Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:06:48.034Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Detection of haplosporidian protistan parasites supports an increase to their known diversity, geographic range and bivalve host specificity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2019

S. A. Lynch*
Affiliation:
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland Aquaculture and Fisheries Development Centre, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
S. Lepée-Rivero
Affiliation:
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
R. Kelly
Affiliation:
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
E. Quinn
Affiliation:
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
A. Coghlan
Affiliation:
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
B. Bookelaar
Affiliation:
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
E. Morgan
Affiliation:
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
J. A. Finarelli
Affiliation:
Area52 Research Group, School of Biology and Environmental Science/Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
J. Carlsson
Affiliation:
Area52 Research Group, School of Biology and Environmental Science/Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
S. C. Culloty
Affiliation:
School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland Aquaculture and Fisheries Development Centre, Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
*
Author for correspondence: S. A. Lynch, E-mail: s.lynch@ucc.ie

Abstract

Haplosporidian protist parasites are a major concern for aquatic animal health, as they have been responsible for some of the most significant marine epizootics on record. Despite their impact on food security, aquaculture and ecosystem health, characterizing haplosporidian diversity, distributions and host range remains challenging. In this study, water filtering bivalve species, cockles Cerastoderma edule, mussels Mytilus spp. and Pacific oysters Crassostrea gigas, were screened using molecular genetic assays using deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) markers for the Haplosporidia small subunit ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid region. Two Haplosporidia species, both belonging to the Minchinia clade, were detected in C. edule and in the blue mussel Mytilus edulis in a new geographic range for the first time. No haplosporidians were detected in the C. gigas, Mediterranean mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis or Mytilus hybrids. These findings indicate that host selection and partitioning are occurring amongst cohabiting bivalve species. The detection of these Haplosporidia spp. raises questions as to whether they were always present, were introduced unintentionally via aquaculture and or shipping or were naturally introduced via water currents. These findings support an increase in the known diversity of a significant parasite group and highlight that parasite species may be present in marine environments but remain undetected, even in well-studied host species.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2019

Introduction

The phylum Haplosporidia consists of 36 recognized species in four genera, Urosporidium, Minchinia, Haplosporidium and Bonamia. Certain haplosporidian species have been credited with causing some of the most serious epizootic marine disease breakouts on record, in particular in shellfish species (Carnegie et al., Reference Carnegie, Arzul and Bushek2016). In recent years, over ten newly detected haplosporidian species have been added to the phylum, including species in the Bonamia and Minchinia lineages (Arzul and Carnegie, Reference Arzul and Carnegie2015). In a previous study, environmental samples (water and sediment) from South Africa, Panama and the UK were molecularly screened, and revealed previously undescribed phylogenetic lineages within the Haplosporidia (Hartikainen et al., Reference Hartikainen, Ashford, Berney, Okamura, Feist, Baker-Austin, Stentiford and Bass2014). Besides their low detection prevalence, a major reason for the lack of detection of novel haplosporidian taxa is thought to be the use of (and increasing reliance on) broadly targeted molecular probes that are unsuitable for the highly divergent genes that characterize parasite groups (Hartikainen et al., Reference Hartikainen, Ashford, Berney, Okamura, Feist, Baker-Austin, Stentiford and Bass2014). Despite these obstacles, novel haplosporidians continue to be discovered in host/carrier species and habitats including the recently detected Haplosporidium pinnae in the fan mussel Pinna nobilis in the western Mediterranean Sea, thus highlighting the possibility that a significant diversity of haplosporidians have yet to be discovered (Lynch et al., Reference Lynch, Villalba, Abollo, Engelsma, Stokes and Culloty2013, Reference Lynch, Morgan, Carlsson, Mackenzie, Wooton, Rowley, Malham and Culloty2014; Arzul and Carnegie, Reference Arzul and Carnegie2015; Pagenkopp Lohan et al., Reference Pagenkopp Lohan, Hill-Spanik, Torchin, Aguirre-Macedo, Fleischer and Ruiz2016; Ramilo et al., Reference Ramilo, Abollo, Villalba and Carballal2017; Catanese et al., Reference Catanese, Grau, Valencia, Garcia-March, Vázquez-Luis, Alvarez, Deudero, Darriba, Carballal and Villalba2018).

Recent discoveries have highlighted that the geographic range of Phylum Haplosporidia is much greater than originally appreciated. Bonamia ostreae, which has caused significant mortalities in the European flat oyster Ostrea edulis, was thought to exclusively occur in the Northern hemisphere in both western and eastern North America and Europe but is now known to extend to the southern hemisphere in New Zealand where it has parasitized the native oyster Ostrea chilensis (Lane et al., Reference Lane, Webb and Duncan2016). Bonamia exitiosa was originally described in O. chilensis in New Zealand (Dinamani et al., Reference Dinami, Hine and Jones1987; Hine, Reference Hine1996) but is now known to have an extensive geographic range in the southern and northern hemisphere and can infect several oyster species (Hill-Spanik et al., Reference Hill-Spanik, McDowell, Stokes, Reece, Burreson and Carnegie2015). Haplosporidium nelsoni, the causative agent of MSX disease in the eastern oyster Crassostrea virginica in North America, was detected for the first time in Irish and Spanish Pacific oysters Crassostrea gigas and in O. edulis in Ireland (Lynch et al., Reference Lynch, Villalba, Abollo, Engelsma, Stokes and Culloty2013). In addition, Minchinia mercenariae, reported to cause infections in the hard clam Mercenaria mercenaria from the Atlantic coast of the United States (Ford et al., Reference Ford, Stokes, Burreson, Scarpa, Carnegie, Krauter and Bushek2009), was detected in the common cockle Cerastoderma edule in the Netherlands (Engelsma et al., Reference Engelsma, Culloty, Lynch, Arzul and Carnegie2014) and the UK (Longshaw and Malham, Reference Longshaw and Malham2013) where it was implicated in host population crashes, and an M. mercenariae-like parasite was recently confirmed in C. edule in Galicia, Spain (Ramilo et al., Reference Ramilo, Abollo, Villalba and Carballal2017).

Parasites in the phyla Haplosporidia have been reported infecting a number of bivalve hosts from across Europe. Species known to infect C. edule are Haplosporidium edule, Minchinia tapetis and M. mercenariae (Longshaw and Malham, Reference Longshaw and Malham2013; Ramilo et al., Reference Ramilo, Abollo, Villalba and Carballal2017) and in mussels Minchinia sp. in Mytilus galloprovincialis along the Mediterranean coast of France (Comps and Tige, Reference Comps and Tige1997), Haplosporidium sp. in M. edulis in Maine (Figueras and Jardon, Reference Figueras and Jardon1991), USA, a haplosporidian-like parasite in M. edulis in Atlantic Canada (Stephenson and McGladdery, Reference Stephenson and McGladdery2002) and Minchinia mytili in Mytilus edulis (Ward et al., Reference Ward, Feist, Noguera, Marcos-López, Ross, Green, Urrutia, Bignell and Bass2019). Lynch et al. (Reference Lynch, Morgan, Carlsson, Mackenzie, Wooton, Rowley, Malham and Culloty2014) assessed the health status of Mytilus spp. around the coasts of Ireland and Wales, and detected a previously undescribed haplosporidian (Haplosporidia sp. SAL-2014) belonging to the Minchinia clade in a single M. edulis from Wales (Lynch et al., Reference Lynch, Morgan, Carlsson, Mackenzie, Wooton, Rowley, Malham and Culloty2014). The sequence of this haplosporidian was most similar to Minchina chitonis detected in the chiton Lepidochitona cinereus and an undescribed haplosporidian species parasitizing the Florida marsh clam Cyrenoida floridana (Reece et al., Reference Reece, Siddal, Stokes and Burreson2004). H. nelsoni has been associated with C. gigas populations in California (Friedman, Reference Friedman1996; Burreson et al., Reference Burreson, Stokes and Friedman2000), Korea (Kern, Reference Kern1976), France (Renault et al., Reference Renault, Stokes, Chollet, Cochennec, Berthe and Burreson2000), Japan (Friedman, Reference Friedman1996; Kamaishi and Yoshinaga, Reference Kamaishi and Yoshinaga2002) and Ireland (Lynch et al., Reference Lynch, Villalba, Abollo, Engelsma, Stokes and Culloty2013). In addition to H. nelsoni, Haplosporidium costale, a species associated with seaside organism (SSO) disease in C. virginica, was recently detected in C. gigas in China for the first time (Wang et al., Reference Wang, Lu, Liang and Wang2010).

The objectives of this study were: determine (1) if Haplosporidia spp. were present in cockles, mussels and oysters at particular sites in Ireland, (2) did coinfection occur and (3) what abiotic and biotic factors associated with site influence and anthropogenic activities, i.e. aquaculture and shipping may influence their presence.

Materials and methods

Study sites, bivalve spp. sampled and site description

A range of Irish coastal sites was sampled with different environmental (abiotic and biotic) factors and anthropogenic influences (aquaculture and shipping) from nature reserve sites to key economic areas influenced by frequent and heavy anthropogenic effects (Table 1, Fig. 1). Multiple samples of cockles (n = 1,604), mussels (n = 516) and oysters (n = 420) were collected from five of the fourteen Irish sites over several months and years resulting in a higher overall number of individuals being screened at those sites. A minimum sample size of thirty individuals was collected on a single occasion from five other sites.

Fig. 1. Map of Ireland showing the sample sites and bivalve species sampled and screened for Haplosporidia spp. at each location during this study.

Table 1. Description of bivalve species, sample sites, months, years and anthropogenic activities at each site, and histology and molecular analyses for Haplosporidia spp

+ Positive detection.

A# denotes Genbank Accession Number exact match to.

a Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) and Special Protected Areas (SPA) under the birds and habitats EU Directive.

Cockle, mussel and pacific oyster samples

Wild C. edule was sampled at a nonculture site (March 2010–June 2011) and at two C. gigas culture sites (April to August 2015) (Table 1). Cultured C. gigas were sampled from both culture sites in 2015. Wild Mytilus spp. were sampled from both culture sites in 2015, from a third culture site in September 2017 and from 11 nonculture sites in May to November 2017.

Histology

A cross section of tissue (mantle, gill, connective, digestive and gonad) was taken from each cockle, mussel and oyster, and was fixed in Davidson's solution for 24–48 h and subsequently stored in 70% ethanol. The fixed tissue was then dehydrated fixed in paraffin cut at 5 µm and stained using haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and mounted in dibutyl phthalate xylene. Slides were examined using a Nikon light microscope at 4×, 10×, 20×, 40× and 100× magnification.

Molecular genetic diagnostic techniques

Genomic deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) from C. edule, Mytilus spp. and C. gigas gill tissue (~5 mm2 from fresh and fresh frozen (−20 °C)) was extracted from each individual using the Chelex-100 extraction method (Walsh et al., Reference Walsh, Metzger and Higuchi1991).

Several polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) using generic and specific primers and thermocycling conditions for Haplosporidia spp. were utilized in the molecular genetic screening. Additionally, a PCR to detect the nuclear DNA markers Me15/Me16 (Inoue et al., Reference Inoue, Walte, Matsuoka, Odo and Harayama1995) was carried out on mussels that amplified a PCR product to determine if they were M. edulis, M. galloprovincialis or hybrids of both parent species.

