Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T04:29:37.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A comparative account of the tracheal system of larvae of the horse bot-fly, Gasterophilus intestinalis (De Geer), and of some other dipterous larvae

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

R. J. Tatchell
Affiliation:
The Molteno Institute, University of Cambridge

Extract

1. The tracheal systems of first, second and third instar larvae of Gasterophilus intestinalis are described.

2. The homologies of the conical tracheae of the tracheal organ are demonstrated and explain the apparent disappearance of a complete tracheal metamere.

3. Anomalies in the tracheal system of the anterior segments of Gasterophilus led to an investigation of the tracheal systems of Drosophila, Eristalis, Calliphora, Scatopse and Aëdes.

4. The anterior tracheal system of larval Diptera has been re-interpreted; that of the Cyclorrhapha can be derived from that of the Nematocera without the formation of new tracheae other than a large trachea from the lateral longitudinal trunk to the antero-lateral musculature.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1960

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Carpenter, G. H. & Pollard, F. J. S. (1918). The presence of lateral spiracles in the larva of Hypoderma. Proc. R. Irish Acad. 34, 7384.Google Scholar
Dinulescu, G. (1932). Recherches sur la biologie des gastrophiles. Ann. Sci. Nat. Zool. (10), 15, 1184.Google Scholar
Enderlein, G. (1899). Die respirations Organe der Gastriden. S.B. Akad. Wiss. Wien, 108, 235303.Google Scholar
Gäbler, H. (1930). Die postembryonale Tracheensystems von Eristalis tenax L. Z. Morph. Okol. Tiere, 19, 427–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imms, A. D. (1942). On Braula coeca Nitsch and its affinities. Parasitology, 34, 88100.Google Scholar
Keilin, D. (1944). Respiratory systems and respiratory adaptations in larvae and pupae of Diptera. Parasitology, 36, 166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keilin, D. & Wang, Y. L. (1946). Haemoglobin of Gastrophilus larvae. Purification and properties. Biochem. J. 40, 855–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemnitz, G. A. von (1916). Untersuchungen iiber den Stoffbestand und Stoffwechsel der Larven von Gastrophilus equi (Clark), nebst bemerkungen iiber den Stoffbestand der Larven von Chironomus (Spec?) L. (Physiologischer Teil.). Z. Biol. 67, 129244.Google Scholar
Langeron, M. (1949). Précis de microscopie. Paris: Masson et Cie.Google Scholar
Levenbook, L. (1951). The effect of carbon dioxide and certain respiratory inhibitors on the respiration of larvae of the horse bot-fly (Gasterophilus intestinalis De Geer). J. Exp. Biol. 28, 181202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, J. C. (1909). Ent. Medd. IV, 1 (cited in Keilin, 1944).Google Scholar
Pantel, J. (1898). Cellule, 15, 1 (cited in Keilin, 1944).Google Scholar
Portier, P. (1911). Récherches physiologiques sur des insectes aquatiques. Arch. Zool. exp. gin. 8, 89379.Google Scholar
Prenant, A. (1899). Terminaison intracellulaire et reellement cytoplasmique des trachees chez la larve de l'Oestre du cheval. C.R. Soc. Biol., Paris, 11 série, 1, 507–10.Google Scholar
Prenant, A. (1900). Notes cytologiques. Cellules tracheales des Oestres. Arch. Anat. micr. 3, 293336.Google Scholar
Tappeiner, H. (1883). Die Gase des Verdauungschlauches der Pflanzenpresser. Z. Biol. 19, 228–79.Google Scholar
Thorpe, W. H. (1941). The biology of Cryptochaetum (Diptera) and Eupelmus (Hymenoptera) parasites of Aspidoproctus (Coccidae) in East Africa. Parasitology, 33, 149–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitten, J. M. (1955). A comparative morphological study of the tracheal system of larval Diptera. Part I. Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 96, 257–78.Google Scholar
Wigglesworth, V. B. (1950). A new method for injecting the tracheae and tracheoles of insects. Quart. J. Micr. Sci. 91, 217–24.Google ScholarPubMed