Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T14:22:17.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the Classification of the Ascaridae. II. The Polydelphis Group; with some account of other Ascarids parasitic in Snakes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Extract

The Ascarids parasitic in snakes present considerable difficulties from the systematic point of view, owing to the incomplete character of many of the descriptions, and to the state of confusion which has long existed in the nomenclature. The writer has made an attempt, by examining such material as was available, and by comparing a number of the existing descriptions, to clear up some of this confusion. It was hoped also that such a comparative treatment would throw some light on the systematic value of the modifications of the female genital apparatus, which occur in some of these forms.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1920

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baird, W. (1860). Description of some New Species of Intestinal Worms in the Collection of the British Museum. Proc. Zool. Soc., London, p. 446.Google Scholar
Baird, W. (1861). Description of some New Species of Intestinal Worms in the Collection of the British Museum. Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. (3) vii. p. 228.Google Scholar
Baylis, H. A. (1916). The Types of the Species of Ascaris described by Baird. Parasitology, viii. 4, p. 411.Google Scholar
Creplin, F. G. H. (1848). See Retzius, A. (1848).Google Scholar
Dujardin, F. (1845). Histoire nalurdle des Hdminthes. Paris.Google Scholar
Gedoelst, L. (1916). Notes sur la Faune parasitaiie du Congo beige. Rev. Zool. Afric. v. 1.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. Von (1897). Nemathelminthen gesammelt von Herrn Prof. Dr F. Dahl im Bismarck-Archipel. Arch. f. Naturg., Berlin, lxiii. Bd. I. p. 281. Plates XXI–XXII.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. Von (1899). Nematoden aus der Berliner Zoologischen Sammlung. Mt. Zool. Mus., Berlin, i. 2, p. 6. Plates I–VI.Google Scholar
Linstow, O. Von (1903). Parasiten, meistens Helminthen, aus Siam. Arch. f. mikr. Anal., Bonn, lxii. p. 108. Plate V.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linstow, O. Von (1908). Schultze's Reise in Westl. u. Zentr. Sudafrika, II. Helminthes. Nematoden u. Acanthocephalen. Denk. Med. Ges., Jena, xiii. p. 19. Plate IV.Google Scholar
Molin, R. (1858). Prospectus Helminthum quae in prodr. faunae helminthol. Venet. continentur. Sitz. k. Akad. Wiss., Wien, xxx. p. 127.Google Scholar
Örley, L. (1882). Report on the Nematodes in the Possession of the British Museum. Ann. and Mag. Nat. Hist. (5) ix. p. 301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parona, C. (1890). Sopra alcuni Elminti di Vertebrati Birmani, etc. Ann. Mus. Civ. Star. Nat. Geneva, (2) vii. (xxvii) p. 765. Plate III.Google Scholar
Railiiet, A. and Henry, A. (1910). Sur quelques Helminthes du “Python sebae” (Gmelin). Bull Soc. Path, exot., Paris, iii. 2. p. 94.Google Scholar
Retzius, A. (1830). Beskrifning öfver en ny art Spolmask, funnen hos Python bivittatus, etc. K. Vetensk.-Acad. Handl., Stockholm, 1829 (pub. 1830) p. 103. Plate V.Google Scholar
Retzius, A. (1848). Beschreibung einer neuen Spulwurm-Art, gefunden im Python bivittatus, etc. [Translated, with notes, by Creplin, .] Arch. f. Naturg., Berlin, xiv. Bd. I, p. 166. Plate VI.Google Scholar
Schneider, A. (1866). Monographic der Nematoden. Berlin.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1895). Notizie elmintologiche. Boll. Soc. Adriat. Sci. Nat., Trieste, xvi. p. 33. Plates IV–VI.Google Scholar
Stossich, M. (1896). II Genere Ascaris Linné. Boll. Soc. Adriat. Sci. Nat. xvii. p. 9.Google Scholar
Wedl, K. (1862). Zur Helminthenfauna Ägyptens. Sitz. k. Akad. Wiss., Wien, xliv. Abth. I. p. 463. Plates I–III.Google Scholar