Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T12:17:29.488Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Host searching in Argulus foliaceus L. (Crustacea: Branchiura): the role of vision and selectivity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 May 1998

V. N. MIKHEEV
Affiliation:
A.N. Severtsov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
E. T. VALTONEN
Affiliation:
Department of Environmental and Biological Science, University of Jyväskylä, PL 35, 40351 Jyväskylä, Finland
P. RINTAMÄKI-KINNUNEN
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, University of Oulu, Finland

Abstract

In laboratory experiments, the swimming behaviour of the ectoparasite Argulus foliaceus and its infection rates on juvenile perch (Perca fluviatilis) and roach (Rutilus rutilus) were examined. The highest infection rate and a preference for perch juveniles were obtained in darkness, the lowest infection rate and a lack of preference in the light, when aquaria with glass walls (high reflectivity) were used. In the light, when aquaria were lined with black plastic (low reflectivity) an intermediate level of infection for perch and the highest for roach was recorded. Under such conditions roach were significantly more heavily infected than perch; an attack rate 4 times greater was recorded for brighter (more reflective) roach juveniles than for perch. Within the aquaria with a low reflective interior parasites swam 4·4 times slower and were observed predominantly in the central area, while in the highly reflective aquaria fast swimming A. foliaceus were recorded mainly near the walls. The primary role of visual stimuli for the host search behaviour of A. foliaceus in the light is suggested. Parasites can effectively use such stimuli only in the low reflective surroundings. Highly reflective glass aquarium walls produce numerous secondary local light sources, which cause fast, erratic parasite movements and prevent the efficient location of potential hosts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
1998 Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)