Hostname: page-component-7f64f4797f-8cpv7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-11-04T09:54:29.440Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Report on a Collection of Cestoda, mainly from Egypt. Part III. Cyclophyllidea (Conclusion): Tetraphyllidea

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

F. J. Meggitt
F. J. Meggitt
Affiliation:
University of Rangoon.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A few specimens very badly preserved and pigmented: coating them was a deposit which entirely obscured the internal anatomy and could not be removed. The internal anatomy therefore could not be removed. The internal anatomy therefore could not be elucidated. Length 10*, greatest breadh 0·47. Scolex 0·54 dia. As the only species without a rostellum recorded from this host is A. vaginatus the specimens are listed under that name.

Information

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 20 , Issue 3 , October 1928 , pp. 315 - 328
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1928

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Baylis, H. A. (1926). Some Tetrabothriid cestodes from whales of the genus Balaenoptera. Journ. Linn. Soc. Zool. 36, 161–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braun, M. (1894). Cestoda. In Dr H. G. Bronn's Klassung und Ordnung des Tierreichs, 4, Lfg. 1.Google Scholar
Cameron, T. W. M. (1925). The cestode genus Mesocestoides Vaillant. Journ. Helminth. 3, 33–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1904). Die Tetrabothrien der Säugetiere. Centralbl. Bakt. Abt. 1, Orig. 35, 744–52.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1907). Die Systematik der Ordnung der Cyclophyllidae. Zool. Anz. 32, 289–97.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1909). Die Cestoden der Vögel des weissen Nils. Res. Swed. Zool. Exped. Egypt, 1901, No. 27.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1909 b). Das Genus Biuterina Fuhrmann. Centralbl. Bakt. Abt. 1, Orig. 48, 412–28.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. and Baer, J. G. (1925). Zoological results of the Third Tanganyika Expedition conducted by Dr W. A. Cunnington, 1904–1905. Report on the Cestoda. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 79–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haul, M. C. (1919). The adult taenioid cestodes of dogs and cats, and of related carnivores in North America. Proc. U.S. Nat. Mus. 55, 1–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janicki, C. v. (1906). Studien an Säugetiercestoden. Zeit. f. wissen. Zool. 81, 505–97.Google Scholar
Janicki, C. v. (1918). Neue Studien über postembryonale Entwicklung und Wirtwechsel bei Bothriocephalen. I. Triaenophorus nodulosus (Pall.). Corr.-Bl. Schweiz. Aerzte, 48, 1343–9.Google Scholar
Krabbe, H. (1869). Bidrag til Kundskab on Fuglenes Baendelorme. Dansk. Viden. Selsk. Skr., not. math. Afd. (5), 8, 249–363.Google Scholar
La Rue, G. R. (1914). A revision of the cestode family Proteocephalidae. Illin. Biol. Monogr. 1.Google Scholar
Leiper, R. T. and Atkinson, E. L. (1914). Helminths of the British Antarctic Expedition, 1910–1913. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 222–6.Google Scholar
Leiper, R. T. and Atkinson, E. L. (1915). Parasitic worms, with a note on a free-living nematode. Rep. Brit. Ant. (“Terra Nova”) Exped. 1910, Zool. 2, 19–60.Google Scholar
Meggitt, F. J. (1924). The cestodes of mammals. London.Google Scholar
Monticelli, F. S. (1893). Intorno ad alcuni elminti del museo zoologico della R. Università di Palermo. Nat. Sicil. 12, 167–80, 208–16.Google Scholar
Nybelin, O. (1914). Notizen über Cestoden. I. Ueber Progynolaenia odhneri, einen neuen Vogelcestoden aus Schweden. II. Noch ein Fall von Dinobothrium septaria v. Ben. aus Selache maxima. Zool. Beit. Upsala, 3, 225–30.Google Scholar
Nybelin, O. (1922). Anatomisch-systematische Studien über Pseudophyllideen. Göleborgs Kgl. Vet.-Vitt.-Samm. Handl. Fj. föl. 26, 1–228.Google Scholar
Pintner, T. (1928). Die sog. Gamobothriidae Linton 1899. Zool. Jahrb., Abt. f. Anat. 50, 55–116.Google Scholar
Poche, F. (1925). Das System der Platodaria. Arch.f. Naturg. 41, Abt. A.Google Scholar
Southwell, T. (1925). A monograph of the Tetraphyllidea with notes on related cestodes. Mem. Liverpool Sch. Trap. Med. n.s. 2.Google Scholar
Szpotanska, J. (1925). Étude sur les Tetrabothriides des Procellariiformes. Bull. Acad. Polonaise sci. left., cl. math.-nat. B, 673–727.Google Scholar
Wolffhügel, K. (1900). Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Vogelhelminthen. (Dissert. Basel).Google Scholar
Woodland, W. N. F. (1924 c). On a new Bothriocephalus and a new genus of Proteocephalidae from Indian fresh-water fishes. Parasitology, 16, 441–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodland, W. N. P. (1925). Tetracampos Wedl, 1861 as a genus of the Bothriocephalidae. Ann. Trap. Med. Parasit. 19, 185–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodland, W. N. P. (1927). A revised classification of the Tetraphyllidean cestoda, with descriptions of some Phyllobothriidae from Plymouth. Proc. Zool. Soc. London, 519–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodland, W. N. P. (1927 a). On Dinobothrium Septaria Van Beneden, 1889, and Parabothrium bulbiferum Nybelin, 1922. Parasitology, 13, 231–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar