Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T16:00:17.234Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Insights on adaptive and innate immunity in canine leishmaniosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 April 2016

SHAZIA HOSEIN*
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology and Pathogen Biology, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, AL9 7TA, UK
DAMER P. BLAKE
Affiliation:
Department of Pathology and Pathogen Biology, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, AL9 7TA, UK
LAIA SOLANO-GALLEGO*
Affiliation:
Department de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Valles, Barcelona, Spain
*
*Corresponding authors. Department of Pathology and Pathogen Biology, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, AL9 7TA, UK and Department de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Valles, Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: shaziahosein@gmail.com; laia.solano@uab.cat
*Corresponding authors. Department of Pathology and Pathogen Biology, Royal Veterinary College, University of London, Hawkshead Lane, North Mymms, AL9 7TA, UK and Department de Medicina i Cirurgia Animals, Facultat de Veterinària, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del Valles, Barcelona, Spain. E-mail: shaziahosein@gmail.com; laia.solano@uab.cat

Summary

Canine leishmaniosis (CanL) is caused by the parasite Leishmania infantum and is a systemic disease, which can present with variable clinical signs, and clinicopathological abnormalities. Clinical manifestations can range from subclinical infection to very severe systemic disease. Leishmaniosis is categorized as a neglected tropical disease and the complex immune responses associated with Leishmania species makes therapeutic treatments and vaccine development challenging for both dogs and humans. In this review, we summarize innate and adaptive immune responses associated with L. infantum infection in dogs, and we discuss the problems associated with the disease as well as potential solutions and the future direction of required research to help control the parasite.

Type
Special Issue Review
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2016

INTRODUCTION

Leishmaniosis is a protozoan disease that is transmitted by the bite of a female phlebotomine sand-fly. Both human and canine leishmaniosis (CanL) are categorized as neglected tropical diseases, and are endemic in the Mediterranean Basin, the Middle East and in sub-tropical and tropical regions of the world (Desjeux, Reference Desjeux2004). Canine leishmaniosis due to Leishmania infantum is endemic in approximately 50 countries affecting two major regions; South America and the Mediterranean region (Baneth et al. Reference Baneth, Koutinas, Solano-Gallego, Bourdeau and Ferrer2008). Prevalence within these regions is variable, largely influenced by climatic and ecological conditions, which determine the abundance of the vector (Solano-Gallego et al. Reference Solano-Gallego, Koutinas, Miro, Cardoso, Pennisi, Ferrer, Bourdeau, Oliva and Baneth2009). Canine leishmaniosis spreads quickly and extensively among dog populations when conditions for transmission become favourable; that is when there is a high sand-fly vector and canine-host density (Baneth et al. Reference Baneth, Koutinas, Solano-Gallego, Bourdeau and Ferrer2008; Espejo et al. Reference Espejo, Costard and Zagmutt2015). Precise prevalence rates are difficult to compare as over the years different methods have been used to detect infection. Early epidemiological studies were based on direct parasitological and serological tests, whereas recent observations include molecular or cellular immunological methods (Baneth et al. Reference Baneth, Koutinas, Solano-Gallego, Bourdeau and Ferrer2008). However, there is a positive relationship between the prevalence of disease in human and canine populations (Marty et al. Reference Marty, Le Fichoux, Giordana and Brugnetti1992; Cunha et al. Reference Cunha, Freire, Eulalio, Critosvao, Netto, Johnson, Reed and Badaro1995). A high prevalence of CanL in the Mediterranean region is present, while human leishmaniosis is hypoendemic (Farrell, Reference Farrell2002). Increases in human Leishmania infections in this region have been linked to an increase in human immunodeficiency virus cases and co-infection (Abdalmaula et al. Reference Abdalmaula, Barbadoro, Marigliano, Illuminati, Di Stanislao, D'Errico and Prospero2013), but there is growing evidence that disease is also diagnosed in immunocompetent adults (Gramiccia et al. Reference Gramiccia, Scalone, Di Muccio, Orsini, Fiorentino and Gradoni2013; Horrillo et al. Reference Horrillo, San Martin, Molina, Madronal, Matia, Castro, Garcia-Martinez, Barrios, Cabello, Arata, Casas and Ruiz Giardin2015).

Leishmania has a digenetic lifecycle. Leishmania metacyclic promastigotes are injected under the skin of the vertebrate host by the phlebotomine (sand fly) vector. This form of the parasite is flagellated and they are rapidly engulfed by phagocytic cells such as neutrophils, dendritic cells and macrophages, which are either resident or recruited to the bite site (Kaye and Scott, Reference Kaye and Scott2011). It is believed that the parasites use neutrophils as a ‘safe hideaway’, but establish prolific infections in macrophages where the flagellated promastigotes differentiate into amastigotes (Faria et al. Reference Faria, Reis and Lima2012). These amastigotes then replicate within the parasitophorous vacuole. Amastigotes multiply by binary division, causing the host cell to enlarge and eventually rupture, allowing the released amastigotes to infect other mononuclear phagocytic cells. Amastigotes circulating in the blood stream are then available to be ingested by a sand fly when it takes a blood meal and the cycle repeats itself (Wakelin, Reference Wakelin1996).

The immune responses to L. infantum infection in dogs are very variable and can play a key role in controlling the infection. There is a large body of work that focuses on T-cell mediated immunity but there is limited data on the importance of innate immune responses in CanL. The aim of this paper was to bring together current knowledge of the adaptive and innate immune responses associated with L. infantum infection in dogs.

CANL

Dogs appear to be the main reservoir host for L. infantum infection, however, in many regions other canids such as jackals, foxes, wolves and other mammals, such as hares or black rats, have been implicated as wild reservoirs (Millan et al. Reference Millan, Ferroglio and Solano-Gallego2014). It has been suggested that domestic cats should receive greater attention as a public health risk, since feline leishmaniosis has been reported in many countries where canine and human disease is endemic (Martin-Sanchez et al. Reference Martin-Sanchez, Acedo, Munoz-Perez, Pesson, Marchal and Morillas-Marquez2007; Maia et al. Reference Maia, Nunes and Campino2008).

Not all dogs exposed to L. infantum develop clinical manifestations and subclinical infections are more frequent than clinical disease. Therefore, L. infantum in dogs can manifest as chronic subclinical infection, self-limiting disease or severe illness (Solano-Gallego et al. Reference Solano-Gallego, Koutinas, Miro, Cardoso, Pennisi, Ferrer, Bourdeau, Oliva and Baneth2009). The outcome of canine L. infantum infection is largely influenced by the development of the cell-mediated immune (CMI) response. T lymphocytes play a crucial role in immunity to leishmaniosis by influencing cytokine production and subsequently interacting with infected macrophages (Rodriguez-Cortes et al. Reference Rodriguez-Cortes, Fernandez-Bellon, Ramis, Ferrer, Alberola and Solano-Gallego2007a ).

In dogs, which become sick, clinical features and the incubation period can vary extensively (Solano-Gallego et al. Reference Solano-Gallego, Miro, Koutinas, Cardoso, Pennisi, Ferrer, Bourdeau, Oliva and Baneth2011). A clinical staging system based on clinico-pathological abnormalities, clinical signs and serological status has been proposed in an attempt to cover the wide spectrum of clinical manifestations found in CanL (Solano-Gallego et al. Reference Solano-Gallego, Koutinas, Miro, Cardoso, Pennisi, Ferrer, Bourdeau, Oliva and Baneth2009). Based on this system, the correct treatment can be determined and a realistic prognosis be ascertained. The most common clinical signs include lymphadenomegaly, cutaneous lesions, weight loss, anorexia, lethargy and ocular lesions (Solano-Gallego et al. Reference Solano-Gallego, Miro, Koutinas, Cardoso, Pennisi, Ferrer, Bourdeau, Oliva and Baneth2011). Epistaxis is likely to be the result of several pathogenic factors such as nasal-mucosal ulceration and thrombocytopathy (Petanides et al. Reference Petanides, Koutinas, Mylonakis, Day, Saridomichelakis, Leontides, Mischke, Diniz, Breitschwerdt, Kritsepi, Garipidou, Koutinas and Lekkas2008). An increased number and size of lymphoid follicles results in lymphadenomegaly, facilitating palpation of superficial lymph nodes as a diagnostic measure (Giunchetti et al. Reference Giunchetti, Martins-Filho, Carneiro, Mayrink, Marques, Tafuri, Correa-Oliveira and Reis2008). Splenomegaly might also be noted, but is often mild and difficult to detect. This results from a disorganization of normal lymphoid tissue and loss of normal spleen leukocyte diversity (Santana et al. Reference Santana, Vassallo, de Freitas, Oliveira, Pontes-de-Carvalho and dos-Santos2008). Hepatomegaly and liver disease including macrophagic and lymphoplasmacytic inflammation and collagen deposition has also been reported in cases of CanL (Rallis et al. Reference Rallis, Day, Saridomichelakis, Adamama-Moraitou, Papazoglou, Fytianou and Koutinas2005; Melo et al. Reference Melo, Moura, Ribeiro, Alves, Caliari, Tafuri and Calabrese2009), although the principal cause of death attributed to CanL is severe renal damage (Solano-Gallego et al. Reference Solano-Gallego, Koutinas, Miro, Cardoso, Pennisi, Ferrer, Bourdeau, Oliva and Baneth2009), with glomerulonephritis resulting from immune complex deposition associated with an intense humoral response and high parasite loads (Costa et al. Reference Costa, Goto, Saldanha, Silva, Sinhorini, Silva and Guerra2003).

IMMUNE VARIATION AS A RISK FACTOR ASSOCIATED WITH CANL

The precise immune mechanisms responsible for resistance or susceptibility to infection and subsequent disease are not known for CanL. Nonetheless, it appears that factors such as breed, immunosuppression, concomitant disease and nutritional status can influence the outcome of infection (Miro et al. Reference Miro, Cardoso, Pennisi, Oliva and Baneth2008). Similarly, the presence of ongoing co-infections with pathogens such as Ehrlichia canis or Filarias or previous infections appear to be associated with more clinical signs and clinicopathological abnormalities and disease severity (Mekuzas et al. Reference Mekuzas, Gradoni, Oliva, Foglia Manzillo and Baneth2009; Cortese et al. Reference Cortese, Terrazzano, Piantedosi, Sica, Prisco, Ruggiero and Ciaramella2011; Tabar et al. Reference Tabar, Altet, Martinez and Roura2013). Other factors that might determine the outcome of infection includes the virulence of L. infantum parasites (Martin-Martin et al. Reference Martin-Martin, Jimenez, Gonzalez, Eguiluz and Molina2015), inoculum of parasites, sand-fly transmission or other routes of transmission. For example, sand fly salivary proteins can induce a strong cellular immune response in dogs (Collin et al. Reference Collin, Gomes, Teixeira, Cheng, Laughinghouse, Ward, Elnaiem, Fischer, Valenzuela and Kamhawi2009). One study demonstrated that dogs developed a strong immune response to two salivary proteins, namely LJL143 and LJM17 from the natural vector sand fly Lutzomyia longipalpis. Blood collected from these immunized dogs was found to contain cells that were producing interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) and subsequently resulted in the recruitment of immune cells at the inoculation site, which were found to have an adverse effect on Leishmania parasites (Collin et al. Reference Collin, Gomes, Teixeira, Cheng, Laughinghouse, Ward, Elnaiem, Fischer, Valenzuela and Kamhawi2009).

All breeds of dog are potentially susceptible to L. infantum with factors such as age, gender and proportion of time spent outdoors (especially overnight) found to influence the likelihood and outcome of infection (Franca-Silva et al. Reference Franca-Silva, da Costa, Siqueira, Machado-Coelho, da Costa, Mayrink, Vieira, Costa, Genaro and Nascimento2003; Zivicnjak et al. Reference Zivicnjak, Martinkovic, Marinculic, Mrljak, Kucer, Matijatko, Mihaljevic and Baric-Rafaj2005; Miranda et al. Reference Miranda, Roura, Picado, Ferrer and Ramis2008; Galvez et al. Reference Galvez, Miro, Descalzo, Nieto, Dado, Martin, Cubero and Molina2010). However, it has also been established that mongrels and autochthonous breeds from endemic areas develop various degrees of resistance to disease (Solano-Gallego et al. Reference Solano-Gallego, Llull, Ramos, Riera, Arboix, Alberola and Ferrer2000). An example of such a breed is the Ibizan hound from the island of Mallorca (Spain). The breed develops very effective cellular immune responses and rarely presents with clinical disease (Solano-Gallego et al. Reference Solano-Gallego, Llull, Ramos, Riera, Arboix, Alberola and Ferrer2000). Amongst pedigree dogs, studies have found that breeds such as Rottweilers, Boxers and German Shepherds are more susceptible to disease than other breeds like Yorkshire Terriers and Poodles (Ciaramella et al. Reference Ciaramella, Oliva, Luna, Gradoni, Ambrosio, Cortese, Scalone and Persechino1997; Franca-Silva et al. Reference Franca-Silva, da Costa, Siqueira, Machado-Coelho, da Costa, Mayrink, Vieira, Costa, Genaro and Nascimento2003; Miranda et al. Reference Miranda, Roura, Picado, Ferrer and Ramis2008). It has also been reported that Foxhounds may have a genetic susceptibility to CanL (Duprey et al. Reference Duprey, Steurer, Rooney, Kirchhoff, Jackson, Rowton and Schantz2006). One component of such genetic variation is the nature of the immune response against L. infantum infection (Baneth et al. Reference Baneth, Koutinas, Solano-Gallego, Bourdeau and Ferrer2008).

Dog leukocyte antigen (DLA) is part of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) in dogs. DLA has been found to be the main genetic component associated with canine diabetes. In prone breeds (including Samoyed, Cairn Terrier and Tibetan Terrier), the common alleles/haplotypes are DLA-DBR1*009, DQA1*001 and DQB1*008 (Catchpole et al. Reference Catchpole, Kennedy, Davison and Ollier2008). Quinnell et al. reported a study, which investigated the relationship between DLA class II alleles and the course of L. infantum infection in a group of naturally infected Brazilian dogs. The study revealed a significant association between the presence of the allele DLA-DRB1*01502 and susceptibility to CanL (Quinnell et al. Reference Quinnell, Kennedy, Barnes, Courtenay, Dye, Garcez, Shaw, Carter, Thomson and Ollier2003b ). The dogs presenting this allele also had significantly higher anti-Leishmania IgG levels and were far more likely to be parasite positive by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). High IgG levels have been associated with susceptibility (Quinnell et al. Reference Quinnell, Kennedy, Barnes, Courtenay, Dye, Garcez, Shaw, Carter, Thomson and Ollier2003b ). Polymorphisms and mutations of the solute carrier family 11, member a1 gene (Slc11a1) have also been shown to exert a genetic influence. The gene, also known as natural resistance-associated macrophage protein 1 (NRAMP1), encodes an ion transporter protein, which is involved in the control of intraphagosomal replication of parasites and in macrophage activation (Blackwell et al. Reference Blackwell, Goswami, Evans, Sibthorpe, Papo, White, Searle, Miller, Peacock, Mohammed and Ibrahim2001). The haplotype TAG-8-141 has been associated with Boxer breed predisposition to CanL (Sanchez-Robert et al. Reference Sanchez-Robert, Altet, Sanchez and Francino2005). It is believed that numerous loci are accountable for the progression of disease as a result of L. infantum infection in dogs (Quilez et al. Reference Quilez, Martinez, Woolliams, Sanchez, Pong-Wong, Kennedy, Quinnell, Ollier, Roura, Ferrer, Altet and Francino2012). Quilez et al.  performed a genome-wide scan using a dataset of 115 healthy infected and 104 affected Boxer dogs and identified over 126 000 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) distributed across the genome. Analysis of these SNPs allowed the phenotype to be predicted with an accuracy of ~0·29 in new samples, providing evidence of a significant genetic component to CanL within the breed (Quilez et al. Reference Quilez, Martinez, Woolliams, Sanchez, Pong-Wong, Kennedy, Quinnell, Ollier, Roura, Ferrer, Altet and Francino2012). A recent study using a genome-wide scan in 20 mixed–breed dogs and 28 controls identified two candidate loci in chromosomes 1 and 2. Markers discovered were related to notch signaling (critical for macrophage activity and cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) T cell differentiation) and IL-2, IL-15 and IFN-γ expression (Utsunomiya et al. Reference Utsunomiya, Ribeiro, Quintal, Sangalli, Gazola, Paula, Trinconi, Lima, Perri, Taylor, Schnabel, Sonstegard, Garcia and Nunes2015). In addition, polymorphisms in canine toll-like receptors (TLRs) were characterized following sequencing after enrichment of exonic regions (Cusco et al. Reference Cusco, Sanchez, Altet, Ferrer and Francino2014). Seven different breeds were studied and DNA from a total of 335 dogs and 100 wolves were included in the pools. The results revealed that TLR5 was the most polymorphic amongst all canine TLRs (Cusco et al. Reference Cusco, Sanchez, Altet, Ferrer and Francino2014).

IMMUNE RESPONSES ASSOCIATED WITH CANL

Immune-mediated mechanisms are responsible for many of the pathological findings in CanL. Circulating immune complexes and anti-nuclear antibodies have been detected in dogs with CanL (Lucena and Ginel, Reference Lucena and Ginel1998; Margarito et al. Reference Margarito, Lucena, Lopez, Molleda, Martin and Ginel1998; Smith et al. Reference Smith, Tompkins and Breitschwerdt2004). Vasculitis induced by immune complexes activates the complement cascade (Torrent et al. Reference Torrent, Leiva, Segales, Franch, Pena, Cabrera and Pastor2005). This is an important pathological mechanism, which is responsible for tissue necrosis and for some of dermal, visceral ocular and renal lesions commonly found in CanL (Vamvakidis et al. Reference Vamvakidis, Koutinas, Kanakoudis, Georgiadis and Saridomichelakis2000; Torrent et al. Reference Torrent, Leiva, Segales, Franch, Pena, Cabrera and Pastor2005; Baneth et al. Reference Baneth, Koutinas, Solano-Gallego, Bourdeau and Ferrer2008). The severity of disease is correlated with high antibody levels and increasing parasite load (Farrell, Reference Farrell2002). In addition, a study has revealed that the number of apoptotic cells within the inflammatory infiltrate is directly related to the parasitic load and thus the severity of the clinical picture in infected dogs (Vercosa et al. Reference Vercosa, Melo, Puerto, Mendonca and Vasconcelos2012).

Leishmania is renowned for its ‘silent’ establishment of disease, illustrated by little or no change in immune response despite parasite proliferation and dissemination. A silent phase was reported by Belkaid et al. in mice infected with L. major over a period of 4–5 weeks before the development of lesions (Belkaid et al. Reference Belkaid, Mendez, Lira, Kadambi, Milon and Sacks2000). This silent establishment was also reported later in dogs (Santos-Gomes et al. Reference Santos-Gomes, Rosa, Leandro, Cortes, Romao and Silveira2002). A low proportion of experimentally infected dogs expressed specific cytokines in the first 8 months of infection coupled with parasite dissemination, but without clinical signs of disease (Santos-Gomes et al. Reference Santos-Gomes, Rosa, Leandro, Cortes, Romao and Silveira2002). The authors suggested that this was the parasite's ‘silent establishment’ by avoiding adverse host-cell mediated immunological reactions (Santos-Gomes et al. Reference Santos-Gomes, Rosa, Leandro, Cortes, Romao and Silveira2002).

The following sections of this paper will be about the immune responses associated with CanL that can be further broken down into adaptive and innate immune responses. We will report the adaptive immune responses first, as these responses have been covered in greater detail over a longer period of time compared with innate responses.

ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY

In early studies a clearly defined Th1/Th2 (pro-inflammatory/anti-inflammatory) dichotomy was observed in murine leishmaniosis (Sadick et al. Reference Sadick, Locksley, Tubbs and Raff1986; Bretscher et al. Reference Bretscher, Wei, Menon and Bielefeldt-Ohmann1992; Menon and Bretscher, Reference Menon and Bretscher1998), however it has since become apparent that the immune responses associated with both human and CanL are far more complex. Nonetheless, it is clear that in both human and experimental animal models of the disease, cytokines play a very important role in influencing the nature of the host immune response (Cummings et al. Reference Cummings, Tuladhar and Satoskar2010). The ability of the host to control L. infantum infection requires the generation of CMI responses, which activate host macrophages, eliminating intracellular parasites. In both human and experimental models of cutaneous leishmaniosis (CL), control of the infection is mediated by the early induction of an IL-12 driven Th1 immune response along with the production of IFN-γ by CD4+ T cells (Tripathi et al. Reference Tripathi, Singh and Naik2007). Conversely, susceptibility to infection and disease progression in CL is driven predominantly by the induction of a non-protective IL-4 Th-2-type response and the production of Th-2 associated cytokines such as IL-4, IL-10, IL-13 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-β (Alexander and Bryson, Reference Alexander and Bryson2005; Tripathi et al. Reference Tripathi, Singh and Naik2007). In experimental models of murine CL, IL-4 has been shown to play a crucial role in mediating susceptibility to Leishmania infection by the down regulation of protective Th-1 associated cytokines IL-12 and IFN-γ, therefore inhibiting nitric oxide (NO) production and eventual parasite killing by macrophages (Alexander et al. Reference Alexander, Satoskar and Russell1999). However, further studies later demonstrated that the IL-4 mediated exacerbation of CL was dependent upon the particular strain of Leishmania (Kropf et al. Reference Kropf, Herath, Weber, Modolell and Muller2003).

Unlike mice, immune responses seen in dogs more closely resemble those seen in human infections. Many early CanL studies described protective cell mediated immune responses that were associated with the activation of Th1 cells, producing IFN-γ, IL-2 and TNF-α, and active disease characterized by mixed Th1/Th2 responses (Carrillo and Moreno, Reference Carrillo and Moreno2009). However, many of these investigations were performed on peripheral blood samples and further studies indicated that the immune responses to the parasites were in-fact organ specific (Reis et al. Reference Reis, Martins-Filho, Teixeira-Carvalho, Giunchetti, Carneiro, Mayrink, Tafuri and Correa-Oliveira2009). Th1, Th2 or mixed Th1/Th2 immune responses were subsequently observed in different organs of CanL dogs. These correlated with the absence or presence of clinical signs and parasite load data (Strauss-Ayali et al. Reference Strauss-Ayali, Baneth and Jaffe2007; Travi et al. Reference Travi, Osorio, Saldarriaga, Cadena, Tabares, Peniche, Lee and Melby2009; Boggiatto et al. Reference Boggiatto, Ramer-Tait, Metz, Kramer, Gibson-Corley, Mullin, Hostetter, Gallup, Jones and Petersen2010). These findings illustrated that the phenotypic cell profiles and cytokines involved in immune responses, in compartments where parasites are known to replicate, have variable effects on local parasite control, highlighting the complexity of cellular immune responses in L. infantum infection (Maia and Campino, Reference Maia and Campino2012). Indeed, cytokine profiles in different tissues vary greatly. Table 1 shows examples of studies evaluating cytokine changes in several compartments that have been evaluated in natural and experimental canine L. infantum infection to date. It is important to highlight the differences between studies on clinical classification of dogs, type of infection, technique employed for measurement of cytokines and geographical location as well as the small sample size of dogs evaluated in the majority of these studies.

Table 1. Examples of studies evaluating cytokine changes in several compartments in natural and experimental canine L. infantum infection

AD, asymptomatic; SD, symptomatic; OD, oligosymptomatic; LD, Leishmania infected dogs; LD-S, clinical signs and clinical pathological abnormalities; LD-A, no clinical signs or clinical pathological abnormalities; iNOS, inducible nitric oxide; IL, interleukin; IFA, immunofluorescence; IFN, interferon; TGF, transcription growth factor; TNF, tumour necrosis factor; ELISA, enzyme linked immunosorbent assay; RT–PCR, reverse transcriptase and real time polymerase chain reaction; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

a Natural infection.

b Experimental infection.

ORGAN SPECIFIC IMMUNE RESPONSES

Lymph node

In popliteal lymph nodes, a balance was observed between the percentage of IL-10 and TNF-α expression, which was possibly attributed to an absence of clinical signs and low parasite loads (Maia and Campino, Reference Maia and Campino2012). This was similar to earlier findings where lymph nodes from sub-clinical dogs had a high expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines, which was correlated with a low number of parasites. The authors suggested a role for IL-10 and TGF-β in disease progression (Alves et al. Reference Alves, de Amorim, Moura, Ribeiro, Alves, Michalick, Kalapothakis, Bruna-Romero, Tafuri, Teixeira and Melo2009). In a study by Barbosa et al. they reported that asymptomatic dogs showed high expression of genes encoding IL-2 and IL-12 in lymph nodes (Barbosa et al. Reference Barbosa, Alexandre-Pires, Soares-Clemente, Marques, Rodrigues, De Brito, Da Fonseca, Alves and Santos-Gomes2011). Hosein et al. reported down regulation of IL-22 with disease progression in an experimental CanL model (Hosein et al. Reference Hosein, Rodriguez-Cortes, Blake, Allenspach, Alberola and Solano-Gallego2015). Giunchetti et al. reported that lymph node CD8+ T cells might be involved in a distinct activation status during CanL which was most likely associated with immunomodulatory or suppressor cell activity (Giunchetti et al. Reference Giunchetti, Martins-Filho, Carneiro, Mayrink, Marques, Tafuri, Correa-Oliveira and Reis2008). Alexandre-Pires et al. demonstrated that CD8+ T subpopulations in lymph nodes from treated dogs were significantly lower than in asymptomatic non-treated dogs. In addition, they reported that the CD4+ T cell subset in lymph nodes of both treated and asymptomatic dogs was significantly higher than that in control, non-infected dogs (Alexandre-Pires et al. Reference Alexandre-Pires, de Brito, Alguero, Martins, Rodrigues, da Fonseca and Santos-Gomes2010). These findings possibly indicate that an increase in CD8+ T cells is associated with parasite persistence, whereas CD4+ subpopulation expansion favours control of the parasite (Alexandre-Pires et al. Reference Alexandre-Pires, de Brito, Alguero, Martins, Rodrigues, da Fonseca and Santos-Gomes2010; Maia and Campino, Reference Maia and Campino2012).

Liver

In the liver of CanL dogs, production of IFN-γ, IL-10 and TGF-β was reported to be high in naturally infected dogs with no clinical signs of the disease (Correa et al. Reference Correa, Dossi, de Oliveira Vasconcelos, Munari and de Lima2007). Maia et al. reported similar findings a few years later. Experimentally infected dogs expressed these cytokines in addition to inducible NO synthase (iNOS). However, IL-4 and TNF-α were not expressed (Maia and Campino, Reference Maia and Campino2012). It was suggested that the absence of TNF-α in these experimentally infected dogs might have been associated with a high level of parasitism (Maia et al. Reference Maia, Nunes, Cristovao and Campino2010; Maia and Campino, Reference Maia and Campino2012). Hosein et al. also reported a significant down regulation of IL-22 transcription in both liver and spleen samples when non-infected controls were compared with L. infantum infected dogs (Hosein et al. Reference Hosein, Rodriguez-Cortes, Blake, Allenspach, Alberola and Solano-Gallego2015). Nascimento et al. investigated chemokine and cytokine receptor expression in dogs naturally infected with L. infantum (Nascimento et al. Reference Nascimento, Albuquerque, Do-Valle-Matta, Caldas, Diniz, Talvani, Bahia, Andrade, Galvao, Camara and Guedes2013). In the liver of symptomatic dogs, a significant down regulation was noted for expression of beta chemokine receptors (CCR), CCR3, CCR4, CCR5, CCR6 and CCR8 when compared with expression levels in asymptomatic dogs. These chemokines were also downregulated when symptomatic dogs were compared with healthy non-infected controls (Nascimento et al. Reference Nascimento, Albuquerque, Do-Valle-Matta, Caldas, Diniz, Talvani, Bahia, Andrade, Galvao, Camara and Guedes2013). The authors concluded that the suppression of these receptors seen in symptomatic dogs was possibly due to a reduced migration of immune cells, which would normally assist with parasite clearance and granuloma formation (Nascimento et al. Reference Nascimento, Albuquerque, Do-Valle-Matta, Caldas, Diniz, Talvani, Bahia, Andrade, Galvao, Camara and Guedes2013). Recently, the same authors documented that the progression of this disease was characterized not only by the down regulation of T helper (Th) 1-related cytokines, such as IFN-γ and TNF-α, but also by the down regulation of genes encoding interleukin (IL)-17A, inducible NO synthase (iNOS) and IL-10 in the spleen and liver in symptomatic dogs compared with asymptomatic dogs (Nascimento et al. Reference Nascimento, Albuquerque, Nascimento, Caldas, Do-Valle-Matta, Souto, Talvani, Bahia, Galvao, Camara and Guedes2015).

Spleen

In CanL, there is a strong association with splenic architecture disruption, often characterized by the disorganization of normal lymphoid tissue, a loss of normal spleen leukocyte diversity and eventual atrophy of the lymphoid tissue (Sanchez et al. Reference Sanchez, Diaz, Zerpa, Negron, Convit and Tapia2004). It was reported that in natural infection there was a positive correlation between the expression of IL-10 with increasing parasite load and disease progression (Lage et al. Reference Lage, Oliveira, Busek, Guerra, Giunchetti, Correa-Oliveira and Reis2007). Conversely, it has also been reported that no changes in IL-10 expression were seen in experimentally infected dogs irrespective of parasite load (Strauss-Ayali et al. Reference Strauss-Ayali, Baneth and Jaffe2007). In addition, an association between high IFN-γ expression and chemokine expression, and splenic parasitism with disease progression was reported (Correa et al. Reference Correa, Dossi, de Oliveira Vasconcelos, Munari and de Lima2007). Cavalcanti et al. recently reported that in naturally infected dogs, parasite load induced splenic architecture breakage, which resulted in an impairment of both pro-inflammatory (IFN-γ, IL-2 and IL-6) and anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10 and TGF-β) (Cavalcanti et al. Reference Cavalcanti, Ribeiro-Alves, Pereira Lde, Mestre, Ferreira, Morgado, Boite, Cupolillo, Moraes and Porrozzi2015). Michelin et al. measured TNF-α, IL-4 and IL-10 in the liver and spleen of dogs naturally infected with L. infantum and reported that all cytokines studied were higher in the spleens of symptomatic dogs compared with asymptomatic or non-infected controls (Michelin et al. Reference Michelin, Perri and De Lima2011).

Hosein et al. reported an involvement of IL-22 in the spleen of experimentally infected dogs. In both early and late stages of infection (6 and 15 months post infection), IL-22 transcription was significantly lower when compared with non-infected healthy control dogs (Hosein et al. Reference Hosein, Rodriguez-Cortes, Blake, Allenspach, Alberola and Solano-Gallego2015). Information about the involvement of IL-22 in CanL is scarce but in human studies, it has been described that lower levels of IL-22 in human visceral leishmaniosis (VL) is associated with disease establishment and it has been suggested that IL-22 plays a complementary role to Th1 cytokines in the protection against VL (Pitta et al. Reference Pitta, Romano, Cabantous, Henri, Hammad, Kouriba, Argiro, el Kheir, Bucheton, Mary, El-Safi and Dessein2009).

Nascimento et al. also reported changing chemokine and chemokine receptor profiles in the spleens of dogs with varying clinical forms of CanL (Nascimento et al. Reference Nascimento, Albuquerque, Do-Valle-Matta, Caldas, Diniz, Talvani, Bahia, Andrade, Galvao, Camara and Guedes2013). The authors looked at chemokines from the CC-family chemokine ligand family (CCL), chemokine motif ligand (CXCL), CXC chemokine receptors (CXC) and beta chemokine receptors (CCR). A reduction in expression levels of CCL1, CCL3, CCL17, CCL20, CCL26, CXCL9, CCR3, CCR4, CCR6 and CCR8 was reported in the spleens of both symptomatic and asymptomatic dogs when compared with non-infected controls. The mRNA levels of CCL2, CCL5 and CXCL10 were however increased in the spleens of symptomatic dogs compared with the levels in the spleens of asymptomatic animals (Nascimento et al. Reference Nascimento, Albuquerque, Do-Valle-Matta, Caldas, Diniz, Talvani, Bahia, Andrade, Galvao, Camara and Guedes2013).

Bone marrow

The progression of Leishmania infection has been linked with macrophagic inflammation in bone marrow, accompanied by an increased percentage of plasma cells and lymphocytes as well as erythroid hypoplasia (Maia and Campino, Reference Maia and Campino2008). Quinnell et al. observed an increased accumulation of TNF-α and IFN-γ in the bone marrow of naturally infected dogs (Quinnell et al. Reference Quinnell, Courtenay, Shaw, Day, Garcez, Dye and Kaye2001), and these findings were also similar to those of Manzillo et al. who speculated that erythroid hypoplasia were attributable to bone marrow macrophages producing high levels of these cytokines (Manzillo et al. Reference Manzillo, Restucci, Pagano, Gradoni and Oliva2006b ). Foglia Manzillo et al. evaluated bone marrow aspirates from 15 naturally infected dogs with and without clinical signs of disease (Manzillo et al. Reference Manzillo, Restucci, Pagano, Gradoni and Oliva2006b ). They reported that the most common pathological features within the bone marrow of these dogs were megakaryocytic dysplasia, which was noted in 10 of the 15 dogs, and erythrophagocytic dysplasia in eight dogs. These features were also thought to be linked to the increased number of macrophages found to be producing high levels of IFN-γ and TNF-α (Manzillo et al. Reference Manzillo, Restucci, Pagano, Gradoni and Oliva2006b ). Barbosa et al. reported significantly higher levels of IL-12 mRNA in the bone marrow of dogs following treatment with allopurinol and meglumine antimoniate compared with healthy, asymptomatic and symptomatic dogs (Barbosa et al. Reference Barbosa, Alexandre-Pires, Soares-Clemente, Marques, Rodrigues, De Brito, Da Fonseca, Alves and Santos-Gomes2011).

Skin

The skin is crucial for parasite transmission and skin parasite burdens seem to be the best marker for transmission potential (Courtenay et al. Reference Courtenay, Carson, Calvo-Bado, Garcez and Quinnell2014). Guarga et al. determined that even seropositive subclinical dogs were infectious to sand-flies through xenodiagnosis (Guarga et al. Reference Guarga, Lucientes, Peribanez, Molina, Gracia and Castillo2000). Madeira et al. looked at skin as a potential parasitological diagnostic tool for CanL and obtained skin samples from the ear and scapular regions of sero-reactive dogs in the Belo Horizonte region of Brazil (Madeira et al. Reference Madeira, Figueiredo, Pinto, Nascimento, Furtado, Mouta-Confort, de Paula, Bogio, Gomes, Bessa and Passos2009). In 61% of the animals tested, isolation of L. infantum was possible from ear and scapular skin. The results from the study demonstrated that intact skin could be a possible detection site for Leishmania parasites in sero-positive dogs (Madeira et al. Reference Madeira, Figueiredo, Pinto, Nascimento, Furtado, Mouta-Confort, de Paula, Bogio, Gomes, Bessa and Passos2009). While the skin is essential for natural transmission via sand-flies, there is limited data on the cytokine profiles in this tissue in canine L. infantum infection. Papadogiannakis and Koutinas recently reported a mixed Th1/Th2 cytokine profile in the dermis of dogs naturally infected with L. infantum. Dogs with clinical signs of CanL were found to have an overproduction of IL-4, IL-13 and TNF-α in the dermis (Papadogiannakis and Koutinas, Reference Papadogiannakis and Koutinas2015). Menezes-Souza et al. also reported a mixed cytokine profile in the skin of naturally infected dogs (Menezes-Souza et al. Reference Menezes-Souza, Correa-Oliveira, Guerra-Sa, Giunchetti, Teixeira-Carvalho, Martins-Filho, Oliveira and Reis2011). Subclinical dogs were found to express high levels of IL-13, TNF-α and IFN-γ, and trans-acting T-cell specific transcription factor GATA-3 (Menezes-Souza et al. Reference Menezes-Souza, Correa-Oliveira, Guerra-Sa, Giunchetti, Teixeira-Carvalho, Martins-Filho, Oliveira and Reis2011). An earlier study by Brachelente et al. looking at cutaneous lesions in naturally infected dogs revealed that dogs with high parasite burden had significantly high IL-4 expression (Brachelente et al. Reference Brachelente, Muller, Doherr, Sattler and Welle2005). Most recently, Hosein et al. reported a marginal significant increase in the transcription factor forkhead box P3 (FoxP3) in both subclinical and sick dogs compared with non-infected controls (Hosein et al. Reference Hosein, Rodriguez-Cortes, Blake, Allenspach, Alberola and Solano-Gallego2015). A study by Menezes-Souza et al. investigated the chemokines in the skin of dogs with CanL (Menezes-Souza et al. Reference Menezes-Souza, Guerra-Sa, Carneiro, Vitoriano-Souza, Giunchetti, Teixeira-Carvalho, Silveira-Lemos, Oliveira, Correa-Oliveira and Reis2012). It was reported that chemokine mRNA expression demonstrated enhanced parasite density and was positively correlated with the expression of CCL2, CCL4, CCL5, CCL21, and CXCL8. In contrast, there was a negative correlation between parasite density and CCL24 expression (Menezes-Souza et al. Reference Menezes-Souza, Guerra-Sa, Carneiro, Vitoriano-Souza, Giunchetti, Teixeira-Carvalho, Silveira-Lemos, Oliveira, Correa-Oliveira and Reis2012).

Other tissues

Other groups have investigated the cytokine profiles present in other tissues such as the brain, jejunum and colon that were deemed less commonly associated with L. infantum infection in dogs (Figueiredo et al. Reference Figueiredo, Amorim, Pinto, Barbosa, de Jesus Pinheiro, Deoti, Faria and Tafuri2013; Melo et al. Reference Melo, Seraguci, Schweigert, Silva, Grano, Peiro, Lima and Machado2013). Figueiredo et al. reported higher levels of IL-10 and TNF-α in the jejunum than the colon of infected animals, whereas IL-4 was higher in the colon than the jejunum of infected animals (Figueiredo et al. Reference Figueiredo, Amorim, Pinto, Barbosa, de Jesus Pinheiro, Deoti, Faria and Tafuri2013). In the brains of CanL dogs, Melo et al. reported that IL-10, TGF-β and IL-12p40 were downregulated, while IL-1-β, IFN-γ and TNF-α were upregulated, however expression levels did not correlate with parasite load (Melo et al. Reference Melo, Seraguci, Schweigert, Silva, Grano, Peiro, Lima and Machado2013). The authors suggested that the differences seen in the brain were due to the host's immune response, regardless of the phase of the disease (Melo et al. Reference Melo, Seraguci, Schweigert, Silva, Grano, Peiro, Lima and Machado2013).

T CELL MEDIATED IMMUNITY INCLUDING REGULATORY T LYMPHOCYTES

Clinical CanL has been associated with immunological changes involving T cells (Barbieri, Reference Barbieri2006). Such changes can be measured as the absence of delayed type hypersensitivity to Leishmania antigens (Pinelli et al. Reference Pinelli, Killick-Kendrick, Wagenaar, Bernadina, del Real and Ruitenberg1994; Cardoso et al. Reference Cardoso, Neto, Sousa, Rodrigues and Cabral1998), IL-2 production and TNF-α by peripheral blood mononuclear cells in vitro (Pinelli et al. Reference Pinelli, Gonzalo, Boog, Rutten, Gebhard, del Real and Ruitenberg1995; Santos-Gomes et al. Reference Santos-Gomes, Rosa, Leandro, Cortes, Romao and Silveira2002), and IFN-γ absence and decreased T-cell numbers in the peripheral blood. There is also evidence that the absence or decreased T-cell mediated immunity is due to T-cell exhaustion (Esch et al. Reference Esch, Juelsgaard, Martinez, Jones and Petersen2013). It was demonstrated that exhaustion was associated with a significant increase in the population of T cells with surface expression of programmed death 1 (PD-1). Blocking PD-1 encouraged the return of CD4+ and CD8+ T cell function and also resulted in a marked increase in the production of reactive oxygen species in co-cultured monocyte derived phagocytes (Esch et al. Reference Esch, Juelsgaard, Martinez, Jones and Petersen2013). Infected macrophages were also lysed by CD8+ cytotoxic T cells in a histocompatibility complex-restricted process that can be supressed in sick dogs with high parasite loads (Pinelli et al. Reference Pinelli, Killick-Kendrick, Wagenaar, Bernadina, del Real and Ruitenberg1994; De Luna et al. Reference De Luna, Vuotto, Ielpo, Ambrosio, Piantedosi, Moscatiello, Ciaramella, Scalone, Gradoni and Mancino1999). In sub-clinical infection, the opposite can be seen; low parasitism and the increased prevalence of CD8+ T lymphocytes (Reis et al. Reference Reis, Teixeira-Carvalho, Giunchetti, Guerra, Carvalho, Mayrink, Genaro, Correa-Oliveira and Martins-Filho2006a ). The vast majority of Leishmania infected dogs present a CMI response, which is exemplified by strong in vitro lymphocyte proliferation and positive skin reaction to the intradermal leishmanin injection (Montenegro test)(Cardoso et al. Reference Cardoso, Neto, Sousa, Rodrigues and Cabral1998; Maia and Campino, Reference Maia and Campino2008). These responses are eventually blunted with disease progression in addition to decreased intracellular killing of amastigotes by neutrophils and macrophages (Brandonisio et al. Reference Brandonisio, Panunzio, Faliero, Ceci, Fasanella and Puccini1996; Baneth et al. Reference Baneth, Koutinas, Solano-Gallego, Bourdeau and Ferrer2008).

In sick dogs, the depletion of T lymphocytes in lymphoid organs becomes falsely compensated B-cell proliferation and activity (Koutinas and Koutinas, Reference Koutinas and Koutinas2014). This activity, along with the activity of plasma cells, histiocytes and macrophages, potentially explains the generalized lymphadenomegaly, splenomegaly and hyperglobulinemia, which have become clinical hallmarks of this disease (Baneth et al. Reference Baneth, Koutinas, Solano-Gallego, Bourdeau and Ferrer2008; Koutinas and Koutinas, Reference Koutinas and Koutinas2014). CanL associated hyperglobulinemia is detrimental via the generation of auto-antibodies, anti-histone antibodies and/or the circulating immune complexes, which are generated in abundance (Lopez et al. Reference Lopez, Lucena, Novales, Ginel, Martin and Molleda1996; Cortese et al. Reference Cortese, Sica, Piantedosi, Ruggiero, Pero, Terrazzano, Mastellone and Ciaramella2009). Renal complications are often a result of CanL and although there have been high incidences of infection-mediated glomerulonephritis, information about the pathogenesis of CanL associated disease is scarce. Esch et al. recently reported that asymptomatic and symptomatic dogs had increased glomerular nucleotide-binding domain leucine-rich repeat-containing-like receptor family, pyrin domain containing 3 and autophagosome-associated microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3, which was associated with lesion severity of the glomeruli (Esch et al. Reference Esch, Schaut, Lamb, Clay, Morais Lima, do Nascimento, Whitley, Jeronimo, Sutterwala, Haynes and Petersen2015). Glomerulonephritis was initiated by complement deposition and IgG, and the overall findings from the study suggest possible roles for inflammasome complexes as a cause of glomerular damage during L. infantum infection (Esch et al. Reference Esch, Schaut, Lamb, Clay, Morais Lima, do Nascimento, Whitley, Jeronimo, Sutterwala, Haynes and Petersen2015).

Regulatory T cells (Tregs), have an important role in suppression of host immunity in murine (Peters and Sacks, Reference Peters and Sacks2006; Rodrigues et al. Reference Rodrigues, Marques, Soares-Clemente, Ferronha and Santos-Gomes2009) and human leishmaniosis (Katara et al. Reference Katara, Ansari, Verma, Ramesh and Salotra2011; Rai et al. Reference Rai, Thakur, Singh, Seth, Srivastava, Singh and Mitra2012). Tregs have also been found to play a role in CanL. Silva et al. evaluated IL-10 and TGF-β production by Treg cells in the spleen and blood of naturally infected dogs and correlated these findings with parasite loads (Silva et al. Reference Silva, de Andrade, Melo, Perosso, Vasconcelos, Munari and Lima2014). The results of this study revealed an increase in IL-10 production from Tregs in the spleen of the naturally infected dogs but no correlation could be determined between the percentage of spleen Treg cells producing TGF-β or IL-10 and the parasite load (Silva et al. Reference Silva, de Andrade, Melo, Perosso, Vasconcelos, Munari and Lima2014). In another study conducted by Cortese et al., the immune profiles of dogs naturally infected with L. infantum were investigated (Cortese et al. Reference Cortese, Annunziatella, Palatucci, Rubino, Piantedosi, Di Loria, Ruggiero, Ciaramella and Terrazzano2013). The results revealed a significant increase of Th1 cells, CD8+ and CD3+ T lymphocytes and a reduced percentage of Treg CD4+, CD3+ and FoxP3 subsets in infected dogs, irrespective of antibody titre (Cortese et al. Reference Cortese, Annunziatella, Palatucci, Rubino, Piantedosi, Di Loria, Ruggiero, Ciaramella and Terrazzano2013). Figueiredo et al. also looked at naturally infected dogs but reported the expression of Tregs in the jejunum, colon and mesenteric lymph nodes (Figueiredo et al. Reference Figueiredo, Deoti, Amorim, Pinto, Moraes, Carvalho, Magno da Silva, de Assis, de Faria and Tafuri2014). No correlation was noted between clinical signs and immunological, parasitological findings or histopathological changes in the gastrointestinal tract. However, infection with L. infantum resulted in an increased expression of FoxP3, CD4+, TGF-β, IL-10, TNF-α and IFN-γ in the colon and jejunum and a reduction of CD8+ and IL-4 (Figueiredo et al. Reference Figueiredo, Deoti, Amorim, Pinto, Moraes, Carvalho, Magno da Silva, de Assis, de Faria and Tafuri2014). Meanwhile, in the skin of naturally infected dogs, Menezes-Souza et al. reported a correlation of Tregs GATA-3 and FoxP3 with subclinical infection together with high levels of IL-13, IFN-γ and TNF-α (Menezes-Souza et al. Reference Menezes-Souza, Correa-Oliveira, Guerra-Sa, Giunchetti, Teixeira-Carvalho, Martins-Filho, Oliveira and Reis2011). These findings led the authors to conclude that in subclinical infection or dogs with low levels of skin parasitism, mixed inflammatory and Treg responses could be important for parasite persistence and replication at low levels and also for the maintenance of clinical status of these dogs (Menezes-Souza et al. Reference Menezes-Souza, Correa-Oliveira, Guerra-Sa, Giunchetti, Teixeira-Carvalho, Martins-Filho, Oliveira and Reis2011). Hosein et al. have also reported the involvement of Tregs, in particular FoxP3 in CanL (Hosein et al. Reference Hosein, Rodriguez-Cortes, Blake, Allenspach, Alberola and Solano-Gallego2015). In a recent study, they reported that FoxP3 was positively correlated with parasite density in both the liver and skin of sick dogs in an experimental model of CanL (Hosein et al. Reference Hosein, Rodriguez-Cortes, Blake, Allenspach, Alberola and Solano-Gallego2015). Further investigations into the role of Tregs in CanL are still required, but from the information already available it is clear that Tregs are of importance in this infection.

HUMORAL IMMUNE RESPONSE

In mice, one of the strongest correlations with polarized immunity is the profiling of IgG subclass in antigen-specific immune response (Day, Reference Day2007). In humans, associations are dependent on clinical forms of the disease. In localized CL, for example, there was an association with IgG1, IgG2 and IgG3, whereas in diffuse cutaneous forms of the disease the response was dominated by IgG4, IgG1 and IgG2 (Rodriguez et al. Reference Rodriguez, Centeno and Ulrich1996). Canine leishmaniosis is often associated with a marked humoral response, which is non-protective and denotes failure to control the infection. The levels of Leishmania-specific immunoglobulins are greater in sick dogs compared with sub-clinical dogs (Palatnik-de-Sousa et al. Reference Palatnik-de-Sousa, Batista-de-Melo, Borja-Cabrera, Palatnik and Lavor2004). A marked association was seen between these levels, tissue parasite density and the clinical status of the animal (Reis et al. Reference Reis, Teixeira-Carvalho, Vale, Marques, Giunchetti, Mayrink, Guerra, Andrade, Correa-Oliveira and Martins-Filho2006b ). Over the years, the levels of canine IgG subclasses; IgG1 and IgG2, have been extensively researched in an attempt to establish a correlation between the type of Th response, the subclass level and the final clinical outcome of infection (Baneth et al. Reference Baneth, Koutinas, Solano-Gallego, Bourdeau and Ferrer2008). Investigations employing monoclonal antibodies to canine IgG1 and IgG2 have displayed a stable increase in the production of both these subclasses during natural and experimental infection with no indication of a practical use (Quinnell et al. Reference Quinnell, Courtenay, Garcez, Kaye, Shaw, Dye and Day2003a ; Strauss-Ayali et al. Reference Strauss-Ayali, Baneth and Jaffe2007). Rodriguez-Cortes et al. reported that the intensity of L. infantum infection in blood samples was significantly correlated with clinical signs and IgG, IgA and IgM concentrations (Rodriguez-Cortes et al. Reference Rodriguez-Cortes, Ojeda, Lopez-Fuertes, Timon, Altet, Solano-Gallego, Sanchez-Robert, Francino and Alberola2007b ). Understanding humoral responses in CanL dogs is important to establish a good prognosis and to enable the best possible treatment (Papadogiannakis et al. Reference Papadogiannakis, Andritsos, Kontos, Spanakos, Koutis and Velonakis2010).

INNATE IMMUNE RESPONSES

The components of innate immunity comprise a set of disease-resistance mechanisms that are not pathogen specific but have molecular and cellular components that identify classes of molecules specific to frequently encountered pathogens. Cells associated with innate immunity such as dendritic cells and macrophages directly kill pathogenic microbes via phagocytosis, or they induce the production of cytokines, which facilitate the elimination of pathogens. The innate immune response instructs the development of long lasting pathogen specific adaptive immune responses (Kumar et al. Reference Kumar, Kawai and Akira2009).

Dendritic cells

Dendritic cells are very important in assisting with the control of Leishmania infection and impairment of these cells by the parasite often results in the onset of disease. However, limited information is available regarding dendritic cells in canine L. infantum infection. Silva et al. reported that the impairment of follicular dendritic cells, B cell migration, CXCL13 expression and germinal centre formation were associated with severe clinical forms of CanL (Silva et al. Reference Silva, Andrade, Santana, Santos, Oliveira, Veras, Vassallo and dos-Santos2012). Intradermal injection of leishmanin solution induced antigen-specific maturation of canine dendritic cells in L. infantum dogs (Sacchi et al. Reference Sacchi, Calvi, Kramer, Ferroglio, Grandi, Clementi and Corona2006). This had the further effect of inducing up regulation of surface MHC class II expression. The results from this study suggested that canine dendritic cells acted as effector cells in the delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction seen (Sacchi et al. Reference Sacchi, Calvi, Kramer, Ferroglio, Grandi, Clementi and Corona2006).

Neutrophils

There is now a large amount of evidence, which suggests that Leishmania parasites are able to infect and replicate within neutrophils. Polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) are manipulated so that the parasites use granulocytes as host cells, permitting a productive infection. This enables L. major to use the PMNs as ‘Trojan horses’ before entering the macrophages (Laskay et al. Reference Laskay, van Zandbergen and Solbach2003). Conversely, De Souza Carmo et al. showed that amastigote destruction was observed inside L. amazonensis infected macrophages that were co-cultured with neutrophils (de Souza Carmo et al. Reference de Souza Carmo, Katz and Barbieri2010). The nitroblue tetrazolium reduction test (NBT) was investigated as a possible quick and cost effective assay for evaluation of percentage of canine neutrophils and monocytes activated in peripheral blood (Gomez-Ochoa et al. Reference Gomez-Ochoa, Lara, Couto, Marcen, Peris, Gascon and Castillo2010). The results from the study revealed that dogs with mild disease or no clinical development of disease had a significantly higher neutrophil reactivity (34%) compared with dogs with severe disease (3·7%) (Gomez-Ochoa et al. Reference Gomez-Ochoa, Lara, Couto, Marcen, Peris, Gascon and Castillo2010).

Neutrophils have been found to have the ability to de-condense chromatin and eject DNA into the surrounding extracellular environment, resulting in the trapping and inactivation of pathogens (Abi Abdallah and Denkers, Reference Abi Abdallah and Denkers2012). This phenomenon is known as neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and recent studies have shown that these NETs are not only important for the destruction of bacterium and viruses but also in protozoan infections including Leishmania, Eimeria, Plasmodium and Toxoplasma (Baker et al. Reference Baker, Imade, Molta, Tawde, Pam, Obadofin, Sagay, Egah, Iya, Afolabi, Baker, Ford, Ford, Roux and Keller2008; Guimaraes-Costa et al. Reference Guimaraes-Costa, Nascimento, Froment, Soares, Morgado, Conceicao-Silva and Saraiva2009; Behrendt et al. Reference Behrendt, Ruiz, Zahner, Taubert and Hermosilla2010). It has, however, been reported that Leishmania parasites have the ability to utilise these NETs to their advantage either by facilitating the containment of the parasite at the site of inoculation (Gabriel et al. Reference Gabriel, McMaster, Girard and Descoteaux2010) or by escaping NET mediated killing by activity of the enzyme 3′-nucleotidase/nuclease (Guimaraes-Costa et al. Reference Guimaraes-Costa, DeSouza-Vieira, Paletta-Silva, Freitas-Mesquita, Meyer-Fernandes and Saraiva2014). To date, there are no reports of a role for NETs in CanL.

It has been well established that L. infantum infection causes oxidative stress of neutrophils (Almeida et al. Reference Almeida, Narciso, Melo, Preve, Bosco, Lima and Ciarlini2013b ). Oxidative stress is when there is a disruption in the normal balance between the production of reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defences (Betteridge, Reference Betteridge2000). In dogs, oxidative stress was reported to have occurred in both moderate and severe stages of leishmaniosis. The viability of neutrophils decreased in the final stages of the disease and this is thought to have been as a result of uremia (Almeida et al. Reference Almeida, Narciso, Melo, Preve, Bosco, Lima and Ciarlini2013b ). A similar study also demonstrated that in moderate disease there was increased superoxide production but in very severe stages of disease there was a decrease in superoxide production and increased apoptosis, which was also associated with uremia (Almeida et al. Reference Almeida, Narciso, Bosco, Pereira, Braga, Avanco, Marcondes and Ciarlini2013a ).

Macrophages

Nitric oxide (NO) production is the last step involved in the destruction of Leishmania by macrophages. Nitric oxide is produced by nitric oxide synthase (NOS), which converts one of the terminal nitrogens of the guanidine group of L-arginine to NO, producing citrulline (Marletta et al. Reference Marletta, Yoon, Iyengar, Leaf and Wishnok1988). A number of cytokines have been found to enhance this NO production synergistically with IFN-α, potentially facilitating parasite control in vivo. IFN-α has been found to synergize with IFN-γ in the induction of iNOS and NO production by macrophages in vitro (Green et al. Reference Green, Crawford, Hockmeyer, Meltzer and Nacy1990; Rogers et al. Reference Rogers, Kropf, Choi, Dillon, Podinovskaia, Bates and Muller2009).

Several studies have demonstrated that the main effector mechanism involved in protection is the activation of macrophages by IFN-γ and TNF-α, which kill intracellular amastigotes via the L-arginine NO pathway. This has been demonstrated following successful chemotherapy of L. infantum dogs (Vouldoukis et al. Reference Vouldoukis, Drapier, Nussler, Tselentis, Da Silva, Gentilini, Mossalayi, Monjour and Dugas1996). Anti-leishmanial activity and NO production were also detected in a canine macrophagic cell line infected with L. infantum after incubation with IL-2, IFN-γ and TNF-α (Pinelli et al. Reference Pinelli, Gebhard, Mommaas, van Hoeij, Langermans, Ruitenberg and Rutten2000). Inducible NO synthase (iNOS or NOS2) produces NO and this is known to be one of the main microbicidal mechanisms in murine macrophages. Cells stimulated with human IFN-γ and bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and subsequently infected with L. infantum promastigotes showed high levels for fluorescence for NOS2 in their cytoplasm, which was not seen in uninfected macrophages (Sisto et al. Reference Sisto, Brandonisio, Panaro, Acquafredda, Leogrande, Fasanella, Trotta, Fumarola and Mitolo2001). The authors concluded that in this infection model, canine macrophages were able to express NOS2 and that IFN-γ and LPS have a role in NOS2 production (Sisto et al. Reference Sisto, Brandonisio, Panaro, Acquafredda, Leogrande, Fasanella, Trotta, Fumarola and Mitolo2001). Zafra et al. investigated the expression of iNOS by Leishmania infected canine macrophages and the results from this study revealed that a high iNOS expression was correlated with a low intracellular amastigote burden (Zafra et al. Reference Zafra, Jaber, Perez-Ecija, Barragan, Martinez-Moreno and Perez2008). The results from the study suggested that elevated iNOS expression in canine macrophage was a mechanism to control the infection (Zafra et al. Reference Zafra, Jaber, Perez-Ecija, Barragan, Martinez-Moreno and Perez2008). Meanwhile, Panaro et al. studied dogs naturally infected with L. infantum in Southern Italy (Panaro et al. Reference Panaro, Brandonisio, de Caprariis, Cavallo, Cianciulli, Mitolo and Otranto2008). Blood was taken from each dog at 4 month intervals and cell culture experiments were set up using macrophages and lymphocytes obtained from peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Supernatants from cultures were assayed with Griess reagent to detect NO (Panaro et al. Reference Panaro, Brandonisio, de Caprariis, Cavallo, Cianciulli, Mitolo and Otranto2008). The results revealed that in the first few months of infection, NO levels in supernatants with infected macrophages were higher in dogs that were symptomatic compared with asymptomatic dogs. However, 8 months after diagnosis, the level of NO was significantly higher in the asymptomatic group and in addition, the release of NO significantly decreased in cultures with autologous lymphocytes in both groups (Panaro et al. Reference Panaro, Brandonisio, de Caprariis, Cavallo, Cianciulli, Mitolo and Otranto2008). Holzmuller et al. demonstrated that the co-incubation of infected macrophages with autologous lymphocytes from dogs, which were immunized with purified excreted-Leishmania antigens resulted in cell death of intracellular amastigotes by NO mediated apoptosis (Holzmuller et al. Reference Holzmuller, Cavaleyra, Moreaux, Kovacic, Vincendeau, Papierok and Lemesre2005). Taken together, these findings re-inforce the notion that NO production is important for parasite elimination.

TLRs

It has been widely accepted that in susceptible dogs, the innate immune system is evaded by the parasites via a number of mechanisms including remodelling of phagosomal compartments and interference of various signalling pathways (Sacks and Sher, Reference Sacks and Sher2002). In particular, within recent years there has been a great deal of interest in the involvement of TLRs in Leishmania infection. This has been extensively studied in both human and murine models (Kropf et al. Reference Kropf, Freudenberg, Modolell, Price, Herath, Antoniazi, Galanos, Smith and Muller2004a ; Liese et al. Reference Liese, Schleicher and Bogdan2007; Raman et al. Reference Raman, Bhatia, Picone, Whittle, Bailor, O'Donnell, Pattabhi, Guderian, Mohamath, Duthie and Reed2010; Tuon et al. Reference Tuon, Fernandes, Pagliari, Duarte and Amato2010; Gallego et al. Reference Gallego, Golenbock, Gomez and Saravia2011). However, there is a limited amount of information about the role that these receptors play in canine L. infantum infection (Figueiredo et al. Reference Figueiredo, Amorim, Pinto, Barbosa, de Jesus Pinheiro, Deoti, Faria and Tafuri2013, Reference Figueiredo, Deoti, Amorim, Pinto, Moraes, Carvalho, Magno da Silva, de Assis, de Faria and Tafuri2014; Melo et al. Reference Melo, Silva, Grano, Homem and Machado2014a ). To date, 10 TLRs have been characterized in humans with 12 found to be functional in mice (Kawai and Akira, Reference Kawai and Akira2011) and 10 in dogs (Cusco et al. Reference Cusco, Sanchez, Altet, Ferrer and Francino2014). TLRs are a type of pattern recognition receptor. These are type-1 transmembrane proteins, which are expressed by cells of the innate immune system and in turn direct the responses of the adaptive immune system (Venugopal et al. Reference Venugopal, Nutman and Semnani2009). TLRs can induce inflammatory cytokines, type-1 IFN, chemokines and co-stimulatory molecules. The specificity of each TLR is dependent on the cytoplasmic adapter molecules that are associated with the toll- IL 1 receptor (TIR) domain, known as myeloid differentiation primary response gene 88 (MyD88), Mal (MyD88 adapter-like) also known as TIR-containing adapter protein (TIRAP) or toll-like receptor adapter protein (TRAM) (Medzhitov, Reference Medzhitov2001; Kawai and Akira, Reference Kawai and Akira2011). The adaptor molecules in turn provide the necessary structure for the recruitment and activation of downstream kinases and transcription factors that regulate inflammatory responses.

Unlike several other pathogens such as Listeria or Toxoplasma, there is a marked absence in pro-inflammatory cytokine induction upon phagocytosis of Leishmania by macrophages (Carrera et al. Reference Carrera, Gazzinelli, Badolato, Hieny, Muller, Kuhn and Sacks1996). Adaptive immunity is indispensable for the resolution of infection. However, there is mounting evidence that it is innate mechanisms, which play an important role in anti-Leishmania defences (Faria et al. Reference Faria, Reis and Lima2012). Early investigations suggesting Leishmania induces TLR mediated responses derived from studies using cells lacking MyD88 (Hawn et al. Reference Hawn, Ozinsky, Underhill, Buckner, Akira and Aderem2002). These experiments revealed that L. major exposure activated promoter regions of IL-1α through the MyD88 pathway in macrophages (Hawn et al. Reference Hawn, Ozinsky, Underhill, Buckner, Akira and Aderem2002). Subsequently it was reported that genetically resistant mice lacking MyD88 had a high susceptibility to L. major infection with large non-healing lesions and elevated Th2 responses. These findings suggested TLR responses were important for the development of anti-parasite immunity (Muraille et al. Reference Muraille, De Trez, Brait, De Baetselier, Leo and Carlier2003).

TLRs have been found to have important roles in several canine diseases such as anal furunculosis (House et al. Reference House, Gregory and Catchpole2008), osteoarthritis (Kuroki et al. Reference Kuroki, Stoker, Sims and Cook2010), inflammatory bowel disease (McMahon et al. Reference McMahon, House, Catchpole, Elson-Riggins, Riddle, Smith, Werling, Burgener and Allenspach2010) and pyometra (Chotimanukul and Sirivaidyapong, Reference Chotimanukul and Sirivaidyapong2011) to name a few. Investigations into the importance of TLRs in CanL are ongoing, but at present preliminary. In murine models, TLR2 has been associated with a protective role in leishmaniosis. In a L. major murine model, the TLR2 deficient mice had an increased number of cutaneous lesions (de Veer et al. Reference de Veer, Curtis, Baldwin, DiDonato, Sexton, McConville, Handman and Schofield2003). TLR2 and TLR3 were involved in the phagocytosis of Leishmania donovani parasites (Flandin et al. Reference Flandin, Chano and Descoteaux2006). In a human neutrophil study, it was reported that TLR2 can directly bind to lipophosphoglycan to promote signalling events (Becker et al. Reference Becker, Salaiza, Aguirre, Delgado, Carrillo-Carrasco, Kobeh, Ruiz, Cervantes, Torres, Cabrera, Gonzalez, Maldonado and Isibasi2003). In dogs, it was recently reported that the macrophages derived from peripheral blood from Leishmania infected dogs showed a decrease in TLR2 gene expression compared with healthy non-infected dogs (Melo et al. Reference Melo, Perosso, Almeida, Silva, Somenzari and de Lima2014b ). However, Amorim et al. described high TLR2 expression in monocytes and granulocytes in Leishmania infected dogs in Brazil. These dogs were not infectious to sand-flies by xenodiagnosis as the skin Leishmania parasite burden was found to be insufficient (Amorim et al. Reference Amorim, Silva, Figueiredo, Moura, Castro, Lima, Gontijo Nde, Michalick, Gollob and Tafuri2011). More recently, TLRs in CanL were studied in the gastrointestinal tract of infected dogs. This study revealed that the immunological and parasitological parameters varied by section of the gastrointestinal tract (Figueiredo et al. Reference Figueiredo, Amorim, Pinto, Barbosa, de Jesus Pinheiro, Deoti, Faria and Tafuri2013). There was a high parasite load in the colon, as well as higher frequency and expression of TLR2, CD11c receptors and IL-4 (Figueiredo et al. Reference Figueiredo, Amorim, Pinto, Barbosa, de Jesus Pinheiro, Deoti, Faria and Tafuri2013). A study by Ordeix et al. recently revealed that there was a lower expression of TLR2 in skin biopsies from dogs with mild disease (papular dermatitis) compared with dogs with moderate or severe disease, supporting an association between TLR2 and the pathogenesis of cutaneous lesions in CanL (Ordeix et al. Reference Ordeix, Saz, Hosein and Solano-Gallego2015). Hosein et al. reported down regulation of TLR2 transcription in the early stages of infection in lymph node samples of dogs experimentally infected with L. infantum, followed by up regulation in subclinical but not sick dogs. Further evidence of up regulation of TLR2 was revealed in the liver of both infected groups when compared with non-infected controls (Hosein et al. Reference Hosein, Rodriguez-Cortes, Blake, Allenspach, Alberola and Solano-Gallego2015). Overall, TLR2 up regulation seems to be associated with disease progression in dogs.

TLR3 is reported to be central in the production of NO and parasite phagocytosis (Flandin et al. Reference Flandin, Chano and Descoteaux2006). In vitro studies have implied that there is a possible role for TLR3 in immunity against Leishmania (Flandin et al. Reference Flandin, Chano and Descoteaux2006) but in vivo data is scarce, even in the mouse model. It is believed that a down regulation in this TLR would favour disease progression. In a hamster model, Ives et al. demonstrated that metastasizing L. guyanensis parasites have a high Leishmania RNA virus–1(LRV1) burden, which is recognized by the host TLR3 to induce pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines and exacerbate disease (Ives et al. Reference Ives, Ronet, Prevel, Ruzzante, Fuertes-Marraco, Schutz, Zangger, Revaz-Breton, Lye, Hickerson, Beverley, Acha-Orbea, Launois, Fasel and Masina2011). There is even less information regarding TLR3 in CanL. A recent study by Turchetti et al. looked at the transcription of cytokines (IL-10, IL-12, TNF-α and IFN-γ) and innate immunity genes (Nramp1, Nod-like receptor (NOD)1, NOD2, TLR1, TLR2, TLR3, TLR4, TLR5, TLR6, TLR7 and TLR9) in canine macrophages that were resistant or susceptible to intracellular survival of L infantum. The study revealed that the decreased intracellular survival of L. infantum in macrophages was associated with increased production of IFN-γ and TNF-α, and decreased production of IL-10 (Turchetti et al. Reference Turchetti, da Costa, Romao Ede, Fujiwara, da Paixao and Santos2015). This supports the notion that resistance is associated with a Th1-type response (Pinelli et al. Reference Pinelli, Killick-Kendrick, Wagenaar, Bernadina, del Real and Ruitenberg1994). However, TLR, NLR or Nramp1 appeared to have no influence on the intracellular survival of L. infantum (Turchetti et al. Reference Turchetti, da Costa, Romao Ede, Fujiwara, da Paixao and Santos2015). In a recent experimental CanL study, it was reported that TLR3 transcription was significantly downregulated with progression of disease in the lymph nodes when compared with control non-infected dogs and a tendency of down regulation was also noted in skin and spleen tissues (Hosein et al. Reference Hosein, Rodriguez-Cortes, Blake, Allenspach, Alberola and Solano-Gallego2015). As the information relating to TLR3 in CanL is so scarce, further studies would be required to be able to ascertain if this TLR has an important role in this infection.

TLR4 has been described as having a protective role in L. major infections. TLR4 deficient mice had a diminished parasite load in skin lesions but an increased parasite survival in host cells, which was correlated with higher arginase activity (Kropf et al. Reference Kropf, Freudenberg, Modolell, Price, Herath, Antoniazi, Galanos, Smith and Muller2004a ). The same group later showed that there was an increased parasite growth and delayed healing of cutaneous lesions resulting from a lack of TLR4 (Kropf et al. Reference Kropf, Freudenberg, Kalis, Modolell, Herath, Galanos, Freudenberg and Muller2004b ). In a L. infantum mouse model study, it was revealed that L. infantum infection resulted in increased transcription of TLR4 along with TLR2 (Cezario et al. Reference Cezario, Oliveira, Peresi, Nicolete, Polettini, Lima, Gatto and Calvi2011). This increased transcription could have been due to an influx of inflammatory cells into the spleen, in particular at the beginning of the infection, and a decrease seen at the chronic stage of infection could possibly have been due to partial control of the infection (Cezario et al. Reference Cezario, Oliveira, Peresi, Nicolete, Polettini, Lima, Gatto and Calvi2011). In a recent study looking at naturally infected dogs, Melo et al. reported increased TLR2 and TLR4 expression in the spleens of naturally infected dogs compared with non-infected dogs (Melo et al. Reference Melo, Silva, Grano, Homem and Machado2014a ). This elevated expression could indicate that these TLRs are important for the control of the infection and they are elevated in an attempt to eliminate the parasite. More recently, it was reported that significant changes were seen with TLR4 transcription in both the lymph node and spleen in an experimental model of CanL (Hosein et al. Reference Hosein, Rodriguez-Cortes, Blake, Allenspach, Alberola and Solano-Gallego2015). In both these tissues, TLR4 was significantly downregulated in the early (subclinical infection) as well as the late stages of infection (disease progression) when compared with non-infected controls (Hosein et al. Reference Hosein, Rodriguez-Cortes, Blake, Allenspach, Alberola and Solano-Gallego2015). TLR-4 down regulation appears to be associated with disease progression in dogs.

In a L. infantum murine model, cytokine production from dendritic cells was dependent on TLR9 (Liese et al. Reference Liese, Schleicher and Bogdan2007) and in L. major infection, TLR9 was essential for natural killer cell response (Liese et al. Reference Liese, Schleicher and Bogdan2007). Down regulation of the TLRs with disease progression is suggestive of an inhibitory role where the parasite may be facilitating the onset of disease by reducing or limiting the transcription of these TLRs, which would otherwise play a protective role.

The expression of TLR1, TLR3, TLR4 and TLR7 were assessed in both TLR2 and TLR9 deficient macrophages (Pandey et al. Reference Pandey, Doyen, Mishra, Saha and Chandel2015). The results of the study revealed that TLR9 was important for the modulation of TLRs 1, 2 and 3 in a L. major macrophage model. The TLR9 deficient macrophages in this study also had reduced CD40 expression and lower levels of TNF-α and IL-12 (Pandey et al. Reference Pandey, Doyen, Mishra, Saha and Chandel2015). Tuon et al. looked at TLR9 expression in patients with cutaneous leishmaniosis caused by L. braziliensis and found that TLR9 expression was mainly observed in granulomas. Some TLR9 positive cells were found in the dermis of patients. The percentage of cells that expressed TLR9 was significantly higher in the skin of CL patients compared with normal skin, but TLR9 expression was downregulated in keratinocytes of infected patients (Tuon et al. Reference Tuon, Amato, Bacha, Almusawi, Duarte and Amato Neto2008). In contrast, Hosein et al. reported significant changes in TLR9 transcription in the spleen and skin of experimentally infected dogs. TLR9 transcription was only upregulated in the early stages of infection in both these tissues when compared with healthy non-infected control dogs (Hosein et al. Reference Hosein, Rodriguez-Cortes, Blake, Allenspach, Alberola and Solano-Gallego2015), while TLR9 down regulation was observed in lymph nodes and skin with disease progression (Hosein et al. Reference Hosein, Rodriguez-Cortes, Blake, Allenspach, Alberola and Solano-Gallego2015). In another canine study, increased frequency and expression of TLR9 was associated with a lower parasite load in the jejunum of L. infantum infected dogs, whereas the colon showed a higher parasite load along with an increased frequency and expression of TLR2 (Figueiredo et al. Reference Figueiredo, Deoti, Amorim, Pinto, Moraes, Carvalho, Magno da Silva, de Assis, de Faria and Tafuri2014). Therefore, in CanL, TLR9 down regulation appears to correlate with disease progression. Table 2 summarizes the work to date on TLRs in CanL.

Table 2. Summary of published studies evaluating TLRs in canine L. infantum infection

TLR, toll-like receptor; RT–PCR, reverse transcriptase and real time polymerase chain reaction; PBMC, peripheral blood mononuclear cells; Xeno, xenodiagnosis; IHQ, immunohistochemistry; AD, asymptomatic; SD, symptomatic.

a Natural infection.

b Experimental infection.

It is evident that there is a very important role for TLRs in protection against Leishmania infections including L. infantum infection in dogs. So far, there is a strong association between overall TLR down regulation and disease progression, with the exception of TLR2 in dogs. These parasites have developed strategies to hijack the innate immune responses in a survival attempt.

Moreover, several research groups have employed the strategy of directly targeting TLRs using specific agonists to elicit protection against several species of Leishmania including L. major and L. donovani. In particular, this has been trialled and success reported for TLRs 2, 4 and 9. Stimulation of these TLRs elicited a protective response and it has been suggested that antigens stimulating TLRs would be ideal as potential vaccines (Chandra and Naik, Reference Chandra and Naik2008; Raman et al. Reference Raman, Bhatia, Picone, Whittle, Bailor, O'Donnell, Pattabhi, Guderian, Mohamath, Duthie and Reed2010; Srivastava et al. Reference Srivastava, Pandey, Jha, Chandel and Saha2013; Chandel et al. Reference Chandel, Pandey, Shukla, Lalsare, Selvaraj, Jha and Saha2014; Huang et al. Reference Huang, Hinchman and Mendez2015). In Leishmania, there has already been some progress with the use of ligands in vaccine development using mice models, which is promising for future dog studies. Most recently, Craft et al. reported the use of topical resiquimod (a synthetic TLR7/8 activating molecule), inducing protection against L. infantum infection in mice (Craft et al. Reference Craft, Birnbaum, Quanquin, Erfe, Quant, Haskell and Bruhn2014). Topical application to the skin of mice prior to, or following systemic infection resulted in conferred resistance to future intravenous challenge and protection that persisted for as long as 8 weeks after the first topical treatment (Craft et al. Reference Craft, Birnbaum, Quanquin, Erfe, Quant, Haskell and Bruhn2014). Mice with existing infections were also found to have significantly lower visceral parasite loads following topical resiquimod treatment. Resiquimod was found to increase the trafficking of leukocytes, B-cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, granulocytes, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in livers and spleens of the mice (Craft et al. Reference Craft, Birnbaum, Quanquin, Erfe, Quant, Haskell and Bruhn2014). In an earlier study, subcutaneous vaccination with imiquimod, a TLR7/8 agonist, was shown to mediate a Th1 response against L. major antigen, which suppressed Th2 responses following a challenge infection (Zhang and Matlashewski, Reference Zhang and Matlashewski2008). Both studies suggested the use of these compounds as potential vaccine adjuvants for vaccines or topical preventative and therapeutic agents (Zhang and Matlashewski, Reference Zhang and Matlashewski2008; Craft et al. Reference Craft, Birnbaum, Quanquin, Erfe, Quant, Haskell and Bruhn2014).

IMMUNOMODULATION: FROM PREVENTION TO TREATMENT

Effective control of CanL needs to address the vertebrate host, the vector and the parasite. Life cycle interruption of Leishmania is currently best achieved through the use of permethrin based impregnated dog collars or the topical application of insecticides (Killick-Kendrick et al. Reference Killick-Kendrick, Killick-Kendrick, Focheux, Dereure, Puech and Cadiergues1997; Courtenay et al. Reference Courtenay, Kovacic, Gomes, Garcez and Quinnell2009). Spot-on treatment of permethrin was also found to significantly reduce the incidence of CanL (Manzillo et al. Reference Manzillo, Oliva, Pagano, Manna, Maroli and Gradoni2006a ). Additional control measures include spraying homes, animal shelters and soft furnishings with pyrethroids (Alexander and Maroli, Reference Alexander and Maroli2003). Ultimately, the best control strategy would be an effective vaccine. Such a vaccine would not only reduce the number of CanL cases but also the incidence in humans (Alvar et al. Reference Alvar, Canavate, Molina, Moreno and Nieto2004). Several vaccine candidates have been tested in the past couple of decades with varying rates of success in dogs (Foroughi-Parvar and Hatam, Reference Foroughi-Parvar and Hatam2014). There is no clear cut immune response in CanL, but it is well established that a Th1 dominated response is the most desired outcome for protection in the dog (Baneth et al. Reference Baneth, Koutinas, Solano-Gallego, Bourdeau and Ferrer2008).

Currently, in Brazil, there is one commercially available canine vaccine; Leish-Tec® (Hertape Calier Saude Animal SA). There were previously two, but Leishmune® (Fort Dodge Animal Health) is no longer available. Leish-Tec® appeared to partially protect dogs against CanL, but only limited data from field trials have been reported (Fernandes et al. Reference Fernandes, Costa, Coelho, Michalick, de Freitas, Melo, Luiz Tafuri, Resende Dde, Hermont, Abrantes Cde and Gazzinelli2008). The same authors later reported that dogs vaccinated with Leish-Tec® exhibited adverse reactions with greater frequency and severity compared with dogs vaccinated with Leishmune® (Fernandes et al. Reference Fernandes, Junior, de Jesus, Souza, Larangeira, Fraga, Tavares Veras and Barrouin-Melo2014). The toxic effects of saponin are believed to vary depending on the compound purity and the dosage used. Both these vaccines contained saponin as an adjuvant, but Leishmune® was formulated with purified fraction QS21 (Oliveira-Freitas et al. Reference Oliveira-Freitas, Casas, Borja-Cabrera, Santos, Nico, Souza, Tinoco, da Silva, Palatnik, Parente and Palatnik-de-Sousa2006), known to have milder toxic effects (Kensil et al. Reference Kensil, Patel, Lennick and Marciani1991). In earlier trials, Leishmune® was found to induce a significant, long-lasting protective effect against CanL in Phase III clinical trials (da Silva et al. Reference da Silva, Borja-Cabrera, Correia Pontes, de Souza, Luz, Palatnik and Palatnik de Sousa2000; Borja-Cabrera et al. Reference Borja-Cabrera, Correia Pontes, da Silva, Paraguai de Souza, Santos, Gomes, Luz, Palatnik and Palatnik de Sousa2002). Leishmune® was also proposed to be used as a transmission blocking vaccine and in immune therapy for dogs already infected (Borja-Cabrera et al. Reference Borja-Cabrera, Cruz Mendes, Paraguai de Souza, Hashimoto Okada, de, Kawasaki, Costa, Reis, Genaro, Batista, Palatnik and Palatnik-de-Sousa2004; Saraiva et al. Reference Saraiva, de Figueiredo Barbosa, Santos, Borja-Cabrera, Nico, Souza, de Oliveira Mendes-Aguiar, de Souza, Fampa, Parra, Menz, Dias, de Oliveira and Palatnik-de-Sousa2006).

In Europe, the LiESP/QA-21 vaccine was recently made available. This vaccine is marketed under the trade name CaniLeish® (Virbac, France) and is composed of purified excreted-secreted proteins of L. infantum (LiESP) and adjuvanted with QA-21, which is a purified fraction of the Quillaja saponaria saponin (Lemesre et al. Reference Lemesre, Holzmuller, Goncalves, Bourdoiseau, Hugnet, Cavaleyra and Papierok2007). CaniLeish® is licensed for use with a primary vaccination course comprising three injections at 3-week intervals subsequently followed by annual booster vaccinations (Moreno et al. Reference Moreno, Vouldoukis, Martin, McGahie, Cuisinier and Gueguen2012). The same authors were able to demonstrate in vitro that CaniLeish® elicited a protective Th1 dominated immune profile, which lasted for a year after vaccination, and macrophages were able to reduce the intracellular parasite burdens in cell culture assays when co-cultured with autologous lymphocytes (Moreno et al. Reference Moreno, Vouldoukis, Schreiber, Martin, McGahie, Gueguen and Cuisinier2014).

Another study evaluated the preventative efficacy of a domperidone based treatment programme against CanL in a high prevalence area (Sabate et al. Reference Sabate, Llinas, Homedes, Sust and Ferrer2014). Domperidone is a dopamine D2 receptor antagonist that has been shown to enhance the innate CMI response, mainly through the reversible increase of blood prolactin (Gomez-Ochoa et al. Reference Gomez-Ochoa, Castillo, Gascon, Zarate, Alvarez and Couto2009). The results from the study demonstrated that this treatment regime reduced seroconversion rates in treated healthy dogs in endemic areas of CanL (Sabate et al. Reference Sabate, Llinas, Homedes, Sust and Ferrer2014).

TREATMENT OF CLINICAL DISEASE

There are several drugs currently available for the treatment of CanL. However, while many of these drugs can result in improved clinical signs, none of them have the ability to eliminate the infection. There is also the issue of toxicity and drug resistance (Noli and Auxilia, Reference Noli and Auxilia2005). The most common drugs used for CanL are the meglumine antimoniate, miltefosine and allopurinol. However, in recent years attempts have been made to use immumodulatory molecules for treatment of CanL such as the protein aggregate magnesium-ammonium phospholinoleate-palmitoleate anhydride immumo-modulator (P-MAPA) (Santiago et al. Reference Santiago, Neto, Alexandre, Munari, Andrade, Somenzari, Ciarlini and de Lima2013) that appears to induce TLR2 in human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells (Favaro et al. Reference Favaro, Nunes, Seiva, Nunes, Woolhiser, Duran and Lenaerts2012) and in canine macrophages (Melo et al. Reference Melo, Perosso, Almeida, Silva, Somenzari and de Lima2014b ). The treatment with this immumodulator resulted in an improvement in clinical signs and a significant reduction in parasite load in the skin. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) cultures also showed an increase in IL-2 and IFN-γ and a decrease in IL-10 levels (Santiago et al. Reference Santiago, Neto, Alexandre, Munari, Andrade, Somenzari, Ciarlini and de Lima2013). Taken together, the findings from this study indicated that P-MAPA has the potential to be used as an immunotherapeutic drug in CanL (Santiago et al. Reference Santiago, Neto, Alexandre, Munari, Andrade, Somenzari, Ciarlini and de Lima2013). Another study reported the use of a recombinant cysteine proteinase from L. infantum (rLdccys1) for immunotherapy of CanL (Ferreira et al. Reference Ferreira, Silva, Longo-Maugeri, Katz and Barbieri2014). Dogs treated with this proteinase did not display worsening clinical signs, had a reduction in the splenic parasite load, high IFN-γ and low IL-10 concentrations in comparison with control dogs (Ferreira et al. Reference Ferreira, Silva, Longo-Maugeri, Katz and Barbieri2014). The findings of this study illustrated the potential use of rLdccys1 as an immunotherapeutic tool for CanL and warrants further investigations (Ferreira et al. Reference Ferreira, Silva, Longo-Maugeri, Katz and Barbieri2014).

In conclusion, understanding of CanL caused by L. infantum is complicated. Visceral dissemination of the parasites makes sampling from infected animals difficult. In response experimental in vivo studies using mice have commonly been undertaken, although unfortunately these offer a poor reflection of immune responses associated with L. infantum in dogs. It is essential that as much information as possible be gathered from both naturally and experimentally infected dogs to better our understanding of this disease. Taken together, the findings summarized in this paper illustrate the multi-systemic effect of L. infantum in dogs. Although a great deal of progress has been made towards understanding the immune responses associated with CanL, a vast amount remains to be determined. A more comprehensive understanding of both the local and systemic responses to L. infantum in the dog is needed to be able to develop more effective treatment regimens and/or vaccines. Improving the control of the spread of CanL might also have a positive impact on reducing the number of human cases of the disease.

FINANCIAL SUPPORT

This work was supported by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council via a grant to the Royal Veterinary College (BB/F016891/1). Dr. Laia Solano-Gallego holds a Ramón y Cajal senior researcher contract awarded by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (Spain) and the European Social Fund. This manuscript has been assigned the reference PPB_01228 by the Royal Veterinary College.