Two generic PCRs using similar mastermix and thermocycling conditions with primer pair HAP-F1′/HAP-R3′ (Renault et al., Reference Renault, Stokes, Chollet, Cochennec, Berthe and Burreson2000; Lynch et al., Reference Lynch, Morgan, Carlsson, Mackenzie, Wooton, Rowley, Malham and Culloty2014) and ssu980/HAP-R1′ (Molloy et al., Reference Molloy, Giamberini, Stokes and Burrenson2012; Lynch et al., Reference Lynch, Morgan, Carlsson, Mackenzie, Wooton, Rowley, Malham and Culloty2014) to amplify the Small subunit ribosomal deoxyribonucleic acid (SSU rDNA) region of Haplosporidia spp. were carried out on C. edule, Mytilus spp. and C. gigas genomic DNA. A third PCR using specific H. nelsoni MSX-A′/MSX-B′ primers to amplify the small subunit ribosomal ribonucleic acid (SSU rRNA gene) and similar mastermix and thermocycling conditions (Renault et al., Reference Renault, Stokes, Chollet, Cochennec, Berthe and Burreson2000) was carried out on DNA from C. gigas. Negative controls containing double distilled water (ddH2O) were used in each PCR to control for contamination and infected Haplosporidia (B. ostreae, H. nelsoni, Haplosporidia sp. SAL-2014) genomic DNA was used as a positive control. Initially, in the screening of cockles from 2010/2011 no M. mercenariae-like positive material was available as it had not been detected before, however amplification in that single PCR occurred with the cockle deemed positive in the histology and that cockle's DNA was subsequently used as the positive control in the screening of the 2015 samples.

Electrophoresis of amplified products was carried out in a 2% agarose gel and was run with an electrical current of 110 V for 45 min. The expected product size for the HAP-F1′/HAP-R3′ PCR was 350 bp (Renault et al., Reference Renault, Stokes, Chollet, Cochennec, Berthe and Burreson2000), for the ssu980/HAP-R1′ was 430 bp (Molloy et al., Reference Molloy, Giamberini, Stokes and Burrenson2012) and for the MSX-A′/MSX-B′ PCR was 573 bp (Renault et al., Reference Renault, Stokes, Chollet, Cochennec, Berthe and Burreson2000).

Pooled PCR products using replicates (×3) from individual cockles [Flaxfort (n = 1), Dungarvan (n = 1) and Carlingford (n = 1)] using the HAP-F1′/HAP-R3′ primers and mussels (Clonea, n = 1) using the ssu980/HAP-R1′ primers were used to increase the amplicon concentration for Sanger sequencing, as recommended by EurofinsMWG. Both forward and reverse DNA sequences that were optimally generated by EurofinsMWG Sanger sequencing laboratory were matched against the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) nucleotide database with Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLASTn), which finds regions of local similarity between sequences to identify and confirm the DNA being detected in the PCRs. Percentage query coverage in BLAST refers to how much of the query sequence is aligned with results from the database sequence or, in other terms, the size of the sequence fragments that are comparable, while % identity measures the extent to which the nucleotide sequences relate to one another.

Phylogenetic analysis

18S SSU rDNA sequence data for 28 operational taxonomic units from GENBANK (Table 2) were downloaded, to which, the two 18S sequences were added. These data were aligned using Clustal Omega (Sievers et al., Reference Sievers, Wilm, Dineen, Gibson, Karplus, Li, Lopez, McWilliam, Remmert, Söding, Thompson and Higgins2011) at the European Bioinformatics Institute portal (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/). The final alignment was 2221 bp in length. The best-fit evolutionary model for the aligned sequence data was assessed in the jModelTest (v2.1.10; Darriba et al., Reference Darriba, Tabaoada, Doallo and Posada2012), using the small sample corrected Akaike information criterion (Hurvich and Tsai, Reference Hurvich and Tsai1989). This returned the generalized time reversible (GTR) model, with a four-category gamma rate distribution and invariant sites (GTR + G + I) as the best-fit model.

Table 2. Operational taxonomic units from GENBANK used in the phylogenetic analysis

The phylogeny was reconstructed in Mr Bayes (v3.2.5; Ronquist et al., Reference Ronquist, Teslenko, van der Mark, Ayres, Darling, Höhna, Larget, Liu, Suchard and Huelsenbeck2012). A total of 379 base pairs in three distinct regions of the alignment were not able to be unambiguously aligned, and were excluded from the analysis. Two runs of four chains each were run for 5 000 000 generations, saving every thousandth tree. Nodal posterior probabilities were assessed using the 50% consensus tree topology (Huelsenbeck et al., Reference Huelsenbeck, Larget, Miller and Ronquist2002), discarding the first 25% of trees as burnin. Aligned sequences and commands used in the phylogenetic analysis are provided in ***.nex (Supplementary Information).

Resulting forward and reverse sequences were aligned and manually edited to resolve any ambiguities in base calling. The resulting alignments were matched against the NCBI nucleotide database with BLASTn.

Statistics

A χ 2 test was used to determine whether prevalence differences of parasites observed were significant (P values < 0.05) between sample sites in 2015. R packages used were dplyr, tidyr, ggplot2, car and NCStats.

Results

Histology

Cockles

Haplosporidia-like single cell and plasmodia-like life stages identical to those described in Ramilo et al. (Reference Ramilo, Abollo, Villalba and Carballal2017) and a spore-like stage (Fig. 2A–F) were observed in the connective tissues of Irish C. edule in a single individual at Flaxfort the nonculture site in June 2010 [0.11% (1/900)]. Subsequently in 2015, a subsample of PCR positive C. edule at Dungarvan (100% prevalence in the subsample of 10 PCR positive individuals) had positive detection of Haplosporidia-like cells in the corresponding histology section. Similarly in 2015 at Carlingford, Haplosporidia-like cells were observed in the tissues (mainly in the gill, gonad and digestive area, with some physical disruption to the tissues and infiltration of haemocytes) of a subsample of 20 PCR positive individuals (Table 1).

Fig. 2. (A) Large number of haplosporidian spores in the connective tissues of C. edule, (B) & (C) multiple haplosporidia-like sporonts and developing spores respectively in the connective tissues of C. edule, (D) spores in the mantle tissue of C. edule, (E) uninucleate ‘fried egg’ (arrows) and binucleate (arrow head) cells in the epithelium of C. edule and (F) multiple plasmodia in the connective tissues of C. edule.

