Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T11:49:53.821Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eimeria species infecting wood mice (genus Apodemus) and the transfer of two species to Mus musculus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

F. Nowell  and
S. Higgs
F. Nowell
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Zoology, University of Reading, Whiteknights, P.O. Box 228, Reading, Berkshire RG6 2AJ
S. Higgs
Affiliation:
Department of Pure and Applied Zoology, University of Reading, Whiteknights, P.O. Box 228, Reading, Berkshire RG6 2AJ
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Characteristics of four species of Eimeria isolated from Apodemus sylvaticus are described. From oocyst morphology, three are identified as E. apionodes, E. hungaryensis and E. uptoni, the fourth being unnamed. Cloning demonstrated that oocysts of E. hungaryensis were polymorphic. Previous literature relating to the taxonomy is discussed and discrepancies outlined. Species isolated from A. sylvaticus were not transmissible to Clethrionomys glareolus, but both E. hungaryensis and E. apionodes have been passaged through immunosuppressed laboratory mice, the former species more than 16 times. In both A. sylvaticus and immunosuppressed laboratory mice, endogenous development of E. hungaryensis occurred mainly in enterocytes near the tips of the villi in the first half of the small intestine, with a few parasites in the rest of the small intestine and into the large intestine. The pre-patent period was 2 days in both hosts but oocyst output was higher in the natural hosts. E. apionodes parasitized enterocytes on the sides or at the base of the villi, mainly in the last 90% of the small intestine with a few parasites in the large intestine. The pre-patent period was 7 days. Parasites, probably E. hungaryensis and E. apionodes, were also isolated from A. flavicollis.

Keywords

Eimeria spp.Apodemus sylvaticustransmissionClethrionomys glareolus
Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 98 , Issue 3 , June 1989 , pp. 329 - 336
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ball, S. J. & Lewis, D. C. (1984) Eimeria (Protozoa: Coccidia) in wild populations of British rodents. Journal of Zoology 202, 373–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
černá, Z. (1962). Contribution to the knowledge of coccidia parasitic in Muridae. Vestnik Ceskoslovenske Spolecnosti Zoologicke 26, 1–13.Google Scholar
Cordero Del Campillo, M. (1959). Estudios sobre Eimeria falciformis (Eimer, 1870) parásito del ratón. I. Observaciones sobre el periodo pre-patente, esporulacion, morfologia de los ooquistes y estudio biometrico de los mismos, produccion de ooquistes et patogenicidad. Revista Iberica de Parasitologia 19, 351–68.Google Scholar
Duszynski, D. W. (1971). Increase in size of Eimeria separata oocysts during patency. Journal of Parasitology 57, 948–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elton, C., Ford, E. B., Baker, J. R. & Gardner, A. D. (1931). The health and parasites of a wild mouse population. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 1931, 657–721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golemansky, V. (1978). Description de neuf nouvelles espèces de coccidies (Coccidia, Eimeriidae) parasites de micromammiferes en Bulgarie. Acta Protozoologica 17, 261–70.Google Scholar
Gower, D. B. (1979). Steroid Hormones. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Higgs, S. (1985). A study of coccidia infecting Apodemus sylvaticus and other small mammals. Ph.D thesis,University of Reading.Google Scholar
Higgs, S. & Nowell, F. (1988). Laboratory studies with clones of Eimeria hungaryensis, a parasite of the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus. Parasitology 97, 213–20.Google ScholarPubMed
Higgs, S., Nowell, F. & Ibrahim, S. A. M. (1988). The initiation and maintenance of a colony of coccidia-free wood mice (Apodemus sylvaticus). Laboratory Animals 22, 54–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levine, N. D. & Ivens, V. (1965). The Coccidian Parasites (Protozoa, Sporozoa) of Rodents. Illinois Biological Monographs 33. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Levine, N. D. & Ivens, V. (1988). Cross-transmission of Eimeria spp. (Protozoa, Apicomplexa) of rodents – a review. Journal of Protozoology 35, 434–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, D. C. (1981). Studies on coccidian parasites of British wild rodents. M.Phil. thesis. Polytechnic of North East London.Google Scholar
Lewis, D. C. & Ball, S. J. (1983). Species of Eimeria of small wild rodents from the British Isles, with descriptions of two new species. Systematic Parasitology 5, 259–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. C. & Ball, S. J. (1984). Eimeria (Protozoa: Coccidia) in wild populations of some British rodents. Journal of Zoology 202, 373–81.Google Scholar
Musaev, M. A. & Veisov, A. M. (1963). [Coccidia occurring in Apodemus sylvaticus in Azerbaidjan.] (in Russian) Izvestiya Akademii nauk Azerbaidzhanskoi SSR 5 3–14.Google Scholar
Musaev, M. A. & Veisov, A. M. (1965). [The coccidia of rodents in the U.S.S.R.] (in Russian) Izvestiya Akademii nauk Azerbaidzhanskoi SSR, Baku, 1–154.Google Scholar
Nowell, F. & Healing, T. D. (1987). Microparasites of wild small mammals. Mammal Review 17, 67–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellérdy, L. (1954). Zur Kenntnis der Coccidien aus Apodemus flavicollis. Acta Veterinaria Akademiae Scientarum Hungaricae 4, 186–91.Google Scholar
Pellérdy, L. (1974). Coccidia and Coccidiosis. 2nd Edn. Berlin and Hamburg: Paul Parey.Google Scholar
Prasad, H. (1960). Studies on the coccidia of some rodents of the families Muridae, Dipodidae and Cricetidae. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 54, 321–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ring, M. (1959). Studies on parasitic protozoa of wild mice from Berkshire with a description of a new species of Trichomonas. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London 132, 381–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Todd, K. S. & Lepp, D. L. (1972). Completion of the life-cycle of Eimeria vermiformis Ernst, Chobotar & Hammond, 1971 from the mouse Mus musculus in dexamethasone treated rats Rattus norvegicus. Journal of Parasitology 58, 400–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wash, C. D., Duszynski, D. W. & Yates, T. L. (1985). Eimerians from different karyotypes of the Japanese wood mouse (Apodemus spp.), with descriptions of two new species and a redescription of Eimeria montgomeryae Lewis & Ball, 1983. Journal of Parasitology 71, 808–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar