Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T09:16:45.671Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the behaviour, and development in fish, of Subtriquetra subtriquetra: a uniquely free-living pentastomid larva from a crocodilian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Judith M. Winch  and
J. Riley
Judith M. Winch
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland
J. Riley
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, University of Dundee, Dundee DD1 4HN, Scotland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

The primary larva of the porocephalid pentastomid Subtriquetra subtriquetra, which infects the nasopharynx of Caiman sclerops, is uniquely free-living. Eggs hatch within the nasal passages and the emergent larvae can remain infective to the fish intermediate host for 4–5 days. During this period larvae exhibit very stereotyped behaviour, alternating between a characteristic stationary ‘fishing’ posture and very brief periods of movement. Larval activity increases significantly at 3 days, probably effecting dispersal to a more favourable site for host invasion. Host location is passive and invading larvae penetrate to the swim-bladder where subsequent larval development, which involves 7 moults, occurs. All 8 larval stages are freely mobile in the swim-bladder and possess hooks. Sensilla, disposed in characteristic patterns, are present throughout development, increasing in number to the infective stage; the majority of sensilla are located on sensory papillae.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 93 , Issue 1 , August 1986 , pp. 81 - 98
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, J. H. & Riley, J. (1983). Experimental life-cycle studies of Raillietiella gehyrae Bovien 1927 and Raillietiella frenatus Ali, Riley & Self 1981: pentastomid parasites of geckos utilizing insects as intermediate hosts. Parasitology 86, 147–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, J. H. & Riley, J. (1985). The distribution of cephalic sense organs in four species of Raillietiella (Pentastomida: Cephalobaenida). Parasitology 90, 411–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ali, J. H., Riley, J. & Self, J. T. (1981). A revision of the taxonomy of the blunt-hooked Raillietiella, pentastomid parasites of African, South East Asian and Indonesian Lizards, with a description of a new species. Systematic Parasitology 3, 193–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Banaja, A. A. (1983). Scanning electron microscopy examination of larval Linguatula serrata Frölich (Linguatulidae: Pentastomida). Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 69, 271–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banaja, A. A., James, J. L. & Riley, J. (1975). An experimental investigation of a direct life-cycle in Reighardia sternae (Diesing, 1864) a pentastomid parasite of the herring gull (Larus argentatus). Parasitology 71, 493–503.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Croll, N. A. (1972). Behaviour of larval nematodes. In Behavioural Aspects of Parasite Transmission. (ed. Canning, E. U. and Wright, C. A.). London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Deakins, D. E. (1973). Occurrence of encysted larval Raillietiella (Pentastomida) in an adult female. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 92, 287–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doucet, J. (1965). Contribution a l'étude anatomique, histologique et histochemique des pentastomes (Pentastomida). Memoires Office de la Recherche Scientifique et Technique, Outre-Mer Paris, pp. 150.Google Scholar
Esslinger, J. H. (1962 a). Development of Porocephalus crotali (Humboldt, 1808) (Pentastomida) in experimental intermediate hosts. Journal of Parasitology 48, 452–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esslinger, J. H. (1926 b). Morphology of the egg and larvae of Porocephalus crotali (Pentastomida). Journal of Parasitology 48, 457–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esslinger, J. H. (1968). Morphology of the egg and larva of Raillietiella furcocerca (Pentastomida) from a Colombian snake (Clelia clelia). Journal of Parasitology 54, 411–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fain, A. (1961). Les pentastomides de l'Afrique centrale. Annales de Musee Royal de l'Afrique centrale, Series 8 92, 1–115.Google Scholar
Fain, A. & Mortelmans, J. (1960). Observations sur le cycle evolutif de Sambonia lohrmanni chez le varan. Preuve d'un developpement direct chez les Pentastomida. Bulletin de la Classe des Sciences de l'Academie Royale de Belgiques, Series 5 46, 518–31.Google Scholar
Haffner, K. von. (1926 a). Die Sinnesorgane der Linguatuliden, nebst einer Betrachtung über die systematische Stellung dieser Tiergruppe. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie 128, 201–52.Google Scholar
Haffner, K. von. (1926 b). Sinnesorgane und Metamerie der Linguatuliden. Zoologischer Anzeiger 31, 136–41.Google Scholar
Haffner, K. von., Rack, G. & Sachs, R. (1969). Verschiedene Vertreter der Familie Linguatulidae (Pentastomida) als Parasiten von Saugetieren der Serengeti (Anatomie, Systematik, Biologie). Mitteilungen aus dem Hamburg Zoologischen Museum Institut 66, 93–144.Google Scholar
