Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:36:14.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Snake origins and the need for scientific agreement on vernacular names

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2016

Michael S. Y. Lee
Michael S. Y. Lee*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia. E-mail: mlee@zoology.uq.edu.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When transitional fossils blur previously clear boundaries between major groups, drawing that line can be problematic. While the need to rigorously define formal taxon names is widely acknowledged (e.g., de Queiroz and Gauthier 1992; Cantino et al. 1997), the need for similar precision in the scientific use of vernacular terms is not widely appreciated. The lack of accepted usages for common names has engendered endless arguments about when a fish becomes (also?) a tetrapod (e.g., Clack 1997), when a dinosaur becomes (also?) a bird (e.g., Padian and Chiappe 1998), and when a mammal-like reptile becomes (also?) a mammal (e.g., Rowe and Gauthier 1992). Recent descriptions of fossil snakes with well-developed hindlimbs have raised similar questions about where to draw the line between lizards and snakes and initiated a lively debate over the origin of snakes. However, lack of a precise definition of the vernacular term “snake,” as well as lack of a consensus on what constitutes a higher taxon's “origins,” has seriously hindered discussion of “snake origins.” Here, precise definitions of both terms are proposed and justified and their paleobiological implications discussed. The origin of higher taxa remains one of the most intriguing macroevolutionary problems, but scientists risk arguing at cross-purposes unless they agree on the exact boundaries of vernacular groups, and the exact meaning of the term “origin.”

Type
Matters of the Record
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 27 , Issue 1 , Winter 2001 , pp. 1 - 6
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Literature Cited

Bryant, H. N. 1994. Comments on the phylogenetic definition of taxon names and conventions regarding the naming of crown-clades. Systematic Zoology 43:124–130.Google Scholar
Cantino, P. D., Olmstead, R. G., and Wagstaff, S. J. 1997. A comparison of phylogenetic nomenclature with the current system: a botanical case study. Systematic Biology 46:313–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clack, J. A. 1997. Devonian tetrapod trackways and trackmakers: a review of the fossils and footprints. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 30:227–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cundall, D. 1995. Feeding behaviour in Cylindrophis and its bearing on the evolution of alethinophidian snakes. Journal of Zoology 237:353–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Queiroz, K., and Gauthier, J. 1992. Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23:449–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Estes, R., de Queiroz, K., and Gauthier, J. 1988. Phylogenetic relationships within Squamata. Pp. 119–281in Estes, R. and Pregill, G. K., eds. Phylogenetic relationships of the lizard families. Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.Google Scholar
Gauthier, J. 1986. Saurischian monophyly and the origin of birds. Memoirs of the California Academy of Sciences 8:1–55.Google Scholar
Gove, P. B., ed. 1976. Webster's third new international dictionary of the English language unabridged, Vols. I–III. Encyclopaedia Britannica, Chicago.Google Scholar
Greene, H. W. 1873. Dietary correlates of the origin and radiation of snakes. American Zoologist 23:431–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, H. W. 1997. Snakes: the evolution of mystery in nature. University of California Press, Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, H. W., and Cundall, D. 2000. Limbless tetrapods and snakes with legs. Science 287:1939–1940.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kardong, K. V., Kiene, T. L., and Bels, V. 1997. Evolution of trophic systems in squamates. Netherlands Journal of Zoology 47:411–427.Google Scholar
Kemp, T. S. 1982. Mammal-like reptiles and the origin of mammals. Academic Press, London.Google Scholar
Lee, M. S. Y. 1996. Stability in meaning and content of taxon names: an evaluation of crown-clade definitions. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 263:1103–1109.Google Scholar
Lee, M. S. Y., and Caldwell, M. W. 1998. The anatomy and relationships of Pachyrhachis, a primitive snake with hindlimbs. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences 353:1521–1552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, M. S. Y., and Caldwell, M. W. 2000. Adriosaurus and the affinities of mosasaurs, dolichosaurs, and snakes. Journal of Paleontology 74:915–937.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padian, K., and Chiappe, L. 1998. The early evolution of birds. Biological Reviews 73:1–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, T. 1988. Definition, diagnosis, and origin of Mammalia. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 8:241–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, T., and Gauthier, J. 1992. Ancestry, paleontology, and the definition of the name Mammalia. Systematic Biology 41:372–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, J. D., and Lee, M. S. Y. 2000. The Pleistocene serpent Wonambi and the early evolution of snakes. Nature 20:416–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scanlon, J. D., Lee, M. S. Y., Caldwell, M. W., and Shine, R. 1999. The paleoecology of the primitive snake Pachyrhachis. Historical Biology 13:127–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sereno, P. C. 1999. Definitions in phylogenetic taxonomy: critique and rationale. Systematic Biology 48:329–351.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tchernov, E., Rieppel, O., Zaher, H., Polcyn, M., and Jacobs, L. L. 2000. A fossil snake with limbs. Science 287:2010–2012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed