Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:01:53.343Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Haemosporidian infections in wild populations of Podarcis muralis from the Italian Peninsula

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 May 2022

Federico Storniolo*
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Terra e Ambiente, Università di Pavia, Viale Torquato Taramelli 24, Pavia 27100, Italy
Marco A. L. Zuffi
Affiliation:
Museo di Storia Naturale, Università di Pisa, Via Roma 79, Calci 56011, Italy
Alan J. Coladonato
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Terra e Ambiente, Università di Pavia, Viale Torquato Taramelli 24, Pavia 27100, Italy
Marco Mangiacotti
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Terra e Ambiente, Università di Pavia, Viale Torquato Taramelli 24, Pavia 27100, Italy Museo di Storia Naturale, Corso Venezia 55, Milano 20121, Italy
Stefano Scali
Affiliation:
Museo di Storia Naturale, Corso Venezia 55, Milano 20121, Italy
Roberto Sacchi
Affiliation:
Dipartimento Terra e Ambiente, Università di Pavia, Viale Torquato Taramelli 24, Pavia 27100, Italy
*
Author for correspondence: Federico Storniolo, E-mail: federico.storniolo01@universitadipavia.it

Abstract

Parasites can significantly influence the ecology, behaviour and physiology of their hosts sometimes with remarkable effects on their survivorship. However, endemic parasites or those not associated with obvious clinical disease have been partly neglected in the past decades comparatively to the most pathogenic ones. Apicomplexa are an important example of blood parasites that have been broadly investigated, although it can be difficult to determine the effects of infections at the population level, especially in widespread species. Such is the case of the common wall lizard (Podarcis muralis). We investigated 61 populations across Italy between 2008 and 2017 and recorded snout–vent length, latitude, date of collection and took blood samples for parasite count. We modelled parasite prevalence and load in a Bayesian framework. Parasites were present in all populations but 1 and in 13 of them all individuals were parasitized. We recorded almost identical responses for probability of infection and parasite load in both sexes, directly proportional to body size and inversely proportional to latitude, with a peak in cooler months. Therefore, haemosporidians can be very common in P. muralis, although their presence can vary significantly. Moreover, such a high prevalence makes it necessary to investigate to what extent haemosporidians affect hosts' survivorship, taking into consideration abiotic and biotic factors such as temperature, hormone levels and immune response.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided that no alterations are made and the original article is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained prior to any commercial use and/or adaptation of the article.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

To understand the role of parasites in their hosts' ecology and population dynamics it is crucial to investigate their effects on the hosts themselves and how they cope with parasitic infections (Smallridge and Bull, Reference Smallridge and Bull2000). Although the effects of infectious organisms have been widely investigated in the past decades, most research has been focused on pathogenic ones affecting mainly humans and domesticated animals, while little attention has been paid to persistent and endemic parasites in wild populations of reptiles (Anderson, Reference Anderson1995), taking into consideration the potential impacts of such parasites on hosts' ecology, behaviour and physiology (Mendoza-Roldan et al., Reference Mendoza-Roldan, Latrofa, Iatta, Manoj, Panarese, Annoscia, Pombi, Zatelli, Beugnet and Otranto2021) as well. Therefore, the reciprocal interactions between parasites not associated with obvious clinical disease and their natural hosts are still an open field for research as it is still complex to determine the magnitude and impact of the parasite infection on the hosts' survivorship or, alternatively, whether they can coexist without major consequences for the host (Jacobson, Reference Jacobson2007).

Under this perspective, blood parasites of wild vertebrates have been investigated widely in previous research, especially those taxa that undergo reproduction via gametocytes in the blood cells of their host such as Plasmodium, Hepatozoon, Leucocytozoon and Haemoproteus (Lei et al., Reference Lei, Amar, Koeslag, Gous and Tate2013; Netherlands et al., Reference Netherlands, Cook, Kruger, du Perez and Smit2015; Naqvi et al., Reference Naqvi, Khan, Iqbal, Rizwan, Khan, Naqvi, Zafar, Sindhu, Abbas and Abbas2017). These taxa have been studied intensively because of their remarkable distribution within wild populations of vertebrates (Davies and Johnston, Reference Davies and Johnston2000) assessing their role in causing major detrimental effects on their hosts (e.g. anaemia, leucocytosis, liver/spleen enlargement). Moreover, endemic parasite presence has been used in terms of haematology and blood cytology, which are important tools to assess physiological adaptations of the hosts to special environmental conditions (Martínez-Silvestre and Arribas, Reference Martínez-Silvestre and Arribas2014).

