Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T18:57:53.121Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diversification of the Neoselachii (Chondrichthyes) during the Jurassic and Cretaceous

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Charlie J. Underwood
Charlie J. Underwood*
Affiliation:
School of Earth Sciences, Birkbeck College, Malet Street, London WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom. E-mail: c.underwood@bbk.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The Neoselachii are a monophyletic group including all of the extant sharks and rays. They underwent rapid diversification throughout the Jurassic and Cretaceous, going from low-diversity assemblages of members of extinct orders in the Late Triassic to diverse assemblages containing representatives of most extant clades by the end of the Cretaceous. The known fossil record of Mesozoic neoselachians is composed largely of isolated teeth, with articulated skeletal remains being known from a limited number of sites. The small tooth size of a large proportion of neoselachians, including almost all taxa in existence prior to the mid Cretaceous, led to very poor representation in older publications. Their state of knowledge has improved dramatically since 1970 with the increased use of bulk sampling for isolated dental remains. Despite this, the high proportion of Lazarus taxa from some stages suggests that the state of knowledge is still intermittent. Increase in assemblage diversity throughout the Jurassic and Cretaceous suggests that radiation events resulted in real and dramatic increases in diversity, and that the perceived diversification is not an artifact of poor knowledge. Cladogenesis inferred from the fossil record typically compares more favorably with divergence predicted from molecular analysis, where Batoidea form a discrete basal clade, than with divergence predicted from morphological analysis, where Batoidea are considered a derived crown group within the Squalea. The timing of diversification events is discussed in light of the known fossil record, cladistically generated divergence times, and the paleoenvironmental distribution of faunas.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 32 , Issue 2 , Spring 2006 , pp. 215 - 235
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Adnet, S., and Cappetta, H. 2001. A palaeontological and phylogenetical analysis of the squaliform sharks (Chondrichthyes: Squaliformes) based on dental characters. Lethaia 34:234–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agassiz, J. L. R. 1833–1844. Recherches sur les poissons fossiles, Vol. 3. Imprimerie de Petitpierre, Neuchâtel.Google Scholar
Arambourg, C. 1952. Les vértebrés fossiles des Gisements de Phosphates (Maroc-Algerie-Tunisie). Service Géologique de Maroc, Notes et Mémoires 92:1–372.Google Scholar
Arratia, G. and Schultze, H.-P., eds. 1999. Mesozoic fishes, Vol. 2. Systematics and fossil record. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich.Google Scholar
Arratia, G., Kriwet, J., and Heinrich, W.-D. 2002. Selachians and actinopterygians from the upper Jurassic of Tendaguru, Tanzania. Mitteilungen aus dem Museum fúr Naturkunde Berlin, Geowissenschaftliche Reihe 5:207–230.Google Scholar
Batchelor, T. J., and Ward, D. J. 1990. Fish remains from a temporary exposure of Hythe Beds (Aptian-Lower Cretaceous) near Godstone, Surrey. Mesozoic Research 2:181–203.Google Scholar
Biddle, J. P. 1993. Les Elasmobranches de l'Albien inférieur et moyen (Crétacé inférieur) de la Marne et de la Haute-Marne (France). Professional Paper of the Belgian Geological Survey 264:191–240.Google Scholar
Biddle, J. P., and Landemaine, O. 1988. Contribution à l'étude des sélachiens du Crétacé du Bassin de Paris. Découverte des quelques nouvelles espèces associées à une faune de type wealden dans le Barrémien supérieur (Crétacé inférieur) des environs de Troyes (Aube). Publications Musée de Saint-Dizier 2:1–22.Google Scholar
Böttcher, R., and Duffin, C. J. 2000. The neoselachian shark Sphenodus from the Late Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) of Nusplingen abd Egasheim (Baden-Württemberg, Germany). Stuttgarter Beiträge zur Naturkunde B (Geologie und Paläontologie) 283:1–31.Google Scholar