References

REFERENCES

Abdalmaula, G. H., Barbadoro, P., Marigliano, A., Illuminati, D., Di Stanislao, F., D'Errico, M. M. and Prospero, E. (2013). Human visceral leishmaniasis: a picture from Italy. Journal of Infection and Public Health 6, 465472.Google Scholar
Abi Abdallah, D. S. and Denkers, E. Y. (2012). Neutrophils cast extracellular traps in response to protozoan parasites. Frontiers in Immunology 3, 382.Google ScholarPubMed
Alexander, B. and Maroli, M. (2003). Control of phlebotomine sandflies. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 17, 118.Google Scholar
Alexander, J. and Bryson, K. (2005). T helper (h)1/Th2 and Leishmania: paradox rather than paradigm. Immunology Letters 99, 1723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alexander, J., Satoskar, A. R. and Russell, D. G. (1999). Leishmania species: models of intracellular parasitism. Journal of Cell Science 112 (Pt 18), 29933002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alexandre-Pires, G., de Brito, M. T., Alguero, C., Martins, C., Rodrigues, O. R., da Fonseca, I. P. and Santos-Gomes, G. (2010). Canine leishmaniasis. Immunophenotypic profile of leukocytes in different compartments of symptomatic, asymptomatic and treated dogs. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 137, 275283.Google Scholar
Almeida, B. F., Narciso, L. G., Bosco, A. M., Pereira, P. P., Braga, E. T., Avanco, S. V., Marcondes, M. and Ciarlini, P. C. (2013 a). Neutrophil dysfunction varies with the stage of canine visceral leishmaniosis. Veterinary Parasitology 196, 612.Google Scholar
Almeida, B. F., Narciso, L. G., Melo, L. M., Preve, P. P., Bosco, A. M., Lima, V. M. and Ciarlini, P. C. (2013 b). Leishmaniasis causes oxidative stress and alteration of oxidative metabolism and viability of neutrophils in dogs. Veterinary Journal 198, 599605.Google Scholar
Alvar, J., Canavate, C., Molina, R., Moreno, J. and Nieto, J. (2004). Canine leishmaniasis. Advances in Parasitology 57, 188.Google Scholar
Alves, C. F., de Amorim, I. F. G., Moura, E. P., Ribeiro, R. R., Alves, C. F., Michalick, M. S., Kalapothakis, E., Bruna-Romero, O., Tafuri, W. L., Teixeira, M. M. and Melo, M. N. (2009). Expression of IFN-gamma, TNF-alpha, IL-10 and TGF-beta in lymph nodes associates with parasite load and clinical form of disease in dogs naturally infected with Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi . Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 128, 349358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Amorim, I. F., Silva, S. M., Figueiredo, M. M., Moura, E. P., Castro, R. S., Lima, T. K., Gontijo Nde, F., Michalick, M. S., Gollob, K. J. and Tafuri, W. L. (2011). Toll receptors type-2 and CR3 expression of canine monocytes and its correlation with immunohistochemistry and xenodiagnosis in visceral leishmaniasis. PLoS ONE 6, e27679.Google Scholar
Baker, V. S., Imade, G. E., Molta, N. B., Tawde, P., Pam, S. D., Obadofin, M. O., Sagay, S. A., Egah, D. Z., Iya, D., Afolabi, B. B., Baker, M., Ford, K., Ford, R., Roux, K. H. and Keller, T. C. III (2008). Cytokine-associated neutrophil extracellular traps and antinuclear antibodies in Plasmodium falciparum infected children under six years of age. Malaria Journal 7, 41.Google Scholar
Baneth, G., Koutinas, A. F., Solano-Gallego, L., Bourdeau, P. and Ferrer, L. (2008). Canine leishmaniosis - new concepts and insights on an expanding zoonosis: part one. Trends in Parasitology 24, 324330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbieri, C. L. (2006). Immunology of canine leishmaniasis. Parasite Immunology 28, 329337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barbosa, M. A., Alexandre-Pires, G., Soares-Clemente, M., Marques, C., Rodrigues, O. R., De Brito, T. V., Da Fonseca, I. P., Alves, L. C. and Santos-Gomes, G. M. (2011). Cytokine gene expression in the tissues of dogs infected by Leishmania infantum . Journal of Comparative Pathology 145, 336344.Google Scholar
Becker, I., Salaiza, N., Aguirre, M., Delgado, J., Carrillo-Carrasco, N., Kobeh, L. G., Ruiz, A., Cervantes, R., Torres, A. P., Cabrera, N., Gonzalez, A., Maldonado, C. and Isibasi, A. (2003). Leishmania lipophosphoglycan (LPG) activates NK cells through toll-like receptor-2. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 130, 6574.Google Scholar
Behrendt, J. H., Ruiz, A., Zahner, H., Taubert, A. and Hermosilla, C. (2010). Neutrophil extracellular trap formation as innate immune reactions against the apicomplexan parasite Eimeria bovis . Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 133, 18.Google Scholar
Belkaid, Y., Mendez, S., Lira, R., Kadambi, N., Milon, G. and Sacks, D. (2000). A natural model of Leishmania major infection reveals a prolonged “silent” phase of parasite amplification in the skin before the onset of lesion formation and immunity. Journal of Immunology 165, 969977.Google Scholar
Betteridge, D. J. (2000). What is oxidative stress? Metabolism 49, 38.Google Scholar
Blackwell, J. M., Goswami, T., Evans, C. A., Sibthorpe, D., Papo, N., White, J. K., Searle, S., Miller, E. N., Peacock, C. S., Mohammed, H. and Ibrahim, M. (2001). SLC11A1 (formerly NRAMP1) and disease resistance. Cellular Microbiology 3, 773784.Google Scholar
Boggiatto, P. M., Ramer-Tait, A. E., Metz, K., Kramer, E. E., Gibson-Corley, K., Mullin, K., Hostetter, J. M., Gallup, J. M., Jones, D. E. and Petersen, C. A. (2010). Immunologic indicators of clinical progression during canine Leishmania infantum infection. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 17, 267273.Google Scholar
Borja-Cabrera, G. P., Correia Pontes, N. N., da Silva, V. O., Paraguai de Souza, E., Santos, W. R., Gomes, E. M., Luz, K. G., Palatnik, M. and Palatnik de Sousa, C. B. (2002). Long lasting protection against canine kala-azar using the FML-QuilA saponin vaccine in an endemic area of Brazil (Sao Goncalo do Amarante, RN). Vaccine 20, 32773284.Google Scholar
Borja-Cabrera, G. P., Cruz Mendes, A., Paraguai de Souza, E., Hashimoto Okada, L. Y., de, A. T. F. A., Kawasaki, J. K., Costa, A. C., Reis, A. B., Genaro, O., Batista, L. M., Palatnik, M. and Palatnik-de-Sousa, C. B. (2004). Effective immunotherapy against canine visceral leishmaniasis with the FML-vaccine. Vaccine 22, 22342243.Google Scholar
Brachelente, C., Muller, N., Doherr, M. G., Sattler, U. and Welle, M. (2005). Cutaneous leishmaniasis in naturally infected dogs is associated with a T helper-2-biased immune response. Veterinary Pathology 42, 166175.Google Scholar
Brandonisio, O., Panunzio, M., Faliero, S. M., Ceci, L., Fasanella, A. and Puccini, V. (1996). Evaluation of polymorphonuclear cell and monocyte functions in Leishmania infantum-infected dogs. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 53, 95103.Google Scholar
Bretscher, P. A., Wei, G., Menon, J. N. and Bielefeldt-Ohmann, H. (1992). Establishment of stable, cell-mediated immunity that makes “susceptible” mice resistant to Leishmania major . Science 257, 539542.Google Scholar
Cardoso, L., Neto, F., Sousa, J. C., Rodrigues, M. and Cabral, M. (1998). Use of a leishmanin skin test in the detection of canine Leishmania-specific cellular immunity. Veterinary Parasitology 79, 213220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carrera, L., Gazzinelli, R. T., Badolato, R., Hieny, S., Muller, W., Kuhn, R. and Sacks, D. L. (1996). Leishmania promastigotes selectively inhibit interleukin 12 induction in bone marrow-derived macrophages from susceptible and resistant mice. The Journal of Experimental Medicine 183, 515526.Google Scholar
Carrillo, E. and Moreno, J. (2009). Cytokine profiles in canine visceral leishmaniasis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 128, 6770.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Catchpole, B., Kennedy, L. J., Davison, L. J. and Ollier, W. E. (2008). Canine diabetes mellitus: from phenotype to genotype. The Journal of Small Animal Practice 49, 410.Google Scholar
Cavalcanti, A. S., Ribeiro-Alves, M., Pereira Lde, O., Mestre, G. L., Ferreira, A. B., Morgado, F. N., Boite, M. C., Cupolillo, E., Moraes, M. O. and Porrozzi, R. (2015). Parasite load induces progressive spleen architecture breakage and impairs cytokine mRNA expression in Leishmania infantum-naturally infected dogs. PLoS ONE 10, e0123009.Google Scholar
Cezario, G. A., Oliveira, L. R., Peresi, E., Nicolete, V. C., Polettini, J., Lima, C. R., Gatto, M. and Calvi, S. A. (2011). Analysis of the expression of toll-like receptors 2 and 4 and cytokine production during experimental Leishmania chagasi infection. Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 106, 573583.Google Scholar
Chamizo, C., Moreno, J. and Alvar, J. (2005). Semi-quantitative analysis of cytokine expression in asymptomatic canine leishmaniasis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 103, 6775.Google Scholar
Chandel, H. S., Pandey, S. P., Shukla, D., Lalsare, K., Selvaraj, S. K., Jha, M. K. and Saha, B. (2014). Toll-like receptors and CD40 modulate each other's expression affecting Leishmania major infection. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 176, 283290.Google Scholar
Chandra, D. and Naik, S. (2008). Leishmania donovani infection down-regulates TLR2-stimulated IL-12p40 and activates IL-10 in cells of macrophage/monocytic lineage by modulating MAPK pathways through a contact-dependent mechanism. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 154, 224234.Google Scholar
Chotimanukul, S. and Sirivaidyapong, S. (2011). Differential expression of toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) in healthy and infected canine endometrium. Theriogenology 76, 11521161.Google Scholar
Ciaramella, P., Oliva, G., Luna, R. D., Gradoni, L., Ambrosio, R., Cortese, L., Scalone, A. and Persechino, A. (1997). A retrospective clinical study of canine leishmaniasis in 150 dogs naturally infected by Leishmania infantum . The Veterinary Record 141, 539543.Google Scholar
Collin, N., Gomes, R., Teixeira, C., Cheng, L., Laughinghouse, A., Ward, J. M., Elnaiem, D. E., Fischer, L., Valenzuela, J. G. and Kamhawi, S. (2009). Sand fly salivary proteins induce strong cellular immunity in a natural reservoir of visceral leishmaniasis with adverse consequences for Leishmania . PLoS Pathogens 5, e1000441.Google Scholar
Correa, A. P., Dossi, A. C., de Oliveira Vasconcelos, R., Munari, D. P. and de Lima, V. M. (2007). Evaluation of transformation growth factor beta1, interleukin-10, and interferon-gamma in male symptomatic and asymptomatic dogs naturally infected by Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi . Veterinary Parasitology 143, 267274.Google Scholar
Cortese, L., Sica, M., Piantedosi, D., Ruggiero, G., Pero, M. E., Terrazzano, G., Mastellone, V. and Ciaramella, P. (2009). Secondary immune-mediated thrombocytopenia in dogs naturally infected by Leishmania infantum . The Veterinary Record 164, 778782.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cortese, L., Terrazzano, G., Piantedosi, D., Sica, M., Prisco, M., Ruggiero, G. and Ciaramella, P. (2011). Prevalence of anti-platelet antibodies in dogs naturally co-infected by Leishmania infantum and Ehrlichia canis . Veterinary Journal 188, 118121.Google Scholar
Cortese, L., Annunziatella, M., Palatucci, A. T., Rubino, V., Piantedosi, D., Di Loria, A., Ruggiero, G., Ciaramella, P. and Terrazzano, G. (2013). Regulatory T cells, Cytotoxic T lymphocytes and a T(H)1 cytokine profile in dogs naturally infected by Leishmania infantum . Research in Veterinary Science 95, 942949.Google Scholar
Costa, F. A., Goto, H., Saldanha, L. C., Silva, S. M., Sinhorini, I. L., Silva, T. C. and Guerra, J. L. (2003). Histopathologic patterns of nephropathy in naturally acquired canine visceral leishmaniasis. Veterinary Pathology 40, 677684.Google Scholar
Courtenay, O., Kovacic, V., Gomes, P. A., Garcez, L. M. and Quinnell, R. J. (2009). A long-lasting topical deltamethrin treatment to protect dogs against visceral leishmaniasis. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 23, 245256.Google Scholar
Courtenay, O., Carson, C., Calvo-Bado, L., Garcez, L. M. and Quinnell, R. J. (2014). Heterogeneities in Leishmania infantum infection: using skin parasite burdens to identify highly infectious dogs. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 8, e2583.Google Scholar
Craft, N., Birnbaum, R., Quanquin, N., Erfe, M. C., Quant, C., Haskell, J. and Bruhn, K. W. (2014). Topical resiquimod protects against visceral infection with Leishmania infantum chagasi in mice. Clinical and Vaccine Immunology 21, 13141322.Google Scholar
Cummings, H. E., Tuladhar, R. and Satoskar, A. R. (2010). Cytokines and their STATs in cutaneous and visceral leishmaniasis. Journal of Biomedicine & Biotechnology 2010, 294389.Google Scholar
Cunha, S., Freire, M., Eulalio, C., Critosvao, J., Netto, E., Johnson, W. D. Jr., Reed, S. G. and Badaro, R. (1995). Visceral leishmaniasis in a new ecological niche near a major metropolitan area of Brazil. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 89, 155158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusco, A., Sanchez, A., Altet, L., Ferrer, L. and Francino, O. (2014). Non-synonymous genetic variation in exonic regions of canine toll-like receptors. Canine Genetics and Epidemiology 1, 11.Google Scholar
da Silva, V. O., Borja-Cabrera, G. P., Correia Pontes, N. N., de Souza, E. P., Luz, K. G., Palatnik, M. and Palatnik de Sousa, C. B. (2000). A phase III trial of efficacy of the FML-vaccine against canine kala-azar in an endemic area of Brazil (Sao Goncalo do Amaranto, RN). Vaccine 19, 10821092.Google Scholar
Day, M. J. (2007). Immunoglobulin G subclass distribution in canine leishmaniosis: a review and analysis of pitfalls in interpretation. Veterinary Parasitology 147, 28.Google Scholar
de Lima, V. M., Peiro, J. R. and de Oliveira Vasconcelos, R. (2007). IL-6 and TNF-alpha production during active canine visceral leishmaniasis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 115, 189193.Google Scholar
De Luna, R., Vuotto, M. L., Ielpo, M. T., Ambrosio, R., Piantedosi, D., Moscatiello, V., Ciaramella, P., Scalone, A., Gradoni, L. and Mancino, D. (1999). Early suppression of lymphoproliferative response in dogs with natural infection by Leishmania infantum . Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 70, 95103.Google Scholar
de Souza Carmo, E. V., Katz, S. and Barbieri, C. L. (2010). Neutrophils reduce the parasite burden in Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis-infected macrophages. PLoS ONE 5, e13815.Google Scholar
de Veer, M. J., Curtis, J. M., Baldwin, T. M., DiDonato, J. A., Sexton, A., McConville, M. J., Handman, E. and Schofield, L. (2003). MyD88 is essential for clearance of Leishmania major: possible role for lipophosphoglycan and toll-like receptor 2 signaling. European Journal of Immunology 33, 28222831.Google Scholar
Desjeux, P. (2004). Leishmaniasis: current situation and new perspectives. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 27, 305318.Google Scholar
Duprey, Z. H., Steurer, F. J., Rooney, J. A., Kirchhoff, L. V., Jackson, J. E., Rowton, E. D. and Schantz, P. M. (2006). Canine visceral leishmaniasis, United States and Canada, 2000–2003. Emerging Infectious Diseases 12, 440446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esch, K. J., Juelsgaard, R., Martinez, P. A., Jones, D. E. and Petersen, C. A. (2013). Programmed death 1-mediated T cell exhaustion during visceral leishmaniasis impairs phagocyte function. Journal of Immunology 191, 55425550.Google Scholar
Esch, K. J., Schaut, R. G., Lamb, I. M., Clay, G., Morais Lima, A. L., do Nascimento, P. R., Whitley, E. M., Jeronimo, S. M., Sutterwala, F. S., Haynes, J. S. and Petersen, C. A. (2015). Activation of autophagy and nucleotide-binding domain leucine-rich repeat-containing-like receptor family, pyrin domain-containing 3 inflammasome during Leishmania infantum-associated glomerulonephritis. The American Journal of Pathology 185, 21052117.Google Scholar
Espejo, L. A., Costard, S. and Zagmutt, F. J. (2015). Modelling canine leishmaniasis spread to non-endemic areas of Europe. Epidemiology and Infection 143, 19361949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Faria, M. S., Reis, F. C. and Lima, A. P. (2012). Toll-like receptors in leishmania infections: guardians or promoters? Journal Parasitology Research 2012, 930257.Google Scholar
Farrell, J. (2002). Leishmania. Kluwer Academic, Boston, Mass, London.Google Scholar
Favaro, W. J., Nunes, O. S., Seiva, F. R., Nunes, I. S., Woolhiser, L. K., Duran, N. and Lenaerts, A. J. (2012). Effects of P-MAPA immunomodulator on toll-like receptors and p53: potential therapeutic strategies for infectious diseases and cancer. Infectious Agents and Cancer 7, 14.Google Scholar
Fernandes, A. P., Costa, M. M., Coelho, E. A., Michalick, M. S., de Freitas, E., Melo, M. N., Luiz Tafuri, W., Resende Dde, M., Hermont, V., Abrantes Cde, F. and Gazzinelli, R. T. (2008). Protective immunity against challenge with Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi in beagle dogs vaccinated with recombinant A2 protein. Vaccine 26, 58885895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandes, C. B., Junior, J. T., de Jesus, C., Souza, B. M., Larangeira, D. F., Fraga, D. B., Tavares Veras, P. S. and Barrouin-Melo, S. M. (2014). Comparison of two commercial vaccines against visceral leishmaniasis in dogs from endemic areas: IgG, and subclasses, parasitism, and parasite transmission by xenodiagnosis. Vaccine 32, 12871295.Google Scholar
Ferreira, J. H. L., Silva, L. D., Longo-Maugeri, I. M., Katz, S. and Barbieri, C. L. (2014). Use of a recombinant cysteine proteinase from Leishmania (Leishmania) infantum chagasi for the immunotherapy of canine visceral Leishmaniasis. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 8, e2729.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, M. M., Amorim, I. F., Pinto, A. J., Barbosa, V. S., de Jesus Pinheiro, L., Deoti, B., Faria, A. M. and Tafuri, W. L. (2013). Expression of toll-like receptors 2 and 9 in cells of dog jejunum and colon naturally infected with Leishmania infantum . BMC Immunology 14, 22.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, M. M., Deoti, B., Amorim, I. F., Pinto, A. J., Moraes, A., Carvalho, C. S., Magno da Silva, S., de Assis, A. C., de Faria, A. M. and Tafuri, W. L. (2014). Expression of regulatory T cells in Jejunum, colon, and cervical and mesenteric Lymph nodes of dogs naturally infected with Leishmania infantum . Infection and Immunity 82, 37043712.Google Scholar
Flandin, J. F., Chano, F. and Descoteaux, A. (2006). RNA interference reveals a role for TLR2 and TLR3 in the recognition of Leishmania donovani promastigotes by interferon-gamma-primed macrophages. European Journal of Immunology 36, 411420.Google Scholar
Foroughi-Parvar, F. and Hatam, G. (2014). Vaccines for canine leishmaniasis. Advances in Preventive Medicine 2014, 569193.Google Scholar
Franca-Silva, J. C., da Costa, R. T., Siqueira, A. M., Machado-Coelho, G. L., da Costa, C. A., Mayrink, W., Vieira, E. P., Costa, J. S., Genaro, O. and Nascimento, E. (2003). Epidemiology of canine visceral leishmaniosis in the endemic area of Montes Claros Municipality, Minas Gerais State, Brazil. Veterinary Parasitology 111, 161173.Google Scholar
Gabriel, C., McMaster, W. R., Girard, D. and Descoteaux, A. (2010). Leishmania donovani promastigotes evade the antimicrobial activity of neutrophil extracellular traps. Journal of Immunology 185, 43194327.Google Scholar
Gallego, C., Golenbock, D., Gomez, M. A. and Saravia, N. (2011). Toll-like receptors participate in macrophage activation and intracellular control of Leishmania (Viannia) panamensis . Infection and Immunity 79, 28712879.Google Scholar
Galvez, R., Miro, G., Descalzo, M. A., Nieto, J., Dado, D., Martin, O., Cubero, E. and Molina, R. (2010). Emerging trends in the seroprevalence of canine leishmaniasis in the Madrid region (central Spain). Veterinary Parasitology 169, 327334.Google Scholar
Giunchetti, R. C., Martins-Filho, O. A., Carneiro, C. M., Mayrink, W., Marques, M. J., Tafuri, W. L., Correa-Oliveira, R. and Reis, A. B. (2008). Histopathology, parasite density and cell phenotypes of the popliteal lymph node in canine visceral leishmaniasis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 121, 2333.Google Scholar
Gomez-Ochoa, P., Castillo, J. A., Gascon, M., Zarate, J. J., Alvarez, F. and Couto, C. G. (2009). Use of domperidone in the treatment of canine visceral leishmaniasis: a clinical trial. Veterinary Journal 179, 259263.Google Scholar
Gomez-Ochoa, P., Lara, A., Couto, G., Marcen, J. M., Peris, A., Gascon, M. and Castillo, J. A. (2010). The nitroblue tetrazolium reduction test in canine leishmaniasis. Veterinary Parasitology 172, 135138.Google Scholar
Gramiccia, M., Scalone, A., Di Muccio, T., Orsini, S., Fiorentino, E. and Gradoni, L. (2013). The burden of visceral leishmaniasis in Italy from 1982 to 2012: a retrospective analysis of the multi-annual epidemic that occurred from 1989 to 2009. Euro Surveillance 18, 20535.Google Scholar
Green, S. J., Crawford, R. M., Hockmeyer, J. T., Meltzer, M. S. and Nacy, C. A. (1990). Leishmania major amastigotes initiate the L-arginine-dependent killing mechanism in IFN-gamma-stimulated macrophages by induction of tumor necrosis factor-alpha. Journal of Immunology 145, 42904297.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guarga, J. L., Lucientes, J., Peribanez, M. A., Molina, R., Gracia, M. J. and Castillo, J. A. (2000). Experimental infection of Phlebotomus perniciosus and determination of the natural infection rates of Leishmania infantum in dogs. Acta Tropica 77, 203207.Google Scholar
Guimaraes-Costa, A. B., Nascimento, M. T., Froment, G. S., Soares, R. P., Morgado, F. N., Conceicao-Silva, F. and Saraiva, E. M. (2009). Leishmania amazonensis promastigotes induce and are killed by neutrophil extracellular traps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 67486753.Google Scholar
Guimaraes-Costa, A. B., DeSouza-Vieira, T. S., Paletta-Silva, R., Freitas-Mesquita, A. L., Meyer-Fernandes, J. R. and Saraiva, E. M. (2014). 3′-nucleotidase/nuclease activity allows Leishmania parasites to escape killing by neutrophil extracellular traps. Infection and Immunity 82, 17321740.Google Scholar
Hawn, T. R., Ozinsky, A., Underhill, D. M., Buckner, F. S., Akira, S. and Aderem, A. (2002). Leishmania major activates IL-1 alpha expression in macrophages through a MyD88-dependent pathway. Microbes and Infection 4, 763771.Google Scholar
Holzmuller, P., Cavaleyra, M., Moreaux, J., Kovacic, R., Vincendeau, P., Papierok, G. and Lemesre, J. L. (2005). Lymphocytes of dogs immunised with purified excreted-secreted antigens of Leishmania infantum co-incubated with Leishmania infected macrophages produce IFN gamma resulting in nitric oxide-mediated amastigote apoptosis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 106, 247257.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Horrillo, L., San Martin, J. V., Molina, L., Madronal, E., Matia, B., Castro, A., Garcia-Martinez, J., Barrios, A., Cabello, N., Arata, I. G., Casas, J. M. and Ruiz Giardin, J. M. (2015). Atypical presentation in adults in the largest community outbreak of leishmaniasis in Europe (Fuenlabrada, Spain). Clinical Microbiology and Infection 21, 269273.Google Scholar
Hosein, S., Rodriguez-Cortes, A., Blake, D. P., Allenspach, K., Alberola, J. and Solano-Gallego, L. (2015). Transcription of toll-like receptors 2, 3, 4 and 9, FoxP3 and Th17 Cytokines in a susceptible experimental model of canine Leishmania infantum infection. PLoS ONE 10, e0140325.Google Scholar
House, A. K., Gregory, S. P. and Catchpole, B. (2008). Pattern-recognition receptor mRNA expression and function in canine monocyte/macrophages and relevance to canine anal furunuclosis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 124, 230240.Google Scholar
Huang, L., Hinchman, M. and Mendez, S. (2015). Coinjection with TLR2 agonist Pam3CSK4 reduces the pathology of leishmanization in mice. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 9, e0003546.Google Scholar
Ives, A., Ronet, C., Prevel, F., Ruzzante, G., Fuertes-Marraco, S., Schutz, F., Zangger, H., Revaz-Breton, M., Lye, L. F., Hickerson, S. M., Beverley, S. M., Acha-Orbea, H., Launois, P., Fasel, N. and Masina, S. (2011). Leishmania RNA virus controls the severity of mucocutaneous leishmaniasis. Science 331, 775778.Google Scholar
Katara, G. K., Ansari, N. A., Verma, S., Ramesh, V. and Salotra, P. (2011). Foxp3 and IL-10 expression correlates with parasite burden in lesional tissues of post kala azar dermal leishmaniasis (PKDL) patients. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 5, e1171.Google Scholar
Kawai, T. and Akira, S. (2011). Toll-like receptors and their crosstalk with other innate receptors in infection and immunity. Immunity 34, 637650.Google Scholar
Kaye, P. and Scott, P. (2011). Leishmaniasis: complexity at the host-pathogen interface. Nature Reviews. Microbiology 9, 604615.Google Scholar
Kensil, C. R., Patel, U., Lennick, M. and Marciani, D. (1991). Separation and characterization of saponins with adjuvant activity from Quillaja saponaria Molina cortex. Journal of Immunology 146, 431437.Google Scholar
Killick-Kendrick, R., Killick-Kendrick, M., Focheux, C., Dereure, J., Puech, M. P. and Cadiergues, M. C. (1997). Protection of dogs from bites of phlebotomine sandflies by deltamethrin collars for control of canine leishmaniasis. Medical and Veterinary Entomology 11, 105111.Google Scholar
Koutinas, A. F. and Koutinas, C. K. (2014). Pathologic mechanisms underlying the clinical findings in canine leishmaniasis due to Leishmania infantum/chagasi . Veterinary Pathology 51, 527538.Google Scholar
Kropf, P., Herath, S., Weber, V., Modolell, M. and Muller, I. (2003). Factors influencing Leishmania major infection in IL-4-deficient BALB/c mice. Parasite Immunology 25, 439447.Google Scholar
Kropf, P., Freudenberg, M. A., Modolell, M., Price, H. P., Herath, S., Antoniazi, S., Galanos, C., Smith, D. F. and Muller, I. (2004 a). Toll-like receptor 4 contributes to efficient control of infection with the protozoan parasite Leishmania major . Infection and Immunity 72, 19201928.Google Scholar
Kropf, P., Freudenberg, N., Kalis, C., Modolell, M., Herath, S., Galanos, C., Freudenberg, M. and Muller, I. (2004 b). Infection of C57BL/10ScCr and C57BL/10ScNCr mice with Leishmania major reveals a role for toll-like receptor 4 in the control of parasite replication. Journal of Leukocyte Biology 76, 4857.Google Scholar
Kumar, H., Kawai, T. and Akira, S. (2009). Toll-like receptors and innate immunity. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications 388, 621625.Google Scholar
Kuroki, K., Stoker, A. M., Sims, H. J. and Cook, J. L. (2010). Expression of Toll-like receptors 2 and 4 in stifle joint synovial tissues of dogs with or without osteoarthritis. American Journal of Veterinary Research 71, 750754.Google Scholar
Lage, R. S., Oliveira, G. C., Busek, S. U., Guerra, L. L., Giunchetti, R. C., Correa-Oliveira, R. and Reis, A. B. (2007). Analysis of the cytokine profile in spleen cells from dogs naturally infected by Leishmania chagasi . Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 115, 135145.Google Scholar
Laskay, T., van Zandbergen, G. and Solbach, W. (2003). Neutrophil granulocytes–Trojan horses for Leishmania major and other intracellular microbes? Trends in Microbiology 11, 210214.Google Scholar
Lemesre, J. L., Holzmuller, P., Goncalves, R. B., Bourdoiseau, G., Hugnet, C., Cavaleyra, M. and Papierok, G. (2007). Long-lasting protection against canine visceral leishmaniasis using the LiESAp-MDP vaccine in endemic areas of France: double-blind randomised efficacy field trial. Vaccine 25, 42234234.Google Scholar
Liese, J., Schleicher, U. and Bogdan, C. (2007). TLR9 signaling is essential for the innate NK cell response in murine cutaneous leishmaniasis. European Journal of Immunology 37, 34243434.Google Scholar
Lopez, R., Lucena, R., Novales, M., Ginel, P. J., Martin, E. and Molleda, J. M. (1996). Circulating immune complexes and renal function in canine leishmaniasis. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 43, 469474.Google Scholar
Lucena, R. and Ginel, P. J. (1998). Immunoglobulin isotype distribution of antinuclear antibodies in dogs with leishmaniasis. Research in Veterinary Science 65, 205207.Google Scholar
Madeira, M. F., Figueiredo, F. B., Pinto, A. G., Nascimento, L. D., Furtado, M., Mouta-Confort, E., de Paula, C. C., Bogio, A., Gomes, M. C., Bessa, A. M. and Passos, S. R. (2009). Parasitological diagnosis of canine visceral leishmaniasis: is intact skin a good target? Research in Veterinary Science 87, 260262.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maia, C. and Campino, L. (2008). Methods for diagnosis of canine leishmaniasis and immune response to infection. Veterinary Parasitology 158, 274287.Google Scholar
Maia, C. and Campino, L. (2012). Cytokine and phenotypic cell profiles of Leishmania infantum infection in the dog. Journal of Tropical Medicine 2012, 541571.Google Scholar
Maia, C., Nunes, M. and Campino, L. (2008). Importance of cats in zoonotic leishmaniasis in Portugal. Vector Borne and Zoonotic Diseases 8, 555559.Google Scholar
Maia, C., Nunes, M., Cristovao, J. and Campino, L. (2010). Experimental canine leishmaniasis: clinical, parasitological and serological follow-up. Acta Tropica 116, 193199.Google Scholar
Manzillo, V. F., Oliva, G., Pagano, A., Manna, L., Maroli, M. and Gradoni, L. (2006 a). Deltamethrin-impregnated collars for the control of canine leishmaniasis: evaluation of the-protective effect and influence on the clinical outcome of Leishmania infection in kennelled stray dogs. Veterinary Parasitology 142, 142145.Google Scholar
Manzillo, V. F., Restucci, B., Pagano, A., Gradoni, L. and Oliva, G. (2006 b). Pathological changes in the bone marrow of dogs with leishmaniosis. Veterinary Record 158, 690694.Google Scholar
Margarito, J. M., Lucena, R., Lopez, R., Molleda, J. M., Martin, E. and Ginel, P. J. (1998). Levels of IgM and IgA circulating immune complexes in dogs with leishmaniasis. Zentralbl Veterinarmed B 45, 263267.Google Scholar
Marletta, M. A., Yoon, P. S., Iyengar, R., Leaf, C. D. and Wishnok, J. S. (1988). Macrophage oxidation of L-arginine to nitrite and nitrate: nitric oxide is an intermediate. Biochemistry 27, 87068711.Google Scholar
Martin-Martin, I., Jimenez, M., Gonzalez, E., Eguiluz, C. and Molina, R. (2015). Natural transmission of Leishmania infantum through experimentally infected Phlebotomus perniciosus highlights the virulence of Leishmania parasites circulating in the human visceral leishmaniasis outbreak in Madrid, Spain. Veterinary Research 46, 138.Google Scholar
Martin-Sanchez, J., Acedo, C., Munoz-Perez, M., Pesson, B., Marchal, O. and Morillas-Marquez, F. (2007). Infection by Leishmania infantum in cats: epidemiological study in Spain. Veterinary Parasitology 145, 267273.Google Scholar
Marty, P., Le Fichoux, Y., Giordana, D. and Brugnetti, A. (1992). Leishmanin reaction in the human population of a highly endemic focus of canine leishmaniasis in Alpes-Maritimes, France. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 86, 249250.Google Scholar
McMahon, L. A., House, A. K., Catchpole, B., Elson-Riggins, J., Riddle, A., Smith, K., Werling, D., Burgener, I. A. and Allenspach, K. (2010). Expression of Toll-like receptor 2 in duodenal biopsies from dogs with inflammatory bowel disease is associated with severity of disease. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 135, 158163.Google Scholar
Medzhitov, R. (2001). Toll-like receptors and innate immunity. Nature Reviews. Immunology 1, 135145.Google Scholar
Mekuzas, Y., Gradoni, L., Oliva, G., Foglia Manzillo, V. and Baneth, G. (2009). Ehrlichia canis and Leishmania infantum co-infection: a 3-year longitudinal study in naturally exposed dogs. Clinical Microbiology and Infection 15(Suppl 2), 3031.Google Scholar
Melo, F. A., Moura, E. P., Ribeiro, R. R., Alves, C. F., Caliari, M. V., Tafuri, W. L. and Calabrese, K. S. (2009). Hepatic extracellular matrix alterations in dogs naturally infected with Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi . International Journal of Experimental Pathology 90, 538548.Google Scholar
Melo, G. D., Seraguci, T. F., Schweigert, A., Silva, J. E., Grano, F. G., Peiro, J. R., Lima, V. M. and Machado, G. F. (2013). Pro-inflammatory cytokines predominate in the brains of dogs with visceral leishmaniasis: a natural model of neuroinflammation during systemic parasitic infection. Veterinary Parasitology 192, 5766.Google Scholar
Melo, G. D., Silva, J. E., Grano, F. G., Homem, C. G. and Machado, G. F. (2014 a). Compartmentalized gene expression of toll-like receptors 2, 4, and 9 in the brain and peripheral lymphoid organs during canine visceral leishmaniasis. Parasite Immunology 36, 726731.Google Scholar
Melo, L. M., Perosso, J., Almeida, B. F., Silva, K. L., Somenzari, M. A. and de Lima, V. M. (2014 b). Effects of P-MAPA immunomodulator on toll-like receptor 2, ROS, nitric oxide, MAPKp38 and IKK in PBMC and macrophages from dogs with visceral leishmaniasis. International Immunopharmacology 18, 373378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menezes-Souza, D., Correa-Oliveira, R., Guerra-Sa, R., Giunchetti, R. C., Teixeira-Carvalho, A., Martins-Filho, O. A., Oliveira, G. C. and Reis, A. B. (2011). Cytokine and transcription factor profiles in the skin of dogs naturally infected by Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi presenting distinct cutaneous parasite density and clinical status. Veterinary Parasitology 177, 3949.Google Scholar
Menezes-Souza, D., Guerra-Sa, R., Carneiro, C. M., Vitoriano-Souza, J., Giunchetti, R. C., Teixeira-Carvalho, A., Silveira-Lemos, D., Oliveira, G. C., Correa-Oliveira, R. and Reis, A. B. (2012). Higher expression of CCL2, CCL4, CCL5, CCL21, and CXCL8 Chemokines in the skin associated with parasite density in Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6, e1566.Google Scholar
Menon, J. N. and Bretscher, P. A. (1998). Parasite dose determines the Th1/Th2 nature of the response to Leishmania major independently of infection route and strain of host or parasite. European Journal of Immunology 28, 40204028.Google Scholar
Michelin, A. D. F., Perri, S. H. and De Lima, V. M. (2011). Evaluation of TNF-alpha, IL-4, and IL-10 and parasite density in spleen and liver of L. (L.) chagasi naturally infected dogs. Annals of Tropical Medicine and Parasitology 105, 373383.Google Scholar
Millan, J., Ferroglio, E. and Solano-Gallego, L. (2014). Role of wildlife in the epidemiology of Leishmania infantum infection in Europe. Parasitology Research 113, 20052014.Google Scholar
Miranda, S., Roura, X., Picado, A., Ferrer, L. and Ramis, A. (2008). Characterization of sex, age, and breed for a population of canine leishmaniosis diseased dogs. Research in Veterinary Science 85, 3538.Google Scholar
Miro, G., Cardoso, L., Pennisi, M. G., Oliva, G. and Baneth, G. (2008). Canine leishmaniosis–new concepts and insights on an expanding zoonosis: part two. Trends in Parasitology 24, 371377.Google Scholar
Moreno, J., Vouldoukis, I., Martin, V., McGahie, D., Cuisinier, A. M. and Gueguen, S. (2012). Use of a LiESP/QA-21 vaccine (CaniLeish) stimulates an appropriate Th1-dominated cell-mediated immune response in dogs. PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases 6, e1683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moreno, J., Vouldoukis, I., Schreiber, P., Martin, V., McGahie, D., Gueguen, S. and Cuisinier, A. M. (2014). Primary vaccination with the LiESP/QA-21 vaccine (CaniLeish) produces a cell-mediated immune response which is still present 1 year later. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 158, 199207.Google Scholar
Muraille, E., De Trez, C., Brait, M., De Baetselier, P., Leo, O. and Carlier, Y. (2003). Genetically resistant mice lacking MyD88-adapter protein display a high susceptibility to Leishmania major infection associated with a polarized Th2 response. Journal of Immunology 170, 42374241.Google Scholar
Nascimento, M. S. L., Albuquerque, T. D. R., Do-Valle-Matta, M. A., Caldas, I. S., Diniz, L. F., Talvani, A., Bahia, M. T., Andrade, C. M., Galvao, L. M. C., Camara, A. C. J. and Guedes, P. M. M. (2013). Naturally Leishmania infantum-infected dogs display an overall impairment of chemokine and chemokine receptor expression during visceral leishmaniasis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 153, 202208.Google Scholar
Nascimento, M. S., Albuquerque, T. D., Nascimento, A. F., Caldas, I. S., Do-Valle-Matta, M. A., Souto, J. T., Talvani, A., Bahia, M. T., Galvao, L. M., Camara, A. C. and Guedes, P. M. (2015). Impairment of Interleukin-17A expression in canine visceral Leishmaniosis is correlated with reduced interferon-gamma and inducible nitric oxide synthase expression. Journal of Comparative Pathology 153, 197205.Google Scholar
