Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T10:22:44.742Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparative physiology of suspension-feeding in living brachiopods and bivalves: evolutionary implications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Melissa Clark Rhodes  and
R. J. Thompson
Melissa Clark Rhodes
Affiliation:
Department of Malacology, Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19103
R. J. Thompson
Affiliation:
Ocean Sciences Center, Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John's, Newfoundland, A1C 5S7 Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper presents scaling equations relating suspension-feeding rates to body size for articulate brachiopods and bivalve molluscs, two classes which represent a significant component of the fossil record of marine benthic communities. Clearance (feeding) rates of five species of living articulate brachiopods and three species of epifaunal suspension-feeding bivalve molluscs collected from mid-latitude fjords of Newfoundland and New Zealand were measured in similar experimental conditions. In comparisons within and between the two classes, we found that both plectolophous and spirolophous brachiopods had significantly lower feeding rates than mytilids, which are filibranchs, but that a sympatric primitive eulamellibranch veneroid bivalve had rates comparable to the brachiopods. Articulate brachiopods do not appear to feed effectively at the high algal concentrations which bivalves can exploit. The data on comparative suspension-feeding rates support the hypothesis that past changes in diversity and distribution of bivalves and brachiopods may be related to an overall increase in energy flux and escalation of metabolic rates during the Phanerozoic.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 19 , Issue 3 , Summer 1993 , pp. 322 - 334
Copyright
The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arthur, M. A., Zachos, J. C., and Jones, D. S. 1987. Primary productivity and the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary event in the oceans. Cretaceous Research 8:43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1985. Classes and adaptive variety: the ecology of diversification in marine faunas through the Phanerozoic. Pp. 191–253in Valentine, J. W., ed. Phanerozoic diversity patterns: profiles in macroevolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Bambach, R. K. 1993. Seafood through time: changes in biomass, energetics, and productivity in the marine ecosystem. Paleobiology 19:xx–xx.Google Scholar
Bayne, B. L., and Newell, R. C. 1983. Physiological energetics of marine molluscs. Pp. 407–515in Wilbur, K. M., ed. The Mollusca. Academic Press, New York.Google Scholar
Bayne, B. L., Brown, D. A., Burns, K., Dixon, D. R., Ivanovici, A., Livingstone, D. R., Lowe, D. M., Moore, M. N., Stebbing, A. R. D., and Widdows, J. 1985. The effects of stress and pollution on marine animals. Praeger Scientific, New York.Google Scholar
Benton, M. J. 1987. Progress and competition in macroevolution. Biological Review 62:305–338.Google Scholar
Bottjer, D. J., and Ausich, W. I. 1986. Phanerozoic development of tiering in soft substrate suspension-feeding communities. Paleobiology 12:400–420.Google Scholar
Coughlan, J. 1969. The estimation of filtering rate from the clearance of suspensions. Marine Biology 2:356–358.Google Scholar
Curry, G. B. and Ansell, A. D. 1986. Tissue mass in living brachiopods. Pp. 231–241in Emig, C. C. and Racheboef, P. R., eds. Proceedings of the 1st International Congress on Brachiopods. Brest, France.Google Scholar
Curry, G. B., Ansell, A. D., James, M., and Peck, L. 1989. Physiological constraints on living and fossil brachiopods. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Earth Sciences 80:255–262.Google Scholar
Donovan, S. K. and Gale, A. S. 1990. Predatory asteroids and the decline of the articulate brachiopods. Lethaia 23:77–86.Google Scholar
Foster-Smith, R. L. 1975. The effect of concentration of suspension on the filtration rates and pseudofaecal production for Mytilus edulis L., Cerastoderma edule (L.) and Venerupis pullastra (Montagu). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 17:1–22.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Eldredge, N. 1977. Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology 3:115–151.Google Scholar