Brito, P. M., and Séret, B. 1996. The new genus Iansan (Chondrichthyes, Rhinobatoidea) from the Early Cretaceous of Brazil and its phylogenetic relationships. Pp. 47–62 in Arratia, G. and Viohl, G., eds. Mesozoic fishes: systematics and paleoecology. Proceedings of the international meeting, Eichstätt, 1993. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich.Google Scholar
Brown, D. S., and Keen, J. A. 1991. An extensive marine vertebrate fauna from the Kellaways Sand [Callovian, Middle Jurassic] of Lincolnshire. Mercian Geologist 12:87–96.Google Scholar
Candoni, L. 1993. Découverte de Parasymbolus gen. et sp. nov. (Scyliorhinidae-Elasmobranchii) dans le Kimméridgien de Normandie, France. Professional Paper of the Belgian Geological Survey 264:147–156.Google Scholar
Candoni, L. 1995. Deux faunes inédites se sélaciens dans le Jurassique terminal Francais—premiers résultats stratigraphiques. Bulletin de la Société Géologique de Normandie et des Amis du Muséum du Havre 82:29–49.Google Scholar
Cappetta, H. 1975. Sélachians et holocéphale du Gargasien de la région de Gargas (Vaucluse). Géologie Méditerranéenne 2:115–134.Google Scholar
Cappetta, H. 1980. Les selaciens du Cretace superieur du Liban. 1. Requins. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A 168:69–148.Google Scholar
Cappetta, H. 1987a. Mesozoic and Cenozoic elasmobranchii. Chondrichthyes II. ed. Handbook of paleoichthyology, in Schultze, H. P., Vol. 3B Gustav Fischer, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Cappetta, H. 1987b. Extinctions et renouvellements fauniques chez les Sélaciens post-Jurassiques. Mémoires de la Société Géologique de France 150:113–131.Google Scholar
Cappetta, H. 1990. Hexanchiforme nouveau (Neoselachii) du Cretacé Inférieur du Sud de la France. Palaeovertebrata 20:33–54.Google Scholar
Cappetta, H., and Case, G. R. 1999. Additions aux faunes de sélaciens du Crétacé du Texas (Albien supérieur-Campanien). Palaeo Ichthyologica 9:1–112.Google Scholar
Cappetta, H., Duffin, C., and Zidek, J. 1993. Chondrichthyes. Pp. 593–609 in Benton, M. J., ed. The fossil record 2. Chapman and Hall, London.Google Scholar
de Carvalho, M. R. 1996. Higher-level elasmobranch phylogeny, basal squaleans, and paraphyly. Pp. 35–62 in Staissey, et al. 1996.Google Scholar
Carvalho, M. R. de 2004. A Late Cretaceous thornback ray from southern Italy, with a phylogenetic reappraisal of the Platyrhinidae (Chondrichthyes: Batoidea). Pp. 75–100 in Arratia, G. and Tintori, A., eds. Mesozoic fishes, Vol. 3. Systematics, palaeoenvironments and Biodiversity. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich.Google Scholar
Carvalho, M. R. de, and Maisey, J. G. 1996. Phylogenetic relationships of the Late Jurassic shark Protospinax Woodward 1919 (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii). Pp. 9–49 in Arratia, G. and Viohl, G., eds. Mesozoic fishes: systematics and paleoecology. Proceedings of the international meeting, Eichstätt, 1993. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich.Google Scholar
Case, G. R. 1978. A new selachian fauna from the Judith River Formation (Campanian) of Montana. Palaeontographica, Abteilung A 160:176–205.Google Scholar
Cione, A. L. 1999. First report of a Jurassic ray outside of Europe. Pp. 21–28 in Arratia, and Schultze, 1999.Google Scholar
Compagno, L. J. V. 1988. Sharks of the order Carcharhiniformes. Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J. Google Scholar
Cuny, G. 1998. Primitive neoselachian sharks: a survey. Oryctos 1:3–21.Google Scholar
Cuny, G., and Benton, M. J. 1999. Early radiation of the neoselachian sharks of western Europe. Geobios 32:193–204.Google Scholar
Cuny, G., Rieppel, O., and Sander, P. M. 2001. The shark fauna from the Middle Triassic (Anisian) of North-West Nevada. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 133:285–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, K., and Padian, K. 1999. An early Jurassic microvertebrate fauna from the Kayenta Formation of northeastern Arizona: microfaunal changes at the Triassic-Jurassic boundary. PaleoBios 19:19–37.Google Scholar
Delsate, D. 1993. Élasmobranches du Bajocien inférieur de Long-wy (Meurthe-et-Moselle). Cossmanniana 2:56–58.Google Scholar
Delsate, D. 2001. L'ichthyofaune du Pliensbachien (Jurassique Inférieur) de Lorraine et des Ardennes (France): premiers resultats. Bulletin de l'Académie Lorraine des Sciences 40:47–69.Google Scholar
Delsate, D. 2003. Une nouvelle faune de poissons et requins Toarciens du sud du Luxembourg (Dudelange) et de l'Allemagne (Schömberg). Bulletin de l'Académie Lorraine des Sciences 42:13–49.Google Scholar
Delsate, D., and Candoni, L. 2001. Description de nouveaux morphotypes dentaires de Batomorphii toarciens (Jurassique inférieur) de Bassin de Paris: Archaeobatidae nov. fam. Bulletin dela Société Naturelle de Luxembourg 102:131–143.Google Scholar
Delsate, D., and Godefroit, P. 1995. Chrondrichthyens du Toarcien inférieur d'Aubagne (Lorraine belge). Professional Paper of the Belgian Geological Survey 278:23–43.Google Scholar
Delsate, D., and LePage, L.-C. 1990. Découverte d'une faune originale d'Elasmobranches dans les phosphates du Toarcien lorrain (couches à Coeloceras crassum). Bulletin de l'Académie et Société Lorraines des Sciences 29:153–161.Google Scholar
Delsate, D., Duffin, C. J., and Weis, R. 2002. A new microvertebrate fauna from the Middle Hettangian (early Jurassic) of Fontenoille (Province of Luxembourg, south Belgium). Memoirs of the Geological Survey of Belgium 48:1–84.Google Scholar
Douady, C. J., Dosay, M., Shivji, M. S., and Stanhope, M. J. 2003. Molecular phylogenetic evidence refuting the hypothesis of Batoidea (skates and rays) as derived sharks. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 26:215–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duffin, C. J. 1988. The Upper Jurassic selachian Palaeocarcharias de Beaumont (1960). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 94:271–286.Google Scholar
Duffin, C. J. 1998a. New shark remains from the British Rhaetian (latest Triassic). 1. The earliest basking shark. Neues Jahrbuch fúr Geologie und Paláontologie, Monatshefte 1998:157–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duffin, C. J. 1998b. Ostenoselache stenostoma n. g. n. sp., a new neoselachian shark from the Sinemurian (Early Jurassic) of Osteno (Lombardy, Italy). Paleontologia Lombarda 9:1–27.Google Scholar
Duffin, C. J. 1998c. New shark remains from the British Rhaetian (latest Triassic). 2. Hybodonts and palaeospinacids. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte 1998:240–256.Google Scholar
Duffin, C. J., and Ward, D. J. 1983a. Neoselachian sharks' teeth from the Lower Carboniferous of Britain and the Lower Permian of the U.S.A. Palaeontology 26:93–110.Google Scholar
Duffin, C. J., and Ward, D. J. 1983b. Teeth of a new neoselachian shark from the British Lower Jurassic. Palaeontology 26:839–844.Google Scholar
Duffin, C. J., and Ward, D. J. 1993. The Early Jurassic Palaeospinacid sharks of Lyme Regis, southern England. Professional Paper of the Belgian Geological Survey 264:53–102.Google Scholar
Goto, T. 2001. Comparative anatomy, phylogeny and cladistic classification of the order Orectolobiformes. Memoirs of the Graduate School of Fisheries Science, Hokkaido University 48:1–100.Google Scholar
Herman, J. 1977. Les Sélachians néocrétacés et paléocénes de Belgique et des contrées limitrophes eléments d'une biostra-tigraphie intercontinentale. Mémoires pour server a l'Explication des Cartes Géologiques et Minières de la Belgique 15:1–450.Google Scholar
Herman, J. 1982. Die Selachier-Zähne aus der Maastricht-Stufe von Hemmoor, Niederelbe (NW-Deutschland). Geologisches Jahrbuch A 61:129–159.Google Scholar
Kemp, N. R. 1991. Chondrichthyans in the Cretaceous and Tertiary of Australasia. Pp. 498–523 in Vickers-Rich, P., Monaghan, J. M., Baird, R. F., and Rich, T. H., eds. Vertebrate palaeontology of Australasia. Monash University, Melbourne.Google Scholar
Kriwet, J. 1997. Beitrag zur Kenntis der Fischfauna des Oberjura (untres Kimmeridgium) der Kohlengrube Guimarota bei Leiria, Mittel-Portugal. 2. Neoselachii (Pisces, Elasmobranchii). Berliner Geowissenschaftliche Abhandlungen 25:293–301.Google Scholar