Noli, C. and Auxilia, S. T. (2005). Treatment of canine Old World visceral leishmaniasis: a systematic review. Veterinary Dermatology 16, 213232.Google Scholar
Oliveira-Freitas, E., Casas, C. P., Borja-Cabrera, G. P., Santos, F. N., Nico, D., Souza, L. O., Tinoco, L. W., da Silva, B. P., Palatnik, M., Parente, J. P. and Palatnik-de-Sousa, C. B. (2006). Acylated and deacylated saponins of Quillaja saponaria mixture as adjuvants for the FML-vaccine against visceral leishmaniasis. Vaccine 24, 39093920.Google Scholar
Ordeix, L. E., Saz, S. V., Hosein, S. and Solano-Gallego, L. (2015). Histopathological findings and detection of toll-like receptor 2 in cutaneous lesions of canine leishmaniosis. Veterinary Parasitology 209, 157163.Google Scholar
Palatnik-de-Sousa, C. B., Batista-de-Melo, L. M., Borja-Cabrera, G. P., Palatnik, M. and Lavor, C. C. (2004). Improving methods for epidemiological control of canine visceral leishmaniasis based on a mathematical model. Impact on the incidence of the canine and human disease. Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias 76, 583593.Google Scholar
Panaro, M. A., Brandonisio, O., de Caprariis, D., Cavallo, P., Cianciulli, A., Mitolo, V. and Otranto, D. (2008). Canine leishmaniasis in Southern Italy: a role for nitric oxide released from activated macrophages in asymptomatic infection?. Parasites & Vectors 1, 10.Google Scholar
Pandey, S. P., Doyen, N., Mishra, G. C., Saha, B. and Chandel, H. S. (2015). TLR9-deficiency reduces TLR1, TLR2 and TLR3 expressions in Leishmania major-infected macrophages. Experimental Parasitology 154, 8286.Google Scholar
Papadogiannakis, E. I. and Koutinas, A. F. (2015). Cutaneous immune mechanisms in canine leishmaniosis due to Leishmania infantum . Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 163, 94102.Google Scholar
Papadogiannakis, E., Andritsos, G., Kontos, V., Spanakos, G., Koutis, C. and Velonakis, E. (2010). Determination of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the peripheral blood of dogs with leishmaniosis before and after prolonged allopurinol monotherapy. Veterinary Journal 186, 262263.Google Scholar
Petanides, T. A., Koutinas, A. F., Mylonakis, M. E., Day, M. J., Saridomichelakis, M. N., Leontides, L. S., Mischke, R., Diniz, P., Breitschwerdt, E. B., Kritsepi, M., Garipidou, V. A., Koutinas, C. K. and Lekkas, S. (2008). Factors associated with the occurrence of epistaxis in natural canine leishmaniasis (Leishmania infantum). Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 22, 866872.Google Scholar
Peters, N. and Sacks, D. (2006). Immune privilege in sites of chronic infection: Leishmania and regulatory T cells. Immunological Reviews 213, 159179.Google Scholar
Pinelli, E., Killick-Kendrick, R., Wagenaar, J., Bernadina, W., del Real, G. and Ruitenberg, J. (1994). Cellular and humoral immune responses in dogs experimentally and naturally infected with Leishmania infantum . Infection and Immunity 62, 229235.Google Scholar
Pinelli, E., Gonzalo, R. M., Boog, C. J., Rutten, V. P., Gebhard, D., del Real, G. and Ruitenberg, E. J. (1995). Leishmania infantum-specific T cell lines derived from asymptomatic dogs that lyse infected macrophages in a major histocompatibility complex-restricted manner. European Journal of Immunology 25, 15941600.Google Scholar
Pinelli, E., Gebhard, D., Mommaas, A. M., van Hoeij, M., Langermans, J. A., Ruitenberg, E. J. and Rutten, V. P. (2000). Infection of a canine macrophage cell line with Leishmania infantum: determination of nitric oxide production and anti-leishmanial activity. Veterinary Parasitology 92, 181189.Google Scholar
Pitta, M. G., Romano, A., Cabantous, S., Henri, S., Hammad, A., Kouriba, B., Argiro, L., el Kheir, M., Bucheton, B., Mary, C., El-Safi, S. H. and Dessein, A. (2009). IL-17 and IL-22 are associated with protection against human kala azar caused by Leishmania donovani . The Journal of Clinical Investigation 119, 23792387.Google Scholar
Quilez, J., Martinez, V., Woolliams, J. A., Sanchez, A., Pong-Wong, R., Kennedy, L. J., Quinnell, R. J., Ollier, W. E., Roura, X., Ferrer, L., Altet, L. and Francino, O. (2012). Genetic control of canine leishmaniasis: genome-wide association study and genomic selection analysis. PLoS ONE 7, e35349.Google Scholar
Quinnell, R. J., Courtenay, O., Shaw, M. A., Day, M. J., Garcez, L. M., Dye, C. and Kaye, P. M. (2001). Tissue cytokine responses in canine visceral leishmaniasis. The Journal of Infectious Diseases 183, 14211424.Google Scholar
Quinnell, R. J., Courtenay, O., Garcez, L. M., Kaye, P. M., Shaw, M. A., Dye, C. and Day, M. J. (2003 a). IgG subclass responses in a longitudinal study of canine visceral leishmaniasis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 91, 161168.Google Scholar
Quinnell, R. J., Kennedy, L. J., Barnes, A., Courtenay, O., Dye, C., Garcez, L. M., Shaw, M. A., Carter, S. D., Thomson, W. and Ollier, W. E. (2003 b). Susceptibility to visceral leishmaniasis in the domestic dog is associated with MHC class II polymorphism. Immunogenetics 55, 2328.Google Scholar
Rai, A. K., Thakur, C. P., Singh, A., Seth, T., Srivastava, S. K., Singh, P. and Mitra, D. K. (2012). Regulatory T cells suppress T cell activation at the pathologic site of human visceral leishmaniasis. PLoS ONE 7, e31551.Google Scholar
Rallis, T., Day, M. J., Saridomichelakis, M. N., Adamama-Moraitou, K. K., Papazoglou, L., Fytianou, A. and Koutinas, A. F. (2005). Chronic hepatitis associated with canine leishmaniosis (Leishmania infantum): a clinicopathological study of 26 cases. Journal of Comparative Pathology 132, 145152.Google Scholar
Raman, V. S., Bhatia, A., Picone, A., Whittle, J., Bailor, H. R., O'Donnell, J., Pattabhi, S., Guderian, J. A., Mohamath, R., Duthie, M. S. and Reed, S. G. (2010). Applying TLR synergy in immunotherapy: implications in cutaneous leishmaniasis. Journal of Immunology 185, 17011710.Google Scholar
Reis, A. B., Teixeira-Carvalho, A., Giunchetti, R. C., Guerra, L. L., Carvalho, M. G., Mayrink, W., Genaro, O., Correa-Oliveira, R. and Martins-Filho, O. A. (2006 a). Phenotypic features of circulating leucocytes as immunological markers for clinical status and bone marrow parasite density in dogs naturally infected by Leishmania chagasi . Clinical and Experimental Immunology 146, 303311.Google Scholar
Reis, A. B., Teixeira-Carvalho, A., Vale, A. M., Marques, M. J., Giunchetti, R. C., Mayrink, W., Guerra, L. L., Andrade, R. A., Correa-Oliveira, R. and Martins-Filho, O. A. (2006 b). Isotype patterns of immunoglobulins: hallmarks for clinical status and tissue parasite density in Brazilian dogs naturally infected by Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi . Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 112, 102116.Google Scholar
Reis, A. B., Martins-Filho, O. A., Teixeira-Carvalho, A., Giunchetti, R. C., Carneiro, C. M., Mayrink, W., Tafuri, W. L. and Correa-Oliveira, R. (2009). Systemic and compartmentalized immune response in canine visceral leishmaniasis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 128, 8795.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, O. R., Marques, C., Soares-Clemente, M., Ferronha, M. H. and Santos-Gomes, G. M. (2009). Identification of regulatory T cells during experimental Leishmania infantum infection. Immunobiology 214, 101111.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, V., Centeno, M. and Ulrich, M. (1996). The IgG isotypes of specific antibodies in patients with American cutaneous leishmaniasis; relationship to the cell-mediated immune response. Parasite Immunology 18, 341345.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Cortes, A., Fernandez-Bellon, H., Ramis, A., Ferrer, L., Alberola, J. and Solano-Gallego, L. (2007 a). Leishmania-specific isotype levels and their relationship with specific cell-mediated immunity parameters in canine leishmaniasis. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 116, 190198.Google Scholar
Rodriguez-Cortes, A., Ojeda, A., Lopez-Fuertes, L., Timon, M., Altet, L., Solano-Gallego, L., Sanchez-Robert, E., Francino, O. and Alberola, J. (2007 b). A long term experimental study of canine visceral leishmaniasis. International Journal for Parasitology 37, 683693.Google Scholar
Rogers, M., Kropf, P., Choi, B. S., Dillon, R., Podinovskaia, M., Bates, P. and Muller, I. (2009). Proteophosophoglycans regurgitated by Leishmania-infected sand flies target the L-arginine metabolism of host macrophages to promote parasite survival. PLoS Pathogens 5, e1000555.Google Scholar
Sabate, D., Llinas, J., Homedes, J., Sust, M. and Ferrer, L. (2014). A single-centre, open-label, controlled, randomized clinical trial to assess the preventive efficacy of a domperidone-based treatment programme against clinical canine leishmaniasis in a high prevalence area. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 115, 5663.Google Scholar
Sacchi, L., Calvi, L. E., Kramer, L. H., Ferroglio, E., Grandi, G., Clementi, E. and Corona, S. (2006). The intradermal Leishmanin reaction induces antigen-specific maturation of canine dendritic cells with up-regulation of MHCII synthesis and expression. Journal of Comparative Pathology 135, 1724.Google Scholar
Sacks, D. and Sher, A. (2002). Evasion of innate immunity by parasitic protozoa. Nature Immunology 3, 10411047.Google Scholar
Sadick, M. D., Locksley, R. M., Tubbs, C. and Raff, H. V. (1986). Murine cutaneous leishmaniasis: resistance correlates with the capacity to generate interferon-gamma in response to Leishmania antigens in vitro . Journal of Immunology 136, 655661.Google Scholar
Sanchez, M. A., Diaz, N. L., Zerpa, O., Negron, E., Convit, J. and Tapia, F. J. (2004). Organ-specific immunity in canine visceral leishmaniasis: analysis of symptomatic and asymptomatic dogs naturally infected with Leishmania chagasi . The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 70, 618624.Google Scholar
Sanchez-Robert, E., Altet, L., Sanchez, A. and Francino, O. (2005). Polymorphism of Slc11a1 (Nramp1) gene and canine leishmaniasis in a case-control study. The Journal of Heredity 96, 755758.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Santana, C. C., Vassallo, J., de Freitas, L. A., Oliveira, G. G., Pontes-de-Carvalho, L. C. and dos-Santos, W. L. (2008). Inflammation and structural changes of splenic lymphoid tissue in visceral leishmaniasis: a study on naturally infected dogs. Parasite Immunology 30, 515524.Google Scholar
Santiago, M. E. B., Neto, L. S., Alexandre, E. C., Munari, D. P., Andrade, M. M. C., Somenzari, M. A., Ciarlini, P. C. and de Lima, V. M. F. (2013). Improvement in clinical signs and cellular immunity of dogs with visceral leishmaniasis using the immunomodulator P-MAPA. Acta Tropica 127, 174180.Google Scholar
Santos-Gomes, G. M., Rosa, R., Leandro, C., Cortes, S., Romao, P. and Silveira, H. (2002). Cytokine expression during the outcome of canine experimental infection by Leishmania infantum . Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 88, 2130.Google Scholar
Saraiva, E. M., de Figueiredo Barbosa, A., Santos, F. N., Borja-Cabrera, G. P., Nico, D., Souza, L. O., de Oliveira Mendes-Aguiar, C., de Souza, E. P., Fampa, P., Parra, L. E., Menz, I., Dias, J. G. Jr., de Oliveira, S. M. and Palatnik-de-Sousa, C. B. (2006). The FML-vaccine (Leishmune) against canine visceral leishmaniasis: a transmission blocking vaccine. Vaccine 24, 24232431.Google Scholar
Silva, J. S., Andrade, A. C., Santana, C. C., Santos, L. Q., Oliveira, C. I., Veras, P. S., Vassallo, J. and dos-Santos, W. L. (2012). Low CXCL13 expression, splenic lymphoid tissue atrophy and germinal center disruption in severe canine visceral leishmaniasis. PLoS ONE 7, e29103.Google Scholar
Silva, K. L., de Andrade, M. M., Melo, L. M., Perosso, J., Vasconcelos, R. O., Munari, D. P. and Lima, V. M. (2014). CD4+FOXP3+ cells produce IL-10 in the spleens of dogs with visceral leishmaniasis. Veterinary Parasitology 202, 313318.Google Scholar
Sisto, M., Brandonisio, O., Panaro, M. A., Acquafredda, A., Leogrande, D., Fasanella, A., Trotta, T., Fumarola, L. and Mitolo, V. (2001). Inducible nitric oxide synthase expression in Leishmania-infected dog macrophages. Comparative Immunology, Microbiology and Infectious Diseases 24, 247254.Google Scholar
Smith, B. E., Tompkins, M. B. and Breitschwerdt, E. B. (2004). Antinuclear antibodies can be detected in dog sera reactive to Bartonella vinsonii subsp. berkhoffii, Ehrlichia canis, or Leishmania infantum antigens. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine 18, 4751.Google Scholar
Solano-Gallego, L., Llull, J., Ramos, G., Riera, C., Arboix, M., Alberola, J. and Ferrer, L. (2000). The Ibizian hound presents a predominantly cellular immune response against natural Leishmania infection. Veterinary Parasitology 90, 3745.Google Scholar
Solano-Gallego, L., Miro, G., Koutinas, A., Cardoso, L., Pennisi, M. G., Ferrer, L., Bourdeau, P., Oliva, G., Baneth, G. and The LeishVet, G. (2011). LeishVet guidelines for the practical management of canine leishmaniosis. Parasites & Vectors 4, 86.Google Scholar
Solano-Gallego, L., Koutinas, A., Miro, G., Cardoso, L., Pennisi, M. G., Ferrer, L., Bourdeau, P., Oliva, G. and Baneth, G. (2009). Directions for the diagnosis, clinical staging, treatment and prevention of canine leishmaniosis. Veterinary Parasitology 165, 118.Google Scholar
Srivastava, S., Pandey, S. P., Jha, M. K., Chandel, H. S. and Saha, B. (2013). Leishmania expressed lipophosphoglycan interacts with toll-like receptor (TLR)-2 to decrease TLR-9 expression and reduce anti-leishmanial responses. Clinical and Experimental Immunology 172, 403409.Google Scholar
Strauss-Ayali, D., Baneth, G. and Jaffe, C. L. (2007). Splenic immune responses during canine visceral leishmaniasis. Veterinary Research 38, 547564.Google Scholar
Tabar, M. D., Altet, L., Martinez, V. and Roura, X. (2013). Wolbachia, filariae and Leishmania coinfection in dogs from a Mediterranean area. The Journal of Small Animal Practice 54, 174178.Google Scholar
Torrent, E., Leiva, M., Segales, J., Franch, J., Pena, T., Cabrera, B. and Pastor, J. (2005). Myocarditis and generalised vasculitis associated with leishmaniosis in a dog. The Journal of Small Animal Practice 46, 549552.Google Scholar
Travi, B. L., Osorio, E. Y., Saldarriaga, O. A., Cadena, H., Tabares, C. J., Peniche, A., Lee, S. and Melby, P. C. (2009). Clinical, parasitologic, and immunologic evolution in dogs experimentally infected with sand fly-derived Leishmania chagasi promastigotes. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 81, 9941003.Google Scholar
Tripathi, P., Singh, V. and Naik, S. (2007). Immune response to leishmania: paradox rather than paradigm. FEMS Immunology and Medical Microbiology 51, 229242.Google Scholar
Tuon, F. F., Amato, V. S., Bacha, H. A., Almusawi, T., Duarte, M. I. and Amato Neto, V. (2008). Toll-like receptors and leishmaniasis. Infection and Immunity 76, 866872.Google Scholar
Tuon, F. F., Fernandes, E. R., Pagliari, C., Duarte, M. I. and Amato, V. S. (2010). The expression of TLR9 in human cutaneous leishmaniasis is associated with granuloma. Parasite Immunology 32, 769772.Google Scholar
Turchetti, A. P., da Costa, L. F., Romao Ede, L., Fujiwara, R. T., da Paixao, T. A. and Santos, R. L. (2015). Transcription of innate immunity genes and cytokine secretion by canine macrophages resistant or susceptible to intracellular survival of Leishmania infantum . Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 163, 6776.Google Scholar
Utsunomiya, Y. T., Ribeiro, E. S., Quintal, A. P., Sangalli, J. R., Gazola, V. R., Paula, H. B., Trinconi, C. M., Lima, V. M., Perri, S. H., Taylor, J. F., Schnabel, R. D., Sonstegard, T. S., Garcia, J. F. and Nunes, C. M. (2015). Genome-wide scan for visceral Leishmaniasis in mixed-breed dogs identifies candidate genes involved in T helper cells and macrophage signaling. PLoS ONE 10, e0136749.Google Scholar
Vamvakidis, C. D., Koutinas, A. F., Kanakoudis, G., Georgiadis, G. and Saridomichelakis, M. (2000). Masticatory and skeletal muscle myositis in canine leishmaniasis (Leishmania infantum). The Veterinary Record 146, 698703.Google Scholar
Venugopal, P. G., Nutman, T. B. and Semnani, R. T. (2009). Activation and regulation of toll-like receptors (TLRs) by helminth parasites. Immunologic Research 43, 252263.Google Scholar
Vercosa, B. L., Melo, M. N., Puerto, H. L., Mendonca, I. L. and Vasconcelos, A. C. (2012). Apoptosis, inflammatory response and parasite load in skin of Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi naturally infected dogs: a histomorphometric analysis. Veterinary Parasitology 189, 162170.Google Scholar
Vouldoukis, I., Drapier, J. C., Nussler, A. K., Tselentis, Y., Da Silva, O. A., Gentilini, M., Mossalayi, D. M., Monjour, L. and Dugas, B. (1996). Canine visceral leishmaniasis: successful chemotherapy induces macrophage antileishmanial activity via the L-arginine nitric oxide pathway. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 40, 253256.Google Scholar
Wakelin, D. (1996). Immunity to Parasites. How Parasitic Infections are Controlled, 2nd Edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.Google Scholar
Zafra, R., Jaber, J. R., Perez-Ecija, R., Barragan, A., Martinez-Moreno, A. and Perez, J. (2008). High NOS expression in macrophages in canine leishmaniasis is associated with low intracellular parasite burden. Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 123, 353359.Google Scholar
Zhang, W. W. and Matlashewski, G. (2008). Immunization with a toll-like receptor 7 and/or 8 agonist vaccine adjuvant increases protective immunity against Leishmania major in BALB/c mice. Infection and Immunity 76, 37773783.Google Scholar
Zivicnjak, T., Martinkovic, F., Marinculic, A., Mrljak, V., Kucer, N., Matijatko, V., Mihaljevic, Z. and Baric-Rafaj, R. (2005). A seroepidemiologic survey of canine visceral leishmaniosis among apparently healthy dogs in Croatia. Veterinary Parasitology 131, 3543.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Examples of studies evaluating cytokine changes in several compartments in natural and experimental canine L. infantum infection

Figure 1

Table 2. Summary of published studies evaluating TLRs in canine L. infantum infection