Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T21:48:29.884Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A specialist nurse-function in neurooncology: A qualitative study of possibilities, limitations, and pitfalls

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 December 2005

AGNETA SPETZ ,
ROGER HENRIKSSON ,
A. TOMMY BERGENHEIM  and
PÄR SALANDER
AGNETA SPETZ
Affiliation:
Doctorial student at the Department of Radiation Sciences—Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
ROGER HENRIKSSON
Affiliation:
Professor at the Department of Radiation Sciences—Oncology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
A. TOMMY BERGENHEIM
Affiliation:
Professor at the Department of Clinical Neuroscience—Neurosurgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
PÄR SALANDER
Affiliation:
Associate Professor at the Department of Social Welfare, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Objective: Brain tumors, a cancer that affects the cortical processes, have a substantial social impact. Typically, malignant glioma is a brain tumor with a poor prognosis; few patients survive more than two years after diagnosis. In the last several years, different groups have documented how this disease affects a patient's quality of life. These findings have resulted in new ways for nurses to improve the care for these patients and their spouses. However, these initiatives have not been studied in a systematic way. This study investigates how patients with malignant glioma and their families respond to a special nurse, a nurse specifically instructed to address the needs of the patient and the patient's family.

Methods: Sixteen patients and their next-of kin were included. At the time of diagnosis, the special nurse offered to serve as a resource to the patient and the patient's family. During the whole course of the disease, the nurse recorded her interactions with the patients and the patients' family. In addition, the spouses were interviewed after the patient's death. Data was analysed qualitatively with focus on tasks and relationships.

Results: Four relationships between the special nurse and the family were detected: 1) a resource for the whole family; 2) a parallel resource within the family; 3) a resource for the next-of kin; and 4) a resource for the patient. Most of the patients and their families found this program beneficial. The nurse provided the patient and family with several functions. In some cases the family and nurse interaction developed into a closer relationship, a relationship based on the nurse's availability and concern for the patient's and family's welfare.

Significance of Results: This close relationship underlines the importance of the nurse's professionalism and a systemic perspective for understanding the nurse's function within the milieu of a cancer patient's family.

Keywords

Brain tumorRelationshipSpecialist nurseSpouse
Type
Research Article
Information
Palliative & Supportive Care , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 2005 , pp. 121 - 130
Copyright
© 2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berne, E. (2004). Games People Play: The Psychology of Human Relationships. London: Penguine Books.
Boxhall, S. & Dougherty, M. (2003). An evaluation of a specialist nursing role for men with prostate cancer. Urologic Nursing, 23, 148–152.Google Scholar
Curren, J.R. (2001). Support needs of brain tumour patients and their carers: The place of a telephone service. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 7, 331–337.Google Scholar
Davies, E. & Higginson, I.J. (2003). Communication, information and support for adults with malignant cerebral glioma: A systematic literature review. Supportive Care in Cancer, 11, 21–29.Google Scholar
Higgens, D. (2000). The role of the prostate cancer nurse specialist. Professional Nurse, 15, 539–542.Google Scholar
Hordern, A. (2000). The emerging role of the breast care nurse in Australia. Cancer Nursing, 23, 122–127.Google Scholar
Given, B.A., Given, C.W., & Kozachik, S. (2001). Family support in advanced cancer. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 51, 213–231.Google Scholar
Jary, J. (1996). The role of the specialist nurse in breast cancer. Professional Nurse, 11, 664–665.Google Scholar
Keitel, M.A., Cramer, S.H., & Zevon, M.A. (1990). Spouses of cancer patients: A review of the literature. Journal of Counselling and Development, 69, 163–165.Google Scholar
Koop, P.M. & Strang, V.R. (2003). The bereavement experience following home-based family caregiving for persons with advanced cancer. Clinical Nursing Research, 12, 127–144.Google Scholar
Kvale, S. (1996). Inter Views: An Introduction to Qualitative Research Interviewing. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Morton-Cooper, A. (2000). Action Research in Health Care. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
Polkinghorne, D.E. (1995). Narrative configuration in qualitative analysis. In Life History and Narrative, Hatch, J.M. & Wisniewski, R. (eds.), pp. 5–23. London: Falmer.
Salander, P., Bergenheim, T., & Henriksson, R. (1996). The creation of protection and hope in patients with malignant gliomas. Social Science & Medicine, 42, 985–996.Google Scholar
Salander, P. (2003). Bad news from the patients perspective: An analysis of the written narratives of newly diagnosed cancer patients. Social Science & Medicine, 55, 721–732.Google Scholar
Salander, P. & Spetz, A. (2002). How do patients and spouses deal with the serious facts of malignant glioma? Palliative Medicine, 16, 305–313.Google Scholar
Sardell, S., Sharpe, G., Ashley, S., et al. (2000). Evaluation of nurse-led telephone clinic in the follow-up of with malignant glioma. Clinical Oncology, 12, 36–41.Google Scholar
Sherwood, P., Given, B.A., Doorenbos, A.Z., et al. (2004). Forgotten voices: lessons from bereaved caregivers of persons with a brain tumour. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 10, 67–75.Google Scholar
Sollner, W., DeWries, A., Steixner, F., et al. (2001). How successful are oncologists in identifying patient distress, perceived social support, and need for psychosocial counselling. British Journal of Cancer, 84(2), 179–185.Google Scholar
Strauss, A.L. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Weisman, A. & Worden, J.W. (1976). The existential plight in cancer: Significance of the first 100 days. International Journal of Psychiatry in Medicine, 7, 1–15.Google Scholar
Wideheim, A.K., Edvardsson, T., Påhlson, A., et al. (2002). A family's perspective on living with a highly malignant brain tumor. Cancer Nursing, 25, 236–244.Google Scholar
Winter, R. & Munn-Giddings, C. (2001). A Handbook for Action Research in Health and Social Care. London: Routledge.
Winterling, J., Wasteson, E., Glimelius, B., et al. (2004). Substantial changes in life: perceptions in patients with newly diagnosed advanced cancer and their spouses. Cancer Nursing, 27, 381–388.Google Scholar