Kriwet, J. 1999. Neoselachier (Pisces, Elasmobranchii) aus dem Unterkreide (untres Barremium) von Galve und Alcaine (Spanien, Provinz Teruel). Palaeo Ichthyologica 9:113–142.Google Scholar
Kriwet, J. 2003. Neocelachian remains (Chondrichthyes, Elasmobranchii) from the Middle Jurassic of SW Germany and NW Poland. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 48:583–594.Google Scholar
Leidner, A., and Thies, D. 1999. Placoid scales and oral teeth of Late Jurassic elasmobranchs from Europe. Pp. 29–40 in Arratia, and Schultze, 1999.Google Scholar
Maisey, J. G. 1984. Higher elasmobranch phylogeny and biostratigraphy. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 82:33–52.Google Scholar
Maisey, J. G. 1985. Cranial morphology of the fossil elasmobranch Synechodus dubrisiensis . American Museum Novitates 2804:1–28.Google Scholar
Maisey, J. G., Naylor, G. J. P., and Ward, D. J. 2004. Mesozoic elasmobranches, neoselachian phylogeny and the rise of modern elasmobranch diversity. Pp. 17–56 in Arratia, G. and Tintori, A., eds. Mesozoic fishes, Vol. 3. Systematics, palaeoenvironments and biodiversity. Friedrich Pfeil, Munich.Google Scholar
Martill, D. M. 1991. Fish. Pp. 197–225 in Martill, D. M. and Hudson, J. D., eds. Fossils of the Oxford Clay. Field guides to fossils, Vol. 4. Palaeontological Association, London.Google Scholar
Martill, D. M. 1999. Bone beds of the Westbury Formation. Pp. 49–65 in Swift, A. and Martill, D. M., eds. Fossils of the Rhaetian Penarth Group. Field guides to fossils, Vol. 9. Palaeontological Association, London.Google Scholar
McEachran, J. D., and Aschliman, N. 2004. Phylogeny of Batoidea. Pp. 79–113 in Carrier, J. C., Musick, J. A., and Heithaus, M. R., eds. Biology of sharks and their relatives. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. Google Scholar
McEachran, J. D., Dunn, K. A., and Miyake, T. 1996. Interrelationships of the batoid fishes (Chondrichthyes: Batoidea). Pp. 63–84 in Staissey, et al. 1996.Google Scholar
Noubhani, A., and Cappetta, H. 1997. Les Orectolobiformes, Carchariniformes, et Myliobatiformes (Elasmobranchii, Neoselachii) des Bassins a phosphate du Maroc (Maastrichtian-Lutétien basal). Palaeo Ichthyologica 8:1–327.Google Scholar
Popov, E. V., Seltzer, V. B., and Volkov, A. V. 2004. On records of elasmobranchs teeth (Chondrichthyes: Elasmobranchii) from the lower Callovian of Saratov, Russia. Transactions of the Scientific Research Geological Institute of the N. G. Chernyshevskii Saratov State University 16:133–154.Google Scholar
Rees, J. 1998. Early Jurassic selachians from the Hasle Formation on Bornholm, Denmark. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 43:439–452.Google Scholar
Rees, J. 2000. A new Pleinsbachian (Early Jurassic) neoselachian shark fauna from southern Sweden. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica 45:407–424.Google Scholar
Rees, J. 2002. Shark fauna and depositional environment of the earliest Cretaceous Vitabáck Clays at Eriksdal, southern Sweden. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh (Earth Sciences) 93:59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, J. 2005. Neoselachian shark and ray teeth from the Valanginian, Lower Cretaceous, of Wawal, central Poland. Palaeontology 48:209–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reif, W.-E. 1977a. Tooth enameloid as a taxonomic criterion. 1. A new euselachian shark from the Rhaetic-Liassic boundary. Neues Jahrbuch fúr Geologie und Paläontologie, Abhandlungen 160:61–72.Google Scholar
Reif, W.-E. 1977b. Tooth enameloid as a taxonomic criterion. 2. Is “Dalatias” barnstonensis Sykes 1971 (Triassic, England) a squalomorphic shark? Neues Jahrbuch fúr Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte 1978:42–58.Google Scholar
Saint-Seine, M. P. 1949. Les poissons des calcaires lithographiques de Cerin. Nouvelles Archives du Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle de Lyon 1:1–347.Google Scholar
Schweizer, R. 1964. Die elasmobranchier und holocephalen aus den Nusplinger plattenkalken. Palaeontographica Abteilung A 123:58–110.Google Scholar
