Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T00:23:36.718Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Remarkable differences in the presence of the acanthocephalan parasite Echinorhynchus truttae in brown trout (Salmo trutta) captured in two adjacent river basins in Galicia (NW Spain)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2018

Seila Couso-Pérez
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Parasitology, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Campus Vida, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
Antonio Cañizo-Outeiriño
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Parasitology, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Campus Vida, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
Rainer Campo-Ramos
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Parasitology, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Campus Vida, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
Elvira Ares-Mazás
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Parasitology, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Campus Vida, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
Hipólito Gómez-Couso*
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Parasitology, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Campus Vida, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain Institute of Food Research and Analysis, University of Santiago de Compostela, 15782 Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
*
Author for correspondence: Hipólito Gómez-Couso, E-mail: hipolito.gomez@usc.es
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This is the first report on the presence of acanthocephalan parasite Echinorhynchus truttae in brown trout (Salmo trutta) from Spain. A total of 343 fish were captured by local anglers from 19 rivers in the adjacent Tambre and Ulla watersheds in Galicia (north-western Spain). Macroscopic and microscopic analyses of the intestinal contents revealed the presence of adults and/or eggs of E. truttae in 53 of the 123 trout from Tambre river basin (43.1%). By contrast, parasitic forms of this acanthocephalan were only observed in eight of the 220 fish from Ulla basin (3.6%), showing significant differences between the prevalences obtained in two adjacent watersheds (P < 0.001, odds ratio 19.0). Prevalence was significantly higher in specimens >3 years (length >26.0 cm) than in younger specimens (P < 0.05). The absence of Gammarus pulex in the region suggests that native gammarid species in Galicia (Echinogammarus lusitanicus and Echinogammarus beriyoni) may act as intermediate host in the life cycle of E. truttae. Different prevalences of E. truttae indicate that the presence/abundance of the intermediate crustacean host may be different in the two river basins, probably as a consequence of various abiotic factors and anthropogenic activities.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2018

Introduction

Rivers are continually undergoing changes that are closely linked to adjacent terrestrial ecosystems. Eutrophication of fluvial ecosystems as a result of anthropogenic activity (e.g. discharge of urban and industrial wastewaters and the use of fertilizers and pesticides in agriculture) leads to important changes in aquatic communities (zooplanktonic, benthic and fish communities) and loss of biodiversity (Gilbert and Avenant-Oldewage, Reference Gilbert and Avenant-Oldewage2017). Environmental conditions can also directly or indirectly affect the presence of parasitic organisms (mainly those parasites with complex life cycles) due to changes in the abundance and distribution of the respective intermediate and definitive hosts (Sures, Reference Sures2004).

Echinorhynchus truttae Schrank, 1788, an acanthocephalan parasite of salmonids, is known to infect a variety of species, including brown trout (Salmo trutta), one of the most important species of freshwater fish in Europe and of high economic value. This parasite is found throughout Europe (including Ireland and the British Islands) and its range extends across Siberia to the Bering Strait (Wayland, Reference Wayland2013). The life cycle of E. truttae requires two hosts. Fish act as final hosts for the adult worms, which inhabit the digestive tract, and amphipods, such as Gammarus, act as the intermediate hosts that harbour the infective form (cystacanth). The life cycle is completed when the infected crustaceans are eaten by an appropriate definitive host (Crompton and Nickol, Reference Crompton and Nickol1985; Kennedy, Reference Kennedy2006).

During a large study of the parasitic fauna of brown trout captured in several rivers in north-western (NW) Spain, remarkable differences in the presence of E. truttae were observed. This work provided data on the prevalence, mean intensity and mean abundance of this acanthocephalan parasite in specimens of S. trutta captured in the adjacent Tambre and Ulla river basins in Galicia and constitutes the first report of this acanthocephalan in Spain.