Hett, M. (1924). On the family Linguatulidae. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London, 107–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, P. D. (1979). The neuroanatomy of Porocephalus crotali Humboldt, 1811 (Pentastomida). Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 98, 114–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keegan, H. L. (1943). Observations on the pentastomid, Kiricephalus coarctatus (Diesing) Sambon, 1910. Transactions of the American Microscopical Society 62, 194–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leuckart, R. (1860). Bau und Entwicklungsgeschichte der Pentastomen nach Untersuchungen besonders von Pent. taenioides und P. dendiculatum. Vol. 6. C.F. Leipzig: Wintersche Verlagshandlung.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nadakal, A. M. & Mohandas, A. (1975). Histochemical studies on the reptilian pentastomid Kiricephalus pattoni (Stephens, 1908) Sambon, 1922 (Porocephalidae: Pentastomida). Rivista di Parassitologia 36, 197–206.Google Scholar
Pearse, A. S. (1920). The fishes of Lake Valencia, Venezuela. University of Wisconsin Studies in Science 1, 5–51.Google Scholar
Riley, J. (1983). Recent advances in our understanding of pentastomid reproductive biology. Parasitology 86, 59–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riley, J. (1986). The biology of pentastomids. Advances in Parasitology (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riley, J. & Self, J. T. (1979). On the systematics of the pentastomid genus Porocephalus (Humboldt, 1811) with descriptions of two new species. Systematic Parasitology 1, 25–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, J. & Self, J. T. (1981). Some observations on the taxonomy and systematics of the pentastomid genus Armillifer (Sambon, 1922) in South East Asian and Australian snakes. Systematic Parasitology 2, 171–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, J. & Self, J. T. (1982). A revision of the pentastomid genus Parasambonia Stunkard and Gandal, 1968; a new generic character, a description of the male, and a new species. Systematic Parasitology 4, 125–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, J. & Spratt, D. M. (1986). Further observations of pentastomids (Arthropoda) parasitic in Australian reptiles and mammals. Australian Journal of Zoology (in the Press).Google Scholar
Riley, J., Spratt, D. M. & Presidente, P. J. A. (1985). Pentastomids (Arthropoda) parasitic in Australian reptiles and mammals. Australian Journal of Zoology 33, 39–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sachs, R., Rack, G. & Woodford, M. H. (1973). Observations on pentastomid infestation of East African game animals. Bulletin of epizootic Diseases of Africa 21, 401–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Salazar, N. P. (1964). A newly reported arthropod parasite in the lungs and body cavity of some Philippine snakes. Philippine Journal of Science 93, 171–8.Google Scholar
Sambon, L. W. (1922). A synopsis of the family Linguatulidae. Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 25, 188–206, 391–428.Google Scholar
Self, J. T. (1969). Biological relationships of the Pentastomida: a bibliography on the Pentastomida. Experimental Parasitology 24, 63–119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silva-Motta, C. A., (1963). Consideracoes sobre sistematica de Linguatulida. Atas da Sociedade de Biologia de Rio de Janiero 7, 9–10.Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. (1891). Bau und Entwicklungsgeschichte von Pentastomum proboscideum Rud. und Pentastomum subcylindricum Dies. Zeitschrift für wissenschaftliche Zoologie 52, 85–157.Google Scholar
Storch, V. & Bockeler, W. (1979). Electron microscopic observations on the sensilla of the pentastomid Reighardia sternae (Diesing, 1864). Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 60, 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas, M. V. (1970). A contribution to the morphology of the eggs and nymphal stages of Porocephalus stilesi Sambon, 1910 and Porocephalus clavatus (Wyman, 1847) Sambon, 1910 (Pentastomida). Revista di biologia Tropicale 17, 27–89.Google Scholar
Varcas, M. V. (1971). Hallazgo de Subtriquetra subtriquetra Sambon, 1922 (Pentastomida) en Costa Rica y su redescripcion. Revista Latinoamericana de Microbiologica, 13, 137–46.Google Scholar
Vargas, M. V. (1974). The biology and taxonomy of Sebekia and Subtriquetra. Proceedings of the Third International Congress of Parasitology, Vol. 2, p. 1021.Google Scholar
Vargas, M. V. (1975). Descripcion del huevecillo, larva y ninfa de Subtriquetra subtriquetra Sambon, 1922 (Pentastomida), y algunas observations sobre su ciclo de vida. Revista di biologia Tropicale 23, 67–75.Google Scholar
Whitfield, P. J., Anderson, R. M. & Bundy, D. A. P. (1977). Experimental investigations on the behaviour of the cercariae of an ectoparasitic digenean Transversotrema patialense: general activity patterns. Parasitology 75, 9–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winch, J. M. & Riley, J. (1986). Morphogenesis of larval Sebekia oxycephala (Pentastomida) from a South American crocodilian (Caiman sclerops) in experimentally infected fish. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 72, 251–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar