Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:35:11.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the biology and morphology of Echinococcus granulosus (Batsch, 1786) of buffalo–dog origin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Hardev Singh Gill  and
B. Venkateswara Rao
Hardev Singh Gill
Affiliation:
Post-Graduate College of Animal Sciences, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, U.P.
B. Venkateswara Rao
Affiliation:
Post-Graduate College of Animal Sciences, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, Izatnagar, U.P.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The present material of buffalo–dog origin could not be transmitted to the laboratory animals, such as white rats, white mice, rabbits, golden hamsters, guinea-pigs and chicks.

Secondary development took place only in mice.

The strobilar phase was infective to a cat but did not show sexual differentiation even at 30 days, and worms were further observed to be at a degenerative stage.

The buffalo was highly suited to the perpetuation of the parasite, forming larger cysts and massive production of scoleces; nearly 90% of the cysts were fertile.

The strobila had mostly two segments and not more than three.

The number and distribution of testes were more posterior to the genital pore and were also observed posterior to the vitellaria, occasionally.

The position of the genital pore in the gravid as well as mature segments was both anterior and posterior but with an average of 52.8%.

Uterine sacculations were observed to range from 28 to 54.

Echinococcus material of buffalo–dog origin does not appear to fall into a definite ‘subspecies’ pattern. It is suggested that it be merely recognized as a further ‘mutant’, the existence of which can be accounted for on theoretical grounds.

The authors are thankful to the Director, Indian Veterinary Research Institute, and to Dr H. D. Srivastava, Head of Division of Parasitology, I.V.R.I., for providing the necessary laboratory facilities.

Type
Research Article
Information
Parasitology , Volume 57 , Issue 4 , November 1967 , pp. 695 - 704
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1967

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Borrel, A, J. (1948). Lesions hydatiques inattendue chez une poule. Revue Med. vet. 99, 441–45.Google Scholar
Cameron, T. W. M. (1926). Observations on the genus Echinococcus Rudolphi, 1801. J. Helminth. 4, 13–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cameron, T. W. M. (1960). The incidence and diagnosis of hydatid cyst in Canada. Echinococcus granulosus var. canadensis. Parasitologia 2, 371–80.Google Scholar
Dailey, M. D. & Sweatman, G. K. (1965). The taxonomy of Echinococcus granulosus in the donkey and dromedary in Lebanon and Syria. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 59, 463–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drezansic, I. & Wikerhauser, T. (1956). Prilog eksperimental noj invaziji macke i liscesi Echinococcus granulosus. Vet. Arh. 26, 179–82.Google Scholar
Gemmell, M. A. (1962). Natural and acquired immunity factors interfering with development during the rapid growth phase of Echinococcus granulosus in dogs. Immunology 5, 496–3.Google ScholarPubMed
Howkins, A. B., Gemmell, M. A. & Smyth, J. D. (1965). Experimental transmission of Echinococcus from horses to foxes. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 59, 457–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchison, W. F. & Bryan, M. W. (1960). Studies on the hydatid worm Echinococcus granulosus. I. Species identification of the parasite found in Mississippi. Am. J. trop. Med. Hyg. 9, 606–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lorincz, F. (1933). A macska szereperol asechinecoccosis terjeszteschen. Orv. Hétil. 77, 532–36.Google Scholar
Novenic, V., Cvetkovic, L. & Lepojev, O. (1960). Duration of development of Echinococcus granulosus in dogs. Acta Vet., Beogr. 10, 27–30.Google Scholar
Rao, B. V. (1958). Studies on helminth parasites of carnivorous mammals. M.Sc. thesis, Faculty of Veterinary Science University of Madras. (Unpublished.)Google Scholar
Rausch, R. (1953). The taxonomic value and variability of certain structures in the cestode genus Echinococcus (Rud. 1801) and a review of recognized species. Thapar Commemoration Volume, Lucknow, pp. 233–46.Google Scholar
Rausch, R. & Nelson, G. S. (1963). A review of the genus Echinococcus (Rudolphi, 1801). Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 57, 127–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smyth, J. D. (1964). The biology of the hydatid organisms. Adv. Parasit. 2, 169–219.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smyth, J. D. & Smyth, M. M. (1964). Natural and experimental hosts of Echinococcus granulosus and E. multilocularis, with comments on the genetics of speciation in the genus Echinococcus. Parasitology 54, 493–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwell, T. (1927). Experimental infection of the cat and fox with adult Echinococcus. Ann. trop. Med. Parasit. 21, 155–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweatman, G. K. & Williams, R. J. (1962). Wild animals in New Zealand as hosts of Echinococcus granulosus and other taeniid tapeworms. Trans. R. Soc. N.Z. (Zool.), 2, 221–50.Google Scholar
Sweatman, G. K. & Williams, R. J. (1963). Comparative studies on the biology and morphology of Echinococcus granulosus from domestic livestock, moose and reindeer. Parasitology 53, 339–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verster, A. (1965). Review of Echinococcus species in South Africa. Onderstepoort J. vet. Res. 32, 7–118.Google Scholar
Vogel, H. (1957). Über den Echinococcus multilocularis Süd-Deutschlands. I. Das Bandwurm-Stadium von Stämmen menschlicher und tierischer Herkunft. Z. trop. med. Parasit. 8, 404–54.Google Scholar
Webster, G. A. & Cameron, T. W. M. (1961). Observations on experimental infections with Echinococcus in rodents, Can. J. Zool. 39, 877–89.Google Scholar
Williams, R. J. & Sweatman, G. K. (1963). On the transmission, biology and morphology of Echinococcus granulosus equinus, a new subspecies of hydatid tapeworms in horses in Great Britain. Parasitology 53, 391–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yamashita, J., Obhayashi, M. & Konnon, S. (1956). Studies on Echinococcosis, III. On experimental infection in dogs especially on the development of Echinococcus granulosus (Batsch, 1786). Jap. J. vet. Res. 4, 113–22.Google Scholar