Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:18:13.697Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Distribution of acephaline gregarines of British earthworms and their comparison with those of other neighbouring European countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

A. O. Segun
A. O. Segun
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Ife, Ile-Ife, Nigeria
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Some monocystids of British earthworms are widely distributed, occurring in hosts which were collected from different parts of the country, whereas others are localized or irregularly distributed.Only nine of the 45 monocystids identified from British earthworms have been reported from similar hosts collected from France, Germany and Sweden. Fourteen others occur in similar hosts collected from one or two of the continental countries and the remaining 22 monocystids appear to be completely absent from continental earthworms.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 65 , Issue 1 , August 1972 , pp. 47 - 53
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1972

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Berlin, H., (1924). Untersuchungen über Monocystideen in den vesiculae seminales der schwedisehen Oligochaeten. Archiv für Protistenkunde 48, 1–124.Google Scholar
Bosanquet, W. C., (1894). Notes on a gregarine of the earthworm (Lumbrious herculeus). Quarterly Journal of Microscopical Science 36, 421–33.Google Scholar
Grassé, P. P., (1953). Traité de Zoologie, tome 1, fase. 2. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Hesse, E., (1909). Contribution à I'étude des Monocystides des Oligochétes. Archives de zoologie expérimentale et générale 3, 27–301.Google Scholar
Leigh-Sharpe, H., (1919). Some observations on Pleurocystis cuenoti, Hesse (1909), a coelozoie parasite of the earthworm. Annals and Magazine of Natural History, series 9, 3, 256–62.Google Scholar
Loubatiéres, R., (1955). Contributions á I'étude des Gregarinemorphes. Annals des science naturelles zoologie 11e, séries 17, 12, 74–201.Google Scholar
Meier, M., (1956). Die Monocystideen fauna der Oligochaeten von Enlangen und Umbegund. Archiv für Protistenkunde 101, 335–400.Google Scholar
Miles, H. B., (1963). The occurrence of acephaline gregarines in some British earthworms. Archiv für Protistenkunde 106, 575–82.Google Scholar
Mulsow, K., (1911). Über Fortpflanzungserscheinungen bei Monocystis rostrata n.sp. Archiv für Protistenkunde 22, 20–55.Google Scholar
Pfeiffer, L., (1891). Die Protozoen als Krankheitserreger. Die Epithelzellen und sparmanutterzellen-Infektion im Hoden des Regenwurmes durch Monocystiden, pp. 37–44. Jena.Google Scholar
Phillips, N. E., & Mackinnon, D. L., (1946). Observations on a monocystid gregarine, Apolocystis elongata n.sp. in the seminal vesicles of Eisenia foetida Sav. Parasitology 37, 65–73.Google Scholar
Rees, B., (1961). Studies on monocystid gregarines. Three Monocystis species including two new species, Monocystis cambriensis and M. lanceata. Parasitology 51, 523–32.Google Scholar
Rees, B., (1963). Studies on monocystid gregarines. Six Apolocystis species including four new species, A. lavernensis, A. perfida, A. rotaria and A. spinosa. Parasitology 53, 491–500.Google Scholar
Ruston, J., (1959). Dirhynchocystis minuta n.sp. gregarine from the seminal vesicles of Liumbricus terrestris L., with a note on the association of Rhynchocystis porrecta Schmdt. Journal of Parasitology 45, 259–61.Google Scholar
Segun, A. O., (1968). Studies on acephaline gregarines in British earthworms—their systematics, occurrence and possible mode of transmission. Ph.D. thesis, University of London.Google Scholar
Segun, A. O., (1971). Acephaline gregarines of earthworms—additions to the British records. Journal of Protozoology, 18, 313–17.Google Scholar