Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T05:10:58.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ecological specificity explains infection parameters of anuran parasites at different scales

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2022

Lorena Euclydes*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná 81531-980, Brazil
Gabriel M. De La Torre
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná 81531-980, Brazil
Amanda Caroline Dudczak
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná 81531-980, Brazil
Francisco Tiago de Vasconcelos Melo
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Cell Biology and Helminthology ‘Prof. Dr. Reinalda Marisa Lanfredi’, Institute of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Pará 66075-110, Brazil
Karla Magalhães Campião
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná 81531-980, Brazil
*
Author for correspondence: Lorena Euclydes, E-mail: lorena.euclydes@gmail.com

Abstract

Understanding the determinants of parasite infection in different hosts is one of the main goals of disease ecology. Evaluating the relationship between parasite–host specificity and infection parameters within host communities and populations may contribute to this understanding. Here we propose two measures of specificity that encompasses phylogenetic and ecological relatedness among hosts and investigated how such metrics explain parasite infection prevalence and mean infection intensity (MII). We analysed the parasites associated with an anuran community in an area of Atlantic Forest and used the number of infected hosts and the net relatedness index to calculate the phylogenetic and ecological specificities of the parasites. These specificity measures were related to infection metrics (prevalence and MII) with generalized linear mixed models at community (all hosts) and population (infected host species) scales. Parasite prevalence was correlated with the number of infected hosts and, when considering only multi-host parasites, was positively related to parasite ecological specificity at community and population scales. Thus, parasite species have similar prevalences in ecologically closer hosts. No relationship was found for parasite MII. Incorporating ecological characteristics of hosts in parasite specificity analyses improves the detection of patterns of specificity across scales.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agosta, SJ (2006) On ecological fitting, plant-insect associations, herbivore host shifts, and host plant selection. Oikos 114, 556565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agosta, SJ and Klemens, JA (2008) Ecological fitting by phenotypically flexible genotypes: implications for species associations, community assembly and evolution: ecological fitting. Ecology Letters 11, 11231134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agosta, SJ, Janz, N and Brooks, DR (2010) How specialists can be generalists: resolving the “parasite paradox” and implications for emerging infectious disease. Zoologia (Curitiba) 27, 151162.10.1590/S1984-46702010000200001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amato, JFR and Amato, SB (2010) Técnicas gerais para coleta e preparação de helmintos endoparasitos de aves. In Matter, SV, Straube, FC, Accordi, IA, Piacentini, VQ and Candido, JF Jr. (eds), Ornitologia e Conservação: Ciência Aplicada, Técnicas de Pesquisa e Levantamento. Rio de Janeiro, BR: Technical Books Editora, pp. 369393.Google Scholar
Amin, OM (1985) Classification. In Crompton, DWT and Nickol, BB (eds), Biology of Acanthocephala. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 2772.Google Scholar
Anderson, RC (2000) Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates: Their Development and Transmission, 2nd Edn. Wallingford, Oxon, UK; New York, NY: CABI Pub.Google Scholar
Anderson, RC, Chabaud, AG, Willmott, S and Commonwealth Institute of Helminthology (eds) (2009) Keys to the Nematode Parasites of Vertebrates. Archival volume. Wallingford: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Araujo, SBL, Braga, MP, Brooks, DR, Agosta, SJ, Hoberg, EP, von Hartenthal, FW and Boeger, WA (2015) Understanding host-switching by ecological fitting. PLoS ONE 10, e0139225.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrett, LG, Thrall, PH, Burdon, JJ and Linde, CC (2008) Life history determines genetic structure and evolutionary potential of host–parasite interactions. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 23, 678685.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blomberg, SP, Garland, T and Ives, AR (2003) Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57, 717.10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.xCrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bongers, T and Ferris, H (1999) Nematode community structure as a bioindicator in environmental monitoring. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14, 224228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, DR and McLennan, DA (2002) The Nature of Diversity: An Evolutionary Voyage of Discovery. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, DR, León-Règagnon, V, McLennan, DA and Zelmer, D (2006) Ecological fitting as a determinant of the community structure of platyhelminth parasites of anurans. Ecology 87, S76S85. doi: 10.1890/0012- 9658(2006)87[76:EFAADO]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bush, AO, Lafferty, KD, Lotz, JM and Shostak, AW (1997) Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited. The Journal of Parasitology 83, 575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campião, KM, Ribas, AdA, Morais, DH, da Silva, RJ and Tavares, LER (2015) How many parasites species a frog might have? Determinants of parasite diversity in South American anurans. PLoS ONE 10, e0140577.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, NJ and Clegg, SM (2017) Integrating phylogenetic and ecological distances reveals new insights into parasite host specificity. Molecular Ecology 26, 30743086.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooper, N, Griffin, R, Franz, M, Omotayo, M and Nunn, CL (2012) Phylogenetic host specificity and understanding parasite sharing in primates. Ecology Letters 15, 13701377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crump, MLE and Scott, NJ Jr. (1994) Visual encounter survey. In Heyer, WR, Donnelly, MA, McDiarmid, RW, Donnelly Heyek, LC and Foster, MS (eds), Measuring and Monitoring Biological Diversity, Standard Methods for Amphibians. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 8491.Google Scholar
D'Bastiani, E and Campião, KM (2021) Disentangling the beta-diversity in anuran parasite communities. Parasitology 148, 327332.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
D'Bastiani, E, Campião, KM, Boeger, WA and Araújo, SBL (2020) The role of ecological opportunity in shaping host–parasite networks. Parasitology 147, 14521460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Oliveira, CR, Ávila, RW and Morais, DH (2019) Helminths associated with three Physalaemus species (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from Caatinga Biome, Brazil. Acta Parasitologica 64, 205212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dobson, A, Lafferty, KD, Kuris, AM, Hechinger, RF and Jetz, W (2008) Homage to Linnaeus: How many parasites? How many hosts? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105, 1148211489.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dray, S and Dufour, A-B (2007) The ade4 package: implementing the duality diagram for ecologists. Journal of Statistical Software 22, 120. doi: 10.18637/jss.v022.i04CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellis, VA, Huang, X, Westerdahl, H, Jönsson, J, Hasselquist, D, Neto, JM, Nilsson, J, Nilsson, J, Hegemann, A, Hellgren, O and Bensch, S (2020) Explaining prevalence, diversity and host specificity in a community of avian haemosporidian parasites. Oikos 129, 13141329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Euclydes, L, Dudczak, AC and Campião, KM (2021) Anuran's habitat use drives the functional diversity of nematode parasite communities. Parasitology Research 120, 9931001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fecchio, A, Wells, K, Bell, JA, Tkach, VV, Lutz, HL, Weckstein, JD, Clegg, SM and Clark, NJ (2019) Climate variation influences host specificity in avian malaria parasites. Ecology Letters 22, 547557.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferrari, S and Cribari-Neto, F (2004) Beta regression for modelling rates and proportions. Journal of Applied Statistics 31, 799815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fountain-Jones, NM, Pearse, WD, Escobar, LE, Alba-Casals, A, Carver, S, Davies, TJ, Kraberger, S, Papes, M, Vandegrift, K, Worsley-Tonks, K and Craft, ME (2017) Towards an eco-phylogenetic framework for infectious disease ecology. Biological Reviews 93, 950970. doi: 10.1111/brv.12380CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frost, D (2021) Amphibian Species of the World: an Online Reference. Version 6.1. Retrieved from American Museum of Natural History: New York, USA. https://amphibiansoftheworld.amnh.org/index.php (accessed 02 August 2021).Google Scholar