Mussels

In the M. edulis, haplosporidia-like single cell and plasmodia life stages similar to those described in the cockles were also observed in mussels deemed to be positive in the PCR (Clonea 1.7% (1/60) and Ringaskiddy 3.3% (2/60)). No spores were observed (Table 1).

Molecular genetic screening:

Cockles: A single cockle at Flaxfort Strand deemed to have haplosporidian-like cells visualized in the histology (0.11% prevalence, 1/900) also produced a PCR product (350 bp) (1.7% prevalence, 1/60) with the HAP-F1′/HAP-R3′ primers (Renault et al., Reference Renault, Stokes, Chollet, Cochennec, Berthe and Burreson2000) in June 2010.

Overall, 59 (8.3%, (59/704)) cockles produced a PCR product (350 bp) with the HAP-F1′/HAP-R3′ primers (Renault et al., Reference Renault, Stokes, Chollet, Cochennec, Berthe and Burreson2000) from April to August 2015 at both oyster culture sites – the total prevalence was 4% (10/250) in Dungarvan and 10.8% (49/454) in the Carlingford cockles, which was statistically different (χ 2 = 14.381, df = 1, P value < 0.001). The highest prevalence was detected in the Carlingford cockles in July and in the Dungarvan cockles in April (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Prevalence of M. mercenariae-like parasite in C. edule at the two Irish C. gigas culture sites from April to August 2015.

A single haplosporidian spp. M. mercenariae-like parasite in C. edule at Flaxfort Strand (2010) and at the C. gigas culture sites Dungarvan and Carlingford Lough (2015) was identified in the PCR products amplified in cockles from the three sites [Accession # KY522823.1 (Ramilo et al., Reference Ramilo, Abollo, Villalba and Carballal2017)] with 97% query coverage and 100% maximum identity and are referred to as ‘Isolates 221, 226 and 228’ in this study.

Mussels: No PCR products were produced using both primer pairs (Renault et al., Reference Renault, Stokes, Chollet, Cochennec, Berthe and Burreson2000; Molloy et al., Reference Molloy, Giamberini, Stokes and Burrenson2012) in the wild Mytilus spp. screened at the three culture sites at Dungarvan, Carlingford and Ballymacoda.

Overall, of the 11 nonculture sites screened two sites with 0.5%, (3/580) of mussels produced products (430 bp) using the ssu980/HAP-R1′ (Molloy et al., Reference Molloy, Giamberini, Stokes and Burrenson2012). A total of 6.6% (2/60) of M. edulis from two Ringaskiddy samples [3.3% each, (1/30)] produced products (430 bp) in July 2017 and October 2017 respectively, while a single M. edulis (3.3%, 1/30) at Clonea in September 2017 produced a PCR product. All of these products were identified as Haplosporidia sp. SAL-2014 [Accession # KC852876.2 (Lynch et al., Reference Lynch, Morgan, Carlsson, Mackenzie, Wooton, Rowley, Malham and Culloty2014)] with 98% query coverage and 100% maximum identity and are referred to as ‘Isolate 376’ in this study.

Pacific oysters:

No PCR products were produced using either primer pairs (Renault et al., Reference Renault, Stokes, Chollet, Cochennec, Berthe and Burreson2000; Molloy et al., Reference Molloy, Giamberini, Stokes and Burrenson2012) in the C. gigas screening or in the MSX-A′/MSX-B′ screening for H. nelsoni (Renault et al., Reference Renault, Stokes, Chollet, Cochennec, Berthe and Burreson2000).

Direct sequencing:

The PCR product of the single mussel at Clonea was successfully sequenced however, the PCR products for both mussels at Ringaskiddy were also sent for sequencing but only the reverse sequences (which were a match) were amplified and not the corresponding forward sequence. As both sequences could not be aligned the result was not considered robust.

Due to the cost of sequencing all of the cockle PCR products amplified (n = 60), a subsample of cockle PCR products was sent for sequencing (representative of each sample site and years). Additionally, a similar morphology of each parasite was observed in the cockle and mussel histology for each respective parasite. More recent sequencing of PCR products (n = 40) from additional cockles at each location (study currently being carried out by the authors) has confirmed the findings of this study.

Phylogenetic analyses:

The maximum likelihood phylogeny of haplosporidian taxa conclusively places Isolate 376, which is identical to the undescribed isolate SAL-2014 [Haplosporidia sp. Accession # KC852876.2 (Lynch et al., Reference Lynch, Morgan, Carlsson, Mackenzie, Wooton, Rowley, Malham and Culloty2014)], and Isolates 221, 226 and 228, which are identical to M. mercenariae-like parasite [Accession # KY522823.1 (Ramilo et al., Reference Ramilo, Abollo, Villalba and Carballal2017)], in a clade with species of the genus Minchinia (Fig. 4). Also included in this clade is an undescribed haplosporidian parasite of the Florida marsh clam C. floridana. The internal topology of this clade is fairly well-resolved, with Isolate 376 and the C. floridana parasite being recovered with M. chitonis and M. teredinis with unanimous bootstrap support. The phylogeny also recovers unambiguous support for the monophyly of Urosporidium (Fig. 4). Several of the internal nodes of the phylogeny are poorly supported in the bootstrap (Fig. 4), although, these involve branching events among the Bonamia Group, the Minchinia Group and the paraphyletic genus Haplosporidium.

Fig. 4. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of haplosporidian taxa based on partial 18S SSU rRNA sequences. Branches marked with an asterisk (*) have 100% posterior probability support for that node, otherwise, the nodal support is indicated by the number given. Inset to the bottom right repeats, for clarity, the Minchinia subclade with very small branch lengths, and gives the nodal posterior probabilities for this topology. A well-supported clade includes all of the 18S SSU rDNA sequences assigned to the genus Minchinia, the previously identified parasite of C. floridana (Reece et al., Reference Reece, Siddal, Stokes and Burreson2004), as well as the novel sequences for this study. As has been found in other analyses (Reece et al., Reference Reece, Siddal, Stokes and Burreson2004; Lynch et al., Reference Lynch, Villalba, Abollo, Engelsma, Stokes and Culloty2013; Ramilo et al., Reference Ramilo, Abollo, Villalba and Carballal2017), we find strong evidence for the paraphyly of the genus Haplosporidium.

Discussion

Detection of Haplosporidia spp.

Two haplosporidian species were detected for the first time in C. edule and in M. edulis in a new geographic range. When detected, both Haplosporidia spp. were observed in individual samples of mussels and cockles that consisted of at least 30 individuals. The prevalence of the M. mercenariae-like parasite was significantly greater in C. edule at both aquaculture sites (late spring, summer and early autumn samples) compared to C. edule at the nonculture site (summer sample), which may indicate that the extended presence of this parasite has some association with anthropogenic inputs and activities in these areas. Oyster seed/spat consignments are routinely imported to both culture sites from France and the UK for on-growing in late spring. A low overall prevalence of the M. mercenariae-like parasite was detected in this study, which is similar to that observed in the Ramilo et al. (Reference Ramilo, Abollo, Villalba and Carballal2017) study and for M. mercenariae infecting North American hard clams (Ford et al., Reference Ford, Stokes, Burreson, Scarpa, Carnegie, Krauter and Bushek2009). Haplosporidia sp. SAL-2014 (Lynch et al., Reference Lynch, Morgan, Carlsson, Mackenzie, Wooton, Rowley, Malham and Culloty2014), a novel species first detected in a Welsh M. edulis in 2012, was also detected in this study for the first time at a similar prevalence in wild Irish M. edulis at two nonculture sites. One of those sites is a busy ferry/shipping terminal in Cork Harbour and a ferry between Wales and Cork Harbour was in operation from the 1980s up until recently.

Host partitioning

Interestingly the M. mercenariae-like parasite was not detected in the cohabiting C. gigas nor was it detected in the cohabiting Mytilus spp. Haplosporidia sp. SAL-2014 was exclusively detected in M. edulis even though M. galloprovincialis and Mytilus hybrids were present at the Irish sites where it was detected. This difference in emerging haplosporidian species detection, diversity and abundance in these three bivalve species strongly indicates that these parasite species are host specific and host partitioning is occurring. Additionally, the findings of this study would indicate that the haplosporidian species may be associated more with one environmental niche than another i.e. the sediment rather than with the water column for the M. mercenariae-like parasite, as the cockles were collected on the surface of the sediment and would normally be buried within the sediment similar to clams, while the oysters and mussels were at least 30 cm above the sediment on trestles or rocky outcrops respectively. Hartikainen et al. (Reference Hartikainen, Ashford, Berney, Okamura, Feist, Baker-Austin, Stentiford and Bass2014) identified three new Minchinia-affiliated SSU-types in environmental samples at a single location at Weymouth, SW England, in 2011 and 2012. Two of the Minchina spp. were closely related to M. mercenariae while the third was identical to M. tapetis [both parasites were associated with Welsh cockle mortalities; Longshaw and Malham (Reference Longshaw and Malham2013)]. Hartikainen et al. (Reference Hartikainen, Ashford, Berney, Okamura, Feist, Baker-Austin, Stentiford and Bass2014) observed that Minchinia-affiliated SSU-types were detected in water column samples, strongly indicating a planktonic life-cycle stage (predominantly in the 0.45–20-μm size fraction) and were mostly in the April samples. Findings from this study and the Hartikainen et al. (Reference Hartikainen, Ashford, Berney, Okamura, Feist, Baker-Austin, Stentiford and Bass2014) study would indicate that Minchinia spp. are niche selective or their detections are closely associated with their life stages i.e. in the water column in a planktonic intermediate host or near the sediment associate with primary bivalve host species.

Phylogenetics

The phylogenetic analysis in this study recovers unambiguous support for the grouping of these two haplosporidian isolates into a single clade with members of the genus Minchinia. As such, the four isolates would support the detection of a new geographic range for both of these species within the genus Minchinia. This would represent a substantial increase to the known diversity of this genus, as only six species associated with host species are currently described. The low bootstrap support for the internal nodes in phylogeny involves the genus Haplosporidium, and the interrelationships between its species and the two main haplosporidian clades, the Bonamia Group and the Minchinia Group. Haplosporidium is paraphyletic (Reece et al., Reference Reece, Siddal, Stokes and Burreson2004), likely representing a plesiomorphic grade from which the remaining two clades derived. The short internal branch lengths and the low resolving power in the bootstrap potentially indicate a rapid diversification among haplosporidian taxa.

Site effect and shore height influence

A higher prevalence of the M. mercenariae-like parasite was observed in C. edule at Carlingford compared to Dungarvan. Carlingford is a more sheltered site with a lot of shipping activity, while Dungarvan is an oceanic bay that experiences tidal flushing, greater water exchange and some shipping activity (Lynch et al., Reference Lynch, Morgan, Carlsson, Mackenzie, Wooton, Rowley, Malham and Culloty2014; Bookelaar et al., Reference Bookelaar, O’ Reilly, Lynch and Culloty2018). Higher pathogen retention, prevalence and diversity occur at sheltered marine environments, as pathogens are less likely to be swept away on the tides (Lenihan, Reference Lenihan1999; Lynch et al., Reference Lynch, Darmody, O'Dwyer, Gallagher, Nolan, McAllen and Culloty2016; Bookelaar et al., Reference Bookelaar, O’ Reilly, Lynch and Culloty2018). A higher prevalence of the M. mercenariae-like parasite was observed in C. edule at the high shore at Carlingford compared to cockles lower down the shore at the oyster trestles. C. edule higher up the shore may experience more stressful abiotic conditions such as air exposure, fluctuating temperatures, precipitation etc., which may make them more susceptible to infections (Wegeberg and Jensen, Reference Wegeberg and Jensen2003) or it may be possible that C. edule at the high shore are more likely to be in contact with other host species (Lynch et al., Reference Lynch, Morgan, Carlsson, Mackenzie, Wooton, Rowley, Malham and Culloty2014).

Potential drivers of emerging parasites

It is not uncommon for parasites to be widespread in marine environments, especially along near shore coastlines (Raftos et al., Reference Raftos, Kuchel, Aladeileh and Butt2014). Coastal marine environments are very vulnerable to climate change (Holt et al., Reference Holt, Wakelin, Lowe and Tinker2010) and a changing marine environment can have a direct impact on the distribution, life cycle and physiological status of hosts, pathogens and vectors (Gallana et al., Reference Gallana, Ryser-Degiorgis, Wahli and Segner2013). While a change in host, pathogen or vector does not necessarily translate into a change of the disease, it is the impact of climate change on the interactions between the disease components that impact disease risk (Gallana et al., Reference Gallana, Ryser-Degiorgis, Wahli and Segner2013). In addition, natural coastal disturbance arising from storm surges and high energy systems, which are predicted to increase under future climate change conditions (IPCC, 2018), may also play their part in pathogen emergence. Storms are important episodic events that can resuspend and transport sediments and are known to cause large-scale advection (i.e. transfer of heat or matter), sediment resuspension and transport (Cacchione et al., Reference Cacchione, Grant, Drake and Glenn1987; Warner et al., Reference Warner, Butman and Dalyander2008). An association between disease outbreaks in marine organisms and storm activity is recognized (Burge et al., Reference Burge, Eakin, Friedman, Froelich, Hershberger, Hofmann, Petes, Prager, Weil, Willis, Ford and Harvell2014). In one study, a strong correlation with hurricane activity [and a strong storm (nor'easter)] and the amoebic pathogen Paramoeba invadens, causative agent of urchin disease in the green urchin Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis in the northwest Atlantic, was modelled and confirmed (Feehan et al., Reference Feehan, Scheibling, Brown and Thompson2015). Other factors such as the movement of non-native species, both intentionally (i.e. for aquaculture) and unintentionally (i.e. as stowaways in ship ballast water or on hulls), brings the threat of ‘pathogen spillover’ into introduced areas and highly-susceptible host populations (Carnegie et al., Reference Carnegie, Arzul and Bushek2016; Ek-Huchim et al., Reference Ek-Huchim, Aguirre-Macedo, Améndola-Pimenta, Vidal-Martínez, Pérez-Vega, Simá-Alvarez, Jiménez-García, Zamora-Bustillos and Rodríguez-Canul2017). It is also recognized that coastal development may unbalance marine parasite-host systems (Coen and Bishop, Reference Coen and Bishop2015), as past emergent and resurgent diseases in wildlife appear to be associated with anthropogenic activities (Harvell et al., Reference Harvell, Kim, Burkholder, Colwell, Epstein, Grimes, Hofmann, Lipp, Osterhaus, Overstreet, Porter, Smith and Vasta1999; Daszak et al., Reference Daszak, Cunningham and Hyatt2000). Cultured bivalve breeding programmes are designed to mitigate the impacts of pathogens and may be unintentionally resulting in or expediating ‘host jumping’ from now less susceptible bivalve hosts to new cohabiting and highly susceptible naïve host species (Bookelaar et al., Reference Bookelaar, O’ Reilly, Lynch and Culloty2018). Such programmes may inadvertently be making selectively bred bivalve hosts more susceptible to novel pathogens. Additionally, due to the very poor biogeographical records available for protistan parasites it is possible that these parasites evolved in these hosts at those locations and were not introduced.

Conclusions

The detection of both these Haplosporidia spp. in the Minchinia clade will contribute to an improved understanding of Haplosporidia diversity, prevalence, host, geographic distribution and a certain degree ecology. This study further supports that a M. mercenariae-like haplosporidan infects C. edule in Europe (Ramilo et al., Reference Ramilo, Abollo, Villalba and Carballal2017) and that it appears to be exclusive to C. edule while Haplosporidia sp. SAL-2014 (Lynch et al., Reference Lynch, Morgan, Carlsson, Mackenzie, Wooton, Rowley, Malham and Culloty2014) appears to be exclusive to M. edule. As many other species, including protected bird species, rely on C. edule and M. edulis as a food source and the pivotal role both bivalve species play in marine coastal ecosystems, it would be beneficial to better understand the impact that these Haplosporidia spp. may or may not have on cockle and mussel populations currently and under future climate change conditions. Understanding some of the current drivers of parasite introduction, emergence and spread may facilitate a better prediction of future impacts and host or geographical range expansion of Haplosporidia under changing environmental scenarios. In particular with a parasite group such as the Haplosporidia, which have had such a devastating historical impact both commercially and ecologically.

Financial support

This work was supported by the Susfish and Bluefish Projects, both part-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF) through the Ireland Wales Co-operation Programme. A cross-border programme investing in the overall economic, environmental and social well-being of Ireland and Wales.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest and certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Ethical standards

Not applicable.

References

Arzul, I and Carnegie, RB (2015) New perspective on the haplosporidian parasites of molluscs. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 131, 3242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bookelaar, BE, O’ Reilly, A, Lynch, SA and Culloty, SC (2018) Role of the intertidal predatory shore crab Carcinus maenas in transmission dynamics of ostreid herpesvirus-1 microvariant. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 130, 221233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burge, CA, Eakin, MC, Friedman, CS, Froelich, B, Hershberger, PK, Hofmann, EE, Petes, LE, Prager, KC, Weil, E, Willis, BL, Ford, SE and Harvell, CD (2014) Climate change influences on marine infectious diseases: implications for management and society. Annual Review of Marine Science 6, 249277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burreson, EM, Stokes, NA and Friedman, CS (2000) Increased virulence in an introduced pathogen; Haplosporidium nelsoni (MSX) in the eastern oyster Crassotrea virginicia. Journal of Aquatic Animal Health 12, 18.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cacchione, DA, Grant, WD, Drake, DE and Glenn, SM (1987) Storm-dominated bottom boundary layer dynamics on the Northern California Continental Shelf: measurements and predictions. Journal of Geophysics 92, 18171827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnegie, RB, Arzul, I and Bushek, D (2016) Managing marine mollusc diseases in the context of regional and international commerce: policy issues and emerging concerns. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B, Biological Sciences 371, 111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catanese, G, Grau, A, Valencia, JM, Garcia-March, JR, Vázquez-Luis, M, Alvarez, E, Deudero, S, Darriba, S, Carballal, MJ and Villalba, A (2018) Haplosporidium pinnae sp. nov., a haplosporidian parasite associated with mass mortalities of the fan mussel, Pinna nobilis, in the Western Mediterranean Sea. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 157, 924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coen, LD and Bishop, MJ (2015) The ecology, evolution, impacts and management of host–parasite interactions of marine molluscs. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 13, 177211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comps, M and Tige, G (1997) Fine structure of Minchinia sp. a haplosporidian infecting the mussel Mytilus galloprovincialis L. Systematic Parasitology 38, 4550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darriba, D, Tabaoada, GL, Doallo, R and Posada, D (2012) JModeltest2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nature Methods 9, 772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daszak, P, Cunningham, AA and Hyatt, AD (2000) Emerging infectious diseases of wildlife-threats to biodiversity and human health. Science 287, 1756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dinami, P, Hine, PM and Jones, JB (1987) Occurrence and characteristics of the haemocyte parasite Bonamia sp. in the New Zealand dredge oyster Tiostrea lutaria. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 3, 3744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ek-Huchim, JP, Aguirre-Macedo, ML, Améndola-Pimenta, M, Vidal-Martínez, VM, Pérez-Vega, JA, Simá-Alvarez, R, Jiménez-García, I, Zamora-Bustillos, R and Rodríguez-Canul, R (2017) Genetic structure analysis of Perkinsus marinus in Mexico suggests possible translocation from the Atlantic Ocean to the Pacific coast of Mexico. Parasites & Vectors 10, 372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engelsma, MY, Culloty, SC, Lynch, SA, Arzul, I and Carnegie, RB (2014) Bonamia parasites: a rapidly changing perspective on a genus of important mollusc pathogens. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 110, 523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feehan, CJ, Scheibling, RE, Brown, MS and Thompson, KR (2015) Marine epizootics linked to storms: mechanisms of pathogen introduction and persistence inferred from coupled physical and biological time-series. Limnology and Oceanography 61, 316329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueras, A and Jardon, C (1991) Diseases and parasites of mussels (Mytilus edulis, Linneaus, 1758) from two sites on the east coast of the United States. Journal of Shellfish Research 10, 8994.Google Scholar
Ford, SE, Stokes, NA, Burreson, EM, Scarpa, E, Carnegie, RB, Krauter, JN and Bushek, D (2009) Minchinia mercenariae n. sp. (Haplosporidia) in the Hard Clam Mercenaria mercenaria: implications of a rare parasite in a commercially important host. Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology 56, 542551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, CS (1996) Haplosporidian infection of the Pacific oyster, Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg), in California and Japan. Journal of Shellfish Research 15, 597600.Google Scholar
Gallana, M, Ryser-Degiorgis, MP, Wahli, T and Segner, H (2013) Climate change and infectious diseases of wildlife: altered interactions between pathogens, vectors and hosts. Current Zoology 59, 427437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartikainen, H, Ashford, OS, Berney, C, Okamura, B, Feist, SW, Baker-Austin, C, Stentiford, GD and Bass, D (2014) Lineage-specific molecular probing reveals novel diversity and ecological partitioning of haplosporidians. ISME 1, 177186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harvell, CD, Kim, K, Burkholder, JM, Colwell, RR, Epstein, PR, Grimes, DJ, Hofmann, EE, Lipp, EK, Osterhaus, AD, Overstreet, RM, Porter, JW, Smith, GW and Vasta, GR (1999) Emerging marine diseases-climate links and anthropogenic factors. Science 285, 15051510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill-Spanik, KM, McDowell, JR, Stokes, NA, Reece, KS, Burreson, EM and Carnegie, RB (2015) Phylogeographic perspective on the distribution and dispersal of a marine pathogen, the oyster parasite Bonamia exitiosa. Marine Ecology Progress Series 536, 6576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hine, PM (1996) The ecology of Bonamia and decline of bivalve molluscs. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 20, 109116.Google Scholar
Holt, J, Wakelin, S, Lowe, J and Tinker, J (2010) The potential impacts of climate change on the hydrography of the northwest European continental shelf. Progress in Oceanography 86, 361379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huelsenbeck, JP, Larget, B, Miller, RE and Ronquist, F (2002) Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Systematic Biology 51, 673688.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hurvich, CM and Tsai, C-L (1989) Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika 76, 297307, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Available at ort.ipcc.ch/sr15/pdf/sr15_spm_final.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inoue, K, Walte, JH, Matsuoka, M, Odo, S and Harayama, S (1995) Interspecific variations in adhesive protein sequences of Mytilus edulis, M. galloprovincialis and M. trossulus. Biological Bulletin 189, 370375.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamaishi, T and Yoshinaga, T (2002) Detection of Haplosporidium nelsoni in Pacific oyster Crassotrea gigas in Japan. Fish Pathology 37, 195195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, FG (1976) Sporulation of Minchinia sp. (Haplosporida, Haplosporidiidae) in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas (Thunberg) from the Republic of Korea. The Journal of Protozoology 23, 498500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lane, HS, Webb, SC and Duncan, J (2016) Bonamia ostreae in the New Zealand oyster Ostrea chilensis: a new host and geographic record for this haplosporidian parasite. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 118, 5563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lenihan, HS (1999) Physical-biological coupling on oyster reefs: How habitat structure influences individual performance. Ecological Monographs 69, 251275.Google Scholar
Longshaw, M and Malham, SK (2013) A review of the infectious agents, parasites, pathogens and commensals of European cockles (Cerastoderma edule and C. glaucum). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 93, 227247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lynch, SA, Villalba, A, Abollo, E, Engelsma, M, Stokes, NA and Culloty, SC (2013) The occurrence of haplosporidian parasites Haplosporidium nelsoni and Haplosporidium sp. in oysters in Ireland. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 112, 208212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, SA, Morgan, E, Carlsson, J, Mackenzie, C, Wooton, EC, Rowley, AF, Malham, S and Culloty, SC (2014) The health status of mussels, Mytilus spp., in Ireland and Wales with the molecular identification of a previously undescribed haplosporidian. Journal of Invertebrate Pathology 118, 5965.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lynch, SA, Darmody, G, O'Dwyer, K, Gallagher, MC, Nolan, S, McAllen, R and Culloty, SC (2016) Biology of the invasive ascidian Ascidiella aspersa in its native habitat: reproductive patterns and parasite load. Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 181, 249255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Molloy, DP, Giamberini, L, Stokes, NA and Burrenson, EM (2012) Haplosporidium raabei n. sp. (Haplosporidia): a parasite of zebra mussels, Dreissena polymorpha (Pallas, 1771). Parasitology 139, 463477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pagenkopp Lohan, KM, Hill-Spanik, KM, Torchin, ME, Aguirre-Macedo, L, Fleischer, SC and Ruiz, GM (2016) Richness and distribution of tropical oyster parasites in two oceans. Parasitology 143, 11191132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Raftos, DA, Kuchel, R, Aladeileh, S and Butt, D (2014) Infectious microbial diseases and host defense responses in Sydney rock oysters. Frontiers in Microbiology 5, 135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramilo, A, Abollo, E, Villalba, A and Carballal, MJ (2017) A Minchinia mercenaria-like parasite infects cockles Cerastoderma edule in Galicia (NW Spain). Journal of Fish Diseases 41, 4148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reece, KS, Siddal, ME, Stokes, NA and Burreson, EM (2004) Molecular phylogeny of the haplosporidia based on two independent gene sequences. International Journal for Parasitology 90, 11111122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renault, T, Stokes, NA, Chollet, B, Cochennec, N, Berthe, F and Burreson, EM (2000) Haplosporidiosis in the Pacific oyster Crassotrea gigas from the French Atlantic coast. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 42, 207214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ronquist, F, Teslenko, M, van der Mark, P, Ayres, DL, Darling, A, Höhna, S, Larget, B, Liu, L, Suchard, MA and Huelsenbeck, JP (2012) Mrbayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61, 539542.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sievers, F, Wilm, A, Dineen, DG, Gibson, TJ, Karplus, K, Li, W, Lopez, R, McWilliam, H, Remmert, M, Söding, J, Thompson, JD and Higgins, DG (2011) Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Molecular Systems Biology 7, 539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stephenson, MF and McGladdery, SE (2002) Detection of a previously undescribed haplosporidian-like infection of a blue mussel (Mytilus edulis) in Atlantic Canada. Journal of Shellfish Research 21, 389.Google Scholar
Walsh, PS, Metzger, DA and Higuchi, R (1991) Chelex 100 as a medium for simple extraction of DNA for PCR-based typing from forensic material. Biotechniques 10, 506513.Google ScholarPubMed
Wang, Z, Lu, X, Liang, Y and Wang, C (2010) Haplosporidium nelsoni and H. costale in the Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas from China's coasts. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 89, 223228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ward, GM, Feist, SW, Noguera, P, Marcos-López, M, Ross, S, Green, M, Urrutia, A, Bignell, JP and Bass, D (2019) Detection and characterisation of haplosporidian parasites of the blue mussel Mytilus edulis, including description of the novel parasite Minchinia mytili n. sp. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms 133, 5768.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warner, J, Butman, B and Dalyander, P (2008) Storm-driven sediment transport in Massachusetts Bay. Continental Shelf Research 28, 257282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wegeberg, AM and Jensen, KT (2003) In situ growth of juvenile cockles, Cerastoderma edule, experimentally infected with larval rematodes (Himasthla interrupta). Journal of Sea Research 50, 3743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Map of Ireland showing the sample sites and bivalve species sampled and screened for Haplosporidia spp. at each location during this study.