Shirai, S. 1996. Phylogenetic interrelationships of neoselachians (Chondrichthyes: Euselachii). Pp. 9–34 in Staissey, et al. 1996.Google Scholar
Siverson, M. 1996. Lamniform sharks of the mid Cretaceous Alinga Formation and Beedagong Claystone, Western Australia. Palaeontology 39:813–849.Google Scholar
Staissey, J., Parenti, L. R., and Johnson, G. D., eds. 1996. Interrelationships of fishes. Academic Press, San Diego.Google Scholar
Thies, D. 1981. Vier neue Neoselachier-Haiarten aus der NW-deutschen Unterkreide. Neues Jahrbuch für Geologie und Paläontologie, Monatshefte 1981:75–86.Google Scholar
Thies, D. 1983. Jurazeitliche Neoselachier aus Deutschland und S-England. Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg 58:1–117.Google Scholar
Thies, D., and Candoni, L. 1998. Corysodon Saint-Seine 1949–a valid genus of Mesozoic neoselachian sharks. Geologica et Palaeontologica 32:221–233.Google Scholar
Thurmond, J. T. 1971. Cartilaginous fishes of the Trinity Group and related rocks (Lower Cretaceous) of north central Texas. Southeastern Geology 13:207–227.Google Scholar
Underwood, C. J. 2002. Sharks, rays and chimaeroid from the Kimmeridgian (Late Jurassic) of Ringstead, southern England. Palaeontology 45:297–325.Google Scholar
Underwood, C. J. 2004a. Environmental controls on the distribution of neoselachian sharks and rays within the British Bathonian (Middle Jurassic). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 203:107–126.Google Scholar
Underwood, C. J. 2004b. Barremian and Aptian (Cretaceous) sharks and rays from Speeton, Yorkshire, north-east England. Proceedings of the Yorkshire Geological Society 55:73–84.Google Scholar
Underwood, C. J., and Mitchell, S. H. 1999. Albian and Cenomanian selachian assemblages from North East England. Special Papers in Palaeontology 60:9–59.Google Scholar
Underwood, C. J., and Rees, J. 2002. Selachian faunas from the earliest Cretaceous Purbeck Group of Dorset, southern England. Special Papers in Palaeontology 68:83–102.Google Scholar
Underwood, C. J., and Ward, D. J. 2004. Neoselachian sharks and rays from the British Bathonian (Middle Jurassic). Palaeontology 47:447–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Underwood, C. J., Mitchell, S. H., and Veltkamp, C. J. 1999. Shark and ray teeth from the Hauterivian (Lower Cretaceous) of north-east England. Palaeontology 42:287–302.Google Scholar
Ward, D. J. 1999. Sections on Jurassic and Cretaceous faunas. Pp. 355–479 in Dineley, D. L. and Metcalf, S. J., eds. 1999. Fossil fishes of Great Britain. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough, U.K. Google Scholar
Ward, D. J. In press. Elasmobranchii. In Young, J., Gale, A. S., and Skipper, J., eds. Fossils of the Gault Clay. Field guides to fossils. Palaeontological Association.Google Scholar
Welton, B. J., and Farrish, R. F. 1993. The collector's guide to the fossil sharks and rays from the Cretaceous of Texas. Before Time Publications, Lewisville, Tex. Google Scholar
White, E. I. 1931. The vertebrate faunas of the English Eocene, Vol. 1. From the Thanet Sands to the Basement Bed of the London Clay. Oxford University Press, Oxford.Google Scholar
Winchell, C. J., Martin, A. P., and Mallatt, J. 2004. Phylogeny of elasmobranches based on LSU and SSU ribosomal RNA genes. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 311:214–224.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. S. 1889. Catalogue of the fossil fishes in the British Museum, Part 1. British Museum (Natural History), London.Google Scholar
Woodward, A. S. 1918. On two new elasmobranch fishes (Crossorhinus jurassicus sp. nov., and Protospinax annectans sp. nov) from the Upper Jurassic lithographic stone of Bavaria. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1918:231–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wroblewski, A. F.-J. 2004. New selachian paleofaunas from “fluvial” deposits of the Ferris and Lower Hanna Formations (Maastrichtian-Selandian: 66–58 Ma), southern Wyoming. Palaios 19:249–258.Google Scholar
Young, T. 1982. Neoselachian sharks from the Middle Jurassic of England. Sheffield University Geological Society Journal 8:24–31.Google Scholar