Gould, S. J., and Calloway, C. B. 1980. Clams and brachiopods—ships that pass in the night. Paleobiology 6:383–396.Google Scholar
Grange, K. R., Singleton, R. J., Richardson, J. R., Hill, P. J., and Main, W. De L. 1981. Shallow rock-wall biological associations of some southern fiords of New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 8:209–227.Google Scholar
James, M. A., Ansell, A. D., Collins, M. J., Curry, G. B., Peck, L. S., and Rhodes, M. C. 1992. Biology of living brachiopods. Advances in Marine Biology 28:175–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jorgensen, C. B., Kiorboe, T., Mohlenberg, F., and Riisgard, H. U. 1984. Ciliary and mucus-net filter feeding, with special reference to fluid mechanical characteristics. Marine Ecology—Progress Series 15:283–292.Google Scholar
Kuenzler, E. J. 1961. Phosphorus budget of a mussel population. Limnology and Oceanography 6:400–415.Google Scholar
Lee, D. E. 1991. Aspects of the ecology and distribution of the living Brachiopoda of New Zealand. Pp. 273–279in MacKinnon et al. 1991.Google Scholar
LaBarbera, M. J. 1986. Brachiopod lophophores: functional diversity and scaling. Pp. 313–321in Emig, C. C. and Racheboef, P. R., eds. Proceedings of the 1st International Congress on Brachiopods. Brest, France.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, D. I., Lee, D. E., and Campbell, J. D., eds. 1991. Brachiopods through time. Balkema, Rotterdam.Google Scholar
Margolis, S., Mount, F., Doehne, E., Showers, W., and Ward, P. 1987. The Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary carbon and oxygen isotope stratigraphy, diagenesis, and paleoceanography at Zumaya, Spain. Paleoceanography 2:361–377.Google Scholar
McCammon, H. M. 1981. Physiology of the brachiopod digestive system. Pp. 170–204in Dutro, J. T. Jr., and Boardman, R. S., organizers. Lophophorates: notes for a short course. University of Tennessee Department of Geological Sciences Studies in Geology Number 5.Google Scholar
McKinney, F. K. 1993. A faster-paced world?: contrasts in biovolume and life-process rates in cyclostome (class Stenolaemata) and cheilostome (Class Gymnolaemata) bryozoans. Paleobiology 19:335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. I. 1988. Spatio-temporal transitions in Paleozoic bivalvia: an analysis of North American fossil assemblages. Historical Biology 1:251–273.Google Scholar
Owen, G., and Williams, A. 1969. The caecum of articulate brachiopods. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 172:187–201.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M., and Boyajian, G. E. 1988. Patterns of generic extinction in the fossil record. Paleobiology 14:109–125.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. R. 1981. Distribution and orientation of six articulate brachiopod species from New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Zoology 8:189–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, M. C. 1990. Extinction patterns and comparative physiology of brachiopods and bivalves. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Penn.; University Microfilms.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. C., and Thayer, C. W. 1991a. Effects of turbidity on suspension-feeding: are brachiopods better than bivalves? Pp. 191–196in MacKinnon et al. 1991.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. C., and Thayer, C. W. 1991b. Mass extinctions: ecological selectivity and primary production. Geology 19:877–880.Google Scholar
Rhodes, M. C., and Thompson, R. J. 1992. Clearance rate of the articulate brachiopod Neothyris lenticularis (Deshayes, 1839). Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 163:77–89.Google Scholar
Riisgard, H. U. 1988. Efficiency of particle retention and filtration rate in 6 species of Northeast American bivalves. Marine Ecology—Progress Series 45:217–223.Google Scholar
Rudwick, M. J. S. 1970. Living and fossil brachiopods. Hutchinson University Library, London.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., 1979. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity II. Early Phanerozoic families and multiple equilibria. Paleobiology 5:222–251.Google Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., 1984. A kinetic model of Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity III. Post-Paleozoic families and mass extinctions. Paleobiology 10:246–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sepkoski, J. J. Jr., and Miller, A. I. 1985. Evolutionary faunas and the distribution of Paleozoic marine communities in space and time. Pp. 153–190in Valentine, J. W., ed. Phanerozoic diversity patterns: profiles in macroevolution. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Sokal, R. R., and Rohlf, F. J. 1981. Biometry, 2d ed.W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1968. Post-Paleozoic adaptive radiation of infaunal bivalve molluscs—a consequence of mantle fusion and siphon formation. Journal of Paleontology 42:214–229.Google Scholar
Stanley, S. M. 1979. Macroevolution: pattern and process. W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.Google Scholar
Steele-Petrovic, H. M. 1975. An explanation for the tolerance of brachiopods and relative intolerance of filter-feeding bivalves for soft muddy bottoms. Journal of Paleontology 49:552–556.Google Scholar
Steele-Petrovic, H. M. 1976. Brachiopod food and feeding processes. Palaeontology 19:417–436.Google Scholar
Steele-Petrovic, H. M. 1979. The physiological differences between articulate brachiopods and filter-feeding bivalves as a factor in the evolution of marine level-bottom communities. Palaeontology 22:101–134.Google Scholar
Suchanek, T. H., and Levinton, J. 1974. Articulate brachiopod food. Journal of Paleontology 48:1–5.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1981. Ecology of living brachiopods. Pp. 110–126in Dutro, J. T. Jr., and Boardman, R. S., organizers. Lophophorates: notes for a short course. University of Tennessee Department of Geological Sciences Studies in Geology Number 5.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1983. Sediment-mediated biological disturbance and the evolution of marine benthos. Pp. 479–625in Tevesz, M. and McCall, P., eds. Biotic interactions in recent and fossil benthic communities. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1985. Brachiopods versus mussels: competition, predation, and palatability. Science 228:1527–1528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thayer, C. W. 1986. Are brachiopods better than bivalves? Mechanisms of turbidity tolerance and their interaction with feeding in articulates. Paleobiology 12:161–174.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W. 1992. Escalating energy budgets and oligotrophic refugia: winners and drop-outs in the Red Queen's race. P. 290in Fifth North American Paleontological Convention, Abstracts and Program. Paleontological Society Special Publication Number 6.Google Scholar
Thayer, C. W., and Allmon, R. A. 1991. Unpalatable thecideid brachiopods from Palau: ecological and evolutionary implications. Pp. 253–260in MacKinnon et al. 1991.Google Scholar
Thompson, R. J., and Bayne, B. L. 1974. Some relationships between growth, metabolism and food in the mussel Mytilus edulis. Marine Biology 27:317–326.Google Scholar
Vahl, O. 1973a. Pumping and oxygen consumption rates of Mytilus edulis L. of different sizes. Ophelia 12:45–52.Google Scholar
Vahl, O. 1973b. Porosity of the gill, oxygen consumption and pumping rate in Cardium edule (L.) (Bivalvia). Ophelia 10:109–118.Google Scholar
Van Valen, L. 1973. A new evolutionary law. Evolutionary Theory 1:1–18.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1987. Evolution and escalation. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J.Google Scholar
Vermeij, G. J. 1992. Economics and evolution. P. 298in Fifth North American Paleontological Convention, Abstracts and Program. Paleontological Society Special Publication Number 6.Google Scholar
Widdows, J. 1978. Combined effects of body size, food concentration and season on the physiology of Mytilus edulis. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 58:109–124.Google Scholar
Widdows, J. 1985. Physiological procedures. Chapter 7. Pp. 161–178in Bayne et al. 1985.Google Scholar
Winter, J. E. 1978. A review on the knowledge of suspension-feeding in lamellibranchiate bivalves, with special reference to artificial aquaculture systems. Aquaculture 13:1–33.Google Scholar
Zachos, J. C., Arthur, M. A., and Dean, W. E. 1989. Geochemical evidence for suppression of pelagic marine productivity at the Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary. Nature (London) 337:61–64.Google Scholar
Zar, J. H. 1984. Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J.Google Scholar