Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T08:13:24.715Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Validation of the Family Inventory of Needs (FIN) for family caregivers in palliative care

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 May 2014

Sophie Schur
Affiliation:
Division of Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna
Marie Neubauer
Affiliation:
Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna
Michaela Amering
Affiliation:
Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna
Alexandra Ebert-Vogel
Affiliation:
Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna
Eva Katharina Masel
Affiliation:
Division of Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna
Ingrid Sibitz
Affiliation:
Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna
Herbert Watzke
Affiliation:
Division of Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna
Beate Schrank*
Affiliation:
Division of Social Psychiatry, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna King's College London, Institute of Psychiatry, London
*
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Beate Schrank, Medical University of Vienna, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Division of Social Psychiatry, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: beate.schrank@meduniwien.ac.at

Abstract

Objective:

Caregivers of cancer patients are faced with significant demands that can seriously impact their physical and mental health. It is important for healthcare professionals to be aware of caregivers' support needs in order for these to be adequately addressed. Our study develops a German version of the Family Inventory of Needs (FIN) and provides a comprehensive evaluation of its acceptability and psychometric properties.

Method:

Cross-sectional data from 308 participants were taken from the baseline assessment of an ongoing prospective study. Retests were completed by 46 participants approximately one week after baseline. Informal caregivers of terminally ill cancer patients were recruited from three hospitals in Vienna. Questionnaires for hope (IHS), traumatic stress (IES–R), and depression and anxiety (HADS) were employed together with the translated FIN to assess concurrent and discriminant validity.

Results:

The internal consistency of FIN–Importance had a Cronbach's α of 0.94, and that for FIN–Fulfillment was α = 0.96. Retest reliability for FIN–Importance was r = 0.97, while that for FIN–Fulfillment could not be calculated due to missing responses to this subscale. Concurrent and discriminant validity tests for the scale and the discriminative power of items were adequate. However, missing responses may limit the feasibility of using this scale in research settings. We identified six questions that could be excluded from the scale in order to increase its acceptability and further improve its psychometric properties.

Significance of results:

Our results suggest that the FIN is suitable for clinical settings. For use in research, we suggest four adaptations to increase the scale's acceptability and psychometric properties. The FIN can be a valuable tool for informing the emotional, physical, and psychological support provided to family carers of people who are terminally ill with cancer.