Garcia-Longoria, L, Marzal, A, de Lope, F and Garamszegi, L (2019) Host-parasite interaction explains variation in the prevalence of avian haemosporidians at the community level. PLoS ONE 14, e0205624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haas, W (2003) Parasitic worms: strategies of host finding, recognition and invasion. Zoology 106, 349364.10.1078/0944-2006-00125CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haddad, CFB, Toledo, LF, Prado, CPA, Loebmann, D, Gasparini, JL and Sazima, I (2013) Guia dos anfíbios da Mata Atlântica: Diversidade e Biologia, 1st Edn. São Paulo, Brazil: Anolis.Google Scholar
Hamann, MI, Kehr, AI and González, CE (2013) Biodiversity of trematodes associated with amphibians from a variety of habitats in Corrientes Province, Argentina. Journal of Helminthology 87, 286300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hechinger, RF, Lafferty, KD, Huspeni, TC, Brooks, AJ and Kuris, AM (2007) Can parasites be indicators of free-living diversity? Relationships between species richness and the abundance of larval trematodes and of local benthos and fishes. Oecologia 151, 8292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellgren, O, Pérez-Tris, J and Bensch, S (2009) A jack-of-all-trades and still a master of some: prevalence and host range in avian malaria and related blood parasites. Ecology 90, 28402849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janzen, DH (1985) On ecological fitting. Oikos 45, 308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jetz, W and Pyron, RA (2018) The interplay of past diversification and evolutionary isolation with present imperilment across the amphibian tree of life. Nature Ecology & Evolution 2, 850858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, PTJ, Preston, DL, Hoverman, JT and Richgels, KL (2013) Biodiversity decreases disease through predictable changes in host community competence. Nature 494, 230233.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, PTJ, Calhoun, DM, Riepe, TB and Koprivnikar, J (2019) Chance or choice? Understanding parasite selection and infection in multi-host communities. International Journal for Parasitology 49, 407415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kamiya, T, O'Dwyer, K, Nakagawa, S and Poulin, R (2014) What determines species richness of parasitic organisms? A meta-analysis across animal, plant and fungal hosts: determinants of parasite species richness. Biological Reviews 89, 123134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kembel, SW, Cowan, PD, Helmus, MR, Cornwell, WK, Morlon, H, Ackerly, DD, Blomberg, SP and Webb, CO (2010) Picante: R tools for integrating phylogenies and ecology. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 26, 14631464.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Khalil, LF, Jones, A and Bray, RA (1994) Keys to the Cestode Parasites of Vertebrates. Wallingford: CAB International.Google Scholar
Koprivnikar, J, Urichuk, TMY and Szuroczki, D (2017) Influences of habitat and arthropod density on parasitism in two co-occurring host taxa. Canadian Journal of Zoology 95, 589597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krasnov, BR, Poulin, R, Shenbrot, GI, Mouillot, D and Khokhlova, IS (2004) Ectoparasitic “Jacks-of-All-Trades”: relationship between abundance and host specificity in fleas (Siphonaptera) parasitic on small mammals. The American Naturalist 164, 506516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leung, TLF and Koprivnikar, J (2019) Your infections are what you eat: how host ecology shapes the helminth parasite communities of lizards. Journal of Animal Ecology 88, 416426.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lutz, HL, Hochachka, WM, Engel, JI, Bell, JA, Tkach, VV, Bates, JM, Hackett, SJ and Weckstein, JD (2015) Parasite prevalence corresponds to host life history in a diverse assemblage of Afrotropical birds and Haemosporidian parasites. PLoS ONE 10, e0121254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, ET, Farine, DR and Trisos, CH (2017) Phylogenetic community structure metrics and null models: a review with new methods and software. Ecography 40, 461477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moen, DS, Morlon, H and Wiens, JJ (2016) Testing convergence versus history: convergence dominates phenotypic evolution for over 150 million years in frogs. Systematic Biology 65, 146160.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyman, T (2010) To speciate, or not to speciate? Resource heterogeneity, the subjectivity of similarity, and the macroevolutionary consequences of niche-width shifts in plant-feeding insects. Biological Reviews 85, 393411.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavoine, S and Bonsall, MB (2011) Measuring biodiversity to explain community assembly: a unified approach. Biological Reviews 86, 792812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pavoine, S, Vallet, J, Dufour, A-B, Gachet, S and Daniel, H (2009) On the challenge of treating various types of variables: application for improving the measurement of functional diversity. Oikos 118, 391402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavoine, S, Baguette, M, Stevens, VM, Leibold, MA, Turlure, C and Bonsall, MB (2014) Life history traits, but not phylogeny, drive compositional patterns in a butterfly metacommunity. Ecology 95, 33043313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinheiro, RBP, Félix, GMF, Chaves, AV, Lacorte, GA, Santos, FR, Braga, ÉM and Mello, MAR (2016) Trade-offs and resource breadth processes as drivers of performance and specificity in a host–parasite system: a new integrative hypothesis. International Journal for Parasitology 46, 115121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R (1996) Richness, nestedness, and randomness in parasite infracommunity structure. Oecologia 105, 545551.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R (1998) Large-scale patterns of host use by parasites of freshwater fishes. Ecology Letters 1, 118128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poulin, R (2006) Variation in infection parameters among populations within parasite species: intrinsic properties versus local factors. International Journal for Parasitology 36, 877885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R (2007) Are there general laws in parasite ecology? Parasitology 134, 763776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poulin, R and Guegan, J-F (2000) Nestedness, anti-nestedness, and the relationship between prevalence and intensity in ectoparasite assemblages of marine fish: a spatial model of species coexistence. International Journal for Parasitology 30, 11471152. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7519(00)00102-8. PMID: 11027779.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Core Team (2020) A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Poulin, R and Morand, S (2000) The diversity of parasites. The Quarterly Review of Biology 75, 277293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reginato, M and Goldenberg, R (2007) Análise florística, estrutural e fitogeográfica da vegetação em região de transição entre as Florestas Ombrófilas Mista e Densa Montana, Piraquara, Paraná, Brasil. Hoehnea 34, 349360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ribeiro, MC, Metzger, JP, Martensen, AC, Ponzoni, FJ and Hirota, MM (2009) The Brazilian Atlantic Forest: How much is left, and how is the remaining forest distributed? Implications for conservation. Biological Conservation 142, 11411153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robalinho Lima, M and Bensch, S (2014) Why some parasites are widespread and abundant while others are local and rare? Molecular Ecology 23, 31303132.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roy, HE and Handley, L-JL (2012) Networking: a community approach to invaders and their parasites. Functional Ecology 26, 12381248. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2012.02032.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saldaña-Vázquez, RA, Sandoval-Ruiz, CA, Veloz-Maldonado, OS, Durán, AA and Ramírez-Martínez, MM (2019) Host ecology moderates the specialization of Neotropical bat-fly interaction networks. Parasitology Research 118, 29192924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheer, MB and Blum, CT (2011) Arboreal diversity of the Atlantic forest of Southern Brazil: from the beach ridges to the Paraná River. In Grillo, O and Venora, G (eds). The Dynamical Processes of Biodiversity – Case Studies of Evolution and Spatial Distribution. Rijeka, HR: InTech, pp. 109134.Google Scholar
Webb, CO (2000) Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. The American Naturalist 156, 145155.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webb, CO, Ackerly, DD and Kembel, SW (2008) Phylocom: software for the analysis of phylogenetic community structure and trait evolution. Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) 24, 20982100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Womack, MC and Bell, RC (2020) Two-hundred million years of anuran body-size evolution in relation to geography, ecology and life history. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 33, 14171432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zuur, AF, Ieno, EN, Walker, N, Saveliev, AA and Smith, GM (2009) Mixed Effects Models and Extensions in Ecology with R. New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Euclydes et al. supplementary material

Euclydes et al. supplementary material 1

Download Euclydes et al. supplementary material(File)
File 27.1 KB
Supplementary material: File

Euclydes et al. supplementary material

Euclydes et al. supplementary material 2

Download Euclydes et al. supplementary material(File)
File 12.9 KB