On a wider scale it is more complicated to assess the impact of endemic intracellular parasites on wild populations of widespread species due to the broad spectrum of environmental conditions that are experienced by different populations. This is the case of the common wall lizard (Podarcis muralis), which is commonly present in most countries from central-southern Europe ranging from Northern Spain (Ji and Braña, Reference Ji and Braña2000), to Germany and Czech Republic (Jablonski et al., Reference Jablonski, Gvoždík, Choleva, Jandzik, Moracev, Mačát and Veselý2019) and to Turkey across the Balkans (Yildirimhan and Sümer, Reference Yildirimhan and Sümer2019). Furthermore, the ecological requirements of this species cover a wide variety of environmental conditions that allow it to inhabit a great variety of habitats (While et al., Reference While, Williamson, Prescott, Horváthová, Fresnillo, Beeton, Halliwell, Michaelides and Uller2014). For these reasons, P. muralis has been investigated intensively in the last decades from several perspectives, such as behavioural ecology (Coladonato et al., Reference Coladonato, Mangiacotti, Scali, Zuffi, Pasquariello, Matellini, Buratti, Battaiola and Sacchi2020), feeding ecology (Herrel et al., Reference Herrel, Van Damme, Vanhooydonck and De Vree2001), morphology (Calsbeek et al., Reference Calsbeek, Hasselquist and Clobert2010; Urošević et al., Reference Urošević, Ljubisavljević and Ivanović2015), physiology (Bonati et al., Reference Bonati, Csermely and Romani2008, Reference Bonati, Csermely, López and Martín2009), phylogeny and phylogeography (Gassert et al., Reference Gassert, Schulte, Husemann, Ulrich, Rödder, Hochkirch, Engel, Meyer and Habel2013; Yang et al., Reference Yang, Feiner, Laakkonen, Sacchi, Zuffi, Scali, While and Uller2020). In contrast, little effort has been addressed at studying its interactions with parasites, especially with intracellular ones, as most research focused on a limited number of populations in relatively small areas and under specific environmental conditions (Amo et al., Reference Amo, López and Martín2004). Hence, the interactions between lizards and their parasites at wider geographic scales are still an open field for investigation to determine how wild populations interact with endemic parasites under different conditions. Furthermore, taking into consideration biological (e.g. age class, body condition index, sex) and ecological variables (local climate, altitude, diet composition) can provide robust support to such purpose.

Under this perspective, the common wall lizard appears to be an excellent model species, given its wide distribution in the central-southern Europe region and also due to the partial lack of knowledge in terms of interactions with parasites. Hence, we investigated a large number of populations of P. muralis from the Italian Peninsula, covering also a significant range of environmental conditions, with the aim to assess the entity of haemoparasites occurrence in wild populations according to environmental and biological factors in terms of the host–parasites interaction and its ecological drivers and constraints.

Materials and methods

Data sampling

We collected adult common wall lizards by noosing (Blomberg and Shine, Reference Blomberg, Shine and Sutherland2006) during March–September between 2008 and 2017 in 61 sites within the whole species distribution in Italy (Fig. 1). Overall, we captured 892 individuals (549 males and 343 females), and on average (±s.d.) 9 ± 11 males (range: 0–77) and 6 ± 6 females (range: 0–38) for each population. After capture, the snout–vent length (SVL) of each lizard was measured with a digital calliper. Males and females measured on average 63.5 ± 5.2 mm (range: 47.1–84.0 mm) and 59.3 ± 5.5 mm (range: 43.5–76.2 mm), respectively.

Fig. 1. Distribution map of the 61 populations of the common wall lizard sample all over Italy. The dark grey area corresponds to the distribution range of the species.

Blood samples (15–20 μl) were collected in heparinized capillary tubes from the postorbital plexus (MacLean et al., Reference MacLean, Lee and Wilson1973). Air-dried smears were stained with May–Grünwald/Giemsa stain and scanned using a light microscope at 60× following standard routines (Canfield, Reference Canfield1998; Latimer and Bienzle, Reference Latimer, Bienzle, Feldman, Zinkl and Jain2000). For each prepared sample, red blood cells (RBCs) and haemoparasites were counted in 50 explored fields; parasites were morphologically determined at the order level (Frye, Reference Frye and Frye1981). On average (± s.e.) 5811 ± 81 RBCs were counted, and parasite load was standardized to 10 000 erythrocytes (Godfrey et al., Reference Godfrey, Fedynich and Pence1987).

Statistical analyses

Haemoparasites were analysed following 2 approaches: firstly, we modelled the probability of parasite infection through a random intercept generalized linear model (GLMM) with binomial error distribution, then we analysed the parasite load by using a random intercept zero inflated negative binomial (ZINB) model.

To account for seasonal variation of parasites, we used multiple-components cosinor models (Halberg et al., Reference Halberg, Tong, Johnson and von Meyersbach1967; Cornelissen, Reference Cornelissen2014; Sacchi et al., Reference Sacchi, Cancian, Ghia, Fea and Coladonato2021; Storniolo et al., Reference Storniolo, Zuffi, Coladonato, Di Vozzo, Giglio, Gini, Leonetti, Luccini, Mangiacotti, Scali, Abate, Sperone, Tatini and Sacchi2021 for details on the method), which use linear combinations of cosine functions to assess the amplitude (A) and phase (φ) of seasonal rhythms around the average value [i.e. the midline estimating statistic of rhythm (MESOR)] over the period (τ). We used a single-component cosinor model:

$$Y( t ) = M + A\cos \left({\displaystyle{{2\pi t} \over \tau } + \varphi } \right) + e( t ) , \;$$

including time (t) expressed as Julian date (1 =  1 January) and τ = 365 to account for effect of circannual rhythms around the baseline of parasite load. This model was incorporated into GLMM and ZINB models as fixed effect. Sex, body size (standardized SVL, by subtracting the mean and dividing by standard deviation) and latitude (standardized UTM coordinate) also entered the models as fixed effects. We also added the cosinor × sex, cosinor × body size and cosinor × latitude interactions to account for possible sex, size and geographical specific patterns in circannual rhythms on parasite occurrence and parasite load. The population entered the models as a random intercept to account for unexplained variation at the population level (σ 2pop) when controlling for the explanatory variables (Sacchi et al., Reference Sacchi, Cancian, Ghia, Fea and Coladonato2021).

Models were fit in a Bayesian analytical framework available in the package R2jags (Su et al., Reference Su, Yajima and Su2015) in R 4.3.3 (R Core Team, 2018), which uses the samplers implemented in JAGS 4.3.0. Uninformative normal priors (μ = 0 and σ = 0.001) were used for model's coefficients, and γ priors (a = 0.001 and b = 0.001 corresponding to μ = 1 and σ = 1000) were used for both the error (σ) and the random intercept (σ pop). Three chains were run using randomly selected initial values for each parameter within a reasonable interval, and conventional convergence criteria were checked. The number of iterations was selected for each run to obtain at least 10 000 valid values for each chain after convergence and thinning. The results from the posterior distribution indicate the probability of the described event to be true and are reported as the half-sample mode (HSM, Bickel and Frühwirth, Reference Bickel and Frühwirth2006) with 95 and 50% highest density intervals (HDI95, Kruschke, Reference Kruschke2010).

Results

Haemoparasites were found in all but one of the 61 sampled populations, and in 13 populations (22%) all individuals were infected. The parasite prevalence within population was on average (±s.d.) 66.5 ± 29.7% and 65.5 ± 34.8% in males and 65.0 ± 29.9% in females, respectively. The parasite load was on average (±s.d.) 49 ± 109 parasites per 10 000 erythrocytes, ranging from 1 to 1285, 71 ± 136 and 32 ± 88 parasites per 10 000 erythrocytes in females and males, respectively.

The logistic Bayesian model confirmed the observation in rough data and showed that the HSMs (HDIs95) of the posterior probabilities of parasite prevalence were 0.68 (0.35–0.89) for males and 0.74 (0.57–0.86) for females, and changed according to body size, season and, to a lesser extent, also according to latitude (Table 1). Indeed, the probability of infection increased with body size in both sexes (Table 1, Fig. 2), with slight differences between males and females (P ♂<♀ = 0.70, Fig. 2). In both sexes, the probability of infection decreased northward (Fig. 2), without any evident difference between males and females (P ♂>♀ = 0.49, Fig. 2). The analysis of the cosinor components showed that amplitude was not null, in both males and females (Table 2), supporting the occurrence of a seasonal pattern of haemosporidians prevalence in blood cells. However, seasonal amplitude was slightly higher in females than in males (P ♂<♀ = 0.67, Fig. 2). Phases did not deviate from zero (Table 1), with a slight difference between sexes (P ♂<♀ = 0.621), so seasonal trends were not synchronous between sexes, and parasite prevalence tends to be higher during cool months (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2. Posterior probability distributions of the susceptibility to Haemoproteus infection (probability) in male and female common wall lizards in Italy in response to body size, latitude and season as estimated by a Bayesian GLMM. HSM (thick black solid line), HDI50 (dark grey polygons) and HDI95 (light grey polygons) estimates are shown. The horizontal lanes are for the HSM (solid line) and HDI95 (dotted lines) for the baseline (MESOR).

Table 1. Posterior probability distributions of the coefficients of the Bayesian GLMM model for the effect of body size (standardized SVL), latitude (standardized UTMy coordinate) and season (amplitude and phase in cosinor structure) on the parasite prevalence (probability of infection) of male and female common wall lizards in Italy

HSM, HDI50 (in brackets) and the probability of the distribution to deviate from zero.

Table 2. Posterior probability distributions of the coefficients of the Bayesian ZINB model for the effect of body size (standardized SVL), latitude (standardized UTMy coordinate) and season (amplitude and phase in cosinor structure) on the parasite load (N parasites per 10 000 erythrocytes) of male and female common wall lizards in Italy

HSM, HDI50 (in brackets) and the probability of the distribution to deviate from zero.

The Bayesian ZINB model supplied for parasite load similar pattern of responses than Bayesian GLMM did for parasite prevalence. Indeed, the HSMs (HDIs95) of the posterior probabilities of MESORs estimated by the model were 2.38 (0.95–6.04) and 2.86 (1.45–5.98) parasites per 10 000 erythrocytes for males and females, respectively. There was not any support for a difference between sexes (P ♂>♀ = 0.228). However, these parasite load baseline values changed depending mainly on body size and season, and marginally on latitude (Table 2). Parasite load increased with increasing body size (Fig. 3), and differently between males and females (P ♂<♀ = 0.771). Parasite load decreased from south to north (Fig. 3), even without any difference between sexes (P ♂<♀ = 0.405). The cosinor component supported the occurrence of a seasonal pattern of variation given that amplitudes were not null in both males and females (Table 2). In this case, males seemed to have a slightly higher amplitude than females (P ♂>♀ = 0.703). Phases did not deviate from zero (Table 2) and differently between sexes (P ♂<♀ = 0.746), suggesting that seasonal patterns of variation were not synchronous, but reaching the peak during the cool months in both sexes (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3. Posterior probability distributions of the parasite loads (N. of parasites per 10 000 erythrocytes) in male and female common wall lizards in Italy in response to body size, latitude and seasons estimated by a Bayesian zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) model. Symbols and colours as in Fig. 2.

Discussion

Wild populations of vertebrates need to cope with numerous constraints to survive in their natural habitat, namely environmental conditions, food resources, inter and intraspecific competition for such resources and territory, avoidance of predators and strategies to capture prey, that are complex to isolate and define separately. Furthermore, the interaction with parasites happens to be another major stressor for the hosts and, as a result, their fitness can be affected significantly by the presence of such foreign organisms (Sindermann, Reference Sindermann1987). Hence, the presence of persistent parasites in wild populations deserves a closer attention because their role and impact on such populations still need to be defined thoroughly in reptiles as it was shown for amphibians (Daversa et al., Reference Daversa, Manica, Bosch, Jolles and Garner2017) and birds (van Rooyen et al., Reference van Rooyen, Lalubin, Glaizot and Christe2013) that parasite infections can affect the ecology and behaviour of their hosts.