Materials and methods

This study was carried out in 19 rivers belonging to Tambre (n = 10) and Ulla (n = 9) river basins, located on the Atlantic side of Galicia (NW Spain). The Tambre river is 125 km long and the surrounding basin covers an area of 1530 km2, with an elongation ratio of 0.34. The Ulla river is 132 km long and drains an area of 2803 km2, with an elongation ratio of 0.45 (Río Barja and Rodríguez Lestegás, Reference Río Barja and Rodríguez Lestegás1992) (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1. Geographical location of the rivers in the Tambre and Ulla basins (Galicia, NW Spain) where brown trout specimens (Salmo trutta) were captured. (1) Tambre, (2) Barcala, (3) Dubra, (4) Oufín, (5) Paradela, (6) Lengüelle, (7) Sionlla, (8) Samo, (9) Gaiteiro, (10) Cabalar, (11) Ulla, (12) Rois, (13) Sar, (14) Liñares, (15) Toxa, (16) Iso, (17) Boente, (18) Furelos, (19) Pambre. Echinorhynchus truttae presence.

During the 2015 fishing season (15 March–15 August), a total of 343 specimens of brown trout (S. trutta) were captured by local anglers, who removed the gastrointestinal tracts from the fish and stored them in hermetically sealed plastic bags at −20° C, before sending them to the Laboratory of Parasitology in the Faculty of Pharmacy (University of Santiago de Compostela) for analysis. The anglers also provided data such as the length of the fish and the river where they were caught. Fish age was estimated from length as described by Sánchez-Hernández et al. (Reference Sánchez-Hernández, Servia, Vieira-Lanero, Barca-Bravo and Cobo2012) for specimens captured in the same study area: 19.0–19.1 cm (<2 years); 19.2–25.9 cm (2–3 years); >26.0 cm (>3 years).

The intestines were opened longitudinally and the adult forms of E. truttae were removed, washed with physiological saline solution and conserved in 70% ethanol. The parasites were stained with lactophenol cotton blue and identified following Crompton and Nickol (Reference Crompton and Nickol1985) and Buchmann and Bresciani (Reference Buchmann and Bresciani2001). The intestinal contents were also removed and ground in a mortar with 0.04 M phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.2. The homogenates thus obtained were filtered through a set of two sieves (mesh size 150 and 45 µm) before being subjected to diphasic concentration in PBS (0.04 M pH 7.2)/diethyl ether (2:1) by centrifugation at 1250 g , 4 °C, for 15 min. The supernatants were carefully discarded, and the concentration step was repeated until lipid-free sediments were obtained. Aliquots of 10 µL of the sediments were examined under bright field microscopy (×200 magnification) (AX70, Olympus Optical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Prevalence rates, mean intensities and mean abundances of adults and eggs were used to describe the parasite infection according to Bush et al. (Reference Bush, Lafferty, Lotz and Shostak1997).

Statistical analyses were performed with Statgraphics® Centurion XVI v.16.2.04 Statistical Software (©1982–2013 StatPoint Technologies, Inc., Warrenton, VA, USA). Differences in the prevalence rates in relation to the river basin and fish age were investigated using Fisher's exact test and the χ 2 test. The mean intensities and mean abundances were compared by Mann–Whitney test. Differences were considered statistically significant at P < 0.05.

Results

Macroscopic and microscopic analysis of the intestinal contents of 343 brown trout revealed the presence of adults and/or eggs of E. truttae in 53 of the 123 trout from Tambre river basin (43.1%). By contrast, parasitic forms of this acanthocephalan parasite were only observed in eight of the 220 fish from the Ulla basin (3.6%), showing significant differences between the prevalences obtained in two adjacent watersheds (P < 0.001; odds ratio 19.0). The mean intensity and mean abundance of adult forms also differed significantly between the two river basins studied (P < 0.01) (Table 1). Furthermore, E. truttae was found in trout captured in all sampled rivers in the Tambre basin (n = 10), whereas the parasite was only detected in trout from four of the nine rivers sampled in the Ulla basin (Fig. 1).

Table 1. Prevalence, mean intensity and mean abundance of Echinorhynchus truttae in brown trout (Salmo trutta) captured in two adjacent river basins in Galicia (NW Spain) in relation to the length and estimated age of the fish specimens

N, number of trout; P, prevalence (%); MI, mean intensity (adults/infected trout); MA, mean abundance (adults/examined trout); SD, standard deviation.

a Estimated according to the length of the fish following Sánchez-Hernández et al. Reference Sánchez-Hernández, Servia, Vieira-Lanero, Barca-Bravo and Cobo2012.

b Minimun legal size = 19.0 cm.

Regarding the age of the specimens, both the prevalence and mean abundance of E. truttae adults in trout captured from Tambre river basin were significantly higher in fish older than 3 years that in younger trout (<2 and 2–3 years) (P < 0.05) (Table 1).

Discussion

Since the last quarter of the 20th century, when Cordero del Campillo and Álvarez Pellitero (Reference Cordero del Campillo and Álvarez Pellitero1976) mentioned the presence of acanthocephalan species in brown trout (S. trutta) captured in Galician rivers, no data have been made available on these parasites in the geographical area considered in the present study. Álvarez Pellitero (Reference Álvarez Pellitero1979) carried out a wide study on 1205 trout from several rivers in León, a region close to Galicia. However, this researcher did not detect any acanthocephalan parasites in the trout. To our knowledge, the present study is the first study providing data on the prevalence, mean intensity and mean abundance of E. truttae in brown trout in Spain.

The prevalences of infection by E. truttae, determined after macroscopic and microscopic examination of the intestines of 123 and 220 trout from Tambre and Ulla basins, were 43.1 and 3.6%, respectively. These values are within the range described for the same host in different areas of Europe. Thus, the prevalence of infection ranged between 5.5 and 93.3% for ten of 21 locations studied in Central Scotland (Dorucu et al. Reference Dorucu, Crompton, Huntingford and Walters1995), while the prevalence rates of 1.9, 17.4 and 47.1% were reported for trout captured in three streams in northern Italy (Dezfuli et al. Reference Dezfuli, Giari, Biaggi and Poulin2001). Recently, in Turkey, Amin et al. (Reference Amin, Heckmann, Evans and Tepe2016) reported a prevalence rate of 84.5% for Echinorhynchus baeri in S. trutta. By contrast, acanthocephalan species were not detected in 140 trout captured in four Irish lakes (Byrne et al. Reference Byrne, Grey, Holland and Poole2000) or in 484 fish captured in ten hydrographic drainage basins in the Mediterranean island of Corsica (Quilchini et al. Reference Quilchini, Foata, Mouillot, Mattei and Marchand2010).

The effect of the fish size on both the abundance and richness of helminth parasites is well documented (Guégan and Hugueny, Reference Guégan and Hugueny1994). Higher prevalence and abundance in older trout can be attributed to a higher infection risk than younger specimens because older fish are exposed to infective prey for a longer time period and, also, larger fish ingest greater amounts of prey. Dezfuli et al. (Reference Dezfuli, Giari, Biaggi and Poulin2001) observed that the number of E. truttae adults per fish was significantly correlated with fish length in one of the three streams studied in northern Italy. Similarly, in our study, the percentage of positive samples and the number of E. truttae adults per fish were higher in trout of length >26 cm than in smaller specimens. This correlation was observed in trout captured in the Tambre basin, but it was not detected in specimens from the Ulla basin, possibly due to the small number of positive samples obtained from this river basin.

The diet of trout is mainly determined by habitat, season, prey availability and ontogeny (Knutsen et al. Reference Knutsen, Knutsen, Gjosaeter and Jonsson2001; Lehane et al. Reference Lehane, Walsh, Giller and O'Halloran2001; Lagarrigue et al. Reference Lagarrigue, Céréghino, Lim, Reyes-Marchánt, Chappaz, Lavandier and Belaud2002). As the fish grow, their diet changes both qualitatively and quantitatively and they feed on larger macroinvertebrates as well as on other more energetically valuable prey (Oscoz et al. Reference Oscoz, Escala and Campos2000) and, therefore, having higher risk of acquiring parasitic infection through the trophic chain. Prey selection by trout can also play a role in the pattern of E. truttae infection. However, Sánchez Hernández (Reference Sánchez Hernández2009) concluded, after the study of stomach contents of brown trout captured from rivers in the Tambre and Ulla basins, that the feeding of the trout of this geographical area is determined by the most abundant and widely distributed prey through the river.

The parasitization of S. trutta by the acanthocephalan parasite E. truttae implies ingestion of gammarid amphipods harbouring the cystacanth form. This infective form can modify the crustacean behaviour so that it reacts differently to light, becoming more positively phototropic, active and swimming closer to the water surface. The crustaceans thus become more conspicuous to fish and more vulnerable to predation by the definitive host (Fielding et al. Reference Fielding, MacNeil, Dick, Elwood, Riddell and Dunnam2003; MacNeil et al. Reference MacNeil, Fielding, Hume, Dick, Elwood, Hatcher and Dunnam2003; Lagrue et al. Reference Lagrue, Güvenatam and Bollache2013). Unfortunately, we do not have any data on the parasite status of the gammarid amphipod. However, the different prevalence rates of E. truttae suggest that the presence/abundance of the crustacean that acts as the intermediate host may be different in the two river basins. This is supported by information provided by the Environmental Observation Network of Environmental Laboratory (ROAGA-LMAG, Xunta de Galicia) (http://siam.xunta.gal/roaga-lma-descricion) on benthic macroinvertebrate fauna inhabiting several water bodies in the Tambre and Ulla river basins, indicating a higher abundance of gammarids in the Tambre basin (data not shown). Moreover, differences in the prevalence rates of helminth parasites in fish from close water bodies were observed by other authors. Hartvigsen and Kennedy (Reference Hartvigsen and Kennedy1993) carried out studies on composition and richness of helminth communities in S. trutta from ten water reservoirs situated close to each other in a well-defined region of south-west England, and observed that local factors promoting distinctiveness have a greater influence than regional factors which induce similarity.

According to previous reports, the amphipods involved in the biological cycle of E. truttae are species of the genus Gammarus, specifically Gammarus pulex (Crompton and Nickol, Reference Crompton and Nickol1985; Kennedy, Reference Kennedy2006). Although we did not find any reference to the presence of this species in freshwater environments in the Iberian Peninsula, at least ten other species of the genus Gammarus have been described (García and Jaume, Reference García and Jaume2008). The Gammaridae family is the most common group of crustaceans in freshwater environments in Galicia, with Echinogammarus lusitanicus being the most abundant species, although Echinogammarus beriyoni is also present in the middle and low stretches of the rivers (González González and Cobo Gradín, Reference González González and Cobo Gradín2006). As occurs in Ireland with the indigenous Gammarus duebeni (MacNeil et al. Reference MacNeil, Dick and Elwood2000; Prenter et al. Reference Prenter, MacNeil, Dick, Riddell and Dunn2004), our findings suggest that native Galician gammarid species may act as intermediate hosts of E. truttae, although this remains to be confirmed.

Finally, the remarkable difference in the prevalence of E. truttae in brown trout captured in Tambre and Ulla basins may be a consequence of various conditions such as lack of oxygen due to organic pollution and low pH (Meijering, Reference Meijering1991), temperature and salinity changes (Foucreau et al. Reference Foucreau, Cottin, Piscart and Hervant2014; Vereshchagina et al. Reference Vereshchagina, Lubyaga, Shatilina, Bedulina, Gurkov, Axenov-Gribanov, Baduev, Kondrateva, Gubanov, Zadereev, Sokolova and Timofeyev2016), recognized as important factors which influence and alter natural distribution of gammarid amphipods, intermediate hosts for this acanthocephalan parasite.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank anonymous local anglers for their collaboration and the Environmental Observation Network of Environmental Laboratory (ROAGA-LMAG, Xunta de Galicia) for providing information about benthic macroinvertebrate communities.

Financial support

The study was funded by the Autonomous Government of Galicia (grants GPC2014/069 and ED431C 2017/31).

Conflict of interest

None.

References

Álvarez Pellitero, MP (1979). Helmintosis de la trucha en León. PhD Thesis, University of León, León, Spain.Google Scholar
Amin, OM, Heckmann, RA, Evans, RP and Tepe, Y (2016) A description of Echinorhynchus baeri Kostylew, 1928 (Acanthocephala: Echinorhynchidae) from Salmo trutta in Turkey, with notes on synonymy, geographical origins, geological history, molecular profile, and X-ray microanalysis. Parasite 23, 56. doi: 10.1051/parasite/2016067.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buchmann, K and Bresciani, J (2001) An Introduction to Parasitic Diseases of Freshwater Trout, 1st edn. Frederiksberg, Denmark: DSR Publishers.Google Scholar
Bush, AO, Lafferty, KD, Lotz, JM and Shostak, AW (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. Revisited. Journal of Parasitology 83, 575583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrne, CJ, Grey, C, Holland, C and Poole, R (2000) Parasite community similarity between four Irish lakes. Journal of Helminthology 74, 301305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022149X00000445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cordero del Campillo, M and Álvarez Pellitero, MP (1976) Los Parásitos de las Truchas en España. In Grupo Sindical de Piscicultores (ed.). Tratado de Piscicultura. I Jornadas Nacionales de la Trucha. León, Spain: SINA, pp. 507523.Google Scholar
Crompton, DWT and Nickol, BB (1985) Biology of the Acanthocephala, 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Dezfuli, BS, Giari, L, Biaggi, DS and Poulin, R (2001) Associations and interactions among intestinal helminths of the brown trout, Salmo trutta, in northern Italy. Journal of Helminthology 75, 331336. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X01000518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dorucu, M, Crompton, DWT, Huntingford, FA and Walters, DE (1995) The ecology of endoparasitic helminth infections of brown trout (Salmo trutta) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in Scotland. Folia Parasitologica 42, 2935.Google Scholar
Fielding, NJ, MacNeil, C, Dick, JTA, Elwood, RW, Riddell, G and Dunnam, AM (2003) Effects of the acanthocephalan parasite Echinorhynchus truttae on the feeding ecology of Gammarus pulex (Crustacea: Amphipoda). Journal of Zoology, London 261, 321325. doi: 10.1017/S0952836903004230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foucreau, N, Cottin, D, Piscart, C and Hervant, F (2014) Physiological and metabolic responses to rising temperature in Gammarus pulex (Crustacea) populations living under continental or Mediterranean climates. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology, Part A 168, 6975. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpa.2013.11.006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
García, L and Jaume, D (2008) Fauna ibérica. Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (MNCN) – Centro Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad (MINECO) Spain. In: Available at http://www.faunaiberica.mncn.csic.es/faunaib/arthropoda/crustacea/amphipoda.php. Accessed 27 November 2017.Google Scholar
Gilbert, BM and Avenant-Oldewage, A (2017) Parasites and pollution: the effectiveness of tiny organisms in assessing the quality of aquatic ecosystems, with a focus on Africa. Environmental Science and Pollution Research International 24, 1874218769. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-9481-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
González González, MA and Cobo Gradín, F (2006) Macroinvertebrados de las Aguas Dulces de Galicia. Hércules de Ediciones, A Coruña, Spain.Google Scholar
Guégan, JF and Hugueny, B (1994) A nested parasite species subset pattern in tropical fish: host as major determinant of parasite infracommunity structure. Oecologia 100, 184189. doi: 10.1007/BF00317145.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hartvigsen, R and Kennedy, CR (1993) Patterns in the composition and richness of helminth communities in brown trout, Salmo trutta, in a group of reservoirs. Journal of Fish Biology 43, 603615. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.1993.tb00443.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, CR (2006) Ecology of the Acanthocephala. 1st edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knutsen, JA, Knutsen, H, Gjosaeter, J and Jonsson, B (2001) Food of anadromous brown trout at sea. Journal of Fish Biology 59, 553–543. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2001.tb02359.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagarrigue, T, Céréghino, R, Lim, P, Reyes-Marchánt, P., Chappaz, R., Lavandier, P. and Belaud, A. (2002) Diel and seasonal variations in brown trout (Salmo trutta) feeding patterns and relationship with invertebrate drift under natural and hydropeaking conditions in a mountain stream. Aquatic Living Resources 15, 129137. doi: 10.1016/S0990-7440(02)01152-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lagrue, C, Güvenatam, A and Bollache, L (2013) Manipulative parasites may not alter intermediate host distribution but still enhance their transmission: field evidence for increased vulnerability to definitive host and non-host predator avoidance. Parasitology 140, 258265. doi: 10.1017/S0031182012001552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehane, BM, Walsh, B, Giller, PS and O'Halloran, J (2001) The influence of small-scale variation in habitat on winter trout distribution and diet in an afforested catchment. Aquatic Ecolology 61, 6171. doi: 10.1023/A:1011467711628.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacNeil, C, Dick, JTA and Elwood, RW (2000) Differential physico-chemical tolerances of amphipod species revealed by field transplantations. Oecologia 124, 17. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00008864.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacNeil, C, Fielding, NJ, Hume, KD, Dick, JTA, Elwood, RW, Hatcher, MJ and Dunnam, AM (2003) Parasite altered micro-distribution of Gammarus pulex (Crustacea: Amphipoda). International Journal for Parasitology 33, 5764. doi: 10.1016/S0020-7519(02)00229-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meijering, MPD (1991) Lack of oxygen and low pH as limiting factors for Gammarus in Hessian brooks and rivers. Hydrobiologia 223, 159169. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00047637.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oscoz, J, Escala, MC and Campos, F (2000) La alimentación de la trucha común (Salmo trutta L., 1758) en un río de Navarra (N. España). Limnetica 18, 2935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prenter, J, MacNeil, C, Dick, JTA, Riddell, GE and Dunn, AM (2004) Lethal and sublethal toxicity of ammonia to native, invasive, and parasitized freshwater amphipods. Water Research 38, 28472850. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2004.03.042.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Quilchini, Y, Foata, J, Mouillot, D, Mattei, J and Marchand, B (2010) The influence of altitude, hydrographic network and season on brown trout parasites in Corsica using indicator species analysis. Journal of Helminthology 84, 1319. doi: 10.1017/S0022149X09990101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Río Barja, FJ and Rodríguez Lestegás, F (1992) Os Ríos Galegos. Morfoloxía e réxime. Consello da Cultura Galega, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.Google Scholar
Sánchez Hernández, J (2009) Biología de la alimentación de la trucha común (Salmo trutta Linné, 1758) en los ríos de Galicia. PhD Thesis, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Hernández, J, Servia, MJ, Vieira-Lanero, R, Barca-Bravo, S and Cobo, F (2012) Reference data on the growth and population parameters of brown trout in siliceous rivers of Galicia (NW Spain). Limnetica 31, 267282.Google Scholar
Sures, B (2004) Environmental parasitology: relevancy of parasites in monitoring environmental pollution. Trends in Parasitology 20, 170177. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2004.01.014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vereshchagina, KP, Lubyaga, YA, Shatilina, Z, Bedulina, D, Gurkov, A, Axenov-Gribanov, DV, Baduev, B, Kondrateva, ES, Gubanov, M, Zadereev, E, Sokolova, I and Timofeyev, M (2016) Salinity modulates thermotolerance, energy metabolism and stress response in amphipods Gammarus lacustris . PeerJ 4, e2657. Doi: 10.7717/peerj.2657.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wayland, MT (2013) Morphological variation in Echinorhynchus truttae Schrank, 1788 and the E. bothniensis Zdzitowiecki & Valtonen, 1987 species complex from freshwater fishes of Northern Europe. Biodiversity Data Journal 1, e975. doi: 10.3897/BDJ.1.e975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Geographical location of the rivers in the Tambre and Ulla basins (Galicia, NW Spain) where brown trout specimens (Salmo trutta) were captured. (1) Tambre, (2) Barcala, (3) Dubra, (4) Oufín, (5) Paradela, (6) Lengüelle, (7) Sionlla, (8) Samo, (9) Gaiteiro, (10) Cabalar, (11) Ulla, (12) Rois, (13) Sar, (14) Liñares, (15) Toxa, (16) Iso, (17) Boente, (18) Furelos, (19) Pambre. Echinorhynchus truttae presence.

Figure 1

Table 1. Prevalence, mean intensity and mean abundance of Echinorhynchus truttae in brown trout (Salmo trutta) captured in two adjacent river basins in Galicia (NW Spain) in relation to the length and estimated age of the fish specimens