Type
Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Borasio, G.D. (2011). Translating the World Health Organization definition of palliative care into scientific practice. Palliative & Supportive Care, 9, 12.Google Scholar
Creamer, M., Bell, R. & Failla, S. (2003). Psychometric properties of the impact of Event Scale–Revised. Behavioural Research and Therapy, 41, 14891496.Google Scholar
Cummins, R.A. (2003). Normative life satisfaction: Measurement issues and a homeostatic model. Social Indicators Research, 64, 225256.Google Scholar
Deeken, J.F., Taylor, K.L., Mangan, P., et al. (2003). Care for the caregivers: A review of self-report instruments developed to measure the burden, needs, and quality of life of informal caregivers. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 26, 922953.Google Scholar
Fridriksdottir, N., Sigurdardottir, V. & Gunnarsdottir, S. (2006). Important needs of families in acute and palliative care settings assessed with the family inventory of needs. Palliative Medicine, 20, 425432.Google Scholar
Friethriksdottir, N., Saevarsdottir, T., Halfdanardottir, S.I., et al. (2011). Family members of cancer patients: Needs, quality of life and symptoms of anxiety and depression. Acta Oncologica, 50, 252258.Google Scholar
Hannon, B., O'Reilly, V., Bennett, K., et al. (2012). Meeting the family: Measuring effectiveness of family meetings in a specialist inpatient palliative care unit. Palliative & Supportive Care, 10, 4349.Google Scholar
Henriksson, A., Benzein, E., Ternestedt, B.-M., et al. (2011). Meeting needs of family members of persons with life-threatening illness: A support group program during ongoing palliative care. Palliative & Supportive Care, 9, 263271.Google Scholar
Herrmann, C. (1997). International experiences with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale: A review of validation data and clinical results. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 42, 1741.Google Scholar
Hirdes, J.P., Freeman, S., Smith, T.F., et al. (2012). Predictors of caregiver distress among palliative home care clients in Ontario: Evidence based on the interRAI Palliative Care. Palliative & Supportive Care, 10, 155163.Google Scholar
Horowitz, M., Wilner, N. & Alvarez, W. (1979). Impact of Event Scale: A measure of subjective stress. Psychosomatic Medicine, 41, 209218.Google Scholar
Hudson, P. (2013). Improving support for family carers: Key implications for research, policy and practice. Palliative Medicine, 27, 581582.Google Scholar
Hudson, P.L., Trauer, T., Graham, S., et al. (2010). A systematic review of instruments related to family caregivers of palliative care patients. Palliative Medicine, 24, 656668.Google Scholar
Hwang, S.S., Chang, V.T., Alejandro, Y., et al. (2003). Caregiver unmet needs, burden, and satisfaction in symptomatic advanced cancer patients at a Veterans Affairs (VA) medical center. Palliative & Supportive Care, 1, 319329.Google Scholar
Kim, Y., Kashy, D.A., Spillers, R.L., et al. (2010). Needs assessment of family caregivers of cancer survivors: Three cohorts comparison. Psycho-Oncology, 19, 573582.Google Scholar
Kogan, N.R., Dumas, M. & Cohen, S.R. (2013). The extra burdens patients in denial impose on their family caregivers. Palliative & Supportive Care, 11, 9199.Google Scholar
Kristjanson, L.J., Atwood, J. & Degner, L.F. (1995). Validity and reliability of the family inventory of needs (FIN): Measuring the care needs of families of advanced cancer patients. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 3, 109126.Google Scholar
Kubinger, K.D. (2009). Psychologische diagnostik: Theorie und praxis psychologischen diagnostizierens. Göttingen: Hogrefe-Verlag.Google Scholar
Lee, G.L., Woo, I.M.H. & Goh, C. (2013). Understanding the concept of a “good death” among bereaved family caregivers of cancer patients in Singapore. Palliative & Supportive Care, 11, 3746.Google Scholar
Molassiotis, A., Wilson, B., Blair, S., et al. (2011). Unmet supportive care needs, psychological well-being and quality of life in patients living with multiple myeloma and their partners. Psycho-Oncology, 20, 8897.Google Scholar
Park, S.M., Kim, Y.J., Kim, S., et al. (2010). Impact of caregivers' unmet needs for supportive care on quality of terminal cancer care delivered and caregiver's workforce performance. Supportive Care in Cancer, 18, 699706.Google Scholar
Robinson, J., Gott, M. & Ingleton, C. (2013). Patient and family experiences of palliative care in hospital: What do we know? An integrative review. Palliative Medicine. Epub ahead of print. Available at http://pmj.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/05/10/0269216313487568.abstract?rss=1.Google Scholar
Sanderson, C., Lobb, E.A., Mowll, J., et al. (2013). Signs of post-traumatic stress disorder in caregivers following an expected death: A qualitative study. Palliative Medicine, 27, 625631.Google Scholar
Schrank, B., Woppmann, A., Sibitz, I., et al. (2011). Development and validation of an integrative scale to assess hope. Health Expectations, 14, 417428.Google Scholar
Scott, G., Whyler, N. & Grant, G. (2001). A study of family carers of people with a life-threatening illness, 1: The carers' needs analysis. International Journal of Palliative Nursing, 7, 290291.Google Scholar
Sharpe, L., Butow, P., Smith, C., et al. (2005). The relationship between available support, unmet needs and caregiver burden in patients with advanced cancer and their carers. Psycho-Oncology, 14, 102114.Google Scholar
Stenberg, U., Ruland, C.M. & Miaskowski, C. (2010). Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer. Psycho-Oncology, 19, 10131025.Google Scholar
Wanzer, S.H., Federman, D.D., Adelstein, S.J., et al. (1989). The physician's responsibility toward hopelessly ill patients: A second look. The New England Journal of Medicine, 320, 844849.Google Scholar
Wen, K.-Y. & Gustafson, D. (2004). Needs assessment for cancer patients and their families. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 2, 11.Google Scholar
Williams, A.-L. & McCorkle, R. (2011). Cancer family caregivers during the palliative, hospice, and bereavement phases: A review of the descriptive psychosocial literature. Palliative & Supportive Care, 9, 315325.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) (2013). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Available at http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/research_tools/translation/en/.Google Scholar