Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-10T22:52:35.647Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hybrid crinoids in the fossil record (Early Mississippian, Phylum Echinodermata)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

William I. Ausich  and
David L. Meyer
William I. Ausich
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210
David L. Meyer
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45221
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Potential hybrid fossil crinoids, Eretmocrinus magnificus x Eretmocrinus praegravis, are identified from the Lower Mississippian Fort Payne Formation of south-central Kentucky. These are the first fossil hybrid crinoids identified, and one of very few examples of hybrids recognized in the fossil record. Eretmocrinus magnificus x E. praegravis specimens have shapes and calyx plate sculpturing that are morphologically intermediate between well-defined, distinct parent species. Suspected hybrids occur at localities where parent species co-occur and where the parent species are the most abundant; the hybrids occur at what may have been the distributional margins of the parent species; and the mixture of characters on suspected hybrids seems to be morphogenetically partitioned. Parent species are derived from separate lineages within Eretmocrinus, and hybridization is the most probable explanation for these morphologically intermediate specimens. This example highlights the need to consider hybridization as a potential interpretation of intermediate morphologies among fossils and raises questions concerning the impact of hybridization for our interpretation of the fossil record and the role of hybridization in the evolutionary process.

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , Summer 1994 , pp. 362 - 367
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ausich, W. I. 1983. Component concept for the study of paleo-communities with an example from the Early Carboniferous of southern Indiana (U.S.A.). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 44:251–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I., and Meyer, D. L. 1990. Origin and composition of carbonate buildups and associated facies in the Fort Payne Formation (Lower Mississippian, south-central Kentucky): an integrated sedimentologic and paleoecologic analysis. Geological Society of America Bulletin 102:129–146.2.3.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ausich, W. I., Kammer, T. W., and Baumiller, T. K. 1994. Demise of the Middle Paleozoic crinoid fauna: a single extinction event or rapid faunal turnover? Paleobiology 20:345–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, M., and Anderson, M. J.In press. Hybridization of sympatric Patiriella species (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) in New South Wales. Evolution.Google Scholar
Geary, D. H. 1992. An unusual pattern of divergence between two fossil gastropods: ecophenotypy, dimorphism, or hybridization? Paleobiology 18:93–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, P. R., and Grant, B. R. 1992. Hybridization of bird species. Science 256:193–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hinegardner, T. T. 1975. Morphology and genetics of sea urchin development. American Zoologist 15:679–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, L. H. 1955. The invertebrates: Echinodermata. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Kwast, K. E., Foltz, D. W., and Stickle, W. B. 1990. Population genetics and systematics of the Leptasterias hexactis (Echinodermata: Asteroidea) species complex. Marine Biology 105:477–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, N. G. 1958. The monobathrid camerate crinoid family: Batocrinidae. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Kansas, Lawrence.Google Scholar
Mayr, E. 1970. Populations, species, and evolution. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.Google Scholar
Menge, B. A. 1986. A preliminary study of the reproductive ecology of the seastars Asterias vulgaris and A. forbesi in New England. Bulletin of Marine Science 39:467–476.Google Scholar
Nichols, D. 1959. Changes in the chalk heart-urchin Micraster interpreted in relation to living forms. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, series B, 693:347–437.Google Scholar
Shaw, F. C. 1991. Viola Group (Ordovician, Oklahoma) cryptolithinid trilobites: biogeography and taxonomy. Journal of Paleontology 65:919–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stebbins, G. L. 1971. Processes of organic evolution. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Swan, E. F. 1953. The Strongylocentrotidae (Echinoidea) of the northeast Pacific. Evolution 7:269–273.Google Scholar