958. The bears and hyaenas of the interglacials. Quaternaria. 4:69–81.Google Scholar
Kurtén, B. 1968. Pleistocene Mammals of Europe. 317 pp. Aldine Publ. Co.; Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. 1962. Catastrophic selection as a factor in speciation. Evolution. 16:257–271.Google Scholar
Leakey, R. E. F. and Walker, A. C. 1976. Australopithecus, Homo erectus and the single species hypothesis. Nature. 261:572–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maglio, V. J. 1973. Origin and evolution of the Elephantidae. Trans. Am. Philos. Soc. 63:1–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. 1954. Change of genetic environment and evolution. Pp. 157–180. In: Huxley, J., Hardy, A. C., and Ford, E. B., eds. Evolution as a Process. Allen and Unwin; London.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1963. Animal Species and Evolution. 797 pp. Harvard Univ. Press; Cambridge, Mass.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayr, E. 1970. Populations, Species, and Evolution. 453 pp. Harvard Univ. Press; Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1975. The unity of the genotype. Biol. Zentrabl. 94:377–388.Google Scholar
Miller, R. R. 1950. Speciation in pupfishes of the genera Cyprinodon and Empetrichthys inhabitating the Death Valley region. Evolution. 4:155–163.Google Scholar
Nevesskaya, L. A. 1967. Problems of species differentiation in light of paleontological data. Paleontol. J. 1967:1–17.Google Scholar
Ovcharenko, V. N. 1969. Transitional forms and species differentiation of brachiopods. Paleontol. J. 1969:57–63.Google Scholar
Romer, A. S. 1966. Vertebrate Paleontology. 468 pp. Univ. Chicago Press; Chicago, Ill.Google Scholar
Ruzhentsev, V. Ye. 1964. The problem of transition in paleontology. Int. Geol. Rev. 6:2204–2213.Google Scholar
Simpson, G. G. 1944. Tempo and Mode in Evolution. 237 pp. Columbia Univ. Press; New York.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1975a. A theory of evolution above the species level. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.). 72:646–650Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1975b. Clades versus clones in evolution: Why we have sex. Science. 190:382–383.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1976. Stability of species in geologic time. Science. 192:267–269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stanley, S. M. 1977. Trends, rates, and patterns of evolution in the Bivalvia. Pp. 209–250. In: Hallam, A., ed. Patterns of Evolution. Elsevier; Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Tattersall, I. and Eldredge, N. 1977. Fact, theory, and fantasy in human paleontology. Am. Sci. 65:204–211.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. and Campbell, C. A. 1975. Genetic regulation and the fossil record. Am. Sci. 63:673–680.Google ScholarPubMed
Van Valen, L. 1973. A new evolutionary law. Evol. Theory. 1:1–30.Google Scholar
Wilson, A. C., Maxon, L. R., and Sarich, V. M. 1974. The importance of gene rearrangement in evolution: evidence from studies on rates of chromosomal, protein, and anatomical evolution. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. (U.S.A.). 71:3028–3030.Google Scholar