Hostname: page-component-784d4fb959-mvngg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-14T22:46:01.548Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: an interpretation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2016

David M. Raup
David M. Raup*
Affiliation:
Department of Geological Sciences, University of Rochester; Rochester, New York 14627
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Species diversity among fossil invertebrates of the Phanerozoic is highly correlated with volume and area of sedimentary rocks. The correlations are statistically significant at the 1% level. The relationship holds even in regions (such as Canada) where the area and volume of rock do not increase through time. These results are interpreted as indicating that the apparent number of species is strongly dependent on sampling and that many of the changes in diversity seen in the Phanerozoic are artifactual. Consequently, there is no compelling evidence for a general increase in the number of invertebrate species from Paleozoic to Recent. This conclusion applies primarily to marine organisms. Diversity may have been in dynamic equilibrium throughout much of this time.

A few intervals of the Phanerozoic have consistently fewer invertebrate species than would be predicted from the amount of sedimentary rock available for study. The Silurian, Permian, and Cretaceous stand out in this regard. This may result either from lower than normal diversity during these periods or from an unusual abundance of unfossiliferous rocks (evaporites, red beds, etc.).

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Paleobiology , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , Fall 1976 , pp. 289 - 297
Copyright
Copyright © The Paleontological Society 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Literature Cited

Blatt, H. and Jones, R. L. 1975. Proportions of exposed igneous, metamorphic, and sedimentary rocks. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 86:1085–1088.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolton, T. E. 1960–74. Catalogue of Type Invertebrate Fossils of the Geological Survey of Canada. 5 vols. Geol. Surv. Can.; Ottawa.Google Scholar
Boucot, A. J. 1975. Evolution and Extinction Rate Controls. 427 pp. Scientific Publ. Co.; Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Flessa, K. W. 1975. Area, continental drift and mammalian diversity. Paleobiology. 1:189–194.Google Scholar
Garrels, R. M. and Mackenzie, F. T. 1971. Evolution of Sedimentary Rocks. 397 pp. W. W. Norton & Co.; New York.Google Scholar
Gilluly, J. 1949. Distribution of mountain building in geologic time. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 60:561–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilluly, J. 1969. Geological perspective and the completeness of the geologic record. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 80:2303–2312.Google Scholar
Gregor, C. B. 1970. Denudation of the continents. Nature. 228:273–275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gregory, J. T. 1955. Vertebrates in the geologic time scale. pp. 593–608. In: Poldervaart, A., ed. Crust of the Earth. Geol. Soc. Am. Spec. Paper 62.Google Scholar
Harland, W. B., Smith, A. G., and Wilcock, B., eds. 1964. The Phanerozoic Time-Scale. 458 pp. Geol. Soc. London; London.Google Scholar
Higgs, D. V. 1949. Quantitative areal geology of the United States. Am. J. Sci. 247:585–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, R. St. J. 1971. The pre-Pleistocene Phanerozoic time-scale—a review. pp. 9–31. In: Harland, W. B. and Francis, E. H., eds. The Phanerozoic Time-scale, A Supplement (Part 1). Geol. Soc. London Spec. Publ. 5.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R. H. and Wilson, E. O. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. 203 pp. Princeton Univ. Press; Princeton, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1972. Taxonomic diversity during the Phanerozoic. Science. 177:1065–1071.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raup, D. M. 1975. Taxonomic diversity estimation using rarefaction. Paleobiology. 1:333–342.Google Scholar
Raup, D. M. 1976. Species diversity in the Phanerozoic: a tabulation. Paleobiology. 2:279–288.Google Scholar
Ronov, A. B. 1968. Probable changes in the composition of sea water during the course of geological time. Sedimentology 10:25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanders, H. L. 1968. Marine benthic diversity: a comparative study. Am. Nat. 102:243–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schopf, T. J. M. 1974. Permo-Triassic extinctions: relation to sea-floor spreading. J. Geol. 82:129–143.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D. S. 1974. Permo-Triassic extinctions: effects of area on biotic equilibrium. J. Geol. 82:267–274.Google Scholar
Sloss, L. L. 1976. Areas and volumes of cratonic sediments, western North America and eastern Europe. Geology. 4:272–276.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1973a. Evolutionary Paleoecology of the Marine Biosphere. 511 pp. Prentice-Hall, Inc.; Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey.Google Scholar
Valentine, J. W. 1973b. Phanerozoic taxonomic diversity: a test of alternate models. Science. 180:1078–1079.Google Scholar