Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T03:26:45.655Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reconstruction of Tertiary Metasequoia forests. II. Structure, biomass, and productivity of Eocene floodplain forests in the Canadian Arctic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

Christopher J. Williams ,
Arthur H. Johnson ,
Ben A. LePage ,
David R. Vann  and
Tatsuo Sweda
Christopher J. Williams
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Pennsylvania, 240 South Thirty-third Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6316. E-mail: cjwillia@sas.upenn.edu
Arthur H. Johnson
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Pennsylvania, 240 South Thirty-third Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6316. E-mail: cjwillia@sas.upenn.edu
Ben A. LePage
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Pennsylvania, 240 South Thirty-third Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6316. E-mail: cjwillia@sas.upenn.edu
David R. Vann
Affiliation:
Department of Earth and Environmental Science, University of Pennsylvania, 240 South Thirty-third Street, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6316. E-mail: cjwillia@sas.upenn.edu
Tatsuo Sweda
Affiliation:
Forest Resources Planning, Ehime University, 3-5-7 Tarumi, Matsuyama, Japan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abundant fossil plant remains are preserved in the high-latitude middle Eocene deposits of the Buchanan Lake Formation on Axel Heiberg Island, Nunavut Territory, Canada. Intact leaf litter, logs, and stumps preserved in situ as mummified remains offer an opportunity to determine the structure, biomass, and productivity of two Taxodiaceae-dominated forests that grew north of the Arctic Circle (paleolatitude 75–80°N). We excavated fossil tree trunks and treetops to develop equations that describe the height, structure, and mass of the aboveground components of Eocene-age Metasequoia trees. We combined those data with surveys of in situ stumps to determine the structure, biomass, and productivity of two fossil forests, “N” and “HR.” We calculated a canopy height of 40 ± 3 m for the N forest and 25 m ± 2 m for the HR forest. Buried knots in dissected logs and abundant branch-free bole wood indicate that these were tall, closed-canopy forests. Stem tapers indicate that the overstory was of uniform height. Stem volume equaled 2095 m3 ha−1 and stem biomass was 628 Mg ha−1 in the N forest. Volume and biomass in the HR forest were much smaller, 211 m3 ha−1 and 63.3 Mg ha−1, respectively. We estimated understory tree biomass to be 40 Mg ha−1 in the N forest and 3.5 Mg ha−1 in the HR forest. Recovery of seven fossil treetops with exposed branch stubs enabled us to make estimates of branchwood and foliar biomass using allometric equations derived from modern, plantation-grown Metasequoia glyptostroboides. Estimated stand-level branch biomass was 13 and 6.7 Mg ha−1 in the N and HR forests, respectively. Standing foliar biomass was estimated to be 3.2 and 2.1 Mg ha−1 in the N and HR forests, respectively. Using annual ring widths, the reconstructed parabolic stems, and wood density of modern Metasequoia, we calculated annual wood production to be 2.3 Mg ha−1 yr−1 for the N forest and 0.55 Mg ha−1 yr−1 for the HR forest Assuming that the ancient Metasequoia were deciduous like their living relatives, annual aboveground net primary productivity was 5.5 Mg ha−1 yr−1 for the N forest and 2.8 Mg ha−1 yr−1 for the HR forest. Our estimated biomass and productivity values for N are similar to those of modern old-growth forests of the Pacific Northwest of the United States and old-growth coastal Cordillera forests of southern Chile.

Type
Articles
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 29 , Issue 2 , Spring 2003 , pp. 271 - 292
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Ando, M., Nakane, I., and Kawanabe, S. 1991. Studies on the growth of planted stands in Kyoto University Forest in Ashiu III. History of tree introduction into Ashiu and the growth of several planted exotic tree species. Bulletin of the Kyoto University Forests 63:101–117. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Arthur, M. A., Hamburg, S. P., and Siccama, T. G. 2001. Validating allometric estimates of aboveground living biomass an nutrient contents of a northern hardwood forest. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31:11–17.Google Scholar
Basinger, J. F. 1991. The fossil forests of the Buchanan Lake Formation (Early Tertiary), Axel Heiberg Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago: preliminary floristics and paleoclimate. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 403:39–65.Google Scholar
Basinger, J. F., Greenwood, D. G., and Sweda, T. 1994. Early Tertiary vegetation of Arctic Canada and its relevance to paleoclimatic interpretation. NATO ASI Series 127:175–198.Google Scholar
Battles, J. J., Armesto, J. J., Vann, D. R., Zarin, D. J., Aravena, J. C., Pérez, C., and Johnson, A. H. 2002. Vegetation composition, structure and biomass of two unpolluted watersheds in the Cordillera de Piuchué, Chiloé Island, Chile. Plant Ecology 158:5–19.Google Scholar
Blanchette, R. A., Cease, K. R., Abad, A. R., Burnes, T. A., and Obst, J. R. 1991. Ultrastructural characterization of wood from a Tertiary fossil forest in the Canadian Arctic. Canadian Journal of Botany 69:560–568.Google Scholar
Brown, S. 1981. A comparison of the structure, primary productivity, and transpiration of cypress ecosystems in Florida. Ecological Monographs 51:403–427.Google Scholar
Chapman, J. L. 1994. Distinguishing internal developmental characteristics from external palaeoenvironmental effects in fossil wood. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 81:19–32.Google Scholar
Chu, K. L., and Cooper, W. S. 1950. An ecological reconnaissance in the native home of Metasequoia glyptostroboides. Ecology 31:260–278.Google Scholar
Clark, P. J., and Evans, F. C. 1954. Distance to nearest neighbor as a measure of spatial relationships in populations. Ecology 35:445–453.Google Scholar
Colin, F., and Houllier, F. 1992. Branchiness of Norway spruce in northern France: predicting the main crown characteristics from usual tree measurements. Annals of Forest Science 49:511–538.Google Scholar
Duever, M. J., Carlson, J. E., and Riopelle, L. A. 1984. Corkscrew Swamp: a virgin cypress strand. Pp. 334–348in Ewel, K. C. and Odum, H. T., eds. Cypress swamps. University Press of Florida, Gainesville.Google Scholar
Eberle, J. J., and Storer, J. E. 1999. Northernmost record of brontotheres, Axel Heiberg Island, Canada: implications for age of the Buchanan Lake Formation and brontothere paleobiology. Journal of Paleontology 73:979–983.Google Scholar
Enquist, B. J. 2002. Universal scaling in tree and vascular plant allometry: toward a general quantitative theory linking plant form and function from cells to ecosystems. Tree Physiology 22:1045–1064.Google Scholar
Enquist, B. J., and Niklas, K. J. 2001. Invariant scaling relations across tree-dominated communities. Nature 410:655–660.Google Scholar
Enquist, B. J., Brown, J. H., and West, G. B. 1998. Allometric scaling of plant energetics and population density. Nature 395:163–166.Google Scholar
Falder, A. B., Stockey, R. A., and Rothwell, G. W. 1999. In situ fossil seedlings of a Metasequoia-like taxodiaceous conifer from Paleocene river floodplain deposits of central Alberta, Canada. American Journal of Botany 86:900–902.Google Scholar
Forest Products Laboratory. 1999. Wood handbook: wood as an engineering material. General Technical Report-GTR-113. U.S. Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory, Madison, Wisc.Google Scholar
Francis, J. E. 1991. The dynamics of polar fossil forests: Tertiary fossil forests of Axel Heiberg Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 403:29–38.Google Scholar
Gholz, H. L. 1982. Environmental limits on aboveground net primary production, leaf area, and biomass in vegetation zones of the Pacific northwest. Ecology 63:469–481.Google Scholar
