Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T07:52:41.062Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molluscs interfering with the capacity of Fasciola hepatica miracidia to infect Lymnaea truncatula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Niels Ørnbjerg Christensen
Affiliation:
The Danish Agricultural and Veterinary Research Council Parasitological Research Group, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Bülowsvej 13, DK-1870 Copenhagen V, Denmark
Peter Nansen
Affiliation:
The Danish Agricultural and Veterinary Research Council Parasitological Research Group, Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University, Bülowsvej 13, DK-1870 Copenhagen V, Denmark
Flemming Frandsen
Affiliation:
Danish Bilharziasis Laboratory, Jcegersborg Allé 1 D, DK-2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark

Extract

Fasciola hepatica miracidia labelled with radioselenium were used to study aspects of their host-finding capacity by determining radioactivity subsequently taken up by exposed ‘target’ snails (Lymnaea truncatula). Possible interfering effects exercised by a number of non-host snails and bivalves were examined in linear test channels. The infection rate (radioactivity) among ‘target’ snails was markedly lowered when non-host Lymnaea species (L. pereger, L. palustris, L. stagnalis) were interposed as ‘decoys’. The prosobranch Bithynia tentaculata and the bivalve Sphaeriwm corneum exhibited a slight decoy effect whereas pulmonate species like Anisus vortex, Gyraulus albus, Planorbis planorbis, Physa fontinalis did not interfere with miracidial host-finding.

Other experiments showed that miracidia are more strongly attracted towards L. truncatula than L. pereger. Miracidia are not able to penetrate intact egg clusters of L. truncatula.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1976

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Chernin, E. (1968). Interference with the capacity of Schistosoma mansoni miracidia to infect the molluscan host. Journal of Parasitology 54, 509–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chernin, E. & Perlstein, J. M. (1969). Further studies on interference with the host-finding capacity of Schistosoma mansoni miracidia. Journal of Parasitology 55, 500–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Christensen, N. Ø., Nansen, P. & Frandsen, F. (1976). Studies on the infectivity of Fasciola hepatica miracidia to Lymnaea truncatula. Attachment and penetration of miracidia into non-infected and infected snails. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde (in the Press).Google Scholar
Grigoryan, G. A. (1965). Effect of fresh-water molluscs, Physa acuta, on miracidia of Fasciola. Veterinariya 42, 44–6. (In Russian. Abstracted in Helminthological Abstracts (1967), 36, 41.)Google Scholar
Kendall, S. B. (1964). Some factors influencing the development and behaviour of trematodes in their molluscan hosts. In Host–parasite relationship in invertebrate hosts. Symposium of the British Society for Parasitology, vol. n, pp. 5173.Google Scholar
Nansen, P., Christensen, N. Ø. & Frandsen, F. (1976 a). A technique for in vivo labelling of Fasciola hepatica miracidia with radioselenium. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 49, 7380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nansen, P., Frandsen, F. & Christensen, N. Ø. (1976 b). A study on snail location by Fasciola hepatica using radio-isotopically labelled miracidia. Parasitology 72, 163–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neuhaus, W. (1953). Über den chemischen Sinn der Miracidien von Fasciola hepatica. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 15, 476–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed