Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T04:06:14.915Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Acquired resistance to experimental infections of Schistosoma mansoni in the albino rat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 June 2015

S. R. Smithers
Affiliation:
National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, N. W. 7 and, South East Essex College of Technology, Dagenham, Essex
R. J. Terry
Affiliation:
National Institute for Medical Research, Mill Hill, London, N. W. 7 and, South East Essex College of Technology, Dagenham, Essex

Extract

The host–parasite relationships of Schistosoma mansoni in the albino rat have been studied recently by Ritchie, Garson & Knight (1963) and by Sadun & Bruce (1964). The general findings of these and other workers are that, in rats, the worms are always stunted, although they may pair and non-viable eggs may be found in the liver. The worms remain in the liver and seldom, if ever, migrate to the mesenteries. Ritchie et al. (1963) found that the majority of the worms were eliminated between the 4th and 8th week after infection; this is much sooner than in other experimental hosts. Sadun & Bruce (1964) suggest that rats are particularly suitable and convenient for studies on acquired resistance to S. mansoni; this suggestion is based mainly on the grounds that acquired resistance is more easily demonstrated in animals which show a relatively great degree of innate resistance.

The present work has been undertaken in order to establish whether the immune response in the albino rat is at all similar to that in the rhesus monkey (Smithers & Terry, 1965b). Two features of the host–parasite system have been studied in detail; the elimination of the worms which follows an initial infection and a comparison of the development of acquired resistance following exposure to X-irradiated cercariae with that following exposure to normal cercariae.

A Puerto-Rican strain of S. mansoni, and Sprague–Dawley rats weighing 100–200 g, were used in all experiments. The methods of exposing the rats percutaneously to infection and the recovery of the worms by perfusion have been fully described (Smithers & Terry, 1965 a).

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Dineen, J. K. (1963 a). Immunological aspects of parasitism. Nature, Lond., 197, 268–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dineen, J. K. (1963 b). Antigenic relationship between host and parasite. Nature, Lond., 197, 471–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, L. S., Garson, S. & Knight, W. B. (1963). The biology of Schistosoma mansoni in laboratory rats. J. Parasit. 49, 571–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sadun, E. H. & Bruce, J. I. (1964). Resistance induced in rats by previous exposure to and by vaccination with fresh homogenates of Schistosoma mansoni. Expl Parasit. 15, 3243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithers, S. R. & Terry, R. J. (1965 a). The infection of laboratory hosts with cercariae of Schistosoma mansoni and the recovery of the adult worms. Parasitology, 55, 695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smithers, S. R. & Terry, R. J. (1965 b). Naturally acquired resistance to experimental infections of Schistosoma mansoni in the rhesus monkey (Macaca mulatta). Parasitology, 55, 701.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sprent, J. F. A. (1959). Parasitism, immunity and evolution. In The Evolution of Living Organisms, pp. 149–65. Victoria, Australia: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar