Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:14:29.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A contribution to our Knowledge of the Tapeworms of Poultry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

F. J. Meggitt
F. J. Meggitt
Affiliation:
(From the Research Laboratory in Agricultural Zoology, University of Birmingham.)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The following paper is an account of the results obtained by the study of Cestodes sent to this Department for identification. For the most part, the tapeworms were species with a wide distribution and with many previous records of their occurrence. Among them were several whose anatomy, well-known in many respects, had been inadequately described with regard to characters useful, if not essential, for identification.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 12 , Issue 3 , September 1920 , pp. 301 - 309
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1920

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Diamare, V. (1893). Note su' Cestodi. Boll. Soc. Nat. Napoli. Ser. 1. vii. 9.Google Scholar
Dujardin, F. (1845). Histoire naturelle des Helminthes, ou vers intestinaux. Paris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1906, a). Die Hymenolepis Arten der Vögel. Centrbl. Bakt. Abt. 1, Orig., xli. 440–452.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1906, b). Die Hymenolepis Arten der Vögel. Centrbl. Bakt. xlii. 620–628.Google Scholar
Fuhrmann, O. (1909). Neue Davaineiden. Centrbl. Bakt. xlix. 116–122.Google Scholar
Gough, L. H. (1911). A monograph of the tapeworms of the subfamily Avitellininae, being a revision of the genus Stilesia, and an account of the histology of Avitellina centripunctata (Riv.). Quart. Journ. Micr. Sci., n. s. lvi. 317.Google Scholar
Khitrow, M. S. (1900). Sur la présence de la Cotugnia digonophora à Kharkov et de son parasite ver rond. Trudui Kharkov Univ., xxxv. 27.Google Scholar
Krabbe, H. (1869). Bidrag til Kundskab om Fuglenes Baendelorme. Kgl. Dansk. Vidensk. Selsk. Skrift., R. 5. Naturvid. og math. Afd. 8, vi.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. v. (1905). Helminthen der Russischen Polar-Expedition 1900–1903. Mém. Acad. Imp. Sci., Petrograd, Ser. VIII. Cl. Phys.-Math., xviii.Google Scholar
Lühe, M. (1910). Parasitische Plattwürmer. II. Cestodes in: Die Süsswasserfauna Deutschlands, hgb. Prof. Brauer, Jena, H. 18.Google Scholar
Meggitt, F. J. (1915). A new species of tapeworm from a parakeet, Brotogerys tirica. Parasitology, viii. 42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pasquale, A. (1890). Le tenie dei polli di Massana (descrizione di una nuova specie). Giorn. Internaz. Sci. Med., xii. 905.Google Scholar
Railliet, A. (1893). Traité de zoologie médicale et agricole. 2me éd., Paris.Google Scholar
Ransom, B. H. (1909). The taenioid cestodes of North American birds. Proc. Smith. Inst., U.S. Nat. Mus., Bull. 69.Google Scholar
Stiles, C. W. and Hassall, A. (1896). Tapeworms of Poultry. U.S. Dept. of Agric., Bur. Anim. Indus., Bull. 12.Google Scholar
Wolffhügel, K. (1899). Beitrag zur Kenntnis der Vögelhelminthen. Inaug. Diss., Basel.Google Scholar