In this research, parasite prevalence and parasite load were found in the studied populations for both males and females with no intersexual difference. However, given that reptiles grow continuously throughout their life span, both models indicated that age (standardized SVL) plays a major role in parasite susceptibility as larger (i.e. older) individuals are parasitized more frequently and intensely than younger ones. Such observation is consistent with the behaviour and phenology of lizards as they are likely to share basking spots or shelters where the acquisition of parasites via haematophagous ectoparasites is more probable, whereas juveniles are often segregated in marginal spots to reduce competition with adults, where the contact with conspecifics and parasites is less frequent (Smallridge and Bull, Reference Smallridge and Bull2000); moreover, adults could be more parasitized because they have made contact more frequently with parasites during their lifetime (Amo et al., Reference Amo, López and Martín2004).

Concerning the latitudinal pattern we observed, blood parasite prevalence and load are known to be significantly variable according to a broad variety of biotic and abiotic factors such as host phenology, activity and hormone levels, the ecology of vectors under different environmental conditions and in relation to the host's immune system, rainfall, temperature and anthropogenic factors as well (Schall and Marghoob, Reference Schall and Marghoob1995; Schall and Pearson, Reference Schall and Pearson2000). In our study, we detected that parasite load in northern populations is lower, in accordance with some findings indicating that parasites are more abundant in tropical regions (Møller, Reference Møller1998). Such hypothesis is consistent with the common knowledge that reptiles, as ectotherms, tend to have longer seasonal activity periods in warmer environments thus extending the period during which they are potentially exposed to the acquisition of parasites through their vectors (Salkeld et al., Reference Salkeld, Trivedi and Schwarzkopf2008). Mediterranean lizards in fact are generally inactive during cold months as their activity period normally ranges from March to October, although northern populations are likely to be active for a shorter period, thus reducing exposure to the parasite.

In terms of seasonality, reptiles depend on environmental temperature for their physiological functions and parasitic infections can affect significantly behavioural thermoregulation (Schall and Sarni, Reference Schall and Sarni1987; Main and Bull, Reference Main and Bull2000). Therefore, in colder months, reptiles are metabolically less efficient, and this can influence how they respond to parasitic infections. The studied lizards were parasitized more intensely in colder months rather that during the peak of the reproductive season, albeit parasite prevalence was less markedly variable than parasite load. Although our findings seem to be consistent with such hypothesis, it is necessary to point out that susceptibility to parasites (i) is influenced by how the immune system can respond to infections, (ii) can be influenced strongly by how frequently the host interacts with conspecifics and (iii) is often highly dependent on the biology and ecology of the vectors in relation to the hosts'. During the peak of the reproductive season (warmer months), the levels of sex hormones (testosterone and oestrogen), generally considered immunosuppressors (Salvador et al., Reference Salvador, Veiga, Martín, López, Abelenda and Puerta1996; Olsson et al., Reference Olsson, Wapstra, Madsen and Silverin2000), are higher than in the rest of the year (Tokarz et al., Reference Tokarz, McMann, Seitz and John-Alder1998). Furthermore, testosterone promotes higher aggressivity and mobility in males, resulting in more frequent encounters with conspecifics for either male–male fights or copulation with females too (Amo et al., Reference Amo, López and Martín2005). Hence, under this perspective, it would be reasonable to assume that in warmer periods parasite susceptibility should reach its peak, which contrasts with what we observed.

In conclusion, this investigation (2008–2017) showed that haemosporidian infection patterns in P. muralis can vary throughout the year and according to both age and latitude as well. Nevertheless, given that knowledge about vectors and their biology is still lacking for the model species, the evidence we gathered is still preliminary and highlights the importance to investigate this host–parasite–vector system thoroughly to understand how lizards cope with infections. Additionally, it appears evidently necessary to assess to what extent different biotic and abiotic factors affect such host–parasite interaction, especially taking into consideration how the immune system responds to ongoing infections and how and to what extent parasite infections affect lizards in terms of survivorship and fitness.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Prof. Fabio Macchioni (University of Pisa, Department of Veterinary Sciences) for help in parasites classification. We would also thank 2 anonymous reviewers for their work and suggestions to improve the state of this research paper.

