Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T05:39:02.930Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Recent developments in coccidian biology; where do we go from here?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2009

John F. Ryley
Affiliation:
Imperial Chemical Industries Ltd, Pharmaceuticals Division, Mereside, Alderley Park, Macclesfield, Cheshire SK10 4TG

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Trends and Perspectives
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chapman, H. D. (1975). Eimeria tenella in chickens: development of resistance to quinolone anticoccidial drugs. Parasitology 71, 41–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapman, H. D. (1979). Studies on the sensitivity of recent field isolates of E. maxima to monensin. Avian Pathology 8, 181–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, P. L. (1978 a). The effect of Eimeria tenella on the frequency of caecal evacuation in the domestic fowl. Parasitology 77, vii.Google Scholar
Clarke, P. L. (1978 b). The structure of the ileo-caeco-colic junction of the domestic fowl (Gallus gallus L.). British Poultry Science 19, 595600.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clarke, P. L. & Crompton, D. W. T. (1978). The avian caecum as an environment for parasites. Parasitology 77, xxii.Google Scholar
Coles, A. M., Swoboda, B. E. P. & Ryley, J. F. (1979). Thymidylate synthetase as a chemotherapeutic target in the treatment of avian coccidiosis. Parasitology 79, li.Google Scholar
Crompton, D. W. T. & Nesheim, M. C. (1976). Host–parasite relationships in the alimentary tract of domestic birds. Advances in Parasitology 14, 95194.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Souza, W. & Sottto-Padrón, T. (1978). Ultrastructural localization of basic proteins on the conoid, rhoptries and micronemes of Toxoplasma gondii. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 56, 123–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Doran, D. J., Jahn, T. L. & Rinaldi, R. (1962). Excystation and locomotion of Eimeria-acervulina sporozoites (motion picture). Journal of Parasitology 48, Suppl. p. 32. Abstr. no. 57.Google Scholar
Dubremetz, J. F. & Dissous, C. (1978). Subcellular fractionation of Sarcocystis tenella endozoites. Abstracts 4th International Congress of Parasitology, Warszawa. F, 46–7.Google Scholar
Dubremetz, J. F. & Porchet, E. (1978). Sarcocystis tenella: pénétration des endozites dans la. cellule hôte in vitro. Journal of Protozoology 25, 52A. Abstr. no. 159.Google Scholar
Edgar, S. A. & Seibold, C. T. (1964). A new coccidium of chickens, Eimeria mivati sp.n. (Protozoa: Eimeriidae) with details of its life history. Journal of Parasitology 50, 193204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernando, M. A. & Pasternak, J. (1977 a). Isolation of chick intestinal cells infected with second-generation schizonts of Eimeria necatrix. Parasitology 74, 1926.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernando, M. A. & Pasternak, J. (1977 b). Isolation of host-cell nuclei from chick intestinal cells infected with second-generation schizonts of Eimeria necatrix. Parasitology 74, 2732.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernando, M. A., Pasternak, J., Barrell, R. & Stockdale, P. H. G. (1974). Induction of host nuclear DNA synthesis in coccidia-infected chicken intestinal cells. International Journal for Parasitology 4, 267–76.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ikeda, M. (1957). Factors necessary for E. tenella infection of the chicken. V. Organ specificity of E. tenella infection. Japanese Journal of Veterinary Science 19, 105–14.Google Scholar
James, S. (1980 a). Isolation of second-generation schizonts of avian coccidia and their use in-biochemical investigations. Parasitology 80 (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, S. (1980 b). Thiamine uptake in isolated schizonts of Eimeria tenella and the inhibitory effect of amprolium. Parasitology 80 (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeffers, T. K. (1974). Genetic transfer of anticoccidial drug resistance in Eimeria tenella. Journal of Parasitology 60, 900–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeffers, T. K. (1975). Attenuation of Eimeria tenella through selection for precociousness. Journal of Parasitology 61, 1083–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jeffers, T. K. (1976). Genetic recombination of precociousness and anticoccidial drug resistance in Eimeria tenella. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 50, 251–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, J. B. & Edgar, S. A. (1976). Possible secretory function of the rhoptries of Eimeria-magna during penetration of cultured cells. Journal of Parasitology 62, 988–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jensen, J. B. & Edgar, S. A. (1978). Fine structure of penetration of cultured cells by Isospora canis sporozoites. Journal of Protozoology 25, 169–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, J. B. & Hammond, D. M. (1975). Ultrastructure of the invasion of Eimeria magna-sporozoites into cultured cells. Journal of Protozoology 22, 411–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, J., Reid, W. M. & Jeffers, T. K. (1979). Practical immunization of chickens against coccidiosis using an attenuated strain of Eimeria tenella. Poultry Science 58, 3741.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyner, L. P. & Norton, C. C. (1973). The immunity arising from continuous low-level infection with Eimeria tenella. Parasitology 67, 333–40.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyner, L. P. & Norton, C. C. (1975). Transferred drug-resistance in Eimeria maxima. Parasitology 71, 385–92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyner, L. P. & Norton, C. G. (1976). The immunity arising from continuous low-level infection with Eimeria maxima and Eimeria acervulina. Parasitology 72, 115–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joyner, L. P. & Norton, C. C. (1977). Further observations on the genetic transfer of drug resistance in Eimeria maxima. Parasitology 74, 205–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyner, L. P. & Norton, C. C. (1980). The Eimeria acervulina complex: problems of differentiation of Eimeria acervulina, E. mitis and E. mivati. Protozoological Abstracts 4 (in the Press).Google Scholar
Kilejian, A. (1974). A unique histidine-rich polypeptide from the malaria parasite, Plasmodium lophurae. Journal of Biological Chemistry 249, 4650–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kilejian, A. (1976). Does a histidine-rich protein from Plasmodium lophurae have a function in merozoite penetration? Journal of Protozoology 23, 272–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klimes, B., Rootes, D. G. & Tanielian, Z. (1972). Sexual differentiation of merozoites of Eimeria tenella. Parasitology 65, 131–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Latter, V. S. & Wilson, R. G. (1979). Factors influencing the assessment of anticoccidial activity in cell culture. Parasitology 79, 169–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, E-H., Remmler, O. & Fernando, M. A. (1977). Sexual differentiation in Eimeria tenella, (Sporozoa: Coccidia). Journal of Parasitology 63, 155–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L. (1973). Studies on the relationship between Eimeria acervulina and Eimeria mivati. Parasitology 67, 143–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L. (1974). Further studies on the pathogenicity and immunogenicity of an embryoadapted strain of Eimeria tenella. Avian Pathology 3, 255–68.Google ScholarPubMed
Long, P. L. & Tanielian, Z. (1965). The isolation of Eimeria mivati in Lebanon during the course of a survey of Eimeria spp. in chickens. ‘Magon’ Institut de recherches agronomiques, Scientific Series No. 6, 118.Google Scholar
Ludvík, J. (1958). Elektronenoptische Befunde zur Morphologie der Sarcosporidien (Sarcocystis tenella Railliet 1886). Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie, Parasitenkunde, Infektions-krankheiten und Hygiene Erste Abteilung, Originale. 172, 330–50.Google ScholarPubMed
McDougald, L. R. & Jeffers, T. K. (1976). Eimeria tenella (Sporozoa: Coccidia): gametogony following a single asexual generation. Science 192, 258–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyberg, P. A. & Knapp, S. E. (1970 a). Scanning electron microscopy of Eimeria tenella oocysts. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 37, 2932.Google Scholar
Nyberg, P. A. & Knapp, S. E. (1970 b). Effect of sodium hypochlorite on the oocyst wall of Eimeria tenella as shown by electron microscopy. Proceedings of the Helminthological Society of Washington 37, 32–6.Google Scholar
Rose, M. E. (1978). Immune responses of chickens to coccidia and coccidiosis. In Avian Coccidiosis (ed. Long, P. L., Boorman, K. N. and Freeman, B. M.), pp. 297336. Edinburgh: British Poultry Science Ltd.Google Scholar
Ryley, J. F. (1969). Ultrastructural studies on the sporozoite of Eimeria tenella. Parasitology 59, 6772.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryley, J. F. (1973). Cytochemistry, physiology and biochemistry. In The Coccidia (ed. Hammond, D. M. and Long, P. L.), pp. 145181. Baltimore: University Park Press.Google Scholar
Ryley, J. F. (1975). Why and how are coccidia harmful to their host? In Pathogenic Processes in Parasitic Infections. Symposia of the British Society for Parasitology, vol. 13 (ed Taylor, A. E. R. and Muller, B.), pp. 4358. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ryley, J. F. (1980 a). Drug resistance in coccidia. Advances in Veterinary Science and Comparative Medicine 24 (in the Press).Google ScholarPubMed
Ryley, J. F. (1980 b). Screening for and evaluation of anticoccidial activity. Advances in Pharmacology and Chemotherapy 17 (in the Press).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryley, J. F., Bentley, M., Manners, D. J. & Stark, J. R. (1969). Amylopectin, the storage polysaccharide of the coccidia Eimeria brunetti and E. tenella. Journal of Parasitology 55, 839–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryley, J. F. & Hardman, L. (1978). Speciation studies with Eimeria acervulina and Eimeria mivati. Journal of Parasitology 64, 878–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ryley, J. F. & Robinson, T. E. (1976). Life cycle studies with Eimeria magna Pérard, 1925. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 50, 257–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirley, M. W. (1978). Electrophoretic variation of enzymes: a further marker for genetic studies of the Eimeria. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 57, 83–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirley, M. W. (1979). A reappraisal of the taxonomic status of Eimeria mivati Edgar and Seibold 1964, by enzyme electrophoresis and cross-immunity tests. Parasitology 78, 221–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirley, M. W. & Millard, B. J. (1976). Some observations on the sexual differentiation of Eimeria tenella using single sporozoite infections of chicken embryos. Parasitology 73, 337–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Speer, C. A., Hammond, D. M. & Kelley, G. L. (1970). Stimulation of motility in merozoites of five Eimeria species by bile salts. Journal of Parasitology 56, 927–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stotish, R. L., Wang, C. C. & Meyenhofer, M. (1978). Structure and composition of the oocyst wall of Eimeria tenella. Journal of Parasitology 64, 1074–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thompson, J. E., Fernando, M. A. & Pasternak, J. (1979). Induction of gel phase lipid in plasma membrane of chick intestinal cells after coccidial infection. Biochimica Biophysica Acta. 555, 472–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vanderberg, J. P. (1974). Studies on the motility of Plasmodium sporozoites. Journal of Protozoology 21, 527–37.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vetterling, J. M. & Doran, D. J. (1969). Storage polysaccharide in coccidial sporozoites after excystation and penetration of cells. Journal of Protozoology 16, 772–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vetterling, J. M., Madden, P. A. & Dittemore, N. S. (1971). Scanning electron microscopy of poultry coccidia after in vitro excystation and penetration of cultured cells. Zeitschrift für Parasitenkunde 37, 136–47.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, C. C. (1978). Biochemical and nutritional aspects of coccidia. In Avian Coccidiosis (ed. Long, P. L., Boorman, K. N. and Freeman, B. M.), pp. 135–84. Edinburgh: British Poultry Science Ltd.Google Scholar
Wang, C. C. & Stotish, R. L. (1978). Multiple leucine aminopeptidases in the oocysts of Eimeria tenella and their changes during sporulation. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 61B, 307–13.Google Scholar