Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:11:55.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Entamoeba aulastomi Nöller

Cultivation, Morphology, and Method of Division; and Cultivation of Hexamita sp.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Ann Bishop
Ann Bishop
Affiliation:
From the Molteno Institute, Cambridge.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

1. Entamoeba aulastomi and Hexamita sp. from Haemopis sanguisuga have been cultivated in inactivated horse-serum diluted 1 : 10 in 0·5 NaCl solution + solid sterile rice-starch, and upon an inspissated horse-serum slope covered with the liquid medium + sterile rice-starch. Cysts of E. aulastomi appeared on or after the 9th day from subcultivation, but cysts of Hexamita have not appeared in the cultures.

2. The amoeboid phase of E. aulastomi divides by a simple direct method, without the formation of a spindle. There is no equatorial plate. It was not possible to count the number of chromatin granules.

3. The mature cyst is quadrinucleate, though occasional octonucleate cysts are found. Chromatoids are present but are absorbed before hatching. A. large glycogen vacuole is present in the uninucleate cyst. The nucleus divides by the formation of a delicate spindle but no chromosomes were found.

4. E. aulastomi are not harmed by being kept at 2° C. but they die out in the 2nd subculture if kept at 30° C. and within 24 hours if kept at 37° C. The cysts also are killed at 37° C.

5. If treated with N/20 HCl all amoebae are killed in less than 10 min. but the cysts are unharmed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 1932 , pp. 225 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1932

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brug, S. L. (1922). Quelques observations sur les protozoaires parasites intestinaux de l'homme et des animaux. Bull. de la Soc. Path. Exot. 15, 132.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. C. (1909). Researches on the Intestinal Protozoa of Frogs and Toads. Quart. J. Microsc. Sci. 53, 201.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. C. (1919). The Amoebae living in Man. London.Google Scholar
Dobell, C. C. (1927). Further observations and experiments on the cultivation of Entamoeba histolytica from cysts. Parasitol. 19, 288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobell, C. (1928). Researches on the intestinal Protozoa of Monkeys and Man. II. Description of the whole life-history of Entamoeba histolytica in cultures. Parasitol. 20, 357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobell, C. and O'Connor, F. W. (1921). The Intestinal Protozoa of Man. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobell, C. and Laidlaw, P. P. (1926). On the cultivation of Entamoeba histolytica and some other entozoic amoebae. Parasitol. 18, 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drbohlav, J. J. (1925). Culture d'Entamoeba aulastomi Noller 1919. Ann. Parasitol. Hum. et Comp. 3, 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, W. A. (1910). A revision of the British Leeches. Parasitol. 3, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucas, C. L. T. (1927). Two new species of Amoeba found in Cockroaches. Parasitol. 19, 224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackinnon, D. L. (1914). Observations on Amoebae from the Intestine of the Crane-Fly larva, Tipula sp. Arch. Protistenk. 32, 267.Google Scholar
Nöller, W. (1912). Entamoeba aulastomi nov. spec. Eine neue parasitische amöbe aus dem Pferdeegel. Arch. Protistenk. 24, 195.Google Scholar
Prowazek, S. (1904). Untersuchungen über einige parasitische Flagellaten. Arb. Kaiserl. Gesundheitsamte, 21, 1.Google Scholar
Sanders, E. P. (1931). The Life-Cycle of Entamoeba ranarum Grassi (1879). Arch. Protistenk. 74, 365.Google Scholar