Author contributions

Contributions are addressed as follows: conceptualization (M. M., S. S., R. S.); data collection (R. S., S. S., M. A. L. Z., A. J. C., F. S., M. M.); data analysis and interpretation (M. M., R. S., A. J. C.); writing – original draft preparation (F. S., R. S.); writing – review and editing (F. S., M. A. L. Z., R. S., S. S., A. J. C., M. M.).

Financial support

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standards

Permits for animal handling and sample collection are the following: 2008: Aut. Prot. PNM-0003606; 2009–2011: Aut. Prot. PNM-0020292; 2012–2013: Aut. Prot. PNM-0009344; 2014–2015: Aut. Prot. PNM-0011379; 2016: Aut. Prot. PNM-0002154; 2017: Auth. Prot. PNM-0004217.

References

Amo, L, López, P and Martín, J (2004) Prevalence and intensity of haemogregarinid blood parasites in a population of the Iberian rock lizard, Lacerta monticola. Parasitology Research 94, 290293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amo, L, López, P and Martín, J (2005) Prevalence and intensity of haemogregarine blood parasites and their mite vectors in the common wall lizard, Podarcis muralis. Parasitology Research 96, 378381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, RM (1995) Evolutionary pressures in the spread and persistence of infectious agents in vertebrate populations. Parasitology 115, S15S31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bickel, DR and Frühwirth, R (2006) On a fast, robust estimator of the mode: comparisons to other robust estimators with applications. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis 50, 35003530.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blomberg, S and Shine, R (2006) Reptiles. In Sutherland, WJ (ed.), Ecological Census Techniques. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 297307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonati, B, Csermely, D and Romani, R (2008) Lateralization in the predatory behaviour of the common wall lizard (Podarcis muralis). Behavioural Processes 79, 171174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonati, B, Csermely, D, López, P and Martín, J (2009) Lateralization in the escape behaviour of the common wall lizard (Podarcis muralis). Behavioural Brain Research 207, 16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calsbeek, B, Hasselquist, D and Clobert, J (2010) Multivariate phenotypes and the potential for alternative phenotypic optima in wall lizard (Podarcis muralis) ventral colour morphs. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23, 11381147.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Canfield, PJ (1998) Comparative cell morphology in the peripheral blood film from exotic and native animals. Australian Veterinary Journal 76, 793800.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coladonato, AJ, Mangiacotti, M, Scali, S, Zuffi, MAL, Pasquariello, C, Matellini, C, Buratti, S, Battaiola, M and Sacchi, R (2020) Morph-specific seasonal variation of aggressive behaviour in a polymorphic lizard species. PeerJ 8, e10268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornelissen, G (2014) Cosinor-based rhythmometry. Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling 11, 124.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Daversa, DR, Manica, A, Bosch, J, Jolles, JW and Garner, TWJ (2017) Routine habitat switching alters the likelihood and persistence of infection with a pathogenic parasite. Functional Ecology 32, 12621270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, AJ and Johnston, MRL (2000) The biology of some intraerythrocytic parasites of fishes, amphibia and reptiles. Advances in Parasitology 45, 1107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frye, FL (1981) Hematology. In Frye, FL (ed.), Biomedical and Surgical Aspects of Captive Reptile Husbandry. Edwardsville, KS: Veterinary Medicine Publishing Company, pp. 61111.Google Scholar
Gassert, F, Schulte, U, Husemann, M, Ulrich, W, Rödder, D, Hochkirch, A, Engel, E, Meyer, J and Habel, JC (2013) From southern refugia to the northern range margin: genetic population structure of the common wall lizard, Podarcis muralis. Journal of Biogeography 40, 14751489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godfrey, RD Jr, Fedynich, AM and Pence, DB (1987) Quantification of hematozoa in blood smears. Journal of Wildlife Research 23, 558565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halberg, F, Tong, YL and Johnson, EA (1967) Circadian system phase – an aspect of temporal morphology; procedures and illustrative examples. In von Meyersbach, H (ed.), Cellular Aspects of Biorhythms. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 2048.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrel, A, Van Damme, R, Vanhooydonck, B and De Vree, F (2001) The implications of bite performance for diet in two species of lacertid lizards. Canadian Journal of Zoology 79, 662670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jablonski, D, Gvoždík, V, Choleva, L, Jandzik, D, Moracev, J, Mačát, Z and Veselý, M (2019) Tracing the maternal origin of the common wall lizard (Podarcis muralis) on the northern range margin in Central Europe. Mitochondrion 46, 149157.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacobson, ER (2007) Infectious Diseases and Pathology of Reptiles: Color Atlas and Text. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ji, X and Braña, F (2000) Among clutch variation in reproductive output and egg size in the wall lizard (Podarcis muralis) from a lowland population of Northern Spain. Journal of Herpetology 34, 5460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kruschke, JK (2010) Bayesian data analysis. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science 1, 658676.Google ScholarPubMed
Latimer, KS and Bienzle, D (2000) Determination and interpretation of the avian leukogram. In Feldman, J, Zinkl, JG and Jain, NC (eds), Schalm's Veterinary Haematology. Philadelphia: Lippincot Williams and Wilkins, pp. 417431.Google Scholar
Lei, B, Amar, A, Koeslag, A, Gous, TA and Tate, GJ (2013) Differential haemoparasite intensity between black sparrowhawk (Accipiter melanoleucus) morphs suggests an adaptive function for polymorphism. PLoS ONE 8, e81607.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLean, G, Lee, A and Wilson, K (1973) A simple method of obtaining blood from lizards. Copeia 1973, 338339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Main, AR and Bull, CM (2000) The impact of tick parasites on the behaviour of the lizard Tiliqua rugosa. Oecologia 122, 574581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martínez-Silvestre, A and Arribas, O (2014) Blood differential count and effect of haemoparasites in wild populations of Pyrenean lizard Iberolacerta aurelioi (Arribas, 1994). Basic and Applied Herpetology 28, 7986.Google Scholar
Mendoza-Roldan, JA, Latrofa, MS, Iatta, R, Manoj, RRS, Panarese, R, Annoscia, G, Pombi, M, Zatelli, A, Beugnet, F and Otranto, D (2021) Detection of Leishmania tarentolae in lizards, sand flies and dogs in southern Italy, where Leishmania infantum is endemic: hindrances and opportunities. Parasites & Vectors 14, 461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Møller, AP (1998) Evidence of larger impact of parasites on hosts in the tropics: investment in immune function within and outside the tropics. Oikos 82, 265270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naqvi, MA, Khan, MK, Iqbal, Z, Rizwan, HM, Khan, MN, Naqvi, SZ, Zafar, A, Sindhu, ZD, Abbas, RZ and Abbas, A (2017) Prevalence and associated risk factors of haemoparasites, and their effects on hematological profile in domesticated chickens in District Payyah, Punjab, Pakistan. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 143, 4953.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Netherlands, EC, Cook, CA, Kruger, DJD, du Perez, LH and Smit, NJ (2015) Biodiversity of frog haemoparasites from sub-tropical northern KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife 4, 135141.Google ScholarPubMed
Olsson, M, Wapstra, E, Madsen, T and Silverin, B (2000) Testosterone, mites and travels: a test of the immunocompetence-handicap hypothesis in free-ranging male sand lizards. Proceedings of Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 267, 23392343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team (2018) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available at https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Sacchi, R, Cancian, S, Ghia, D, Fea, G and Coladonato, AJ (2021) Color variation in signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus. Current Zoology 67, 3543.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salkeld, DJ, Trivedi, M and Schwarzkopf, L (2008) Parasite loads are higher in the tropics: temperate to tropical variation in a single host-parasite system. Ecography 31, 538544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salvador, A, Veiga, JP, Martín, J, López, P, Abelenda, M and Puerta, M (1996) The cost of producing a sexual signal: testosterone increases the susceptibility of male lizards to ectoparasitic infestation. Behavioral Ecology 7, 145150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schall, JJ and Marghoob, AG (1995) Prevalence of a malarial parasite over time and space: Plasmodium mexicanum in its vertebrate host, the western fence lizard Sceloporus occidentalis. Journal of Animal Ecology 64, 177185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schall, JJ and Pearson, AR (2000) Body condition of a Puerto Rican anole, Anolis gundlachi: effect of a malaria parasite and weather variation. Journal of Herpetology 34, 489491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schall, JJ and Sarni, GA (1987) Malarial parasitism and the behaviour of the lizard, Sceloporus occidentalis. Copeia 1987, 8493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sindermann, CJ (1987) Effects of parasites on fish populations: practical considerations. International Journal of Parasitology 17, 371382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smallridge, CJ and Bull, CM (2000) Prevalence and intensity of the blood parasite Hemolivia mariae in a field population of the skink Tiliqua rugosa. Parasitology Research 86, 655660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storniolo, F, Zuffi, MAL, Coladonato, AJ, Di Vozzo, L, Giglio, G, Gini, AE, Leonetti, FL, Luccini, S, Mangiacotti, M, Scali, S, Abate, F, Sperone, E, Tatini, I and Sacchi, R (2021) Patterns of variation in dorsal colouration of the Italian wall lizard Podarcis siculus. Biology Open 10, bio058793.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Su, Y, Yajima, S, Su, MYS and SystemRequirements JAGS (2015) Package ‘R2jags’. R package version 0.03-08. Available at http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=R2jags.Google Scholar
Tokarz, RR, McMann, S, Seitz, L and John-Alder, H (1998) Plasma corticosterone and testosterone levels during the annual reproductive cycle of male brown anoles (Anolis sagrei). Physiological Zoology 71, 139146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urošević, A, Ljubisavljević, K and Ivanović, A (2015) Fluctuating asymmetry and individual variation in the skull shape of the common wall lizard (Podarcis muralis Laurenti, 1768) estimated by geometric morphometrics. The Herpetological Journal 25, 177186.Google Scholar
van Rooyen, J, Lalubin, F, Glaizot, O and Christe, P (2013) Avian haemosporidian persistence and co-infection in great tits at the individual level. Malaria Journal 12, 18.Google ScholarPubMed
While, GM, Williamson, J, Prescott, G, Horváthová, T, Fresnillo, B, Beeton, NJ, Halliwell, B, Michaelides, S and Uller, T (2014) Adaptive responses to cool climate promotes persistence of a non-native lizard. Proceedings of Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences 282, 20142638.Google Scholar
Yang, W, Feiner, N, Laakkonen, H, Sacchi, R, Zuffi, MAL, Scali, S, While, GM and Uller, T (2020) Spatial variation in gene flow across a hybrid zone reveals causes of reproductive isolation and asymmetric introgression in wall lizards. Evolution 74, 12891300.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yildirimhan, HS and Sümer, N (2019) Studies on gastrointestinal helminth of three lacertid lizard species, Podarcis muralis, Podarcis siculus and Ophisops elegans (Sauria: Lacertidae) from Bursa, North-Western Turkey. Helminthologia 56, 310318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1. Distribution map of the 61 populations of the common wall lizard sample all over Italy. The dark grey area corresponds to the distribution range of the species.