Goodarzi, F., Gentzis, T., and Ricketts, B. D. 1991. A preliminary petrographic study of coals of the fossil forest succession, eastern Axel Heiberg Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 403:147–157.Google Scholar
Gray, H. R. 1956. The form and taper of forest-tree stems. Institute Paper 32:1–74. Imperial Forestry Institute, Oxford.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. G., and Basinger, J. F. 1993. Stratigraphy and floristics of Eocene swamp forests from Axel Heiberg Island, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 30:1914–1923.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. G., and Basinger, J. F. 1994. The paleoecology of high-latitude Eocene swamp forests from Axel-Heiberg Island, Canadian High Arctic. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 81:83–97.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. R., and Wing, S. L. 1995. Eocene continental climates and latitudinal gradients. Geology 23:1040–1048.Google Scholar
Grier, C. C., and Logan, R. S. 1977. Old-growth Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco communities of a western Oregon watershed: biomass distribution and production budgets. Ecological Monographs 47:373–400.Google Scholar
Hamburg, S. P., Zamolodchikov, D. G., Korovin, G. N., Nefedjev, V. V., Utkin, A. I., Gulbe, J. L., and Gulve, T. A. 1997. Estimating the carbon content of Russian forest: a comparison of phytomass/volume and allometric equations. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2:247–265.Google Scholar
Hawke, M. I., and Stasiuk, L. D. 2000. Organic petrography and Rock-Eval characteristics of the Cenozoic fossil forest litter of Axel Heiberg Island, Nunavut, and their implications for hydrocarbon generation. Geological Survey of Canada, Current Research 2000–B5.Google Scholar
He, F., and Duncan, R. P. 2000. Density-dependent effects on tree survival in an old-growth Douglas fir forest. Journal of Ecology 88:676–688.Google Scholar
Irving, E., and Wynne, P. J. 1991. The paleolatitude of the Eocene fossil forests of Arctic Canada. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 403:209–211.Google Scholar
Ishii, H., Clement, J. P., and Shaw, D. C. 2000. Branch growth and crown form in old coastal Douglas-fir. Forest Ecology and Management 131:81–91.Google Scholar
Johnson, C. M., Zarin, D. J., and Johnson, A. H. 2000. Post-disturbance aboveground biomass accumulation in global secondary forests. Ecology 81:1395–1401.Google Scholar
Johnson, D. W., and Lindberg, S. E. 1992. Atmospheric deposition and forest nutrient cycling. Springer, New York.Google Scholar
Joshi, A. B. 2001. Climate, nitrogen mineralization, and productivity in contrasting montane forests. Ph.D. dissertation. University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Kellomaki, S., Hari, P., Kanninen, M., and Ilonen, P. 1980. Eco-physiological studies on young Scots pine stands. II. Distribution of needle biomass and its application in approximating light conditions inside the canopy. Silva Fennica 14:243–257.Google Scholar
Kumagai, H., Sweda, T., Hayashi, K., Kojima, S., Basinger, J. F., Shibuya, M., and Fukaoa, Y. 1995. Growth-ring analysis of early Tertiary conifer woods from the Canadian High Arctic and its paleoclimatic interpretation. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology Palaeoecology 116:247–262.Google Scholar
Kuser, J. E. 1982. Metasequoia keeps on growing. Arnoldia 47:130–138.Google Scholar
Shibuya, M., and Fukaoa, Y. 1983. Metasequoia glyptostroboides in urban forestry. Pp. 20–27in Metria, 4. Proceedings of the fourth conference of the Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance, New York Botanical Garden, June 20–21, 1983.Google Scholar
Kuser, J. E., Sheely, D. L., and Hendricks, D. R. 1997. Genetic variations in two ex situ collections of the rare Metasequoia glyptostroboides (Cupressaceae). Silvae Genetica 46:258–264.Google Scholar
Larson, P. R. 1963. Stem development of forest trees. Forest Science Monograph 5. U.S. Forest Service, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Larson, P. R. 1965. Stem form of young Larix as influenced by wind and pruning. Forest Science 11:412–424.Google Scholar
LeBlanc, D. C. 1990. Relationship between breast-height and whole-stem growth indices for red spruce on Whiteface Mountain, New York. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 20:1399–1407.Google Scholar
LePage, B. A. 2001. New species of Picea (Pinaceae) from the middle Eocene of Axel Heiberg Island, Arctic Canada. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 135:137–167.Google Scholar
LePage, B. A., and Basinger, J. F. 1991a. Early Tertiary Larix from the Buchanan Lake Formation, Canadian Arctic, and a consideration of the phytogeography of the genus. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 403:67–82.Google Scholar
LePage, B. A., and Basinger, J. F. 1991b. A new species of Larix (Pinaceae) from the early Tertiary of Axel Heiberg Island, Arctic Canada. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology 70:89–111.Google Scholar
LePage, B. A., and Basinger, J. F. 1995a. The evolutionary history of the genus Larix (Pinaceae). U.S. Forest Service General Technical Report INT-319:19–29.Google Scholar
LePage, B. A., and Basinger, J. F. 1995b. Evolutionary history of the genus Pseudolarix (Pinaceae). International Journal of Plant Science 156:910–950.Google Scholar
Liu, Y. J., Li, C. S., and Wand, Y. F. 1999. Studies on fossil Metasequoia from north-east China and their taxonomic implications. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 130:267–297.Google Scholar
Liu, Y.-S., and Basinger, J. F. 2000. Fossil Cathaya (Pinaceae) pollen from the Canadian High Arctic. International Journal of Plant Science 161:829–847.Google Scholar
Maguire, D. A., and Bennett, W. S. 1996. Patterns in vertical distribution of foliage in young coastal Douglas-fir. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26:1991–2005.Google Scholar
Massman, W. J. 1981. Foliage distribution in old-growth coniferous tree canopies. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 12:10–17.Google Scholar
Mattheck, C. 1991. Trees: the mechanical design. Springer, Berlin.Google Scholar
McGaughey, R. J. 1997. Visualizing forest stand dynamics using the stand visualization system. ACSM/ASPRS Annual Convention and Exposition, Proceedings, Vol. 4, pp. 248–257. American Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, April 7-10, 1997, Seattle.Google Scholar
McIntyre, D. J. 1991. Pollen and spore flora of an Eocene forest, eastern Axel Heiberg Island, N.W.T. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 403:83–98.Google Scholar
McIver, E. E., and Basinger, J. F. 1999. Early Tertiary floral evolution in the Canadian High Arctic. In Crane, P. R. and Herendeen, P. S., eds. The origin of modern terrestrial ecosystems. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 86:523–545.Google Scholar
Mosbrugger, V., Gee, C. T., Belz, G., and Ashraf, A. R. 1994. Three-dimensional reconstruction of an in-situ Miocene peat forest from the Lower Rhine Embayment, northwestern Germany: new methods in palaeovegetation analysis. Palaeogeography Palaeoclimatology and Palaeoecology 110:295–317.Google Scholar
Nakai, I., and Nakane, I. 1994. Biomass and growth of Metasequoia glyptostroboides Hu et Cheng stand in Kamigamo Experiment Station of Kyoto University Forest, Kyoto City. Reports of the Kyoto University Forests 26:75–86. [In Japanese.]Google Scholar
Nathorst, A. G. 1915. Tertiäre Pflanzenreste aus Ellesmere-land. Viden.-Selsk. I Kristiania 4:1–15.Google Scholar
Niklas, K. J. 1992. Plant biomechanics: an engineering approach to plant form and function. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Niklas, K. J., and Banks, H. P. 1992. Taper of some Early Palaeozoic plants. Paleaeobotanist 41:58–66.Google Scholar
Nobori, Y., Hayashi, K., Kumagai, H., Kojima, S., LePage, B. A., and Sweda, T. 1997. Reconstruction of a Tertiary fossil forest from the Canadian High Arctic using three-dimensional computer graphics. Japan Society of Forest Planning 3:49–54.Google Scholar
Oliver, C. D., and Larson, B. C. 1990. Forest stand dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Parrish, J. T. 1998. Interpreting pre-Quaternary climate from the geologic record. Columbia University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Polman, J. E., Michon, S. G. L., Militz, H., and Helmink, A. T. F. 1999. The wood of Metasequoia glyptostroboides (Hu et Cheng) of Dutch origin. Holz als Roh-und Werkstoff 57:215–221.Google Scholar
Rex, G. M., and Chaloner, W. G. 1983. The experimental formation of plant compression fossils. Palaeontology 26:231–252.Google Scholar
Ricketts, B. D. 1986. New formations in the Eureka Sound Group, Canadian Arctic Islands. Geological Survey of Canada Paper 86–1B:363–374.Google Scholar
Ricketts, B. D. 1987. Princess Margaret Arch: an evaluation of an element of the Eurekan Orogen, Axel Heiberg Island, Arctic Archipelago. Canadian Journal of Earth Science 24:2499–2505.Google Scholar
Ricketts, B. D. 1991. The influence of sedimentation and Eurekan tectonism on the fossil forest succession, eastern Axel Heiberg Island. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin 403:1–27.Google Scholar
Ricketts, B. D. 1994. Basin analysis, Eureka Sound Group, Axel Heiberg and Ellesmere islands, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Geological Survey of Canada Memoir 439:1–119.Google Scholar
Ricketts, B. D., and McIntyre, D. J. 1986. The Eureka Sound Group of eastern Axel Heiberg Island: new data on the Eurekan Orogeny. Geological Survey of Canada Paper 86-1B:405–410.Google Scholar
Saito, H., Kawahara, T., Shidi, T., and Tsutsumi, T. 1970. Productivity of young stands of Metasequoia glyptostroboides. Bulletin of the Tokyo University Forests 41:80–95.Google Scholar
Satoo, T. 1974. Materials for the studies of growth in forest stands. XIII. Primary production relations of a young stand of Metasequoia glyptostroboides planted in Tokyo. Bulletin of the Tokyo University Forests 66:153–164.Google Scholar
Schei, P. 1903. Summary of geological results, the Second Norwegian Polar Expedition in the Fram. Geographical Journal 22:56–67.Google Scholar
Smith, D. M., Larson, B. C., Kelty, M. J., and Ashton, P. M. S. 1997. The practice of silviculture: applied forest ecology, 9th ed.Wiley, New York.Google Scholar
Stockey, R. A., Rothwell, G. W., and Falder, A. B. 2001. Diversity among taxodioid conifers; Metasequoia foxii sp. Nov. From the Paleocene of central Alberta, Canada. International Journal of Plant Sciences 162:221–234.Google Scholar
Tritton, L. M., and Siccama, T. G. 1990. What proportion of standing dead trees in forests of the Northeast are dead? Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 117:163–166.Google Scholar
Tozer, E. T. 1960. Summary account of Mesozoic and Tertiary stratigraphy, Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Geological Survey of Canada Paper 60–5:1–24.Google Scholar
Vann, D. R., Joshi, A., Perez, C., Johnson, A. H., Frizano, J., Zarin, D. J., and Armesto, J. J. 2002. Distribution and cycling of C, N, Ca, Mg, K and P in three pristine, old-growth forests in the Cordillera de Piuchué, Chile. Biogeochemistry 60:25–47.Google Scholar
Vann, D. R., Williams, C. J., LePage, B. A. In press. Possible evolution of photosystem parameters and deciduousness in response to paleoclimate seasonality in Metasequoia glyptostroboides. In The evolution of plant physiology. Linnean Society Symposium Series.Google Scholar
Walton, J. 1936. On the factors which influence the external form of fossil plants: with descriptions of some species of the Paleozoic Equisetale genus Annularia Sternberg. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B 226:219–237.Google Scholar
Weller, D. E. 1987. A reevaluation of the -3/2 power rule of plant self-thinning. Ecological Monographs 57:23–43.Google Scholar
Westoby, M. 1984. The self-thinning rule. Advances in Ecological Research 14:167–225.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R. H., and Woodwell, G. M. 1968. Dimension and reproduction relations of trees and shrubs in the Brookhaven Forest, New York. Journal of Ecology 56:1–25.Google Scholar
Whittaker, R. H., Bormann, F. H., Likens, G. E., and Siccama, T. G. 1974. The Hubbard Brook ecosystem study: forest biomass and production. Ecological Monographs 44:233–254.Google Scholar
Williams, C. J., Johnson, A. H., LePage, B. A., Vann, D. R., and Taylor, K. T. 2003a. Reconstruction of Tertiary Metasequoia forests. I. Test of a method of biomass reconstruction. Paleobiology 29:255–269 [this volume].Google Scholar
Williams, C. J., LePage, B. A., Vann, D. R., Tange, T., Ikeda, H., Ando, M., Kusakabe, T., Tsuzuki, H., and Sweda, T. 2003b. Structure, allometry, and biomass of plantation Metasequoia glyptostroboides in Japan. Forest Ecology and Management (in press).Google Scholar
Wolfe, J. A. 1985. Distribution of major vegetational types during the Tertiary. Geophysical Monographs 32:357–375.Google Scholar
Yoda, K., Kira, T., Ogawa, H., and Hozumi, K. 1963. Self thinning in overcrowded pure stands under cultivated and natural conditions. Journal of Biology Osaka City University 14:107–129.Google Scholar