Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-16T13:38:52.015Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On the morphology of Neogyrodactylus indicus n.g., n.sp., a viviparous monogenetic trematode (fam. Gyrodactylidae) from Argulus indicus Weber

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

Sanjib Chandra Baugh
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, India

Extract

During an examination of fishes for the parasitic crustaceans, fourteen specimens of Argulus belonging to two different species, viz. A. indicus Weber, 1892 (eight specimens) and A. siamensis Wilson, 1926 (six specimens) were collected from the fish, Ophiocephalus marulius Hamilton, taken from a canal in the environs of the village Champahati, District 24 Parganas, West Bengal. Out of seven fishes so obtained only three were found to be infected with the copepod parasites. While examining these copepods, the attention of the writer was drawn to a viviparous monogenetic trematode infecting only one species of Argulus, viz. A. indicus. It was rather unfortunate that the piscine host could not be examined at that stage for the helminthic infection. About one hundred specimens of this trematode were collected from the ventral surfaces of the copepods.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1957

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bychowsky, B. (1947). On a new genus of viviparous monogenetic trematodes. C.R. Acad. Sci. U.R.S.S, N.S., 58, 2139–41.Google Scholar
Dawes, B. (1946). The Trematoda, pp. 1644. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dawes, B. (1947). The Trematoda of British Fishes, no. 131, pp. 1364. Ray Soc. London.Google Scholar
Johnston, T. H. & Tiegs, O. W. (1922)New gyrodactylid trematodes from Australian fishes, together with a reclassification of the superfamily Gyrodactyloidea. Proc. Linn. Soc. N.S.W. 47, 83131.Google Scholar
Kathariner, L. (1894). Die Gattung Gyrodactylus v. Nordm. Arb. zool.-zootom. Inst. Wurzb. Wiesb. 10, 125–64.Google Scholar
Kathariner, L. (1899). Ueber das Vorkommen von Gyrodactylus von Nordm. im Salzwasser. Zool. Anz. 22, 328–9.Google Scholar
Kikuchi, H. (1929). Two new species of Japanese trematodes belonging to Gyrodactylidae. Annot. zool. jap. 12, 175–85.Google Scholar
Mizelle, J. D. (1938). Comparative studies on trematodes (Gyrodactyloidae) from the gills of North American fresh-water fishes. Illinois Biol. Monogr. 17, 181.Google Scholar
Mueller, J. F. (1936). Studies in North American Gyrodactyloidea. Trans. Amer. Micr. Soc. 55, 5572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, E. W. (1937). North American monogenetic trematodes. I. The superfamily Gyrodactyloidea. J. Wash. Acad. Sci. 27, 114–30.Google Scholar
Price, E. W. (1938). A new species of Dactylogyrus (Monogenea: Dactylogyridae), with the proposal of a new genus. Proc. Helminth. Soc. Wash. 5, 48–9.Google Scholar
Sproston, N. G. (1946). A synopsis of the monogenetic trematodes. Trans. Zool. Soc. Lond. 25, 185600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wagener, G. R. (1861). On Gyrodactylus elegans Nordmann. (Trans, of 1860). Quart. J. Micr. Sci., N.S., 1, 196212.Google Scholar
Yamaguti, S. (1940). Studies on the Helminth Fauna of Japan. Part 31. Trematodes of fishes. 7. Jap. J. Zool. 9, 35108.Google Scholar