Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:12:02.316Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An experimental investigation of a direct life-cycle in Reighardia sternae (Diesing, 1864), a pentastomid parasite of the herring gull (Larus argentatus)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

A. A. Banaja ,
J. L. James  and
J. Riley
A. A. Banaja
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, The University, Dundee DD1 4HN
J. L. James
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, The University, Dundee DD1 4HN
J. Riley
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, The University, Dundee DD1 4HN
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A direct life-cycle in Reighardia sternae, a cephalobaenid pentastomid of gulls was investigated: the work was prompted by a report of eggs and larvae recovered from the stomach and intestine of a naturally infected gull.

Infective pentastomid eggs were obtained by surgically transplanting maturing female Reighardia, taken from freshly shot wild gulls, into captive recipients. Faecal material from birds thus artificially infected was collected daily and examined for eggs. Eggs were force fed to 33 hand-reared (from eggs or nestlings) juvenile gulls which were selected at random and sacrificed at intervals thereafter and examined for pentastomids.

One hour after infection, primary larvae appear in the body cavity where they moult immediately. They grow steadily and by 27–35 days are sexually differentiated, and by 66 days have copulated. Fertilized females take a further 116 days to produce eggs by which time they are 7·6 cm long.

The complex migrations undertaken by developing larvae in the gull, and the problems of the mechanism of direct transmission, are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 71 , Issue 3 , December 1975 , pp. 493 - 503
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakke, T. A. (1970). Feeding habits of the common gull, Larus canus, in the Agdenes area, Tröndelag. Fauna 23, 253–71.Google Scholar
Bakke, T. A. (1972). Reighardia sternae (Diesing, 1864) Ward, 1899 (Pentastomida: Cephalo-baenida) from the common gull (Larus canus L.) in a Norwegian locality. Norwegian Journal of Zoology 20, 273–7.Google Scholar
Banaja, A. A., James, J. L. & Riley, J. (1975). Some observations on egg production and autoreinfection of Reighardia sternae (Diesing, 1864) a pentastomid parasite of the herring gull. (In press.)Google Scholar
Cohen, A. L., Marlow, D. P. & Gardner, G. E. (1968). A rapid critical point method using fluorocarbons (‘Freons’) as intermediate and transitional fluids. Journal de Microscopie 7, 331–42.Google Scholar
Deakins, D. E. (1973). Occurrence of encysted larvae Raillietiella (Pentastomida) in an adult female. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 92, 287–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dyck, J. (1975). Reighardia lomviae sp.nov., a new pentastomid from guillemot. Norwegian Journal of Zoology 23, 97–109.Google Scholar
Fain, A. (1964). Observations sur le cycle évolutif du genre Raillietiella (Pentastomida). Bulletin de la Classe des Sciences de l'Académie Royale de Belgiques, Series 5, 50, 1036–60.Google Scholar
Fain, A. & Mortelmans, J. (1960). Observations sur le cycle évolutif de Sambonia lohrmanni chez le varan. Preuve d'un developpement direct chez les Pentastomida. Bulletin de la Classe des Sciences de l'Académie Royale de Belgique, Series 5, 46, 518–31.Google Scholar
Faust, E. C. (1927). Linguatulids (order Acarina) from man and other hosts in China. American Journal of Tropical Medicine 7, 311–25.Google Scholar
Gedoelst, L. (1921). Un linguatulid nouvea parasite d'un batracien. Records of the Indian Museum 22, 25–6.Google Scholar
Haffner, K. von & Rack, G. (1965). Neues über die Entwicklung der Pentastomide Reighardia sternae (Diesing, 1864). Zoologische Jahrbücher. Abteilung für Anatomie, Ontogenie der Tiere 72, 419–44.Google Scholar
Hett, M. L. (1924). On the family Linguatulidae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 107–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heymons, R. & Vitzthum, H. G. (1936). Beiträge zur Systematik der pentastomiden. Zeitschriftfür Parasitenkunde 8, 1–103.Google Scholar
Larrousse, F. (1925). Larve de linguatulidae parasite de Bufo mauritanicus. Archives de l'Institut Pasteur de Tunis 14, 101–4.Google Scholar
Lavoipierre, M. M. J. & Lavoipierre, M. (1966). An arthropod intermediate host of a pentastomid. Nature, London 210, 845–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lavoipierre, M. M. J. & Rajamanickam, C. (1973). Experimental studies on the life-cycle of a lizard pentastomid. Journal of Medical Entomology 10, 301–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loher, W. (1960). The chemical acceleration of the maturation process and its hormonal control in the male of the desert locust. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 153, 380–97.Google Scholar
Nicoli, R. M. & Nicoli, J. (1966). Biologie des pentastomides. Annales de Parasitologie Humaine et Comparée 41, 255–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riley, J. (1972). Some observations on the life-cycle of Reighardia sternae Diesing, 1864 (Pentastomida). Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 40, 49–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riley, J. (1973). A redescription of Reighardia sternae Diesing 1864 (Pentastomida: Cephalo-baenida) with some observations on the glandular systems of pentastomids. Zeitschrift für Morphologie 76, 243–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Self, J. T. (1969). Biological relationships of the Pentastomida: A bibliography on the Pentastomida. Experimental Parasitology 24, 63–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, P. R. (1949). Prolonged survival of excised animal tissue in vitro in nutrients of known composition. Journal of Cellular and Comparative Physiology 34, 221–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wingstrand, K. G. (1972). Comparative spermatology of a pentastomid, Raillietiella hemidactyli, and a branchiuran crustacean, Argulus foliaceus, with a discussion of pentastomid relationships. Det Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Biologiske Skrifter 19, 1–72.Google Scholar