Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:24:21.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The archaeology of apoptosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 October 2006

R. A. KNIGHT
R. A. KNIGHT
Affiliation:
MRC Toxicology Unit, Hodgkin Building, Leicester LE1 9HN.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Human death has been recognised as a significant personal and social event for many thousands of years, and classical archaeologists have revealed the changing complexity of rituals associated with it. The study of cell death, however, is a much more recent event, although many of the molecular pathways involved have now been identified, at least in mammalian systems. In studying the loss of cells, the use of the term ‘death’ is, perhaps, not altogether appropriate both since it carries the cultural resonance associated with bodily death, and because we do not study cell death itself, but rather the processes that lead up to it. Mammalian cell death processes are complex and involve a dynamic equilibrium between death promoting and death inhibiting factors, suggesting that some components of death pathways may have a paradoxical survival function. Since parasites must survive an often hostile environment, they may be a useful model to study whether component molecules of mammalian death pathways originally formed modules of parasite survival strategies, and whether survival and death pathways coevolved.

Keywords

Archaeologyautophagyapoptosisparasites
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 132 , Supplement S1: Programmed cell death and the protozoan parasite , March 2006 , pp. S3 - S5
Copyright
© 2006 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baehrecke, E. H. ( 2005). Autophagy: dual roles in life and death? Nature Reviews in Molecular and Cellular Biology 6, 505–510.Google Scholar
Cuervo, A. M. ( 2004). Autophagy: many paths to the same end. Molecular and Cellular Biochemistry 263, 55–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, D. R. and Kroemer, G. ( 2004). The pathophysiology of mitochondrial cell death. Science 305, 626–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, Z. and El-Deiry, W. S. ( 2005). Overview of cell death signaling pathways. Cancer Biology and Therapy 4, 139–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuma, A., Hatano, M., Matsui, M., Yamamoto, A., Nakaya, H., Yoshimori, T., Ohsumi, Y., Tokuhisa, T. and Mizushima, N. ( 2004). The role of autophagy during the early neonatal period. Nature 432, 1032–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Launay, S., Hermine, O., Fontenay, M., Kroemer, G., Solary, E. and Garrido, C. ( 2005). Vital functions for lethal caspases. Oncogene 24, 5137–5148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzstein, M. M., Stanfield, G. M. and Horvitz, H. R. ( 1998). Genetics of programmed cell death in C. elegans: past, present and future. Trends in Genetics 14, 410–416.Google Scholar
Meylan, E. and Tschopp, J. ( 2005). The RIP kinases: crucial integrators of cellular stress. Trends in Biochemical Sciences 30, 151–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicotera, P., Leist, M. and Ferrando-May, E. ( 1999). Apoptosis and necrosis: different execution of the same death. Biochemical Society Symposia 66, 69–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, X. M. ( 2000). Signal transduction mediated by Bid, a pro-death Bcl-2 family protein, connects the death receptor and mitochondria apoptosis pathways. Cell Research 10, 161–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yousefi, S., Conus, S. and Simon, H. U. ( 2003). Cross-talk between death and survival pathways. Cell Death and Differentiation 10, 861–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar