Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T06:35:41.158Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Diapause and metamorphosis of the blowfly, Lucilia sericata Meig

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Kenneth Mellanby
Kenneth Mellanby
Affiliation:
Sorby Research Laboratory, The University of Sheffield
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Diapause in Lucilia sericata is caused by unfavourable conditions during the larval or prepupal period.

2. Diapausing prepupae usually contain a higher proportion of dry matter than do normal individuals.

3. Diapause occurs because the corpus allatum (Weismann's ring) is not producing the necessary hormone.

4. Diapause is ended when prepupae are removed from sand to empty tubes. Probably the corpus allatum is stimulated by a nervous reaction; the reaction is not due to an increase in the rate of metabolism.

5. Low temperatures (5° C.) do not affect the hormone, but high ones (35–37° C.) destroy it.

6. Prepupae of Lucilia sericata have salivary glands which are dilated to nearly a quarter the body size. The contents serve as a store of water during diapause.

7. Diapausing prepupae after desiccation drink water and return to their original body weight. The water increases the volume of blood in circulation, and the blood controls the size of the adult produced.

8. Diapause in nature enables the species to survive unfavourable conditions.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 30 , Issue 3 , September 1938 , pp. 392 - 402
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Burtt, E. T. (1937). On the corpora allata of dipterous insects. Proc. roy. Soc. B, 124, 13–23.Google Scholar
Buxton, P. A. & Lewis, D. J. (1934). Climate and tsetse flies: laboratory studies upon Glossina submorsitans and tachinoides. Philos. Trans. B, 224, 175–240.Google Scholar
Cousin, G. (1932). Étude expérimentale de la Diapause des Insectes. Bull. biol. Suppl. 15, 1–341.Google Scholar
Drummond, F. M. (1938). Unpublished work.*Google Scholar
Evans, A. C. (1936). The physiology of the sheep blowfly Lucilia sericata Meig. (Diptera). Trans. Roy. ent. Soc. 85, 363–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fraenkel, G. (1935). A hormone causing pupation in the blowfly Calliphora erythrocephala. Proc. roy. Soc. B, 118, 1–12.Google Scholar
Hodson, A. C. (1937). Some aspects of the role of water in insect hibernation. Ecol. Monogr. 7, 271–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holdaway, F. G. & Evans, A. C. (1930). Parasitism a stimulus to pupation: Alysia manducator in relation to the host Lucilia sericata. Nature, Lond., 129, 598.Google Scholar
Mellanby, K. (1936). Experimental work with the tsetse-fly Glossina palpalis in Uganda. Bull. ent. Res. 27, 611–32.Google Scholar
Roubaud, E. (1922). Études sur le sommeil d'hiver préimaginal des Muscids. Bull. biol. 56, 455–588.Google Scholar
Teissier, G. (1931). Recherches morphologiques et physologiques sur la croissance des Insectes. Thése, Paris, pp. 1–238.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1934). The physiology of ecdysis in Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera). II. Factors controlling moulting and “metamorphosis”. Quart. J. micr. Sci. 77, 193–222.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1936). The function of the corpus allatum in the growth and reproduction of Rhodnius prolixus (Hemiptera). Quart. J. micr. Sci. 79, 92–121.Google Scholar
Yuill, J. S. & Craig, R. (1937). The nutrition of flesh fly larvae Lucilia sericata Meig. II. The development of fat. J. exp. Zool. 75, 169–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar