Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T11:29:49.032Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chloroquine increases Plasmodium falciparum gametocytogenesis in vitro

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 1999

A. BUCKLING
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK
L. C. RANFORD-CARTWRIGHT
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK
A. MILES
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK
A. F. READ
Affiliation:
Institute of Cell, Animal and Population Biology, Division of Biological Sciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH9 3JT, UK

Abstract

Malaria parasites are capable of modulating the diversion of resources from asexual growth to the production of stages infective to mosquitoes (gametocytes). Increased rates of gametocytogenesis appear to be a general response to stress, both naturally encountered and novel. We have previously reported earlier and greater gametocytogenesis in response to subcurative antimalarial chemotherapy in the rodent malaria, Plasmodium chabaudi, in vivo. Using an immunofluorescent assay to detect parasites that had invaded red blood cell monolayers, we demonstrate a 5-fold increase in gametocytogenesis in the human malaria, P. falciparum, in vitro, in response to treatment with the antimalarial drug chloroquine. In all clones used, gametocytogenesis increased with increasing inhibition of asexual growth by chloroquine. Furthermore, there were clone differences in the relationship between stress and gametocyte production, implying the response was genetically variable. This was not, however, associated with chloroquine resistance. The epidemiological significance of these results is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 1999 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)