Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T02:18:08.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Peromyscus populations and their Cuterebra parasites display congruent phylogeographical structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2005

S. NOËL ,
B. ANGERS  and
F.-J. LAPOINTE
S. NOËL
Affiliation:
Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3C 3J7
B. ANGERS
Affiliation:
Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3C 3J7
F.-J. LAPOINTE
Affiliation:
Département de Sciences Biologiques, Université de Montréal, C.P. 6128, Succ. Centre-Ville, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H3C 3J7
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The relationships between populations of the Deer Mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) and the White-footed Mouse (P. leucopus) and their respective Cuterebra parasites were examined. Population genetic structure of hosts and parasites was inferred using cytochrome oxidase mitochondrial sequences of specimens from 7 populations. Genetic analyses revealed that isolation-by-distance applies for P. maniculatus and its associated parasite (C. grisea). A significant correlation was also observed between the genetic distances of these host and parasite species. Furthermore, populations of P. maniculatus and C. grisea from the North and South shores of the St Lawrence River were found to be significantly different. This structure may be explained by the St Lawrence River being a dispersal barrier for both species. A robust analysis of the other species pair (P. leucopus and C. fontinella) could not be performed because of limited sample sizes.

Keywords

bot fliesco-evolutiongenetic population structurehost–parasitemitochondrial DNAphylogeography
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 131 , Issue 2 , August 2005 , pp. 237 - 245
Copyright
2005 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

ALTHOFF, D. M. & THOMPSON, J. N. ( 1999). Comparative geographic structures of two parasitoid-host interactions. Evolution 53, 818–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AQUADRO, C. F. & PATTON, J. C. ( 1980). Salivary amylase variation in Peromyscus – use in species identification. Journal of Mammalogy 61, 703–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
AVISE, J. C. ( 1994). Molecular Markers, Natural History and Evolution. Chapman and Hall, New York.CrossRef
AVISE, J. C., ARNOLD, J., BALL, R. M., BERMINGHAM, E., LAMB, T., NEIGEL, J. E., REEB, C. A. & SAUNDERS, N. C. ( 1987). Intraspecific phylogeography: the DNA bridge between population genetics and systematics. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 18, 489–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
BERNATCHEZ, L. ( 1997). Mitochondrial DNA analysis confirms the existence of two glacial races of rainbow smelt Osmerus mordax and their reproductive isolation in the St. Lawrence River estuary (Quebec, Canada). Molecular Ecology 6, 73–83.Google Scholar
CASGRAIN, P. & LEGENDRE, P. ( 2000). Permute: Multiple regression over distance, ultrametric and additive matrices with permutation test. Département de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal (http://www.fas.umontreal.ca/biol/casgrain/en/labo/permute/index.html).
CASGRAIN, P. & LEGENDRE, P. ( 2001). The R package for multivariate and spatial analysis. Département de sciences biologiques, Université de Montréal (http://www.fas.umontreal.ca/BIOL/Casgrain/en/labo/R/v4/telecharger.html.
CATTS, E. P. ( 1982). Biology of New World Bot Flies – Cuterebridae. Annual Review of Entomology 27, 313–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DOUGLAS, M. E. & ENDLER, J. A. ( 1982). Quantitative matrix comparisons in ecological and evolutionary investigations. Journal of Theoretical Biology 99, 777–795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DYBDAHL, M. F. & LIVELY, C. M. ( 1996). The geography of coevolution – comparative population structures for a snail and its trematode parasite. Evolution 50, 2264–2275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAIRBAIN, D. J. ( 1978). The spring decline in deer mice: death or dispersal? Canadian Journal of Zoology 55, 84–92.Google Scholar
HUELSENBECK, J. P., RANNALA, B. & LARGET, B. ( 2003). A statistical perspective for reconstructing the history of host-parasite associations. In Tangled Trees: Phylogeny, Cospeciation and Coevolution ( ed. Page, R. D. M.), pp. 93–119. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
HUMPHRIES, C. J., COX, J. M. & NIELSEN, E. S. ( 1985). Nothofagus and its parasites: a cladistic approach to coevolution. In Coevolution and Systematics ( ed. Stone, A. R. & Hawksworth, D. L.), pp. 55–76. Oxford University Press, New York.
HUNTER, D. M. & WEBSTER, J. M. ( 1973). Aggregation behavior of adult Cuterebra grisea and C. tenebrosa (Diptera: Cuterebridae). Canadian Entomologist 105, 1301–1307.Google Scholar
JARNE, P. & THERON, A. ( 2001). Genetic structure in natural populations of flukes and snails: a practical approach and review. Parasitology 123, S27–S40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JEROME, C. A. & FORD, B. A. ( 2002). Comparative population structure and genetic diversity of Arceuthobium americanum (Viscaceae) and its Pinus host species: insight into host-parasite evolution in parasitic angiosperms. Molecular Ecology 11, 407–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
JUKES, T. H. & CANTOR, C. R. ( 1969). Evolution of protein molecules. In Mammalian Protein Metabolism ( ed. Munro, H. N.), pp. 21–132. Academic Press, New York.CrossRef
LAPOINTE, F. J. & LEGENDRE, P. ( 1992). A statistical framework to test the consensus among additive trees (cladograms). Systematic Biology 41, 158–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LEGENDRE, P. & LAPOINTE, F. J. ( 2004). Assessing congruence among distance matrices: single-malt Scotch whiskies revisited. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Statistics 46, 615–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LESSINGER, A. C. & AZEREDO-ESPIN, A. M. L. ( 2000). Evolution and structural organisation of mitochondrial DNA control region of myiasis-causing flies. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 14, 71–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MANTEL, N. ( 1967). The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Research 27, 209–220.Google Scholar
MULVEY, M., AHO, J. M., LYDEARD, C., LEBERO, P. L. & SMITH, M. H. ( 1991). Comparative population genetic structure of a parasite (Fascioloides magna) and its definitive host. Evolution 45, 1628–1640.Google Scholar
NADLER, S. A., HAFNER, M. S., HAFNER, J. C. & HAFNER, D. J. ( 1990). Genetic differentiation among chewing louse populations (Mallophaga, Trichodectidae) in a Pocket Gopher contact zone (Rodentia, Geomyidae). Evolution 44, 942–951.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NILSSEN, A. C. & ANDERSON, J. R. ( 1995). Flight capacity of the Reindeer warble fly, Hypoderma tarandi (L), and the Reindeer nose bot fly, Cephenemyia trompe (Modeer) (Diptera, Oestridae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 73, 1228–1238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
NOEL, S., TESSIER, N., ANGERS, B. & LAPOINTE, F. J. ( 2004). Molecular identification of two cryptic species of myiasis-causing Cuterebra by multiplex-PCR and RFLP. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 18, 161–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OTRANTO, D., TRAVERSA, D., GUIDA, B., TARSITANO, E., FIORENTE, P. & STEVENS, J. R. ( 2003). Molecular characterization of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I gene of Oestridae species causing obligate myiasis. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 17, 307–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
PARKER, M. A. & SPOERKE, J. M. ( 1998). Geographic structure of lineage associations in a plant-bacterial mutualism. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 11, 549–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RIDDLE, B. R. ( 1995). Molecular biogeography in the Pocket Mice (Perognathus and Chaetodipus) and Grasshopper Mice (Onychomys) – the late Cenozoic development of a North American aridlands rodent guild. Journal of Mammalogy 76, 283–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
RIDDLE, B. R., HAFNER, D. J. & ALEXANDER, L. F. ( 2000 a). Comparative phylogeography of Baileys' Pocket Mouse (Chaetodipus bailey) and the Peromyscus eremicus species group: historical vicariance of the Baja California Peninsular desert. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17, 161–172.Google Scholar
RIDDLE, B. R., HAFNER, D. J. & ALEXANDER, L. F. ( 2000 b). Phylogeography and systematics of the Peromyscus eremicus species group and the historical biogeography of North American warm regional deserts. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 17, 145–160.Google Scholar
SABROSKY, C. W. ( 1986). North American Species of Cuterebra, the Rabbit and Rodent Bot Flies (Diptera: Cuterebridae). Entomological Society of America, College Park.
SAITOU, N. & NEI, M. ( 1987). The neighbor-joining method – a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Molecular Biology and Evolution 4, 406–425.Google Scholar
SAMBROOK, J., FRITSCH, E. F. & MANIATIS, T. ( 1989). Molecular Cloning: a Laboratory Manual, 2nd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor.
SCHNEIDER, S., ROESSLI, D. & EXCOFFIER, L. ( 2000). Arlequin: a software for population genetics data analysis. Genetics and Biometry Laboratory, Geneva.
SHEPPE, W. ( 1965). Dispersal by swimming in Peromyscus maniculatus. Journal of Mammalogy 46, 336–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SHIFFER, C. N. ( 1983). Aggregation behavior of adult Cuterebra fontinella (Diptera: Cuterebridae) in Pennsylvania, USA. Journal of Medical Entomology 20, 365–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SIMON, C., FRATI, F., BECKENBACH, A., CRESPI, B., LIU, H. & FLOOK, P. ( 1994). Evolution, weighting, and phylogenetic utility of mitochondrial gene sequences and a compilation of conserved polymerase chain reaction primers. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 87, 651–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SMOUSE, P. E., LONG, J. C. & SOKAL, R. R. ( 1986). Multiple-regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Systematic Zoology 35, 627–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SWOFFORD, D. L. ( 2002). PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland.
TAJIMA, F. ( 1989). Statistical methods to test for nucleotide mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123, 585–595.Google Scholar
TESSIER, N., NOËL, S. & LAPOINTE, F.-J. ( 2005). A new method to discriminate the Deer Mouse (Peromyscus maniculatus) and the White-Footed Mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) using species-specific primers in multiplex-PCR. Canadian Journal of Zoology (in the Press).Google Scholar
THOMPSON, J. D., GIBSON, T. J., PLEWNIAK, F., JEANMOUGIN, F. & HIGGINS, D. G. ( 1997). The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 25, 4876–4882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
VAN HORNE, B. ( 1981). Demography of Peromyscus maniculatus in serial stages of coastal coniferous forest. Ecology 63, 992–1003.Google Scholar
WOLF, M. & BATZLI, G. O. ( 2001). Increased prevalence of bot flies (Cuterebra fontinella) on white-footed mice (Peromyscus leucopus) near forest edges. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79, 106–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
WOOD, D. M. ( 1981). Oestridae. In Manual of Nearctic Diptera, vol. 3 ( ed. Mc Alpine, J. F.), pp. 1147–1158. Agriculture Canada, Ottawa.
WRIGHT, S. ( 1943). Isolation by distance. Genetics 28, 114–138.Google Scholar
ZUMPT, F. ( 1965). Myiasis in Man and Animals in the Old World, 1st edn. Butterworths, London.