Figure 1

Fig. 2. Posterior probability distributions of the susceptibility to Haemoproteus infection (probability) in male and female common wall lizards in Italy in response to body size, latitude and season as estimated by a Bayesian GLMM. HSM (thick black solid line), HDI50 (dark grey polygons) and HDI95 (light grey polygons) estimates are shown. The horizontal lanes are for the HSM (solid line) and HDI95 (dotted lines) for the baseline (MESOR).

Figure 2

Table 1. Posterior probability distributions of the coefficients of the Bayesian GLMM model for the effect of body size (standardized SVL), latitude (standardized UTMy coordinate) and season (amplitude and phase in cosinor structure) on the parasite prevalence (probability of infection) of male and female common wall lizards in Italy

Figure 3

Table 2. Posterior probability distributions of the coefficients of the Bayesian ZINB model for the effect of body size (standardized SVL), latitude (standardized UTMy coordinate) and season (amplitude and phase in cosinor structure) on the parasite load (N parasites per 10 000 erythrocytes) of male and female common wall lizards in Italy

Figure 4

Fig. 3. Posterior probability distributions of the parasite loads (N. of parasites per 10 000 erythrocytes) in male and female common wall lizards in Italy in response to body size, latitude and seasons estimated by a Bayesian zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) model. Symbols and colours as in Fig. 2.