Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:11:43.282Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The excretory system of the kidney worm Stephanurus dentatus (Nematoda)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

A. H. Waddell
A. H. Waddell
Affiliation:
Department of Parasitology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The growth and morphology of the excretory system of Stephanurus dentatus were investigated using both the light microscope and the electron microscope. In the 3rd-stage larva a branched tubular system extends from the posterior end of the excretory ampulla. The subventral glands are two elongated cells in the body cavity, and these do not appear to be attached to the tubular system.

The tubular and glandular portions of the excretory system are intimately associated with each other at the posterior end of the ampulla or sinus from the 4th-stage, but throughout their development they remain histologically distinctive. Moreover, the nuclei of each portion of the system are of two different types; those of the tubular system are similar to hypodermal nuclei, whereas the nuclei of the subventral glands are like the intestinal nuclei.

The lateral canals are extensions of the excretory sinus and lie embedded in the hypodermal tissue of the lateral chords. As the worm matures, the lateral canals increase in relative length, and the anterior branch of each lateral canal develops during the 4th stage.

Pink viscous fluid which passes from the excretory pore is identical in appearance with the fluid which is found in the lateral chords. It is suggested that the fluid in the lateral canals gains access to the excretory system by way of canaliculi in the wall of the lateral excretory canal.

I am most grateful to Professor J. F. A. Sprent for his interest and advice during this investigation, and to Mr J. J. Mines and Mr C. Boel for their able technical assistance. I gratefully acknowledge the financial support given for this study by the Australian Dairy Produce Board and the U.S. Department of Health, Education and Welfare (No. A 107023–02).

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 58 , Issue 4 , November 1968 , pp. 907 - 919
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1968

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alicata, J. E. (1935). Early developmental stages of nematodes occurring in swine. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dept. Agric. no. 489.Google Scholar
Aubertot, M. (1926). Contractilité de l'appareil excreteur chez les larves du Rhabditis pellio (Schn.). C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci., Paris 182, 163–5.Google Scholar
Bastian, H. C. (1866). On the anatomy and physiology of the nematoids, parasitic and free; with observations on their zoological position and affinities to the echinoderms. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 156, 545–638.Google Scholar
Behrenz, W. (1956). Vergleichende physiologische Untersuchungen uber die Exkretion parasitischer Nematoden mit Hilfe der Fluoreszenzmikroskopie. Z. wiss. Zool. 159, 129–64.Google Scholar
Chitwood, B. G. (1931). A comparative histological study of certain nematodes. Z. Morph. Ökol. Tiere 23, 237–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chitwood, B. G. & Chitwood, M. B. (1950). An Introduction to Nematology, section 1. Baltimore: B. G. Chitwood.Google Scholar
Cobb, N. A. (1890). Oxyuris larvae hatched in the human stomach under normal conditions. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 5, 168–85.Google Scholar
Cobb, N. A. (1913). (Free-living nematodes). Abstract of report before Helminthological Society of Washington, D.C. Feb. 6. Science, N.Y. (n.s.), 37, 498.Google Scholar
Cobb, N. A. (1925). A study of the development of the larvae in utero of Rhabditis icosiensis. J. Parasit. 11, 219–20.Google Scholar
Conte, A. (1902). Contributions à l'embryologie des nématodes. Annls Univ. Lyon pp. 1–133.Google Scholar
Douvres, F. W., Tromba, F. G. & Doran, D. J. (1966). The influence of NCTC 109, serum, and swine kidney cell culture on the morphogenesis of Stephanurus dentatus to fourth stage in vitro. J. Parasit. 52, 875–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eisma, M. (1932). De differentiatie van het derde stadium van de larven der Ancyclostomidae van mensch, hond en kat. Acta leidensia 7, 1–160.Google Scholar
Enigk, K. & Grittner, I. (1952). Zur Morphologie von Strongylus vulgaris (Nematodes) Z. ParasitKde 15, 267–82.Google Scholar
Golovin, E. P. (1902). Observations on nematodes. II. Excretory apparatus. (Russian text). Uchen. Zap. imp. kazan. Univ. pp. 1–120.Google Scholar
Goodey, J. B. (1957). Laboratory methods for work with plant and soil nematodes. Tech. Bull. Minist. Agric., Fish. Fd., no. 2.Google Scholar
Goodrich, E. S. (1946). The study of nephridia and genital ducts since 1895. Q. Jl microsc. Sci. (N.S.), 86, 113–392.Google Scholar
Harris, J. E. & Crofton, H. D. (1957). Structure and function in the nematodes: internal pressure and cuticular structure in Ascaris. J. exp. Biol. 34, 116–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, L. H. (1951). The Invertebrates: Acanthocephala, Aschelminthes, and Entoprocta the Pseudocoelomate Bilateria. 3. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.Google Scholar
Kromhout, G. A. (1943). A comparison of the protonephridia of fresh-water, brackish-water and marine specimens of Gyratrix hermaphroditus. J. Morph. 72, 167–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D. L. (1965). The Physiology of Nematodes. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.Google Scholar
Lillie, R. D. (1948). Histopathologic Technic. Philadelphia: Blakiston.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Looss, A. (1905). The anatomy and life history of Agchylostoma duodenale Dub. A monograph. Rec. Egypt. Govt. Sch. Med. 3, 1–158.Google Scholar
Mackin, J. G. (1936). Studies on the morphology and life history of nematodes in the genus Spironoura. Illinois biol. Monogr. 14, 1–62.Google Scholar
Montgomery, T. H. (1908). On the morphology of the excretory organs of metazoa. A critical review. Proc. Am. phil. Soc. 47, 547–635.Google Scholar
Nichols, R. L. (1956). The etiology of visceral larval migrans. II. Comparative larval morphology of Ascaris lumbricoides, Necator americanus, Strongyloides stercoralis and Ancylostoma caninum. J. Parasit. 42, 363–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palade, G. E. (1952). A study of fixation for electron microscopy. J. exp. Med. 95, 285–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pease, D. C. (1964). Histological Techniques for Electron Microscopy, 2nd ed.New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Raven, B. & Schuurmans-Stekhoven, J. H. (1934). Zur Frage der Exkretion bei de Rhabditiden. Zool. Anz. 106, 17–20.Google Scholar
Sarles, M. P. (1938). The in vitro action of immune rat serum on the nematode Nippostrongylus muris. J. infect. Dis. 62, 337–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuurmans-Stekhoven, J. H. (1927). The nemas Anchylostoma and Necator. Proc. Sect. Sci. K. ned. Akad. Wet. 30, 113–25.Google Scholar
Sommerville, R. I. (1957). The exsheathing mechanism of nematode infective larvae. Expl Parasit. 6, 18–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tayler, L. (1900). Our present knowledge of the kidney worm (Sclerostoma pinguicola) of swine. 16th Ann. Rep. Bureau Anim. Indust. U.S. Dept. Agric. (1899), pp. 613–37.Google Scholar
Tromba, F. G. & Baisden, L. A. (1964). Precipitinogens in the excretory gland contents and in extracts of isolated tissues of Stephanurus dentatus. Proc. helminth. Soc. Wash. 31, 10–18.Google Scholar
Weinstein, P. P. (1952). Regulation of water balance as a function of the excretory system of the filariform larvae of Nippostrongylus muris and Ancylostoma caninum. Expl Parasit. 1, 363–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weinstein, P. P. (1960). Excretory mechanisms and excretory products of nematodes: an appraisal. In Host Influence on Parasitic Physiology, pp. 65–92. ed. Stauber, L.. New Brunswick: Rutgers Univ. Press.Google Scholar
Willmer, E. N. (1952). Some aspects of evolutionary cytology. In Cytology and Cell Physiology, pp. 440–93. Ed. Bourne, G. H.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar