Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T07:26:11.584Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Hatching rhythms in three species of Diclidophora (Monogenea) with observations on host behaviour

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Sheila Macdonald
Affiliation:
School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, U.K.

Extract

Eggs of three species of Diclidophora were incubated in alternating 12 h periods of light and darkness at 13°C. Eggs of D. merlangi collected at Arbroath hatched during the illumination period with most larvae being recovered in the first 4–6 h; some evidence of a seasonal difference in hatching of these eggs was found. Eggs of D. merlangi collected at Plymouth hatched with a peak of larval recovery in the 2 h period before the light came on. Eggs of D. luscae hatched over ‘dusk’ while those of D. denticulata hatched after the light was switched off. Neither mechanical disturbance nor the proximity of host tissue caused hatching in D. merlangi or D. luscae. Observations on the behaviour of the host fishes suggest that the hatching rhythms are adapted to specific host behaviour patterns.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Armstrong, F. A. J. & Butler, E. I. (1962). Hydrographic surveys off Plymouth in 1959 and 1960. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 42, 445–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bagenal, T. B. (1958). An analysis of the variability associated with the Vigneron-Dahl modification of the otter trawl by day and by night and a discussion of its action. Journal du Conseil Permanent International pour l'Exploration de la Mer 24 (1), 6279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailey, R. S. (1975). Observations on diel behaviour patterns in North Sea gadoids in the pelagic phase. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 55, 133–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, T. (1853). A history of the British stalk-eyed Crustacea, LXV, 386 pp. London: John van Voorst.Google Scholar
Bovet, J. (1967). Contribution à la morphologie et la biologie de Diplozoon paradoxum v. Nordmann, 1832. Bulletin de la Société Neuchételoise des Sciences naturelles 90, 64159.Google Scholar
Cerfontaine, P. (1895). Le genre Dactylocotyle. Bulletins de l'Academie Royale de Belgique 29, 913–46.Google Scholar
Chevey, P. (1929). Le Tecaud (Gadus luscus). Résumé de nos connaissances actuelles sur ce poisson. Revue des Travaux – Institut des Pêches Maritimes 2, 7499.Google Scholar
Euzet, L. & Raibaut, A. (1960). Le développement post larvaire de Squalonchocotyle torpedinis (Price, 1942) (Monogenea, Hexabothriidae). Bulletin de la Société Neuchâteloise des Sciences naturelles 83, 101–8.Google Scholar
Frankland, H. M. T. (1955). The life history and bionomics of Diclidophora denticulata (Trematoda, Monogenea). Parasitology 45, 313–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gamble, R. (1958). Some recent whiting investigations. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Near Northern Seas Committee No. 83, 5 pp.Google Scholar
Gamble, R. (1959). Investigations of the subdivisions of North Sea whiting populations. Part I. Further observations on the vertebral counts of whiting in the North Sea area. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Near Northern Seas Committee No. 36, 12 pp.Google Scholar
Godsen, F. (1880). Food of sea fishes-whiting and whiting pout. Zoologist, Series 3 4, 304.Google Scholar
Hislop, J. R. G. (1972). Some aspects of the biology of whiting, Merlangius merlangus (L.). Ph.D. Thesis. University of Aberdeen.Google Scholar
International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. (1965). Report of the Working Group on Sole. Co-operative Research Report no. 5, pp. 1126. Denmark: Charlottenlund Slot.Google Scholar
Jones, R. (1956). A discussion of some limitations of the trawl as a sampling instrument. Rapports et procès - Verbaux des Réunions Counceil Permanent International pour l'Exploration de la Mer 140(1), 44–7.Google Scholar
Kabata, Z. (1963). Parasites as biological tags. Special Publications of the International Commission for the North west Atlantic Fisheries 4, 31–7.Google Scholar
Kabata, Z. (1967). Whiting stocks and their gall bladder parasites in British waters. Marine Research 2, 511.Google Scholar
Kearn, G. C. (1963). The egg, oncomiracidium and larval development of Entobdella soleae, a monogenean skin parasite of the common sole. Parasitology 53, 435–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearn, G. C. (1971). The physiology and behaviour of the monogenean skin parasite Entobdella soleae in relation to its host (Solea solea). In Ecology and Physiology of Parasites: A Symposium (ed. Fallis, A. M.). University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Kearn, G. C. (1973). An endogenous circadian hatching rhythm in the monogenean skin parasite Entobdella soleae, and its relationship to the activity rhythm of the host (Solea solea). Parasitology 66, 101–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kearn, G. C. (1974 a). The effects of skin mucus on hatching in the monogenean parasite Entobdella soleae from the skin of the common sole, Solea solea. Parasitology 68, 173–88.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kearn, G. C. (1974 b). Nocturnal hatching in the monogenean skin parasite Entobdella hippoglossi from the halibut, Hippoglossus hippoglossus. Parasitology 68, 161–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kearn, G. C. (1974 c). A comparative study of the glandular and excretory systems of the oncomiracidia of the monogenean skin parasites Entobdella hippoglossi, E. diadema and E. soleae. Parasitology 69, 257–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kearn, G. C. & Baker, N. O. (1973). Ultrastructural and histochemical observations on the pigmented eyes of the oncomiracidium of Entobdella soleae, a monogenean skin parasite of the common sole, Solea solea. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 41, 239–54.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knudsen, H. (1968). Studies on whiting (Merlangius merlangus (L)) in the North Sea, Skagerrak and Kattegat. III. Meddelelser fra Danmarks Fiskeri-og Havundersogelser 6, No. 2, 745.Google Scholar
Ktari, M. H. (1969). Recherches sur l'anatomie et la biologie de Microcotyle salpae Parona et Perugia, 1890, parasite de Box salpa L. (Téléostéen). Annales de Parasitologie humaine et comparée 44, 425–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, J. (1957). The larvae of some monogenetic trematode parasites of Plymouth fishes. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 36, 243–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, J. (1962). The life histories and population dynamics of monogenean gill parasites of Trachurus trachurus (L.). Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 42, 587600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, J. (1972). Behaviour of monogeneans. In Behavioural Aspects of Parasite Transmission. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 51, Suppl. 1, 1930.Google Scholar
Lyons, K. M. (1972). Sense organs of monogeneans. In Behavioural Aspects of Parasite Transmission. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 51, Suppl. 1, 181–99.Google Scholar
Lythgoe, J. G. (1971). Fishes of the Sea, 320 pp. London: Blandford Press.Google Scholar
Macdonald, S. (1974). Host skin mucus as a hatching stimulant in Acanthocotyle lobianchi, a monogenean from the skin of Raja spp. Parasitology 68, 331–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacKenzie, K. (1972). The plerocercoid of the cestode Gilquinia squali Fabricuis, 1794, as a biological tag for whiting in the Northern North Sea. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, F, 36 Demersal fish (Northern) Committee, 5 pp.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, K. & Wootten, R. (1973). Parasites as biological tags for whiting populations in the Northern North Sea. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea, F, 48, Demersal Fish (Northern) Committee, 2 pp.Google Scholar
Nagabushanam, A. K. (1964). On the biology of the whiting in Manx waters. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 44, 177202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paperna, I. (1963). Some observations in the biology and ecology of Dactylogyrus vastator in Israel. Bamidageh Bulletin of Fish Culture in Israel 15, No. 1, 828.Google Scholar
Parrish, B. B., Blaxter, J. H. S. & Hall, W. B. (1964). Diurnal variations in size and composition of trawl catches. Conseil Permanent International pour l'Exploration de la Mer. Extrait du Rapports et Procès Verbaux 155, 2734.Google Scholar
Plymouth Marine Fauna (1957). 457 pp. Plymouth: Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom.Google Scholar
Roessingh, M. (1959). Whiting investigations in the Netherlands. Annales Biologiques, Copenhague 16, 100–3.Google Scholar
Saetersdal, G. (1967). Review of information on the behaviour of gadoid fish. Food and Agriculture Organisation Conference on Fish Behaviour in Relation to Fishing Techniques and Tactics. pp. 201–5. Bergen.Google Scholar
Schmidt, U. B. (1955). Beitrage zur biologie des köhlers (Gadus virens L) in den Isländischen Gewässern. Berichte der Deutschen Wissenschaftlichen Kommission für Meeresforschung. Neue Folge 14, 182.Google Scholar
Steven, G. A. (1930). Bottom fauna and the food of fishes. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 26, 677705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagner, G. C. (1959). Untersuchungen über die Tagesperiodizität der Nahrungsaufnahme bei Pollachuis virens L. Kurze Mitteilungen aus dem Institut für Fischereibiologie der Universität Hamburg. 9, 61103.Google Scholar
Wheeler, A. (1969). The Fishes of the British Isles and North-West Europe, 613 pp. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Williams, T. & Prime, J. (1966). English whiting tagging experiments in the North Sea. International Council for the Exploration of the Sea. Gadoid Fish Committee. Doc. No. G10.Google Scholar
Woodhead, P. M. J. (1964). Diurnal changes in trawl catches of fish. Rapports et Procès – Verbaux des Réunions Conseil Permanent International pour l'Exploration de la Mer 155, 3544.Google Scholar