Figure 1

Table 1. Description of bivalve species, sample sites, months, years and anthropogenic activities at each site, and histology and molecular analyses for Haplosporidia spp

Figure 2

Table 2. Operational taxonomic units from GENBANK used in the phylogenetic analysis

Figure 3

Fig. 2. (A) Large number of haplosporidian spores in the connective tissues of C. edule, (B) & (C) multiple haplosporidia-like sporonts and developing spores respectively in the connective tissues of C. edule, (D) spores in the mantle tissue of C. edule, (E) uninucleate ‘fried egg’ (arrows) and binucleate (arrow head) cells in the epithelium of C. edule and (F) multiple plasmodia in the connective tissues of C. edule.

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Prevalence of M. mercenariae-like parasite in C. edule at the two Irish C. gigas culture sites from April to August 2015.

Figure 5

Fig. 4. Bayesian phylogenetic tree of haplosporidian taxa based on partial 18S SSU rRNA sequences. Branches marked with an asterisk (*) have 100% posterior probability support for that node, otherwise, the nodal support is indicated by the number given. Inset to the bottom right repeats, for clarity, the Minchinia subclade with very small branch lengths, and gives the nodal posterior probabilities for this topology. A well-supported clade includes all of the 18S SSU rDNA sequences assigned to the genus Minchinia, the previously identified parasite of C. floridana (Reece et al., 2004), as well as the novel sequences for this study. As has been found in other analyses (Reece et al., 2004; Lynch et al., 2013; Ramilo et al., 2017), we find strong evidence for the paraphyly of the genus Haplosporidium.