Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-15T13:53:14.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Pholeter anterouterus Fischthal & Nasir, 1974 (Digenea: Opisthorchiidae) redescribed, together with remarks on the genera Pholeter Odhner, 1914 and Phocitrema Goto & Ozaki, 1930 and their relationship to the centrocestine heterophyids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

J. C. Pearson  and
C. H. Courtney
J. C. Pearson
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, Universty of Queensland, St Lucia, Brisbane, 4067, Australia
C. H. Courtney
Affiliation:
Department of Veterinary Science, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 32611, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Photoleter anterouterus Fischthal & Nasir, 1974, from Pelecanus occidentalis Linnaeus and Pelecanus erythrorhynchos Gmelin from Florida, USA and the ventrogenital complexes of Photoleter gastrophilus (Kossack, 1910) from Delphinus delphis Linnaeus from Queensland, Australia and of Phocitrema fusiforme Goto & Ozaki, 1930 from Alopex lagopus (Linnaeus) and Phoca vitulina Linnaeus from Alaska are redescribed. The genus Photoleter Odhner, 1914 is emended and compared with Phocitrema Goto & Ozaki, 1930 and both genera are compared with members of, and as a result transferred from the family Opisthorchiidae Looss, 1899 to, the subfamily Centrocestinae Looss, 1899, family Heterophyidae Odhner, 1914.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 74 , Issue 3 , June 1977 , pp. 255 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cable, R. M., Connor, R. S. & Balling, J. W. (1960). Digenetic trematodes of Puerto Rican shore birds. New York Academy of science 17, 187–255.Google Scholar
Ciurea, I. (1933). Les vers parasites de ľhomme, des mammifères, et des oiseaux provenant des poissions du Danube et de la Mer Noire. Premier mémoire. Trématodes, famille Heterophyidae Odhner, avec un essai de classification des trématodes de la superfamille Heterophyoidea Faust. Archives Roumaines de Pathologie expèrimentales et de Microbiologie 6, 5–134.Google Scholar
Courtney, C. & Forrester, D. J. (1974). Helminth parasites of the brown pelican in Florida and Louisiana. Proceedings of the Helminthological society in Washington 41, 89–93.Google Scholar
Delyamure, S. L. (1955). Helminthofauna of Marine Mammals (Ecology and Phylogeny). English translation. Israel Program fo Scientific Translations. Jerusalem, 1968.Google Scholar
Dollfus, R. P. (1939). Distome d'un abcès palpé-orbitaire chez un panthère. Possibilitéd'affinités lointaines entre ce distome et les Paragonimidae. Annales de Paristologie humaine et comparée 17, 209–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dollfus, R. P. (1957). Les affinités du genre Pholeter T. Odhner, 1914 (Trematoda, Digenea). Acta Parasitologica Polonica 5, 211–13.Google Scholar
Fischthal, J. H. & Nasir, P. (1974). Somedigenetic trematodes of birds and a mammal from Venezuela. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 41, 178–83.Google Scholar
Forrester, D. J. & Robertson, W. D. (1975). Helminths of rough-toothed dolphins, Steno bredanensis Lesson, 1828, from Florida waters. Journal of Parasitology 61, 922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goto, S. & Ozaki, Y. (1930). Brief notes on new trematodes. III. Japanese Journal of Zoology 3, 73–82.Google Scholar
Kossack, W. (1910). Neue Distomen. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrankheiten und Hygiene. Abteilug 1. Originale 56, 114–20.Google Scholar
Odhner, T. (1914). Die Verwandtschaftsbeziehungen der Trematodengattung Paragonimus Brn. Zoologiska Bidrag 3, 231–46.Google Scholar
Pearson, J. C. (1973). A revision of the subfamily Haplorchinae Looss, 1899 (Trematoda: Heterophyidae) II. Genus Galactosomum. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 266, 341–447.Google ScholarPubMed
Price, E. W. (1932). The trematode parasites of marine mammals. Proceedings of the United States National Museum 81, 1–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, E. W. (1940). A review of the trematode superfamily Opisthorchioidea. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 7, 1–13.Google Scholar
Schmidt-Ries, H. (1939). Die Bisher bei dem kleinen Tümmler (Phocaena phocaena L.) festgestellten Parasiten. Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektionskrandheiten und Hygiene. Abteilung 1. Originale 145, 89–106.Google Scholar
Skryabin, K. I. (1958). Trematodes of Animals and Man, Vol. 14 (in Russian). Moscow: Academy of Science, USSR.Google Scholar
Sogandares-Bernal, F. & Lumsden, R. D. (1963). The generic status of the Heterophyid tremates of the Ascocotyle complex, including notes on the systematics and biology of Ascocotyle angrense Travassos, 1916. Journal of Parasitology 49, 264–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Timon-David, J. (1931). Ésur une tumeru à trématodes de ľ estomac d’un dauphin. Bulletin deľInstitut océanographique. No. 574, pp. 1–11.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1958). Systema Helminthum.InThe Digenetic Trematodes of Vertebrates, Vol. 1. 979 pp. New york: Interscience Publishers.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1971). Synopsis of Digenetic Trematodes, vols. 1 and 2. Tokyo: Keigaku Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Yoshimura, K. (1965). On the trematode species Phocitrema fusiforme Goto & Ozaki, 1930 and Cryptocotyle lingua (Creplin, 1825). Japaness Journal of Veterinary Research 13, 15–18.Google ScholarPubMed