Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T08:21:59.364Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental infection of mice with the microfilariae of Onchocerca lienalis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

S. Townson
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Winches Farm Field Station, 395 Hatfield Road, St Albans, Herts.
A. E. Bianco
Affiliation:
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Winches Farm Field Station, 395 Hatfield Road, St Albans, Herts.

Summary

Microfilariae of Onchocerca lienalis were obtained from the umbilical skin of naturally infected cattle and were injected into mice. Maximum numbers of microfilariae were recovered from the skin and ears of mice when using the subcutaneous route of inoculation. Microfilariae were distributed throughout the pinna of the ear but were concentrated towards the tip where histological sections showed them to be in the dermis and adipose tissue. Using the number of parasites recovered from the ears as an index of the intensity of infection it was found that inbred CBA/H T6T6 mice were one of the most susceptible of 11 strains of mice examined. No difference in susceptibility was found between male and female CBA mice of the same age, but marked differences were demonstrated between male CBA mice of different ages. After infection with 5000 microfilariae the recovery of parasites from the ears increased rapidly to a peak at day 35 when 10% of the inoculum was recovered, and thereafter declined up to day 242. Over a range of inoculation doses examined it was found that there was a direct, linear relationship between the number of microfilariae recovered from the ears and the number in the inoculated dose. CBA mice showed marked resistance to reinfection with microfilariae. Six days after challenge with a secondary infection recoveries of microfilariae from the ears were only 26% of the level in challenge controls and fell to 3% of the level of controls by day 35. It is concluded that the model of O. lienalis microfilariae in CBA mice shows considerable promise as a tool for research into immunological responses to skin-dwelling microfilariae, which are the principal cause of pathology in onchocerciasis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aoki, Y., Recinos, M. M. & Hashiguchi, Y. (1980). Life span and distribution of Onchocerca volvulus microfilariae in mice. Journal of Parasitology 66, 797801.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ash, L. R. (1971). Preferential susceptibility of male jirds (Meriones unguiculatus) to infection with Brugia pahangi. Journal of Parasitology 57, 777–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ash, L. R. & Riley, J. M. (1970). Development of Brugia pahangi in the jird, Meriones unguiculatus with notes on infection in other rodents. Journal of Parasitology 56, 962–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beveridge, I., Kummerow, E. & Wilkinson, P. (1980). Experimental infection of laboratory rodents and calves with microfilariae of Onchocerca gibsoni. Tropenmedizin und Parasitologie 31, 82–6.Google ScholarPubMed
Bianco, A. E., Ham, P., El Sinnary, K. & Nelson, G. S. (1980). Large scale recovery of Onchocerca microfilariae from naturally infected cattle and horses. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 74, 109.Google Scholar
Duke, B. O. L. (1962). Experimental transmission of Onchocerca volvulus from man to a chimpanzee. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 56, 271.Google Scholar
Eichler, D. A. & Nelson, G. S. (1971). Studies on Onchocerca gutturosa (Neumann, 1910) and its development in Simulium ornatum (Meigen, 1818). 1. Observations on O. gutturosa in cattle in South-east England. Journal of Helminthology 45, 245–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El Bihari, S. & Hussein, H. S. (1975). Location of the microfilariae of Onchocerca armillata. Journal of Parasitology 61, 656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grove, D. I. & Davis, R. S. (1978). Serological diagnosis of bancroftian and malayan filariasis. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 27, 508–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grove, D. I., Davis, R. S. & Warren, K. S. (1979). Brugia malayi microfilaraemia in mice: a model for the study of the host response to microfilariae. Parasitology 79, 303–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kershaw, W. E. (1949). Observations on Litomosoides carinii (Travassos, 1919) Chandler, 1931. II. The migration of the first stage larva. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 43, 96115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mazzotti, L. & Palomo, E. (1957). A note on the survival of the microfilariae of Mansonella ozzardi. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 16, 696–9.Google ScholarPubMed
Nelson, G. S., Heisch, R. B. & Furlong, M. (1962). Studies in filariasis in East Africa. II. Filarial infections in man, animals and mosquitos on the Kenya Coast. Transactions of the Royal Society for Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 56, 207–12.Google ScholarPubMed
Nelson, G. S., Amin, M. A., Blackie, E. H. & Robson, N. (1966). The maintenance of Onchocerca gutturosa microfilariae in vitro and in vivo. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 60, 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ponnudurai, T., Denham, D. A., Nelson, G. S. & Rogers, R. (1974). Studies with Brugia pahangi 4. Antibodies against adult and microfilarial stages. Journal of Helminthology 48, 107–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ponnudurai, T., Denham, D. A. & Rogers, R. (1975). Studies on Brugia pahangi 9. The longevity of microfilariae transfused from cat to cat. Journal of Helminthology 49, 2530.Google ScholarPubMed
Rabalais, R. F. (1974). Studies on Onchocerca cervicalis, Railliet and Henry, 1910, microfilariae in the jird, Meriones unguiculatus. Journal of Helminthology 48, 125–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rosen, L. (1955). Observations on the epidemiology of human filariasis in French Oceania. American Journal of Hygiene 61, 219–48.Google Scholar
Solomon, G. B. (1969). Host hormones and parasite infection. International Review of Tropical Medicine 8, 101–58.Google Scholar
Suswillo, R. R., Nelson, G. S., Muller, R., McGreevy, P. B., Duke, B. O. L. & Denham, D. A. (1977). Attempts to infect jirds (Meriones unguiculatus) with Wuchereria bancrofti, Onchocerca volvulus, Loa loa loa, and Mansonella ozzardi. Journal of Helminthology 51, 132–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanner, M. & Weiss, N. (1979). Studies on Dipetalonema viteae (Filarioidea) 4. Passive transfer of immunity to circulating microfilariae by spleen cells. Tropenmedizin und Parasitologic 30, 371–5.Google ScholarPubMed
Townson, S. & Bianco, A. E. (1981). Attempts to infect small laboratory animals with the infective larvae of Onchocerca lienalis. Journal of Helminthology 55, 247–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weiss, N. (1970). Parasitologische und immunobiologische Untersuchungen über die durch Dipetalonema vitae erzeugte Nagetierfilariose. Acta tropica 27, 219–59.Google Scholar
Wenk, P., Wegerkof, P. & Schultebrauchs, R. (1978). Constitution of patency in rodent filariasis (Litomosoides carinii) and its relation to onchocerciasis. Parasitology 77, xxxiii.Google Scholar
Wesley, I. V. (1973). Sex hormones and their influence on preferential susceptibility of the male jird (Meriones unguiculatus) to infection by Brugia pahangi (Nematoda: Filaroidea). Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Wong, M. M. (1964). Studies on microfilaraemia in dogs. II. Levels of microfilaraemia in relation to immunologic responses of the host. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 13, 6677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar